IBM Business Automation Workflow vs Informatica Business Process Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Business Automation Workflow and Informatica Business Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: November 2022).
655,113 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "When you compare with Laserfiche and M-Files, IBM is expensive."
  • "Licensing varies by use-case."
  • "IBM Business Automation Workflow has a flexible pricing mode, but the price is expensive. The price of the solution reflects the quality of the solution which is very high. The technical support is an additional cost."
  • More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    655,113 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We researched both IBM solutions and in the end, we chose Business Automation Workflow. IBM BPM has a good user interface and the BPM coach is a helpful tool. The API is very useful in providing… more »
    Top Answer:The ease of use for the front end within IBM is most valuable. It is a quick win for creating any process because IBM supports proprietary screen building.
    Top Answer:Its price is all right. It is a yearly contract. It needs to be renewed every year.
    Top Answer:There isn't any human touch involved. It's just an automated business process to build different applications and talking to various APIs using the client's ecosystems. We then build new… more »
    Top Answer:We don't use all of the features like Human workflow. Moreover for build human workflow application would prefer products like Appian and Service. Would like to this tool to enable features like BAM… more »
    Top Answer:Our primary use case is to build composite applications for our clients and to automate the business processes. We build new automation applications out of it
    Ranking
    Views
    5,396
    Comparisons
    4,301
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    356
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    1,082
    Comparisons
    967
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Business Automation Workflow
    ActiveVOS, Active Endpoints, Informatica BPM
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM Business Automation Workflow combines business process management and case management capabilities in one workflow solution. It integrates the capabilities of business process and case management into a single workflow offering. It unites information, process, and users to provide a 360-degree view of work to drive more successful optimized business outcomes. IBM Business Automation Workflow on Cloud provides the same capabilities that are offered in the IBM Business Automation Workflow offering, all within a ready-to-use, cloud-based environment that is hosted in IBM Cloud data centers and managed by IBM.

    Informatica Business Process Manager enables process automation and application integration (formerly called ActiveVOS) that integrates users, systems, and processes via purpose-built tools that both citizen integrators and developers can use.
    Offer
    Learn more about IBM Business Automation Workflow
    Learn more about Informatica Business Process Manager
    Sample Customers
    Key Bank, Barclays, Control€xpert, MIR Insurance Brokers, Conqord Oil
    The Travel Company, Carbonite
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm70%
    Engineering Company10%
    Government10%
    Computer Software Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Insurance Company9%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Insurance Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise73%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Management (BPM)
    November 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: November 2022.
    655,113 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 11th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 5 reviews while Informatica Business Process Manager is ranked 39th in Business Process Management (BPM). IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 8.2, while Informatica Business Process Manager is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Low-code, customizable solution for asset management". On the other hand, IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Apache Airflow, Camunda Platform, IBM Case Foundation and Pega BPM, whereas Informatica Business Process Manager is most compared with Apache Airflow, Camunda Platform, Pega BPM, Everest Blueriq and Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.