Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Contrast Security Assess Logo

Top 10 Contrast Security Assess Alternatives

Vendor: Contrast Security
4.4 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Contrast Security Assess Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Contrast Security Assess based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), Snyk, and GitLab. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Contrast Security Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Contrast Security, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Contrast Security Assess Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
4.0 out of 5
SonarQube Server ensures continuous code quality and wide language support. In comparison, Contrast Security Assess offers real-time vulnerability detection with seamless CI/CD integration. SonarQube Server attracts budget-conscious buyers, while Contrast Security Assess delivers higher ROI through its advanced security features.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report
SonarQube Server setup cost is lower, making it a cost-effective choice, whereas Contrast Security Assess involves higher initial expenses, affecting the budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
SonarQube Server setup cost is lower, making it a cost-effective choice, whereas Contrast Security Assess involves higher initial expenses, affecting the budget considerations.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Snyk
4.0 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Snyk
4.0 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess is known for its real-time monitoring and competitive pricing with efficient integration. In comparison, Snyk offers comprehensive open-source security and cloud-native deployment, appealing to those seeking diverse environment support. Both cater to specific needs with distinct approaches.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. Snyk Report
Contrast Security Assess offers a straightforward setup cost, while Snyk's setup includes additional hidden fees, making Contrast more transparent in initial pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Contrast Security Assess offers a straightforward setup cost, while Snyk's setup includes additional hidden fees, making Contrast more transparent in initial pricing.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
GitLab is popular for source code management, CI/CD pipelines, and team collaboration. Companies utilize it for repository management, automated deployment, and code integration. It integrates with tools like SonarQube, enhancing code analysis with cloud compatibility. Users appreciate branch management, automation, excellent user experience, and seek better integrations and improved documentation for enhanced productivity.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. GitLab Report
I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month.
The price is okay.
View comparison
Pricing
I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month.
The price is okay.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
Checkmarx One appeals with competitive pricing, detailed code analysis, and seamless integration. In comparison, Contrast Security Assess offers comprehensive features like real-time vulnerability monitoring and a thorough integration into workflows, appealing to buyers seeking depth and who justify its cost effectiveness.
Download Checkmarx One vs. Contrast Security Assess Report
Checkmarx One has a higher initial setup cost compared to Contrast Security Assess, which offers a more cost-effective implementation option.
View comparison
Pricing
Checkmarx One has a higher initial setup cost compared to Contrast Security Assess, which offers a more cost-effective implementation option.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Veracode
4.1 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Veracode
4.1 out of 5
Veracode offers comprehensive code scanning and wide language support, appealing to those seeking cost-effective, straightforward security solutions. In comparison, Contrast Security Assess excels with real-time vulnerability analysis and continuous monitoring, making it a choice for buyers valuing innovative, dynamic features.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. Veracode Report
Veracode has a lower setup cost compared to Contrast Security Assess, which requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Veracode has a lower setup cost compared to Contrast Security Assess, which requires a higher initial investment.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Coverity Static
3.9 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Coverity Static
3.9 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess offers real-time vulnerability detection with seamless integration for rapid deployment and competitive pricing. In comparison, Coverity Static provides extensive code coverage and detailed defect identification, appealing to those seeking comprehensive analysis and long-term code reliability in complex systems.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. Coverity Static Report
Contrast Security Assess has a straightforward setup, while Coverity Static users mention a more complex implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Contrast Security Assess has a straightforward setup, while Coverity Static users mention a more complex implementation.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Mend.io
4.2 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Mend.io
4.2 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess is favored for its competitive pricing and deployment efficiency. In comparison, Mend.io excels with robust vulnerability management and extensive integrations. Organizations may choose Contrast for budget-friendly setups, while Mend.io appeals for comprehensive security tasks and superior customer service.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. Mend.io Report
Contrast Security Assess typically involves higher initial setup costs, while Mend.io is often noted for its affordability in setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Contrast Security Assess typically involves higher initial setup costs, while Mend.io is often noted for its affordability in setup expenses.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Contrast Security Assess Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
4.1 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess attracts tech buyers with its cost-effective pricing and reliable customer support. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security appeals to those seeking advanced threat intelligence and automation features, offering long-term benefits despite a higher initial investment.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security Report
Contrast Security Assess offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security involves a higher initial investment, highlighting a key difference in cost factors.
View comparison
Pricing
Contrast Security Assess offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security involves a higher initial investment, highlighting a key difference in cost factors.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Contrast Security Assess Logo
GitHub Advanced Security
4.4 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess offers dynamic analysis and real-time insights. In comparison, GitHub Advanced Security integrates code scanning and dependency insights into the development process. A tech buyer may choose Contrast for ease of deployment and support, or GitHub for its comprehensive ecosystem integration.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. GitHub Advanced Security Report
Contrast Security Assess has higher setup costs compared to GitHub Advanced Security, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Contrast Security Assess has higher setup costs compared to GitHub Advanced Security, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Contrast Security Assess Logo
OpenText Core Application Security
4.0 out of 5
OpenText Core Application Security offers scalability and integration, appealing to cost-conscious buyers with its affordability. In comparison, Contrast Security Assess provides advanced vulnerability detection and streamlined deployment, justifying its higher cost for those prioritizing enhanced features and seamless development pipeline integration.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. OpenText Core Application Security Report
OpenText Core Application Security features a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Contrast Security Assess may involve higher setup costs, highlighting a significant distinction in their initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Core Application Security features a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Contrast Security Assess may involve higher setup costs, highlighting a significant distinction in their initial investment requirements.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
OWASP Zap
3.8 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess Logo
OWASP Zap
3.8 out of 5
OWASP Zap appeals to those valuing cost-effectiveness with robust scanning and CI/CD integration, ideal for open-source development. In comparison, Contrast Security Assess offers advanced enterprise-level security features and continuous monitoring, appealing to buyers seeking comprehensive protection despite higher costs.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. OWASP Zap Report
OWASP Zap offers a lower setup cost, making it more accessible compared to Contrast Security Assess, which has a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive features and integration capabilities, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OWASP Zap offers a lower setup cost, making it more accessible compared to Contrast Security Assess, which has a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive features and integration capabilities, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Acunetix
3.9 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Acunetix
3.9 out of 5
Acunetix offers comprehensive pricing and support with dynamic analysis capabilities, ideal for businesses seeking accessible solutions. In comparison, Contrast Security Assess provides superior integration and continuous monitoring, appealing to those prioritizing seamless workflows and long-term ROI despite higher initial costs.
Download Acunetix vs. Contrast Security Assess Report
Acunetix has a lower setup cost, making it more accessible for smaller budgets, while Contrast Security Assess requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features and integrations.
View comparison
Pricing
Acunetix has a lower setup cost, making it more accessible for smaller budgets, while Contrast Security Assess requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features and integrations.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Sonatype Lifecycle
4.2 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Sonatype Lifecycle
4.2 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess attracts cost-conscious businesses with real-time vulnerability scanning and workflow integration. In comparison, Sonatype Lifecycle commands a premium with its advanced component intelligence and automation, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive analysis and compliance management. Each solution excels uniquely, addressing distinct organizational needs.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. Sonatype Lifecycle Report
Contrast Security Assess incurs a lower setup cost while Sonatype Lifecycle demands a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant pricing difference between these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Contrast Security Assess incurs a lower setup cost while Sonatype Lifecycle demands a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant pricing difference between these solutions.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
HCL AppScan
3.9 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess Logo
HCL AppScan
3.9 out of 5
HCL AppScan excels in automated testing, providing thorough vulnerability detection and catering to budget-conscious buyers with its attractive pricing. In comparison, Contrast Security Assess surpasses AppScan in real-time insights and integration, justifying its higher cost with advanced features and adaptability.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. HCL AppScan Report
HCL AppScan has a moderate setup cost, while Contrast Security Assess offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan has a moderate setup cost, while Contrast Security Assess offers a more cost-effective setup option.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Contrast Security Assess Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
4.3 out of 5
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is favored for manual testing capabilities and API ease of use. In comparison, Contrast Security Assess provides automated vulnerability detection with real-time analysis. PortSwigger caters to those needing precision, while Contrast Security appeals to teams seeking continuous integration.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offers straightforward setup costs, while Contrast Security Assess's setup costs are more comprehensive, reflecting their differing approaches and feature sets.
View comparison
Pricing
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offers straightforward setup costs, while Contrast Security Assess's setup costs are more comprehensive, reflecting their differing approaches and feature sets.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Qualys Web Application Scanning
3.8 out of 5
Qualys Web Application Scanning offers comprehensive vulnerability detection and seamless tool integration. In comparison, Contrast Security Assess provides real-time risk assessment and integrates into development pipelines. A tech buyer might choose Qualys for its cost-effectiveness or Contrast for its advanced features.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning Report
Qualys Web Application Scanning involves significant setup costs, while Contrast Security Assess offers a more straightforward and cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a key difference in their implementation expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys Web Application Scanning involves significant setup costs, while Contrast Security Assess offers a more straightforward and cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a key difference in their implementation expenses.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
GitHub
4.4 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess Logo
GitHub
4.4 out of 5
GitHub excels in collaborative code management while Contrast Security Assess focuses on advanced security features. In comparison, Contrast Security Assess provides in-depth vulnerability detection. Tech buyers might choose GitHub for its affordable ROI or Contrast Security Assess for its specialized security integration.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. GitHub Report
GitHub features a straightforward setup process that minimizes initial costs, while Contrast Security Assess requires a more complex setup, potentially leading to higher upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
GitHub features a straightforward setup process that minimizes initial costs, while Contrast Security Assess requires a more complex setup, potentially leading to higher upfront expenses.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Invicti
4.1 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Invicti
4.1 out of 5
Invicti is favored for straightforward pricing and responsive support, while Contrast Security Assess excels in advanced, real-time vulnerability features. In comparison, Contrast provides significant value through in-depth security, whereas Invicti is easier to deploy with intuitive integration.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. Invicti Report
Invicti has a lower setup cost compared to Contrast Security Assess, providing a more budget-friendly option, while Contrast Security Assess may offer broader features that justify its higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Invicti has a lower setup cost compared to Contrast Security Assess, providing a more budget-friendly option, while Contrast Security Assess may offer broader features that justify its higher initial expense.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Kiuwan
4.3 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Kiuwan
4.3 out of 5
Kiuwan appeals with competitive pricing and robust support, catering to diverse environments. In comparison, Contrast Security Assess delivers advanced real-time monitoring and dynamic assessments. Kiuwan's efficiency suits budget-conscious teams, while Contrast's richer features justify higher costs for those seeking comprehensive security insights.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. Kiuwan Report
Kiuwan offers a more affordable setup cost compared to Contrast Security Assess, which tends to be higher. This difference may influence businesses depending on budget considerations when evaluating software security tools.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiuwan offers a more affordable setup cost compared to Contrast Security Assess, which tends to be higher. This difference may influence businesses depending on budget considerations when evaluating software security tools.
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Oligo
1 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Oligo
1 out of 5
Oligo optimizes IT operations by enhancing infrastructure visibility, identifying issues, and ensuring efficient resource management. Users value its real-time analytics, intuitive cloud management, robust scalability, and seamless integration. Areas needing improvement include speed, smoother tool integration, refined notifications, easier navigation, and consistent updates for reliability.
View comparison
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Digital.ai Application Security
3.0 out of 5

Our proprietary protection capabilities shield apps from reverse engineering, tampering, API exploits, and other attacks that can put your business, your customers, and your bottom line at risk.

View comparison
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Quotium Seeker
1 out of 5
Contrast Security Assess Logo
Quotium Seeker
1 out of 5

The Seeker solution helps businesses find high-risk security weaknesses while fostering collaboration between development and security teams. It exposes vulnerable code and ties it directly to business impact and exploitation scenarios, providing a clear explanation of risks. By accelerating adoption of security testing technologies into the software development lifecycle (SDLC), customers across industries such as financial, health, energy and retail can get to market faster with increased stability and certainty.

View comparison

Related categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Application Security Tools
Software Development Analytics