

Sentinel and CrowdStrike Falcon compete in the cybersecurity domain. Sentinel seems to have the upper hand in feature integration and automation, while CrowdStrike Falcon excels in incident detection and response capabilities.
Features: Sentinel offers a powerful correlation engine for efficient rule processing, a scalable architecture, and seamless integration with diverse systems. CrowdStrike Falcon provides superior incident detection and response capabilities, featuring effective endpoint detection and response (EDR) and real-time system analysis without impacting device performance. Additionally, it ensures excellent forensics and threat intelligence as key strengths.
Room for Improvement: Sentinel could enhance its Java desktop tool integration, improve device support and agent flexibility, and better its user-interface integration and cloud connections. CrowdStrike Falcon lacks data loss prevention (DLP) support, needs enhancements in machine learning accuracy, and could improve support for legacy systems and email security.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sentinel offers hybrid deployment options, allowing flexibility between on-premises and cloud environments. Its customer service is well-regarded for strategic problem-solving. CrowdStrike Falcon supports various cloud deployments, especially public clouds, with commendable customer service and technical support, albeit with remarks on support pricing levels.
Pricing and ROI: Sentinel's pricing is on the higher end, catering to larger organizations, but its integration capabilities and long-term ROI through user behavior tracking offer value. CrowdStrike Falcon is also expensive but worth the investment for robust security, providing strong ROI through comprehensive security coverage, making it valuable for enterprises with limited internal resources.
CrowdStrike Falcon saves time and offers good value for money, especially for enterprise companies, because it can stop breaches.
It's very easy to deploy without many IT admins, saving time.
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the technical support as a 10 because they resolve many issues for us.
The CrowdStrike team is very efficient; I would rate them ten out of ten.
They could improve by initiating calls for high-priority cases instead of just opening tickets.
It has adequate coverage and is easy to deploy.
In terms of scalability, I find CrowdStrike to be stable, and I have not encountered any limitations with it.
There's no scalability limitation from CrowdStrike itself, as it just requires agent deployment.
I have never seen instability in the CrowdStrike tool.
We are following N-1 versions across our environment, which is stable.
The biggest issue occurred when every computer worldwide experienced a blue screen.
Simplifying the querying process, such as using double quote queries or directly obtaining logs based on IP addresses or usernames, would be beneficial.
Another concern is CrowdStrike's GUI. It changes annually, making it hard to work and find options.
Threat prevention should be their first priority.
Price is always a consideration, so the price would be nice if it were lower.
It is expensive compared to SentinelOne, but as the market leader, it is worth it.
The licensing cost and setup costs are affordable.
The solution is a bit expensive.
They nearly always bill it in dollars, so if it can be billed in our currency, that would be helpful and fixed in our currency.
I can investigate by accessing the customer's host based on the RTR environment and utilize host search to know details for the past seven days, including logins, processes, file installations, malicious processes, and network connections.
The real-time analytics aspect of CrowdStrike performs well because we get all logs in real-time, with no delay, allowing us to take action immediately.
Being an EDR solution, it helps us identify attacks in real-time.
Sentinel's best features include that it's a very easy product to use.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 3.6% |
| Sentinel | 3.4% |
| Other | 93.0% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 34 |
| Large Enterprise | 62 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
CrowdStrike Falcon offers robust endpoint protection and threat detection, leveraging cloud-native architecture and AI-driven capabilities for advanced security. Its design ensures minimal system impact, making it a preferred choice for organizations seeking efficient protection solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon provides comprehensive security features, including endpoint detection and response, real-time threat insights, and advanced AI-driven detection mechanisms. Its cloud-native architecture facilitates effortless scalability and seamless integration with cloud services, securing endpoints, servers, and roaming users. While Falcon delivers strong threat intelligence and automated detection, it faces challenges in operating system compatibility, reports require enhancements, and integration with some technologies is limited. High pricing and occasional false positives are noted areas for improvement, along with expanded support for older systems.
What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?In industries requiring fortified cybersecurity measures, CrowdStrike Falcon is deployed for endpoint protection and incident response. It offers advanced threat defense and integrates well with cloud services, making it a suitable replacement for traditional antivirus solutions. For sectors engaging in forensic investigations and real-time malware defense, Falcon's capabilities align with their security demands, serving industries from healthcare to finance.
Sentinel is a full-featured Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution that simplifies the deployment, management and day-to-day use of SIEM, readily adapts to dynamic enterprise environments and delivers the true "actionable intelligence" security professionals need to quickly understand their threat posture and prioritize response.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.