Microsoft Sentinel and Tines compete in the cybersecurity domain. Microsoft Sentinel leads in scalability and integration, benefiting organizations within Microsoft's ecosystem, whereas Tines provides agile automation suited for teams focused on swift security workflow automation.
Features: Microsoft Sentinel offers seamless integration with Azure services, robust threat intelligence capabilities, and advanced analytics for security insights. Tines provides flexible task automation, incident response capabilities, and streamlined workflow processes for security teams seeking agile solutions.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Sentinel is cloud-based and deploys quickly through Azure, though its integrations require careful planning. Tines features a straightforward deployment process and places strong emphasis on user-friendly customer support.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Sentinel utilizes a consumption-based pricing model beneficial for large enterprises, while offering ROI benefits for those maximizing Azure's ecosystem. Tines offers competitive pricing with a low entry barrier, appealing to organizations with specific automation needs.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Sentinel | 15.0% |
| Tines | 7.1% |
| Other | 77.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 41 |
Microsoft Sentinel is a scalable, cloud-native, security information event management (SIEM) and security orchestration automated response (SOAR) solution that lets you see and stop threats before they cause harm. Microsoft Sentinel delivers intelligent security analytics and threat intelligence across the enterprise, providing a single solution for alert detection, threat visibility, proactive hunting, and threat response. Eliminate security infrastructure setup and maintenance, and elastically scale to meet your security needs—while reducing IT costs. With Microsoft Sentinel, you can:
- Collect data at cloud scale—across all users, devices, applications, and infrastructure, both on-premises and in multiple clouds
- Detect previously uncovered threats and minimize false positives using analytics and unparalleled threat intelligence from Microsoft
- Investigate threats with AI and hunt suspicious activities at scale, tapping into decades of cybersecurity work at Microsoft
- Respond to incidents rapidly with built-in orchestration and automation of common tasks
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.
Tines offers no-code and low-code automation for users to automate tasks without coding expertise, integrating seamlessly with APIs to enhance incident management and security operations.
Known for a vendor-neutral approach, Tines provides detailed documentation and live chat support, allowing for effective integration with other tools, scheduling capabilities, and streamlined processes that save time and effort. Users find it intuitive for efficient task handling, making manual intervention unnecessary. Challenges include the need for more comprehensive documentation and instructional videos, as well as improvements in AI integration and reporting aesthetics. Pricing is also noted as higher compared to alternatives.
What are the most important features of Tines?Tines primarily serves organizations in the security sector, automating security operations such as alert detection and managed detection and response. It's utilized extensively in security operation centers for tasks like phishing email processing, ticket creation, IOC investigations, and ticket assignments within enterprise security frameworks, with multiple teams delivering Tines services to enhance task handling efficiency.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
