No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

ScreenConnect vs Webex Meetings with AT&T comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ScreenConnect
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
18th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (16th), Remote Visual Support (3rd)
Webex Meetings with AT&T
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
21st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of ScreenConnect is 2.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Webex Meetings with AT&T is 1.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ScreenConnect2.2%
Webex Meetings with AT&T1.6%
Other96.2%
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

Todd Blake - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior IT Specialist at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees
Simple to set up, reasonable pricing, and useful remote control capabilities
I'm on the latest version of the solution. I just updated it yesterday. While we have the solution on-premises at this time, we'll likely move to the cloud later this year. They have a trial version that you can try. They have a free version that you can try as well. I use it myself to support my family. I would try the free version or the trial version depending on your business. They can set you up and you can get to see all the features. I would also advocate going to the cloud version. Don't bother with the on-prem. It's just easier to jump to the cloud. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
Bryant Carthan - PeerSpot reviewer
Branch Head, Training Branch at United States Marine Corps
It integrates well with our learning management system, but the break-out rooms are a little rough around the edges
There are definitely times when the sound becomes a bit unclear, and latency is also an issue. If there are too many people on video simultaneously, the whole system can slow down. The group breakout rooms are still somewhat rough around the edges. I would like to see them improve that feature so we can have more interaction in our classes.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We are more efficient at resolving end-user tickets as a result of implementing this product, with our ticket count lower and our ticket throughput increased because now we just click a button to connect and we're off and running."
"It's very easy to use, very easy to understand. It gives us remote access to the PC without any issues."
"The ConnectWise ScreenConnect tool is very good for remote access."
"The product's two-factor authentication means we are not worried like before about the state of our security."
"Setup was very straightforward. All I had to do was write a GPO on my domain controller and it automatically installed the agent that I downloaded from the software. I literally had to do nothing."
"Compared to what's out there the pricing is probably a good value."
"Control lets us do remote management of machines without having to be on the VPN; it's super simple and super easy, so that's really where the advantage comes in for us."
"I've noted an ROI while using the solution."
"Installation was straightforward."
"The most valuable features for me are its stable connection, user-friendly interface, and screen-sharing files. Cisco's support is also very valuable."
"During meetings, the feature of closed captioning, scripting, and recording was convenient for keeping minutes and making available the information discussed to review meeting minutes. Also to keep track of all the agreements and discussions during those meetings. It worked well with our email systems and other communication services integrated into the functionalities."
"It made it simple for users to join, work together, and share screens."
"Webex Meeting's most valuable features are screen-sharing and remote access."
"We appreciate how Webex integrates with our system. When an employee completes a course, Webex documents it and updates the employee's training records."
"Having Webex has been crucial for maintaining our training programs during COVID."
 

Cons

"The solution is a little bit complicated when you want to implement it."
"Speed is a major factor in Automate, and the control panel is horribly slow."
"There is an issue which is pretty rare, but I find it at least when connecting from my mobile device. I am forced to refresh the screen by changing the screen quality to get screen updates. This only happens sometimes."
"They could provide a toolbox for the plan I'm on."
"Something that I would like to see in the future is mobile video streaming."
"However, the main issue I have seen with it is that, if they are having issues with their web browsers or network, there is really no way to connect with it."
"I would like ConnectWise Control to be more transparent on the real costs to renew their license."
"The previous version of ScreenConnect was so old that it was blocked by Windows Defender, SmartScreen, and most anti-virus applications."
"The features I think can be improved are integrations with third-parties; for example, Microsoft 360 and other shared folders."
"Webex Meetings could be improved with more collaborative features and an archive of information like appointments and discussions that can be shared with everybody."
"It would be nice if there were more integrations available."
"There are definitely times when the sound becomes a bit unclear, and latency is also an issue."
"It could be more secure."
"There are definitely times when the sound becomes a bit unclear, and latency is also an issue. If there are too many people on video simultaneously, the whole system can slow down. The group breakout rooms are still somewhat rough around the edges. I would like to see them improve that feature so we can have more interaction in our classes."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the product's pricing is a good value. I paid $600 a year and that was fine for me. It was about $50 a month. Licensing is all very straightforward."
"We pay $3,000 USD for the service, yearly upfront."
"It is priced well and it is still a great value. Although I have been reading a lot about Splashtop. They are getting pretty competitive on their pricing, including a fairly easy to use remote support for mobile applications, like iOS and Android."
"Pricing is fair for Control and the licensing is simple."
"We pay $85 per month for each user for a ConnectWise package with multiple solutions."
"Their licensing model is good, their pricing model is good, their service is good; bandwidth is excellent. They're consistent."
"We pay an annual licensing fee."
"Make sure you have enough licensing for all the techs that you have."
"Pricing is very competitive because it didn't change much since they were already in the market when other players came in."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Also Known As

ConnectWise Control
AT&T Webex Meetings, Cisco Webex Meetings with AT&T
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Jon Rosen Systems
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ScreenConnect vs. Webex Meetings with AT&T and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.