

Zapier and UiPath are both significant players in the automation software category, each catering to distinct user needs. Zapier stands out for its wide range of integrations and simplicity, making it ideal for non-technical users seeking ease of use without coding. Conversely, UiPath is recognized for its advanced capabilities in AI-driven complex process automation, excelling in handling intricate tasks and offering robust tools for enterprise-level solutions.
Features: Zapier automates tasks across over 2,000 apps without the requirement for coding, offering extensive integration options and a user-friendly interface. Features like multi-step zaps, webhooks, and customizable workflows provide versatility for users. UiPath supports complex automation tasks with AI-driven solutions, featuring stable integration capabilities and a comprehensive development environment with tools like UiPath Studio and Orchestrator, which allows for centralized control of automated processes.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest that Zapier could enhance integration stability, particularly with Google Sheets, improve customer support response times, and further reduce reliance on coding for certain tasks. For UiPath, users see opportunities to enhance compatibility with legacy systems, simplify the user interface, and mature AI functionalities. There is also a desire for more competitive licensing rates to attract a wider range of businesses.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zapier offers a straightforward setup process requiring minimal technical support, frequently relying on community forums for issue resolution. However, users express a desire for more responsive customer service. UiPath provides flexible deployment options suitable for various business sizes, backed by strong enterprise-level support, although there is a noted need for faster issue resolution.
Pricing and ROI: Zapier features a tiered pricing model that includes a free plan, allowing users to test its capabilities. Although paid plans can be perceived as expensive, they are often justified by the integration options and time-saving benefits, offering favorable ROI by reducing development costs. UiPath's higher pricing aligns with its advanced features, offering substantial ROI for larger organizations engaged in automating complex processes, requiring detailed business cases to justify the investment.
It has saved about 20% to 30% of costs.
We have seen a 100% return on investment.
UiPath has reduced human error and saved employee time.
In a scenario where employing three resources for three months might cost approximately $18,000 to $20,000, Zapier provides substantial cost savings.
They were very helpful, addressing the issue in three hours.
Even though they are external, I can ping them on Slack and I get a response right away, so they really make it very accessible to be in touch.
He works through whatever unique internal environment scenarios we have to overcome to make sure that it's doing exactly what we need, even though we're constantly having new security measures to implement on top of it.
Their technical support is good; they respond promptly and are very helpful.
This can help if you need assistance, as you can communicate with the community and support system, and most issues are already resolved by AI.
The experience was positive with prompt responses from their team.
The solution is capable of scaling with just a few clicks.
The scalability of the UiPath Platform rates a ten out of ten.
From a technical standpoint, it's essential to make the right technical decisions and design a scalable solution.
Zapier is suitable for small or simpler automation but not for complex ones.
Scaling it gets quite expensive, and while I cannot evaluate it purely from a technology perspective, compared to Workato, I would give Zapier a seven for scalability.
Overall, there was only one instance of downtime in four years, which did not create any significant impact.
I have not experienced any downtime, crashes, or performance issues.
Over six years, we have created zero support cases with UiPath.
In my current company, we had significant challenges with Zapier regarding maintenance, as Zaps were often broken, not necessarily due to Zapier, but due to changes in the input variables.
Adding more AI could help in small tasks that require intelligence or machine learning, leading to the next stage of automation.
If the UI changes or a label is changed, sometimes the whole flow breaks.
Regarding additional functionality for UiPath, I believe that additional features will only come into play when you start talking to the customers, accept feedback, and work on it.
The error message options in the dashboard should be improved. It should be user-friendly so that beginners or non-technical users can figure out the problems and solutions on their own.
You can build similar or dependent automations in one Zap, which helps with understanding the process without switching between different records.
Having flexibility in creating more complex automation would eliminate the need to transform data within the source or destination.
Most of the UiPath products are priced higher than competitors.
The cost can be a barrier in Hungary, making it difficult for me to persuade others to invest, especially when unattended robots come at a significant price point.
When compared to competition, such as Microsoft's Power Automate platform or IBM Cloud Pak, UiPath is expensive.
The pricing is in accordance with market standards and even lower in some cases.
The pricing of Zapier is slightly higher compared to other market automation tools such as Pabbly, Make.com, and N8N, which have good features but are priced lower than Zapier.
The tool has a noticeable ROI, and the investment is worth every penny as it reduces tedious tasks and improves scalability.
Our use of automation sped up the process of getting paid from insurance companies, saving us substantial amounts of money.
Whenever they release a product, they also release a course in UiPath Academy. So, you can get familiarized with the product and understand the new capabilities.
They have approximately 7,000 connections.
The automation capabilities are impressive.
Creating integration points through webhooks is particularly useful for anyone working on integration projects.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| UiPath Platform | 8.7% |
| Zapier | 0.6% |
| Other | 90.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 249 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 143 |
| Large Enterprise | 667 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
UiPath Platform is appreciated for its user-friendly interface and extensive automation capabilities, offering seamless integration with diverse applications. Its intuitive drag-and-drop functionality enables users to design efficient workflows with minimal technical expertise.
UiPath Platform delivers a robust set of features that enhance automation and productivity. With components like Orchestrator, task management is optimized, facilitating better scalability. Users benefit from advanced AI and document understanding tools, boosting data handling accuracy and reducing errors. Despite its strengths, UiPath faces challenges with upgrading processes, AI enhancements, and user documentation. Integration and selector sensitivity issues, along with support and licensing complexities, highlight areas for potential improvement. Users request smoother deployment, error handling, and migration processes. Enhanced support for RHEL/Ubuntu, LINQ, and Lambda and improved real-time insights, automation recording, and scheduling are desired. Streamlining the experience for non-technical users with simplified workflows remains a priority.
What are the key features of UiPath Platform?
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
UiPath Platform is widely implemented across sectors such as finance, healthcare, insurance, HR, IT, and supply chain to automate repetitive business tasks. Common uses include automating data entry, invoice processing, document management, report generation, and customer service operations. Organizations value the platform's ability to integrate seamlessly with systems like SAP, CRM, and Oracle, allowing for enhanced efficiency and accuracy in processing both structured and unstructured data.
Zapier connects thousands of apps, enabling seamless automation without coding. It supports webhooks, multi-step tasks, and a wide array of integrations. Despite needing enhancements in Google Sheets capabilities, API limits, and UI, it remains a tool for boosting productivity across many sectors.
By linking tools such as Google Sheets, HubSpot, Slack, and Salesforce, Zapier allows users to automate workflows without coding expertise. Its integrations serve logistics operations, CRM, and social media management. Users can process tracking exceptions and streamline operations with third-party software like QuickBooks, Zoho, and Power BI. Although users suggest features like better Google Sheets handling and improved collaboration tools, Zapier continues to provide expansive automation, enhancing efficiency and facilitating new opportunities through integrations.
What Features Stand Out in Zapier?In logistics, Zapier enhances operations by automating exception tracking and third-party software integration. Its use in CRM and social media streamlines lead creation and workflow automation. Users from diverse industries leverage its extensive connectivity to support intelligence management, generate analytical insights, and execute cross-functional tasks efficiently.
We monitor all Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.