We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for MDM and SOTI MobiControl based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable includes managing everything from a single console."
"Intune is effective because of the configuration management and endpoint security it provides. The graphical interface makes it easier to configure and deploy devices."
"One of the most valuable aspects of Microsoft Intune is its seamless integration with Azure Active Directory, offering capabilities akin to Group Policy Objects."
"The key benefit of Intune is its integration with the Microsoft ecosystem."
"Intune enables us to manage our devices from anywhere."
"The ability to wipe data from and reset devices is one of the most important and valuable features. If a device is reported stolen, we can freeze it or wipe the data from it, preventing data leakage."
"It is a very stable and scalable cloud-only solution."
"The ability to send configurations to our systems is valuable, particularly as we don't have a regular Windows AD server. Our current environment doesn't have a Windows AD, which limits our ability to push GPOs. However, this is where the solution can step in and help us push policies."
"The user interface is user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of MobileIron UEM are tunneling and enterprise integration."
"The most valuable feature is that everything is in one place, which makes it easy to manage."
"It's effective in what it is able to achieve and it's easy to use."
"The company provides great customer service."
"The admin part, where I'm adding users, is not too bad. It's easy enough to use."
"The most valuable feature is the fact that I can manage my devices remotely."
"The most valuable feature is the remote support because there are plants here where IT staff is not present. We can use it to provide support remotely."
"SOTI's most valuable feature has to be mobile device management and visibility through the main console. There's a central dashboard that you can use to monitor the devices and keep track of usage, battery consumption, and battery life."
"It's been very stable over the past few years."
"It is very reliable, and their support is excellent."
"I've really enjoyed the use of the file sync when I'm administrating version control in my program."
"The most valuable features are remote control, remote monitoring of the mobile phone data, GPS localization, automobile network management, identity management, speaker logging, and remote management of mobile content."
"Intune's areas for improvement revolve around security and certificate management."
"We need the capabilities of the Cloud Management Gateway (CMG) to be enhanced through Intune instead of Azure."
"Intune has some limitations when it comes to application updates for third-party applications. You can schedule an update, but when it's a package setup, you need to supercede and replace it each time."
"Microsoft Intune is not user-friendly to manage and has room for improvement."
"Intune should be much more granular in terms of supporting more Android cellular devices."
"Sometimes, customers compare it with AirWatch, but the concept of Intune is different from other solutions. It's an application management app. It gets a bit difficult to explain it to customers, but it's not a product limitation. It takes a presale document or presentation to explain it to customers."
"Microsoft Intune fails a lot when it comes to device compliance."
"Sometimes, updating a client policy is very difficult. This needs to be improved."
"We would like the initial setup to be simpler."
"MobileIron UEM could improve the monitoring of devices."
"The integration between the MobileIron and Advanced Neurons isn't completely in sync, and we're still working on that."
"UI needs an upgrade, feels very outdated."
"The interface is complicated and not very easy to use."
"SOTI MobiControl's user interface is very tough to handle and should be made more user-friendly."
"I wish that I had some more tutorials and educational resources on how to use the product."
"The product’s features for managing Windows devices need improvement."
"SOTI MobiControl could improve by being more user-friendly."
"They have legacy design architecture, and sometimes the support isn't helpful."
"Adding more features for iOS devices would be an improvement."
"Its user interface needs to be improved."
"Maybe if there were tiers, it would be better as then companies could lower the pricing by going to the lower deployment model."
Ivanti Neurons for MDM is ranked 5th in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 5 reviews while SOTI MobiControl is ranked 5th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 46 reviews. Ivanti Neurons for MDM is rated 7.4, while SOTI MobiControl is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for MDM writes "Feature-rich, easy to use, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SOTI MobiControl writes "Provides enterprise mobility and remote control mobile device management". Ivanti Neurons for MDM is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, Ivanti Avalanche, IBM MaaS360 and Sophos Mobile, whereas SOTI MobiControl is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, 42Gears SureMDM, Jamf Pro, IBM MaaS360 and JumpCloud. See our Ivanti Neurons for MDM vs. SOTI MobiControl report.
We monitor all UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.