"Provides visibility into the performance uptime."
"I like the monitoring feature."
"Google's technical support is very good."
"The simplicity of the dashboard is very good."
"Working with the solution is very easy. It's user-friendly."
"The service maps that it creates, the health maps that it creates, the insights that it provides, etc., are all quite useful."
"The breakdown of the response time of different components and getting in-depth details of the slow component are the most valuable features. It is easy to use, and it gets the job done."
"The most valuable feature is application monitoring."
"The monitoring so far has been good and we are happy with it."
"The VPN is one of the solution's most valuable features for us."
"It does everything we wanted it to do."
"While we are satisfied with the overall performance, in certain cases we must add additional metrics and additional tools like Grafana and Dynatrace."
"It could be more stable."
"Lacking sufficient operations documentation."
"There has been some problem with the agent, and it is just not working well. It is not able to record information with the application server. They have been able to fix the issue, but it took quite a long time. This is the main issue in the APM products and also in New Relic. The mobile application monitoring has been pretty difficult to set up and also quite expensive. It should be a little bit easier and cheaper. Because it is pretty difficult and expensive, many customers don't take it."
"The product has good documentation for Linux, however, their documentation for Windows is lacking substantially. It's something they need to develop."
"They should bring the pricing down to be more competitive."
"The solution could improve by having more network monitoring features, such as for all the infrastructure."
"How granular I could go down at looking at certain data, especially related to the operations, is limited."
"New Relic APM can improve the information when we dig deeper to check a problem. There should be more detailed information provided."
"I haven't come across any features that are lacking."
"The older view is much better than the new view that they have. We'd like to go back to that previous version. The user interface just isn't as nice as it used to be."
Google Stackdriver is ranked 17th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 3 reviews while New Relic APM is ranked 4th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 10 reviews. Google Stackdriver is rated 8.0, while New Relic APM is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Google Stackdriver writes "Provides visibility into the performance uptime and the overall health of our cloud applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic APM writes "Useful service map feature and reasonably priced but the visibility can be improved". Google Stackdriver is most compared with Azure Monitor, AWS X-Ray, Datadog, Elastic Security and Splunk, whereas New Relic APM is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Azure Monitor, Splunk and New Relic Browser. See our Google Stackdriver vs. New Relic APM report.
See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
