We performed a comparison between IBM Business Automation Workflow and Informatica Business Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."No matter what somebody's technical experience level is, the tool can start adding value immediately. Even if that is just an analyst who doesn't have any technical background, they can use some of these no quote accelerators to get things from ideation to deployment in a matter of minutes."
"It is the only product that includes capture content management and a process suite, as well as rules in RPA."
"The business process modeling is the most valuable feature."
"IBM has spent a lot of time on the connections between the rules engine and its other product, the core BPM platform. They've really centralized the suite as one offering now."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow provides a seamless streamlined collaboration within the organizations."
"The solution reduces the time to the resolution which is essential for businesses."
"It provides a solution for integration orchestration. This solution is for any organization in the banking, telecommunications, healthcare, manufacturing, and all domains and industries."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is the fact it is highly configurable. We can do configurations very easily."
"I know that there are two good features, APN and ServiceNow but we haven't explored all of its features yet."
"There isn't any human touch involved. It's just an automated business process to build different applications and talking to various APIs using the client's ecosystems. We then build new functionalities out of it."
"Informatica Business Process Manager is easy to use and learn."
"Integrating the solution with existing systems can be complicated and it needs careful planning and execution."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow can improve UI flexibility and integration. Additionally, the solutions from IBM have to provide a paperless solution, allowing for digital versions of documents."
"The SCADA Systems are very sophisticated and have a hard time integrating with our older scales. The technical support in regards to the partner side needs some improvement."
"I feel that the features are not user-friendly."
"In terms of improvement, it could be less complex."
"The setup and installation process could be made easier."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is not a very user-friendly solution."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow could improve the integration."
"I need to have some insight into the tool's cloud capabilities."
"We haven't had many technical issues. We don't use all of the components of the tool that are more complex and error-prone."
More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while Informatica Business Process Manager is ranked 20th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6, while Informatica Business Process Manager is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Good for case management, integration capabilities but lacks stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Business Process Manager writes "An easy-to-use solution for ETL purposes ". IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda, Apache Airflow, AWS Step Functions and IBM Case Foundation, whereas Informatica Business Process Manager is most compared with Apache Airflow, Camunda, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms and Oracle BPM.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.