Acunetix Reviews

Name: Acunetix
Brand: Invicti
Rating: 3.9 (32 reviews)

3.9 out of 5

32 reviews
86% willing to recommend

1,559 followers

What is Acunetix?

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Get the Acunetix Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix, SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), GitLab and more!

Acunetix is the #6 ranked solution in top DevSecOps solutions, #14 ranked solution in AST tools, #17 ranked solution in application security solutions, and #23 ranked solution in top Vulnerability Management solutions. PeerSpot users give Acunetix an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. Acunetix is most commonly compared to SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube): Acunetix vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube). Acunetix is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 58% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 18% of all views.

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Featured Acunetix reviews

AnubhavGoswami

Compliance Manager at Compunnel

The primary use is mainly related to vulnerability assessment, including both public and internal IP addresses By using this tool, we have reduced the workload and increased the productivity of users. It generates automated reports. This feature is beneficial when sharing reports with clients as…

Read full review

Abdullah Ozkan

Information Security Engineer at Tübitak Bilgem

I mainly configure the tool for web applications, and I evaluate all products on the market. I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention. It offers support for specific scenarios like CAPTCHA and supports the ability to manage actions and updates from the internet.

Read full review

Kamil Matusik

Head of Operations, Supply Chain at Lyreco Deutschland GmbH

We use Acunetix via API with our bucket. When developers try to push some part of the code, Acunetix is used to analyze the vulnerabilities. The integration of Acunetix with Jira and other buckets is easy. Acunetix is not very different from the other vulnerability scanners. It is not the best solution. The connection is via API. We get the link and change the token between the connections. The integration is not easy, but it's not hard. Bigger companies with a lot of developers can get better tools. Overall, I rate the tool a six or seven out of ten.

Read full review

Acunetix mindshare

Product category:

As of May 2025, the mindshare of Acunetix in the Application Security Tools category stands at 2.8%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

PeerResearch reports based on Acunetix reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Application Security Tools	Apr 30, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Apr 30, 2025	Download
Comparison	Acunetix vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)	Apr 30, 2025	Download
Comparison	Acunetix vs Veracode	Apr 30, 2025	Download
Comparison	Acunetix vs Checkmarx One	Apr 30, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)	4.0	24.5%	81%	114 interviews Add to research
GitLab	4.3	2.9%	97%	82 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

Acunetix offers a web-based interface, scheduling capabilities, and an Interactive Application Security Testing module. It provides fast, automated scans, low false positives, and comprehensive reporting. Acunetix's scalability and versatility allow integration with other applications and support manual intervention. Its crawl-only scan, login sequence feature, and security risk analysis are noteworthy. The platform's user-friendliness and documentation enhance its usability, making it suitable for developers and security teams seeking effective vulnerability identification.

"The features of Acunetix have proved most effective in identifying vulnerabilities."
"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."
"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."

Room for Improvement

Acunetix needs enhancements in its Interactive Application Security Testing module, database integration, and OWASP Top Ten coverage. Users find manual replication and scan configuration cumbersome and seek refined vulnerability identification, false positive reduction, and improved mobile and subdomain scanning. Licensing flexibility, pricing, and integration with various tools need attention. Enhancing reporting features, supporting Web Application Firewall bypass, and offering advanced authentication and authorization settings are also desired improvements. Users also report issues with bandwidth usage during scans.

"I rate its stability six out of ten."
"The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."
"There was an issue related to updates from the internet."

ROI

Acunetix significantly enhances security processes and identifies numerous vulnerabilities, saving time and reducing manual testing needs but lacks precise metrics for exact cost savings. Many report renewal as indicative of ROI value, with some estimating a substantial return. It aids in maintaining security at release times and potentially averts substantial damage from hacks. The tool is regarded as valuable, improving overall security measures and saving significant labor in vulnerability management.

Pricing

Acunetix pricing has drawn mixed responses from enterprise users. Initially perceived as competitive, especially when compared to other vendors, recent changes have seen significant price increases, up to 3.5 times the original, causing some companies to reevaluate its cost-effectiveness. Licensing complexities, particularly with domain-based models, present challenges and can inflate costs unexpectedly. While some find value despite the high price, others cite a lack of transparency and advocate for improved clarity in pricing structures. Annual subscription fees are prevalent.

"The price is exceptionally high."
"The solution is expensive."
"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

Popular Use Cases

Acunetix is primarily employed for dynamic application security testing, internal penetration tests, and web vulnerability scanning. Organizations use it globally to ensure web application security, protect against cross-site scripting and malware, and conduct security assessments. Acunetix integrates with other tools for comprehensive manual and automated testing processes. It is utilized by various teams for vulnerability assessments in banking, IT security, and compliance with standards such as PCI DSS, identifying security issues efficiently.

Service and Support

Acunetix's customer service and support receive mixed feedback. Support is mostly responsive, with some praising quick responses and effective issue resolution, including meeting one-on-one with analysts who incorporate suggestions. However, others note delayed responses and dissatisfaction with ticketing, while some express the need for better support training. Resellers often mediate, providing regional assistance. Overall, time sensitivity is a concern for some users, and improvements are suggested in response times and issue identification.

Deployment

Users generally found Acunetix's initial setup to be straightforward and easy, taking anywhere from minutes to a few days, depending on experience and environment complexity. Some appreciated the simple installation process, aided by online documentation, while others faced challenges with upgrades, Linux compatibility, or on-premise hosting. A streamlined wizard for guidance in setup and upgrades is desired by those who encountered difficulties, particularly during complex deployments.

Scalability

Acunetix's scalability is perceived diversely. Some users rate it highly for adaptability, especially in cloud deployments, allowing flexibility for variable workloads. Others find limitations in desktop environments due to hardware constraints. Certain users are unsure of scaling abilities, while some have not required extensive scaling, remaining satisfied with current operations. The experience varies, with some users successfully managing multiple projects and others evaluating it as suitable primarily for smaller or specialized use.

Stability

Acunetix displays great stability, with users noting no issues like service drops or crashes. While some experienced minor hiccups during upgrades or speed fluctuations, these were resolved. Support was helpful in addressing and fixing problems, and maintenance is easy, requiring only one person. Generally, no false positives or negatives were reported, with consistent and reliable scanning. Some minor, unresolved issues persist, but the majority find Acunetix reliable, rating its stability highly.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Acunetix Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.