Infor LN vs Microsoft Dynamics GP comparison

Infor and Microsoft are both solutions in the ERP category. Infor is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while Microsoft is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.7. Infor holds a 2.1% mindshare in ERP, compared to Microsoft’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Infor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Infor LN

Read 32 Infor LN reviews

4,540 Views
4,358 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Read 25 Microsoft Dynamics GP reviews

2,490 Views
2,415 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Infor LN

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Dynamics GP and Infor LN are competing in the ERP market. Infor LN seems to have an upper hand for large-scale enterprises due to its advanced industry-specific capabilities and operational tools.

Features: Microsoft Dynamics GP is valued for its accounting and financial modules, supply chain management, and integration with Microsoft applications. Infor LN provides robust manufacturing features, industry-specific capabilities, and advanced operational tools, making it suitable for complex organizational needs.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Dynamics GP could enhance its flexibility in customization and reporting capabilities. Infor LN might improve user-friendliness and ease of initial setup while offering clearer documentation for targeted industries.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Dynamics GP is straightforward to deploy, especially for businesses using Microsoft products, and benefits from an extensive partner network. Infor LN provides customizable deployment for larger integrations and offers dedicated service teams for support.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Dynamics GP offers affordability for small to mid-sized businesses with quicker ROI. Infor LN has higher initial costs but justifies them with extensive features that potentially offer greater ROI for large enterprises with advanced needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Infor LN vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Infor LN vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infor LN

Ranking in ERP

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Ranking in ERP

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor LN is 2.1%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics GP is 1.4%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Infor LN	2.1%
Microsoft Dynamics GP	1.4%
Other	96.5%

ERP

Featured Reviews

reviewer2123580

Infor Ln Manufacturing Consultant at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Cloud deployment has streamlined complex manufacturing projects and supports faster implementations

The workflow configuration, alert configuration, and report designing could be a bit easier. It is easy now, but it needs some technical guidance in terms of writing code, fixing it, and making it more flexible for users. The improvement needed in this area is around twenty percent. Seventy to eighty percent is user-friendly, but if Infor can put more energies into making this easier, that would be beneficial. Extensions and any customizations are also a bit technical. If they can make it a simple drag and drop, low code or no code method, it would be easier. Another area for improvement is AI integration. As we are in the AI era, Infor is putting energies into integrating AI within the application, but they are still in progress. If AI can be integrated so that customers or users can interact with it, that would be beneficial. If users want any information from the system or application, it should be a chat-based, user-friendly interaction so that they can get insights in real time. AI integration would add an advantage on a greater level, and Infor should focus on this improvement area.

Read full review

reviewer2723988

Executive Director, Digital & Technology at a tech consulting company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integration and flexibility deliver outstanding business experiences with innovative platforms enhancements

Scale is a primary concern. If the product vision continues to serve small and mid-cap companies, they need to continue incorporating features into the out-of-the-box solution because small-caps typically lack budget for in-house IT organizations to customize and maintain systems. If they want to expand beyond mid-cap and enter the large-cap market, they need to consider balance and provide more customizability. This includes extending process flows through more APIs and building a more modular architecture with granular backend exposed via API. The process layer should allow clients to customize while invoking back-office APIs. The general perception positions Microsoft Dynamics GP in the middle of the market. Systems such as NetSuite and ServiceNow occupy the lower category, providing narrow use cases. Microsoft Dynamics GP offers more breadth and out-of-the-box capabilities at a slightly higher price point. At the top end, SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce offer extensive customizability at a premium price, suitable for large organizations with multiple transactions and customers. Microsoft Dynamics GP currently occupies a favorable position in the middle segment with limited competition.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We like the recent customization features that Infor is providing, such as extensibility, which do not impact on version upgrades."

"It's not too hard to handle the initial setup."

"Customer service and support are very good."

"With Infor LN, many of the processes have been streamlined because it has a central repository of all the data."

"The product is highly scalable but setup is a bit complicated."

"Material planning and predictive planning are both essential aspects."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The project module is the best that I've ever seen, and more than that, it's the company's flexibility to change. It means that in our company, Infor LN has the capability to support many kinds of industries."

More Infor LN pros

"Customer service is very good and technical support is very good."

"It helps to streamline and automate their accounting processes."

"Microsoft Dynamics GP has strong out-of-the-box reporting capabilities, and its integration with Office 365, Power Apps, and Power Platform provides great additional benefits, helping deliver better experiences to employees and customers."

"We have not encountered any noteworthy scalability issues; it’s a matter of increasing the power of the servers and hardware/software that it runs on."

"User-friendly: A key factor for a financial application Helps my company a lot"

"The initial setup was very easy; you do not need a lot of technical in-depth knowledge to handle the implementation, and the stability is reliable."

"It is a tried and tested ERP system which if used correctly, is definitely a very good program for managing all aspects of a business from customer sales, and receivables management, to payable management and finance reporting. So, it's super critical for any mid-sized company."

"Microsoft Dynamics GP has supported our compliance with industry regulations completely."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP pros

Cons

"The following need improvement: Standard beautiful looking reports - most reports have too much content and often need to be customized for user friendly presentations."

"The workflow configuration, alert configuration, and report designing could be a bit easier."

"One area that could be improved in Omada Access Points is team communication."

"The user interface needs to be improved."

"The user interface of Infor LN could be more intuitive for common users. Sometimes, it is necessary to have an expert for connections."

"The tool is expensive. It needs to refine its planning details."

"In general, the HR-related part of Infor LN doesn't work properly in Germany, making it an area that requires improvement."

"My rating considers user experience, missing advanced scheduling and sequential product configurator."

More Infor LN cons

"Budget commitment and an easy way to import transactions into bank management. Reconcile to GL tool should also incorporate bank management transactions."

"There should also be extra redundancy when posting to modules. We use different sets of books such as CashBook and CheckBooks therefore if I select the wrong one the solution allows the transaction to just pass without warning."

"As for room for improvement, they have different modules, project and analytical accounting, but it will be good to have that kind of part in the standard package. To have that additional reporting functionality where you can add an attribute or something, which you can report again. So you can analyze the cost by not just natural accounts but also by a project, without having to go through another module edit on top and then the other module edit on top. The more modules you add, sometimes it doesn't work that well. Additionally, it would be easier to have the solution on the cloud. That's our consideration. We are trying to move all our systems to the cloud, and GP is one of them that we are going to move in the next couple of years. I would rate the solution seven or seven point five out of ten."

"I would rate technical support for Microsoft Dynamics GP on a scale of 1 to 10 as six or five maximum."

"Scale is a primary concern. If the product vision continues to serve small and mid-cap companies, they need to continue incorporating features into the out-of-the-box solution because small-caps typically lack budget for in-house IT organizations to customize and maintain systems."

"Dynamics GP could be improved in terms of its usability and modernization."

"Not quite all the reports are fully exportable to Excel."

"The issue we're encountering is that it's primarily designed for independent installations and not initially structured as a cloud-based solution, which has led to challenges with connectivity."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would say that Infor's pricing is competitive compared to other ERP solutions available in the market, such as SAP and Oracle."

"The tool’s AMC and support are given on a yearly basis. You need to make monthly payments for support."

"Only people who undergo training from the companies can learn about Infor products."

"The cost is somewhat high."

"If you use Infor LN in Infor CloudSuite, there is a need to make an early payment for a license, which is approximately 2,500 EUR."

"The standard pricing is two thousand per year per user. There are no additional costs."

"Infor LN is a free solution, and everything is included in the package, such as add-ons."

"The price of the solution can vary."

More Infor LN pricing and cost advice

"I would say that the pricing is moderate, not cheap, and not expensive. There are many more expensive ERPs than GP, and there are less expensive as well, so it is moderately priced."

"For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."

"The solution's price is steep."

"We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support."

"I think the tool is competitively priced and it's more of a one-time investment with a low annual renewal fee."

"In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective."

"Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft."

"It is an affordable solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

25%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infor LN?

Infor LN is cost-effective when compared to solutions like SAP.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Infor LN?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor LN?

I am a user of Infor and occasionally use Salesforce as well. I have been using Infor for close to a decade. I am a consultant, specifically an implementation consultant where I implement Infor LN....

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

D365 BC licensing SAAS model with subscription ranging $70/User/Month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics GP?

One area we’d like to see improved is cloud modernization and integration. Dynamics GP has been reliable for many businesses, but stronger native cloud capabilities, automation, AI, and easier inte...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

I have implemented Microsoft Dynamics GP in commercial and public sector organizations. In commercial pharma life sciences, Salesforce Veeva implementation supports commercial organizations doing p...

See all answers

Comparisons

Infor CloudSuite vs Infor LN

Compared 14% of the time

Infor LX vs Infor LN

Compared 14% of the time

Infor M3 vs Infor LN

Compared 13% of the time

SAP ERP vs Infor LN

Compared 13% of the time

Infor VISUAL vs Infor LN

Compared 9% of the time

More Infor LN Competitors

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 18% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 16% of the time

SAP ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 6% of the time

Sage MAS vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 6% of the time

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics GP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infor LN

August 2026

Download Infor LN product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP

August 2026

Download Microsoft Dynamics GP product report

Also Known As

Infor ERP LN

Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP

Overview

Infor LN offers advanced production planning and manufacturing capabilities with seamless cloud integration and multicurrency support. It is ideal for mid-sized and large companies looking for integrated operations across finance, logistics, and manufacturing.

Infor LN provides customization and extensibility features, enhancing adaptability for various industries such as aerospace and defense. It enables multinational operations with pre-configured industry-specific accelerators, a recognized user-friendly interface, and robust analytics. While it supports manufacturing, finance, procurement, and CRM across electronics, automotive, and other industries, Infor LN requires improvements in interface simplicity, role setup, and comprehensive planning capabilities. Users find the cloud migration process can be smoother, with better learning resources and community support. Enhancements in automation, AI, and reporting functionalities are needed to fully optimize performance.

What are the key features of Infor LN?

Production Planning: Supports efficient scheduling and management in manufacturing.
Cloud Integration: Ensures seamless transition and operation in cloud environments.
Multicurrency Support: Facilitates smooth financial transactions across different currencies.
Customization and Extensibility: Allows tailored modifications to meet specific needs.
Industry-Specific Modules: Tailors functionalities to specific sectors like aerospace and defense.
Analytics and Dashboards: Provides real-time insights for informed decision-making.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating Infor LN?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines end-to-end processes like sales and distribution.
Enhanced Multinational Operations: Supports large-scale, multi-site logistics.
Integrated Financial Management: Offers comprehensive tools for financial oversight.
Scalability: Accommodates growth from mid-sized to large enterprises.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and task management.

Infor LN is primarily used by companies in manufacturing, finance, procurement, and CRM, excelling in electronics, automotive, and aerospace industries. It effectively supports multi-site logistics and operations, handling processes such as sales, distribution, and supply chain management. Companies benefit from its capabilities in project, vendor, and complex product management, with the option to transition towards cloud-based systems as needed.

Infor

Microsoft Dynamics GP is a comprehensive business management solution providing financial control, accounting features, and extensive reporting. It is built to support small to midsize companies offering reliable stability and simplicity in setup.

Microsoft Dynamics GP integrates with Microsoft Office and supports a range of business operations including financials, sales, and inventory management. Despite its strong functionality in financial reporting and analytics, it faces challenges with its outdated interface and limited cloud capabilities. Companies can enhance the system's functionality through Power Apps and Power Platform alongside third-party add-ons. While it is known for its financial stability and user-friendly navigation, improving integration and scalability remains a priority.

What are some key features?

Financial Control: Strong capabilities in accounting and compliance support.
Extensive Reporting: Provides customizable reporting and analytics options.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with Microsoft Office and other systems.
Core Modules: Includes financials, sales, inventory management, and analytics.
Customization: Offers customizable solutions with third-party add-ons.

What benefits do businesses expect?

Reliable Stability: Offers easy setup and dependable performance.
User Navigation: Known for user-friendly interfaces.
Supportive Community: Access a strong network for guidance and collaboration.
Data Accuracy: Enhance data management with Smart Place features.

Many companies use Microsoft Dynamics GP as their primary accounting and financial management platform, supporting accounts payable, receivable, payroll, and inventory management. The integration capabilities allow it to serve as an ERP for small to midsize entities, facilitating additional functionalities in logistics, HR, warehouse operations, and more.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

LTH Castings, Gloucester Engineering, Gorman-Rupp, Computer Designs, Instrument Technology, GWA Group Limited, PRIDE Industries, CAV Aerospace, New Scale Technologies Inc.

Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall

Buyer's Guide

Infor LN vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

August 2026

Free Report: Infor LN vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

Find out what your peers are saying about Infor LN vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infor LN vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.