ProcessMaker vs UiPath Platform comparison

ProcessMaker and UiPath are both solutions in the Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies category. ProcessMaker is ranked #28, while UiPath is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5. ProcessMaker holds a 0.9% mindshare in BOAT, compared to UiPath’s 8.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ProcessMaker users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

ProcessMaker

Read 2 ProcessMaker reviews

720 Views
274 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath Platform

Read 911 UiPath Platform reviews

24,084 Views
8,670 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

ProcessMaker

UiPath Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ProcessMaker and UiPath Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed ProcessMaker vs. UiPath Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ProcessMaker vs. UiPath Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ProcessMaker

Ranking in Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies

28th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (35th)

UiPath Platform

Ranking in Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

911

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (1st), Agentic Automation (2nd), AI-Agent Builders (1st), AI Finance & Accounting (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies category, the mindshare of ProcessMaker is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Platform is 8.7%, down from 13.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
UiPath Platform	8.7%
ProcessMaker	0.9%
Other	90.4%

Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies

Featured Reviews

UchechiSylvanus

Team Lead, Process Improvement & RPA at Fidelity Bank Plc

Works well, but its interface should be a bit more user-friendly

We use it for our process flows and levels of approvals, but I am not managing it directly Its performance, stability, and security are fine. Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly. I have been using this solution for close to a year. It is stable. It is easy to scale. We currently…

Read full review

reviewer2761431

Manager Rpa at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Significantly reduces manual effort and improves team workflows through automated ticketing

We've used Agent Builder, IXP, and Maestro for orchestration. We have created context-grounded searches or chatbots using context grounding, and we also use context grounding within an Agentic flow where a bot or agent reads ServiceNow tickets to determine whether it has been assigned to the right work group. If it has not been assigned correctly due to human error, it automatically reassigns it to the right group. I would assess Agentic AI's ability to extract data points as effective. We created an agent for the purpose of extracting data, though not in a document. We created what we call an email conversation agent that engages with a customer, vendor, or someone in an email conversation with a set goal of extracting specific data points for an action to be performed subsequently. The one automation we have deployed in production involves the agent interacting with team members to collect data points and create a ServiceNow ticket. We appreciate almost all features of UiPath Platform, with one of the most successful ones being the use of Coms Mining. Most of the new features related to AI have all been good, and we use Agentic. We have already created a few agents and have started to use Maestro for a few flows, though we are not yet there to orchestrate an end-to-end workflow. We have good ROI from the automations we have developed with UiPath Platform, which far exceeds the investment in the platform. It has saved us tens of thousands of hours in manual effort, making the team members happy to pursue other things of value.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."

"We like using the prebuilt AI models in UiPath rather than creating our own AI models. We also found the UiPath Community very good."

"It is a very simple tool to work with for anybody. Simplicity is the best in UiPath. It also has the best community support. If we are looking for any solution, we can directly reach out to UiPath at any point in time."

"In terms of ROI, we are saving more than what the platform costs us. We are at about 1.5 million in savings due to a recent automation. It was a little less than that before. These are soft savings and don't show up on balance sheets. We're trying to work toward automations that actually do lead to hard savings. We've saved about 43,000 hours in a year so far."

"Is it easy to build automation using UiPath in comparison, to, for example, Blue Prism or Power Automate."

"I would assess the stability and reliability of UiPath Platform as excellent, as everything I've experienced so far has had minimal hiccups, and if there were issues, they have been user error rather than reflecting poorly on UiPath Platform."

"The setup was very easy. We're in the cloud, so it's very simple."

"The user-friendly interface allows users to visually plan and design various automation processes through it."

"UiPath Platform is good at detecting UIs."

More UiPath Platform pros

Cons

"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."

"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."

"Navigating the directory of objects needs improvement. I would like to be able to put in keywords that would allow me to figure out what command will allow me to do the task that I am trying to do."

"The technical support is a bit of a weak point for this solution, and ideally, they can improve turnaround time so that we don't have to figure things out ourselves as often."

"The cost of full deployment is high and there is room for improvement."

"There should be more growth, but the platform is there. As they grow those things they should take each piece and make it better. If you start with a good platform and you build it up, it's going to get better. What we have today is very usable, and is only going to get better. I look forward to it."

"UiPath support needs to be a bit quicker than it is currently."

"UiPath is quite expensive compared to Power Automate. That's the main difference, and we have to purchase a new license for every feature."

"The dashboard view could be more visually appealing. Dashboards in any software should stand out with colors, numbers, and other things, but in UiPath, the dashboard is not that visually appealing. The UiPath team could make it more visually appealing for us to get more insights."

"I would like more flexibility during recording and debugging because currently, when UiPath is in debug mode, we cannot make any changes."

More UiPath Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a yearly license."

"An area for improvement comes down to licensing. We need to sell UiPath to our company first... If we could have more of a trial period, since we're already licensed with Studio, and go through that trial period for key applications to see if they can benefit us, that would be helpful."

"This solution is priced less compared with other products."

"Compared to other automation tools, UiPath is expensive."

"It costs much less and it does much more than the competitors' solutions."

"Right now we only have a couple of Studio licenses and a couple of bots, so we're at about $8,000 USD per year."

"When I started with UiPath, there was a desktop model, and we did not have to purchase Orchestrator. Now, there is a bundle or package of Orchestrator with attended or unattended robots, so the cost is a little bit on the higher end. They are selling the Orchestrator model or the admin model. If someone wants to purchase the standalone or desktop model, they cannot do that, so the cost is on the higher side, but if we purchase more licenses, it gets reduced. If we purchase fewer licenses, it will be high."

"No matter how much you complain about the price of a SaaS product, it's still cheaper than building your own data center and other infrastructure. That's my perspective as someone who works for a company that does digital transformation. The price is cheaper than building and deploying your own solutions."

"I think the setup cost is quite nominal, but the licensing might be on a higher side when compared to Automation Anywhere."

More UiPath Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	249
Midsize Enterprise	143
Large Enterprise	667

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries

I can only speak to UiPath since that is the only RPA solution that I have used. I know that there are specific packages that you can integrate into your project that is specifically made to work w...

See all answers

RPA that Bots can run without centralized control?

Yes, Attended Bots which can run without centralized control Module. RPA Tools like Automation Anywhere, uiPath ,Power Automation they do support this.

See all answers

How do I choose between UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate?

Microsoft‌ ‌Power‌ ‌Automate‌ ‌is‌ ‌intuitive‌ ‌and‌ ‌easy‌ ‌to‌ ‌integrate‌ ‌and‌ ‌use.‌ ‌I‌ ‌like‌ ‌that‌ ‌there‌ ‌is‌ ‌no‌ ‌coding‌ ‌experience‌ ‌necessary,‌ ‌and‌ ‌appreciate‌ ‌the‌ ‌automated‌...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs ProcessMaker

Compared 37% of the time

Bonita vs ProcessMaker

Compared 15% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs ProcessMaker

Compared 14% of the time

Appian vs ProcessMaker

Compared 11% of the time

Bizagi vs ProcessMaker

Compared 9% of the time

More ProcessMaker Competitors

Microsoft Power Automate vs UiPath Platform

Compared 15% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs UiPath Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Blue Prism vs UiPath Platform

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow Automation Engine vs UiPath Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Pega Robotic Process Automation vs UiPath Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More UiPath Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

January 2026

Download ProcessMaker product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Platform

January 2026

Download UiPath Platform product report

Also Known As

ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM

UiPath Maestro, UiPath Apps, UiPath Agent Builder

Overview

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

ProcessMaker

UiPath Platform is appreciated for its user-friendly interface and extensive automation capabilities, offering seamless integration with diverse applications. Its intuitive drag-and-drop functionality enables users to design efficient workflows with minimal technical expertise.

UiPath Platform delivers a robust set of features that enhance automation and productivity. With components like Orchestrator, task management is optimized, facilitating better scalability. Users benefit from advanced AI and document understanding tools, boosting data handling accuracy and reducing errors. Despite its strengths, UiPath faces challenges with upgrading processes, AI enhancements, and user documentation. Integration and selector sensitivity issues, along with support and licensing complexities, highlight areas for potential improvement. Users request smoother deployment, error handling, and migration processes. Enhanced support for RHEL/Ubuntu, LINQ, and Lambda and improved real-time insights, automation recording, and scheduling are desired. Streamlining the experience for non-technical users with simplified workflows remains a priority.

What are the key features of UiPath Platform?

Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Allows users to design workflows easily without extensive technical skills.
Orchestrator: Enhances task management and enables scalable automation.
AI and Document Understanding: Improves data accuracy and minimizes errors.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with SAP, CRM, Oracle, and more.
Active Community and Training: UiPath Academy provides resources for skill development.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduction in manual workloads through automation of repetitive tasks.
Improved Accuracy: Enhanced data handling capabilities reduce errors.
Productivity Boost: Supports both attended and unattended automations to streamline operations.
Scalability: Ability to handle growing automation demands efficiently.
Integration Benefits: Easy integration with enterprise systems for streamlined operations.

UiPath Platform is widely implemented across sectors such as finance, healthcare, insurance, HR, IT, and supply chain to automate repetitive business tasks. Common uses include automating data entry, invoice processing, document management, report generation, and customer service operations. Organizations value the platform's ability to integrate seamlessly with systems like SAP, CRM, and Oracle, allowing for enhanced efficiency and accuracy in processing both structured and unstructured data.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube

1. Accenture 2. Deloitte 3. PwC 4. IBM 5. Capgemini 6. KPMG 7. Ernst & Young 8. Infosys 9. Cognizant 10. Wipro 11. Tata Consultancy Services 12. HCL Technologies 13. Genpact 14. Tech Mahindra 15. DXC Technology 16. Atos 17. NTT Data 18. CGI 19. L&T Infotech 20. Hexaware Technologies 21. Mindtree 22. Mphasis 23. Virtusa 24. Syntel 25. Zensar Technologies 26. WNS Global Services 27. Hexaware Technologies 28. Larsen & Toubro Infotech 29. Persistent Systems 30. QuEST Global 31. Sonata Software 32. Zensar Technologies

Buyer's Guide

ProcessMaker vs. UiPath Platform

December 2025

Free Report: ProcessMaker vs. UiPath Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about ProcessMaker vs. UiPath Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ProcessMaker vs. UiPath Platform report.

See our list of best Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies vendors.

We monitor all Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.