Cegid vs SAP SuccessFactors comparison

Cegid and SAP are both solutions in the Cloud HCM category. Cegid is ranked #18 with an average rating of 6.5, while SAP is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8. Cegid holds a 1.6% mindshare in CHCM, compared to SAP’s 10.5% mindshare. Additionally, 78% of Cegid users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Cegid

Read 14 Cegid reviews

1,167 Views
782 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

SAP SuccessFactors

Read 100 SAP SuccessFactors reviews

9,476 Views
7,012 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Cegid

SAP SuccessFactors

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

SAP SuccessFactors and Cegid are prominent players in the HR solutions category. SuccessFactors, with its strength in talent management and analytics, seems to have an edge in comprehensive HR integration.

Features: SAP SuccessFactors offers a comprehensive suite covering the entire employee lifecycle and excelling in talent management and analytics. Its modular setup allows flexible implementation, and it integrates AI and collaboration tools effectively. Cegid is distinguished by its robust Learning Management System (LMS) capabilities and detailed HR functionalities, with a strong focus on user adaptability and customizable HR processes.

Room for Improvement: SuccessFactors could enhance analytics capabilities and streamline module integration across regions while expanding customization options and refining user experience. Cegid's e-Mind product has limitations due to legacy status, suggesting a shift to PeopleNet. Better localization in certain regions and improvements in reporting and implementation processes would be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SuccessFactors is primarily cloud-based, which simplifies deployment, though technical support varies in quality depending on the model and partners. Cegid focuses on on-premise and private cloud installations and provides dedicated support, resolving issues effectively without major escalations.

Pricing and ROI: SuccessFactors' pricing is based on users and modules, generally considered high, but it promises significant enterprise value and ROI through automation and scalability. Cegid offers competitive pricing, especially for large user bases, providing cost efficiency compared to competitors and substantial ROI for larger implementations.

To learn more, read our detailed Cegid vs. SAP SuccessFactors Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cegid vs. SAP SuccessFactors

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,160 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cegid

Ranking in Talent Management

17th

Ranking in Cloud HCM

18th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP SuccessFactors

Ranking in Talent Management

1st

Ranking in Cloud HCM

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

100

Ranking in other categories

Talent Acquisition (1st), Global Payroll (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Cloud HCM category, the mindshare of Cegid is 1.6%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP SuccessFactors is 10.5%, down from 22.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud HCM Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SAP SuccessFactors	10.5%
Cegid	1.6%
Other	87.9%

Cloud HCM

Featured Reviews

Project Manager, HRIS

Project Manager, HRIS at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Optimize talent management with modular features but needs better reporting

There are difficulties regarding the reporting part. While we have some reporting functionalities, they are not powerful or deep. For instance, the coverage report on a specific effective date provides data effective on the day of the report, which is a significant limitation. Additionally, the available APIs, both inbound and outbound, are not well-developed, preventing the creation of accurate interfaces with other systems. There is also a need to review the reporting infrastructure to build a data lake that would allow customers to access data regardless of the effective date of the information. Moreover, the silos between the different modules need to be removed. Ideally, one would want a report that provides information at the same time from performance and compensation.

Read full review

Saptak Samadder

Assistant Manager at Kashiv Biosciences

HR has gained clear analytics for attrition, goals, and appraisals and manages talent efficiently

SAP SuccessFactors has a low error rate. We had many ad hoc reports that we needed to generate, and it was very easy to do so in SAP SuccessFactors. We also created many in-house reports according to our specific requirements with the help of this tool, which was a really big game changer for us. We did not depend on advanced Excel in those cases. We generated a lot of detailed reports whenever we needed them during emergency cases or board meetings. A lot of usefulness and time were saved in those cases. I will also mention that we conducted a comparative study for some recruitment cases. We had a recruitment model where we were looking for a very niche profile. Since the job profile was really different and rare, we had to depend on analytics to understand and shortlist from a large pool of candidates that we already had in our database. Analytics was really helpful in this situation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Performance appraisal might be the most valuable feature for us."

"From the HR side, the most valuable features are the Learning Management Systems (LMS) that allow providing a personalized service in terms of development, where each employee can choose and architect their development plans."

"The performance appraisal is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable features of Meta4 are payroll and resource recruitment. However, all of the features in the human resource system are useful."

"The solution is very helpful as it allows us to optimize and consolidate all the data for talent management."

"The most valuable feature is you can customize every type of payroll calculation that you have."

"The support team were friendly and work in a systematic way. When contacting support you are able to add a level of priority to your case which is always respected by their team."

"The solution has a great payroll engine."

More Cegid pros

"This solution has automatic linking and reporting features. Upgrades are hassle-free because you don't need to change everything from scratch, when compared to Meta4."

"SAP SuccessFactors is stable, we have not found any bugs or glitches."

"The most valuable features of SAP SuccessFactors are onboarding, recruiting, marketing, and performance."

"The performance of the solution is very good."

"What I like most about SAP SuccessFactors are its recruiting and compensation features."

"The cloud security and the correct features for payroll calculations, once issues are resolved, are valuable aspects of this product."

"This solution can be used for reporting related to employee information and contacts"

"The interface is user-friendly. It is very simple and intuitive, so it's good."

More SAP SuccessFactors pros

Cons

"The first response usually lacks depth, and if it were just an HR user submitting tickets, the outcome might be poor."

"The solution is a little bit slow."

"The HR portal, training model, and development career model could all use improvement. Stability and scalability should be improved as well."

"There are difficulties regarding the reporting part."

"training and performance could be improved."

"There is room for improvements, such as including AI solutions for people management to improve job descriptions, recruitment reels, skills mapping, etc."

"The user interface could be improved and the maintenance is complex when it comes to upgrades."

"The HR portal, training model, and the development career model all need improvement."

More Cegid cons

"It's a bit complicated to make a change in the tool... It is time-consuming."

"Integration between Employee Central and Compensation in SAP SuccessFactors is one area of the solution that has room for improvement."

"LMS, Learning Management Systems, needs improvement because there were some stability problems."

"The solution is quite expensive."

"The solution needs more localization, especially for the Middle East and Russia."

"Its overall integration and user experience can be improved. SuccessFactors is a system that is built out of three different systems. The elements part was bought from Plateau, and the original performance dialogue was built by SuccessFactors itself. After that, SAP bought it, and it hasn't improved in the last few years. SuccessFactors is a perfect tool if you use it the way it is meant to be, but if you start building custom sessions and try to use it differently, then it is a total mess. It is not agile. It is like an old Mastodon truck or whatever. We don't have the Employee Central and Competence Management modules. Our company made the choice to not implement the Employee Central module. We also didn't implement the Competence Management module. We use the learning module to do some competence management, but I am not that fond of it. It would have been best to have the whole suite. SAP should never sell this without selling the whole suite because it just doesn't work. The biggest gain for me would be having the possibility of doing strategic personnel planning and managing internal mobility. If it could be used for social purposes, such as creating communities and connecting with media channels, that would be perfect. It should also have the possibilities for local admin and agile product development."

"There's room for improvement in SAP SuccessFactors, particularly in terms of innovation. I'd like more flexibility in its functionality and more customization. In terms of what additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the product, it depends on the module because you have various modules in SAP SuccessFactors, so it's easier to go module by module and understand what features you have in each module. The product has a lot of features coming up, but the product being more mobile, or having mobile features would be nice."

"There is room for improvement in licensing model."

More SAP SuccessFactors cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Meta4 requires annual maintenance that needs to be paid for."

"From a cost perspective, I think this is a well-balanced option."

"Due to the way in which we purchased SuccessFactors as a module along with other SAP modules, we were able to procure it at a slightly better price than usual. I would rate their pricing 5/5 stars."

"For SAP, the product is pricey, both CAPEX and the OPEX. It's something that could be improved."

"It could be cheaper."

"If you go by best practices and do it right from the outset, the setup won't be a costly endeavor. In terms of setup, there is a lot of flexibility compared to three years ago."

"We don't utilize even half of the licenses because not everyone uses them. With SAP SuccessFactors, though, we're now conducting all our performance evaluations within the system, so I suppose we're making better use of those licenses. As for SAP for employee services and internal benefits processing, we do have licenses for those but don't utilize them."

"We are on an annual subscription to use SAP SuccessFactors. The pricing model is something that they could restructure a bit better. If it was based differently on the type of usage it would help."

"Probably, it is one of the priciest products, and is very costly to put up and maintain but because it is a good solution end to end, people take it."

"Our costs for the solution are subsidized by our parent company, I am not aware of the exact cost because of this. However, we pay $50,000 annually. If we move to another solution it will be more expensive."

More SAP SuccessFactors pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud HCM solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,160 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Retailer

17%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	69

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Cegid?

I would recommend Cegid for a small company. I rate the overall solution a six out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cegid?

The solution is very reasonably priced.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cegid?

See all answers

What are the biggest differences between Workday, Oracle Cloud and SAP SuccessFactors?

Differences between Workday, Oracle Cloud,w and SAP SuccessFactors:w Oracle: "simple interface and deep customization to suit the purpose." SAP: Multiple functionalities that increase process effi...

See all answers

What is better, SAP HCM or SAP SuccessFactors?

When it comes to user experience, SuccessFactors is unquestionably superior, as it provides end users with a new experience and an advanced user interface. Additionally, the entire concept of SF is...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP SuccessFactors?

The tool is easy to use for performance management. We haven't experienced any issues with SAP SuccessFactors for performance management, which is great. However, since we're still learning to use ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Workday vs Cegid

Compared 13% of the time

SAP HCM vs Cegid

Compared 10% of the time

Dayforce HCM vs Cegid

Compared 8% of the time

UKG vs Cegid

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle HCM Cloud vs Cegid

Compared 7% of the time

More Cegid Competitors

Workday vs SAP SuccessFactors

Compared 25% of the time

Oracle HCM Cloud vs SAP SuccessFactors

Compared 17% of the time

SAP HCM vs SAP SuccessFactors

Compared 9% of the time

Awardco vs SAP SuccessFactors

Compared 7% of the time

UKG vs SAP SuccessFactors

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP SuccessFactors Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cegid

February 2026

Download Cegid product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP SuccessFactors

January 2026

Download SAP SuccessFactors product report

Also Known As

TalentSoft, Meta4

SuccessFactors

Overview

We create innovative, purposeful business management solutions, designed to help professionals in retail and HR (pay and talent management), payroll, tax and CPAs, achieve their goals and make more possible.

Cegid

SAP SuccessFactors is an AI-powered, cloud-based HR suite supporting over 100 countries, providing real-time insights and integrated solutions across core HR, payroll, talent, learning, analytics, and employee experience.

Trusted by over 10,000 organizations, SAP SuccessFactors elevates people processes, decisions, and experiences by empowering employees. It offers AI-driven tools enhancing self-service, learning, performance, and development, unifying people and skills data to align talents with business goals. The platform ensures compliance with legal updates and speeds up results using HR best practices and a robust partner network. Its modular design, seamless integration, and mobile access stand out, supporting global accessibility and talent management. Role-based permissions and automated compliance offer flexibility and security, catering to diverse industries.

What are the most important features of SAP SuccessFactors?

Performance and Goal Management: Facilitates setting and tracking employee objectives.
Employee Lifecycle Management: Streamlines employee processes from recruitment to exit.
Learning Management: Promotes continuous learning and development.
Real-Time Reporting: Provides instant insights into HR data.

What benefits should users look for in SAP SuccessFactors reviews?

Increased Productivity: AI-driven tools enhance workforce agility.
Talent Alignment: Unifying skills data aligns workforce with business priorities.
Compliance Assurance: Regular updates ensure legal and regulatory adherence.
Global Accessibility: Cloud-based platform supports cross-geography management.

Organizations implement SAP SuccessFactors for Performance Management, Talent Acquisition, Learning, and HR core functions, streamlining recruitment, onboarding, records management, goal setting, and performance evaluation. It extends to time management, compensation, and talent development, integrating across geographies for centralized data management, reporting, and analytics, enhancing HR operations and employee engagement.

SAP

Sample Customers

Aeroports de Paris, Arkadin, Ingenico Payment Services, Bollor_ Group, Bull, FDJ, Limagrain

City of Cape Town, ADAMA Agricultural Solutions Ltd., TransAlta Corporation, Keolis, PT XL Axiata Tbk, National Football League (NFL), Plan International, Yoh, A Day & Zimmermann Company, China Talent Group (CTG TMO), Umicore S.A., Butterfield Bank, Skril

Buyer's Guide

Cegid vs. SAP SuccessFactors

January 2026

Free Report: Cegid vs. SAP SuccessFactors

Find out what your peers are saying about Cegid vs. SAP SuccessFactors and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,160 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cegid vs. SAP SuccessFactors report.

See our list of best Cloud HCM vendors and best Talent Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud HCM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.