

CrowdStrike Falcon and Elastic Security compete in the cybersecurity industry, specifically for threat detection and response solutions. CrowdStrike Falcon seems to have the upper hand with its AI-driven threat detection, simple deployment options, and comprehensive endpoint visibility, providing a high return on investment despite its higher price.
Features: CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced endpoint detection and response, AI-powered threat detection, and comprehensive threat intelligence, making it particularly strong in providing detailed insights into cybersecurity threats. Elastic Security is known for its robust search capabilities, seamless integration with various data sources, and efficient real-time data analysis and anomaly detection functionalities.
Room for Improvement: CrowdStrike Falcon could improve technological integrations and enhance machine learning capabilities. Some users report issues with dashboard customization and data representation. Elastic Security's open-source nature can make initial setup complex and lacks certain advanced analytics. Improvements in documentation and user interface would enhance usability and new user experiences.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike Falcon offers flexible deployment options across different cloud environments, with generally praised customer service and proactive support, although response times can vary. Elastic Security also supports various cloud deployments but may demand more technical expertise for on-premises setups. Its supportive community is beneficial, but improvements in direct customer support and documentation are needed for smoother deployment.
Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon is priced on a per-license basis at the higher end, with customers citing a good return on investment through reduced downtime and improved security efficiency. Elastic Security, being more cost-effective due to its open-source nature, offers significant ROI for enterprises managing extensive data environments. However, pricing varies with added features and support requirements.
CrowdStrike Falcon saves time and offers good value for money, especially for enterprise companies, because it can stop breaches.
It's very easy to deploy without many IT admins, saving time.
It does not require hefty security budgets and can be deployed for enterprise security effectively.
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the technical support as a 10 because they resolve many issues for us.
The CrowdStrike team is very efficient; I would rate them ten out of ten.
They could improve by initiating calls for high-priority cases instead of just opening tickets.
Support is prompt and helpful.
Most of the time when my team encounters issues, they receive responses within 24 hours.
I have not faced any difficulties with Elastic Security, as we have a pretty good support service from them.
It has adequate coverage and is easy to deploy.
In terms of scalability, I find CrowdStrike to be stable, and I have not encountered any limitations with it.
There's no scalability limitation from CrowdStrike itself, as it just requires agent deployment.
It allows us to think about specific use cases, such as gathering malicious IPs in a single view and analyzing threats based on geolocation.
Elastic Security is quite scalable.
I have never seen instability in the CrowdStrike tool.
We are following N-1 versions across our environment, which is stable.
The biggest issue occurred when every computer worldwide experienced a blue screen.
In terms of stability, I would rate Elastic a solid eight out of ten.
Simplifying the querying process, such as using double quote queries or directly obtaining logs based on IP addresses or usernames, would be beneficial.
Another concern is CrowdStrike's GUI. It changes annually, making it hard to work and find options.
Threat prevention should be their first priority.
CrowdStrike and Defender have more established threat intelligence integration due to having a larger client base.
My security testing team continuously reports vulnerabilities, and we have to fix and update the versions frequently.
Machine learning algorithms become better with time; as they ingest a huge volume of data, they become better.
It is expensive compared to SentinelOne, but as the market leader, it is worth it.
The licensing cost and setup costs are affordable.
The solution is a bit expensive.
The pricing is reasonable, especially for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), making it a viable option for businesses building their security infrastructure.
This is beneficial for SMEs as they do not need extensive budgets for security solutions.
Elastic Security is considered cost-effective, especially at lower EPS levels.
I can investigate by accessing the customer's host based on the RTR environment and utilize host search to know details for the past seven days, including logins, processes, file installations, malicious processes, and network connections.
The real-time analytics aspect of CrowdStrike performs well because we get all logs in real-time, with no delay, allowing us to take action immediately.
Being an EDR solution, it helps us identify attacks in real-time.
Elastic Security offers good insight regarding alerts, reports, and cases.
Elastic Security offers advanced features such as machine learning and integration with ChatGPT.
We require rapid processing speed for alerts and event data, and Elastic Security is very efficient at handling this level of data.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Elastic Security | 4.1% |
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 3.3% |
| Other | 92.6% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 34 |
| Large Enterprise | 62 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 40 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
CrowdStrike Falcon offers robust endpoint protection and threat detection, leveraging cloud-native architecture and AI-driven capabilities for advanced security. Its design ensures minimal system impact, making it a preferred choice for organizations seeking efficient protection solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon provides comprehensive security features, including endpoint detection and response, real-time threat insights, and advanced AI-driven detection mechanisms. Its cloud-native architecture facilitates effortless scalability and seamless integration with cloud services, securing endpoints, servers, and roaming users. While Falcon delivers strong threat intelligence and automated detection, it faces challenges in operating system compatibility, reports require enhancements, and integration with some technologies is limited. High pricing and occasional false positives are noted areas for improvement, along with expanded support for older systems.
What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?In industries requiring fortified cybersecurity measures, CrowdStrike Falcon is deployed for endpoint protection and incident response. It offers advanced threat defense and integrates well with cloud services, making it a suitable replacement for traditional antivirus solutions. For sectors engaging in forensic investigations and real-time malware defense, Falcon's capabilities align with their security demands, serving industries from healthcare to finance.
Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.
Additional offerings and benefits:
Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.