Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo

Top 10 CrowdStrike Falcon Alternatives

Vendor: CrowdStrike
4.3 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top CrowdStrike Falcon Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to CrowdStrike Falcon based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wazuh, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Splunk Enterprise Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. CrowdStrike Falcon surpasses its competitors by delivering advanced endpoint protection through AI-powered threat detection, real-time end-to-end visibility, and rapid threat intelligence, ensuring robust security and streamlined incident response capabilities.

CrowdStrike Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with CrowdStrike, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in advanced EDR capabilities, ideal for large organizations seeking robust cloud-native security. In comparison, Wazuh offers flexibility with its open-source nature, appealing to small organizations needing cost-effective, integrated solutions with ELK Stack compatibility.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Wazuh Report
CrowdStrike Falcon often involves higher setup costs due to its advanced features, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it suitable for smaller businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon often involves higher setup costs due to its advanced features, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it suitable for smaller businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels with threat intelligence and AI-driven insights, suitable for proactive threat detection. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers seamless integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, ideal for organizations seeking cost-effective protection, especially those already utilizing Microsoft tools.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup with potentially higher initial costs, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides a more budget-friendly setup but may involve a complex configuration.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup with potentially higher initial costs, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides a more budget-friendly setup but may involve a complex configuration.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security focuses on robust integration and data analysis for comprehensive security management. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon provides swift cloud-based deployment and AI-driven threat prevention, appealing to those seeking rapid setup and proactive threat detection without extensive infrastructure requirements.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more economical setup. This difference highlights the budgetary considerations businesses must evaluate when selecting between these two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more economical setup. This difference highlights the budgetary considerations businesses must evaluate when selecting between these two security solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels with cloud-native architecture and strong AI features, providing real-time visibility and minimal performance impact. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR offers competitive endpoint protection with integrated firewalling, emphasizing affordability and suitability for cost-conscious enterprises.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is known to be higher due to its advanced features, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more affordable setup, attracting cost-sensitive customers.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is known to be higher due to its advanced features, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more affordable setup, attracting cost-sensitive customers.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Darktrace, known for AI-powered detection and network insights, excels with its Antigena response capabilities. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon stands out with reliable EDR and remote management. Darktrace is ideal for deep network insights, while CrowdStrike offers robust endpoint protection and real-time response.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Darktrace Report
Darktrace has a higher setup cost, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting key differences in their cost structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Darktrace has a higher setup cost, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting key differences in their cost structures.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon provides effective EDR with real-time threat analysis, ideal for those needing comprehensive endpoint visibility and lightweight performance. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel excels in AI-driven threat detection and seamless Microsoft integration, offering centralized monitoring and automation for businesses within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Sentinel, which offers a more budget-friendly option. This notable disparity may influence decisions based on initial investment considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Sentinel, which offers a more budget-friendly option. This notable disparity may influence decisions based on initial investment considerations.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in endpoint protection with rollback functionality against ransomware and user-friendly threat prevention. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon offers comprehensive AI-driven threat detection, though it requires internet connectivity, impacting performance. SentinelOne emphasizes rapid support; CrowdStrike delivers swift deployment with cloud-native architecture.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete requires a minimal setup cost, contrasting with CrowdStrike Falcon, which involves higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete requires a minimal setup cost, contrasting with CrowdStrike Falcon, which involves higher initial expenses.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar excels in log management and SIEM, ideal for comprehensive data extraction. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat detection and a lightweight agent, appealing to those prioritizing endpoint protection. QRadar focuses on scalability, while Falcon provides real-time response capabilities.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. IBM Security QRadar Report
IBM Security QRadar's setup cost is competitive, often appealing to larger enterprises, while CrowdStrike Falcon's lower setup cost suits businesses seeking swift deployment with minimal investment.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar's setup cost is competitive, often appealing to larger enterprises, while CrowdStrike Falcon's lower setup cost suits businesses seeking swift deployment with minimal investment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in advanced threat detection with real-time intelligence and cloud-native architecture. In comparison, HP Wolf Security emphasizes hardware-enforced features with isolated browsing, providing robust device protection. CrowdStrike offers seamless cloud deployment, while HP focuses on hardware integration, ensuring flexibility and durability.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. HP Wolf Security Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a lower setup cost, offering a cost-effective start, while HP Wolf Security may involve higher initial expenses, indicating a greater upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a lower setup cost, offering a cost-effective start, while HP Wolf Security may involve higher initial expenses, indicating a greater upfront investment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon provides strong endpoint visibility and supports diverse deployment environments, enhancing threat management. In comparison, Cortex XDR emphasizes AI-driven threat analysis and integration flexibility, benefiting overall security. Both offer premium pricing, but Cortex XDR's cost may impact smaller enterprises.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup process, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks requires a more extensive configuration. These differences in setup costs can influence the overall evaluation of each product's initial investment needs.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup process, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks requires a more extensive configuration. These differences in setup costs can influence the overall evaluation of each product's initial investment needs.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in proactive threat detection through deep learning and anomaly analysis. In comparison, Microsoft Defender XDR offers seamless integration with Microsoft's ecosystem, enhancing its value for users heavily invested in Microsoft tools. Falcon's pricing is premium, while Defender provides cost-effective options within Microsoft's suite.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Microsoft Defender XDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon incurs higher setup costs with a focus on advanced features, while Microsoft Defender XDR offers a more cost-effective setup with core essentials.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon incurs higher setup costs with a focus on advanced features, while Microsoft Defender XDR offers a more cost-effective setup with core essentials.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in robust EDR capabilities and proactive security, appealing to enterprises focused on real-time incident response. In comparison, Elastic Security's open-source flexibility and strong search capabilities attract businesses seeking scalable, cost-effective solutions with customizable security features and extensive data integration options.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Elastic Security Report
CrowdStrike Falcon typically incurs higher setup costs, whereas Elastic Security offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon typically incurs higher setup costs, whereas Elastic Security offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Varonis Platform
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Varonis Platform
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in endpoint detection, offering forensic capabilities and machine learning for minimal interference. In comparison, Varonis Platform focuses on data security, providing detailed monitoring and unified data feeds, appealing to buyers emphasizing data protection and compliance over endpoint analysis.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Varonis Platform Report
CrowdStrike Falcon is noted for its lower setup costs, offering a cost-effective entry point, while Varonis Platform involves a higher setup cost, reflecting its more extensive infrastructure.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon is noted for its lower setup costs, offering a cost-effective entry point, while Varonis Platform involves a higher setup cost, reflecting its more extensive infrastructure.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Tanium offers comprehensive endpoint management and real-time visibility, appealing to those valuing depth in endpoint oversight. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon excels in threat intelligence and rapid response, attracting buyers prioritizing advanced security capabilities and efficient threat mitigation.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Tanium Report
Tanium requires more initial setup investment compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which offers a more straightforward setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium requires more initial setup investment compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which offers a more straightforward setup process.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Huntress Managed EDR
4.7 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels with robust threat intelligence and endpoint visibility for comprehensive EDR solutions. In comparison, Huntress Managed EDR offers effective, cost-efficient SOC services ideal for smaller organizations. CrowdStrike emphasizes high-end features, while Huntress integrates well with existing security solutions.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Huntress Managed EDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is relatively high, whereas Huntress Managed EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a significant cost difference that may influence selection based purely on initial investment considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is relatively high, whereas Huntress Managed EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a significant cost difference that may influence selection based purely on initial investment considerations.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon provides comprehensive endpoint security through AI-driven threat intelligence and seamless remote capabilities, ideal for environments needing extensive EDR features. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers cost-effective network protection with VPN and proxy support, suitable for on-premise deployments seeking straightforward setup.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
CrowdStrike Falcon is praised for its lower setup costs compared to WatchGuard Firebox, which is noted for higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon is praised for its lower setup costs compared to WatchGuard Firebox, which is noted for higher initial expenses.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon enhances endpoint visibility through AI and machine learning, excelling in threat detection without impacting performance. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient offers cost-effective VPN and integrated security features, making it appealing for businesses seeking comprehensive endpoint protection.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup cost, while Fortinet FortiClient offers flexible pricing options. The primary difference lies in their initial cost structures, affecting budget planning.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup cost, while Fortinet FortiClient offers flexible pricing options. The primary difference lies in their initial cost structures, affecting budget planning.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers modular flexibility and strong management capabilities, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive control. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon excels in threat detection and cloud-native deployment, ideal for those prioritizing advanced AI features and quick, efficient integration.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers an affordable setup cost, providing ease of implementation, while CrowdStrike Falcon presents a slightly higher initial investment but includes advanced integration features.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers an affordable setup cost, providing ease of implementation, while CrowdStrike Falcon presents a slightly higher initial investment but includes advanced integration features.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in automatic alerting and threat analysis with robust real-time response. In comparison, Trend Vision One offers centralized visibility and management, excelling in network detection. CrowdStrike is known for ease of deployment while Trend Vision One provides cost-effective pricing and comprehensive protection.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trend Vision One Report
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is competitive, while Trend Vision One offers a more affordable initial investment.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is competitive, while Trend Vision One offers a more affordable initial investment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers a comprehensive suite with centralized management, appealing for diverse environments despite its complex interface. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon provides advanced threat analysis with a cloud-native architecture, suited for scalable protection across multiple devices.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which tends to have a higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which tends to have a higher initial expense.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers extensive zero-day protection and anti-ransomware features, ideal for compliance needs. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon excels in EDR capabilities with real-time threat intelligence, benefiting those needing strong behavioral analysis and managed threat hunting.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon's setup is pricier but includes comprehensive support features.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon's setup is pricier but includes comprehensive support features.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers robust EDR capabilities and comprehensive endpoint visibility without significant performance impact. In comparison, Cortex XSIAM excels with AI-driven integration capabilities and detailed automation. Both solutions enhance security management, but pricing may influence the decision for small to medium businesses.
Download Cortex XSIAM vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup cost structure, while Cortex XSIAM presents more complex and customized pricing options, highlighting distinct approaches to initial deployment expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup cost structure, while Cortex XSIAM presents more complex and customized pricing options, highlighting distinct approaches to initial deployment expenses.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Vectra AI
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Vectra AI
4.3 out of 5
Vectra AI specializes in network behavior insights, leveraging AI for detailed threat detection. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon focuses on endpoint protection with real-time response. Tech buyers might choose Vectra for network intelligence, while CrowdStrike appeals with endpoint security and incident response.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Vectra AI Report
Vectra AI has a higher setup cost while CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Vectra AI has a higher setup cost while CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more cost-effective setup option.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky offers comprehensive threat prevention with tools like System Watcher and centralized management. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon specializes in cloud-native real-time threat detection and EDR. Kaspersky is affordable for small businesses, while CrowdStrike's robust capabilities justify its higher cost.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has an extensive setup process, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon offers a simpler setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has an extensive setup process, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon offers a simpler setup.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Lookout
3.8 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Lookout
3.8 out of 5
Lookout excels in mobile security and threat detection, ideal for businesses prioritizing device protection. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon is favored for comprehensive endpoint security and threat intelligence, making it suitable for enterprises seeking extensive network defense despite a higher price point.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Lookout Report
Lookout incurs lower setup costs compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which offers a more comprehensive initial deployment. This notable difference highlights the cost-efficient entry level of Lookout against the upfront investment in CrowdStrike Falcon's robust features.
View comparison
Pricing
Lookout incurs lower setup costs compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which offers a more comprehensive initial deployment. This notable difference highlights the cost-efficient entry level of Lookout against the upfront investment in CrowdStrike Falcon's robust features.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is ideal for environments needing comprehensive features with minimal resource impact. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon suits enterprises requiring advanced threat intelligence and cloud-native architecture. ESET offers cost-effectiveness, while CrowdStrike provides exhaustive cybersecurity for larger entities.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon's setup involves a higher initial investment. They cater to different budget levels and setup expectations.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon's setup involves a higher initial investment. They cater to different budget levels and setup expectations.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix excels in comprehensive client management with patch management, scalability, and multi-platform support, appealing to those focusing on endpoint efficiency. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat detection and AI-driven forensics, suiting security-focused environments with its cloud-native deployment flexibility.
Download BigFix vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
BigFix has a higher setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, making it potentially less attractive for budget-conscious organizations. CrowdStrike Falcon's lower setup cost provides a competitive edge in affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has a higher setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, making it potentially less attractive for budget-conscious organizations. CrowdStrike Falcon's lower setup cost provides a competitive edge in affordability.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One offers ease of installation and strong security integration, ideal for companies seeking comprehensive protection. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon excels in EDR capabilities, appealing to environments needing minimal system impact and robust remote management.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security involves a one-time setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon opts for a subscription-based setup model. The key difference lies in their pricing structures, with each catering to distinct budgeting preferences.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security involves a one-time setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon opts for a subscription-based setup model. The key difference lies in their pricing structures, with each catering to distinct budgeting preferences.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Forescout Platform offers extensive network visibility and seamless endpoint management, ideal for organizations prioritizing device connections and policy flexibility. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon provides advanced EDR and threat intelligence, perfect for those needing enhanced threat detection and real-time analysis.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Forescout Platform Report
Forescout Platform has a higher setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. CrowdStrike Falcon prioritizes cost efficiency, contrasting with Forescout Platform’s focus on comprehensive features that come at a premium.
View comparison
Pricing
Forescout Platform has a higher setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. CrowdStrike Falcon prioritizes cost efficiency, contrasting with Forescout Platform’s focus on comprehensive features that come at a premium.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in real-time response with AI-driven protection, while Rapid7 InsightIDR specializes in user behavior analytics and seamless integration. In comparison, InsightIDR's flexible pricing appeals to cost-sensitive buyers, whereas Falcon's premium features suit those prioritizing advanced security capabilities.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon reviews highlight higher setup costs, while Rapid7 InsightIDR is noted for its relatively lower setup expenses. The primary distinction lies in the setup cost differences between the two cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon reviews highlight higher setup costs, while Rapid7 InsightIDR is noted for its relatively lower setup expenses. The primary distinction lies in the setup cost differences between the two cybersecurity solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
LogRhythm SIEM excels with its compliance reporting and threat intelligence for security analysis. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon's strength lies in real-time threat detection and endpoint protection. LogRhythm's pricing suits larger enterprises, while CrowdStrike's high cost reflects its comprehensive security features.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. LogRhythm SIEM Report
LogRhythm SIEM offers higher setup costs compared to the more budget-friendly CrowdStrike Falcon. This pricing difference highlights a key distinction in their initial financial commitment levels.
View comparison
Pricing
LogRhythm SIEM offers higher setup costs compared to the more budget-friendly CrowdStrike Falcon. This pricing difference highlights a key distinction in their initial financial commitment levels.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Saviynt
3.7 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Saviynt
3.7 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in threat analysis and EDR with AI-driven autonomic threat adjustment, enhancing endpoint security; however, integration and email security need refinement. In comparison, Saviynt offers strong identity governance but faces challenges in customization and customer support expansion.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Saviynt Report
CrowdStrike Falcon features a straightforward setup cost with minimal complexity, while Saviynt presents a more elaborate setup process that may involve higher initial investments.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon features a straightforward setup cost with minimal complexity, while Saviynt presents a more elaborate setup process that may involve higher initial investments.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Recorded Future
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Recorded Future
4.2 out of 5
Recorded Future offers robust threat intelligence and data mining, benefiting users seeking comprehensive internet monitoring. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon excels in endpoint protection and seamless SIEM integration, attracting those prioritizing real-time threat responses and cloud-native attributes. Both solutions offer flexible deployment and strong support.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Recorded Future Report
Recorded Future typically has a lower setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which tends to have a higher initial investment. This difference highlights the contrasting pricing strategies of these cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Recorded Future typically has a lower setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which tends to have a higher initial investment. This difference highlights the contrasting pricing strategies of these cybersecurity solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in endpoint visibility and threat analysis, providing comprehensive AI-driven security. In comparison, Cynet integrates user behavior analysis and deception technologies, offering more competitive pricing. CrowdStrike needs better integration, while Cynet focuses on enhancing agent support and technical responses.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cynet Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup with seamless onboarding, while Cynet provides a cost-effective setup option with quick deployment capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup with seamless onboarding, while Cynet provides a cost-effective setup option with quick deployment capabilities.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers comprehensive threat detection with EDR and forensic tools for complete endpoint visibility. In comparison, Intercept X Endpoint emphasizes ransomware protection with AI-driven detection. Buyers might choose Falcon for enterprise-level security, while opting for Intercept X for affordability and cross-platform protection.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Intercept X Endpoint Report
CrowdStrike Falcon features a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Intercept X Endpoint may involve higher expenses and complexity during installation, highlighting the difference in initial setup requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon features a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Intercept X Endpoint may involve higher expenses and complexity during installation, highlighting the difference in initial setup requirements between the two solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Microsoft Defender for Identity
4.4 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in endpoint visibility and performance with robust EDR features. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Identity focuses on securing Active Directory and integrated monitoring. CrowdStrike is ideal for those prioritizing high-end security, while Defender attracts buyers seeking comprehensive identity protection.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Microsoft Defender for Identity Report
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is higher than Microsoft Defender for Identity, making it more suitable for larger budgets, while Microsoft Defender offers a more budget-friendly option with efficient initial deployment features.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is higher than Microsoft Defender for Identity, making it more suitable for larger budgets, while Microsoft Defender offers a more budget-friendly option with efficient initial deployment features.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiSIEM excels in combining SOC and NOC functionalities, offering granular monitoring suitable for environments with numerous devices. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon provides robust threat remediation and AI-driven insights, appealing to those prioritizing real-time response and seamless cloud integration.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Fortinet FortiSIEM Report
Fortinet FortiSIEM has a moderate setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon has a lower setup cost, highlighting a cost difference that may influence budget-conscious buyers.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiSIEM has a moderate setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon has a lower setup cost, highlighting a cost difference that may influence budget-conscious buyers.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in EDR features, providing unmatched threat intelligence and real-time response capabilities. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR offers strong patch management and application control, ideal for comprehensive malware defense. CrowdStrike is suited for advanced detection, while WatchGuard appeals to value-driven security investments.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers flexible setup costs, appealing to businesses seeking versatile pricing options, whereas WatchGuard EPDR presents a more structured, straightforward cost model, highlighting stability in budgeting for users.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers flexible setup costs, appealing to businesses seeking versatile pricing options, whereas WatchGuard EPDR presents a more structured, straightforward cost model, highlighting stability in budgeting for users.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Bitdefender Total Security
4.4 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon focuses on robust endpoint protection with minimal resource impact, ideal for large enterprises. In comparison, Bitdefender Total Security emphasizes comprehensive device security, offering features like parental controls, suitable for families and small to medium businesses prioritizing affordability and diverse security needs.
Download Bitdefender Total Security vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has an initial setup cost that may be higher compared to Bitdefender Total Security, which offers a more budget-friendly entry cost. These pricing differences highlight the distinct market positions and target audiences of each product.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has an initial setup cost that may be higher compared to Bitdefender Total Security, which offers a more budget-friendly entry cost. These pricing differences highlight the distinct market positions and target audiences of each product.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.9 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels with AI-driven endpoint detection and high remote capabilities, ideal for environments needing extensive security measures. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Business offers seamless Microsoft ecosystem integration and competitive pricing, appealing to organizations seeking robust security at lower upfront costs.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Microsoft Defender for Business Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a moderate setup cost, offering a quick deployment, whereas Microsoft Defender for Business provides a lower setup cost, making it an economical choice for budget-conscious businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a moderate setup cost, offering a quick deployment, whereas Microsoft Defender for Business provides a lower setup cost, making it an economical choice for budget-conscious businesses.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers real-time threat analysis and remote manual analysis, making it ideal for comprehensive endpoint protection. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone EDR excels in central management and cost-effectiveness, appealing to budget-conscious organizations with its intuitive management and HyperDetect feature.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is known for its more budget-friendly initial expense. CrowdStrike excels in enterprise-grade security features, whereas Bitdefender is praised for its cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is known for its more budget-friendly initial expense. CrowdStrike excels in enterprise-grade security features, whereas Bitdefender is praised for its cost-effective solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon provides comprehensive visibility and AI-driven security with minimal performance impact. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers robust data analysis and customizable alerts. CrowdStrike excels in remote capabilities, while VMware Carbon Black emphasizes cloud integration and alert customization.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint presents a more complex and potentially higher setup expense, highlighting a significant difference in ease and financial requirement in the initial phase.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint presents a more complex and potentially higher setup expense, highlighting a significant difference in ease and financial requirement in the initial phase.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in AI-driven threat detection and EDR capabilities appealing to organizations needing strong endpoint protection. In comparison, Trend Vision One offers multi-cloud support and centralized management ideal for hybrid environments, appealing to those needing flexibility and comprehensive cloud visibility.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a relatively straightforward setup process, minimizing initial costs, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security involves a more extensive configuration, leading to potentially higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a relatively straightforward setup process, minimizing initial costs, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security involves a more extensive configuration, leading to potentially higher setup expenses.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
VirusTotal
4.4 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
VirusTotal
4.4 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers comprehensive threat detection and response with remote connectivity for detailed analysis. In comparison, VirusTotal, integrating multiple scanners, excels in static file analysis. Tech buyers may choose CrowdStrike for endpoint management or VirusTotal for expansive file and URL analysis.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VirusTotal Report
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup costs are generally higher due to its comprehensive, advanced security features, while VirusTotal offers a more accessible entry point with no setup fees, emphasizing its focus on simple and cost-effective virus scanning.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup costs are generally higher due to its comprehensive, advanced security features, while VirusTotal offers a more accessible entry point with no setup fees, emphasizing its focus on simple and cost-effective virus scanning.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in EDR capabilities, offering AI-driven threat detection and quick response. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint integrates well within the Cisco ecosystem, valued for threat analysis and cloud management. Both offer strong ROI but target enterprise needs.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, providing a budget-friendly option. In contrast, Cisco provides a comprehensive feature set that may justify its higher initial investment for some users.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, providing a budget-friendly option. In contrast, Cisco provides a comprehensive feature set that may justify its higher initial investment for some users.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Norton Small Business
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat intelligence and AI-based detection for enterprises needing robust security. In comparison, Norton Small Business provides device security and cloud backup for smaller organizations, appealing with its cost-effective features and broader toolset for overall system protection.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Norton Small Business Report
CrowdStrike Falcon features a simplified setup process with no initial fees, while Norton Small Business offers a low-cost setup, emphasizing affordability. CrowdStrike emphasizes advanced features, whereas Norton focuses on cost-effectiveness for smaller businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon features a simplified setup process with no initial fees, while Norton Small Business offers a low-cost setup, emphasizing affordability. CrowdStrike emphasizes advanced features, whereas Norton focuses on cost-effectiveness for smaller businesses.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Sentinel
3.8 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Sentinel
3.8 out of 5
Sentinel excels with its correlation engine and scalability, making it fit for large organizations. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon offers strong EDR capabilities and remote management, appealing to those needing comprehensive endpoint visibility with minimal system impact.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Sentinel Report
Sentinel has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while CrowdStrike Falcon is priced higher, indicating a potential investment in advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentinel has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while CrowdStrike Falcon is priced higher, indicating a potential investment in advanced features.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced EDR and threat intelligence, ideal for environments requiring detailed threat analysis. In comparison, Malwarebytes Teams provides ease of use and cost-effectiveness, suitable for budget-conscious buyers seeking straightforward protection. CrowdStrike's capabilities stand out in advanced security applications over Malwarebytes.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Malwarebytes Teams Report
CrowdStrike Falcon typically has a higher setup cost compared to Malwarebytes Teams, providing a more comprehensive security platform while Malwarebytes Teams offers a more budget-friendly option with quicker deployment and ease of use.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon typically has a higher setup cost compared to Malwarebytes Teams, providing a more comprehensive security platform while Malwarebytes Teams offers a more budget-friendly option with quicker deployment and ease of use.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Cymulate
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Cymulate
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced endpoint protection with AI-driven threat detection, ideal for enterprises needing comprehensive security. In comparison, Cymulate provides flexibility and quick deployment, appealing to organizations seeking affordable security posture assessments. CrowdStrike's robust features suit larger enterprises, while Cymulate's cost-effectiveness targets smaller businesses.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cymulate Report
CrowdStrike Falcon presents flexible initial setup costs, whereas Cymulate offers more straightforward, predictable pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon presents flexible initial setup costs, whereas Cymulate offers more straightforward, predictable pricing.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in endpoint detection and response with lightweight impact and remote capabilities, while Exabeam uses behavior analytics and SIEM for threat detection. In comparison, Exabeam's usability and interface could improve but integrates well with log management. CrowdStrike Falcon could benefit from better tool integration.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Exabeam Report
CrowdStrike Falcon requires no initial setup costs, offering quick deployment, while Exabeam incurs a substantial setup cost, reflecting its extensive configuration needs.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon requires no initial setup costs, offering quick deployment, while Exabeam incurs a substantial setup cost, reflecting its extensive configuration needs.

Related categories

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)