Entuity vs ManageEngine OpManager comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Park Place Technologies and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Park Place Technologies is ranked #68, while ManageEngine is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3. Park Place Technologies holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Park Place Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Entuity

Read 11 Entuity reviews

3,427 Views
3,256 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 56 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

8,498 Views
8,158 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

Entuity

ManageEngine OpManager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine OpManager and Entuity are key players in the network monitoring software market, with ManageEngine OpManager having an upper hand due to its affordability and ease of deployment, especially for smaller environments.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager is known for effective device and network monitoring, automation, alerting, and reporting capabilities, allowing proactive system management with customizable threshold settings. Entuity shines with advanced network mapping, application-level monitoring, and superb integration capabilities, complemented by clear visualization of network components and traffic patterns.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager needs better stability during upgrades, enhanced artificial intelligence features, and a simpler user interface. Its backup solutions also need simplification. Entuity should work on integration with other tools, improve device configuration retrieval, and support more recent technologies and devices. Enhancing the SLA dashboard and network mapping logging features is also recommended for Entuity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both ManageEngine OpManager and Entuity primarily offer on-premises deployment. Users report ManageEngine OpManager is easier to deploy in smaller environments, while Entuity's setup process is intuitive. For customer service, ManageEngine OpManager receives praise for responsive support, with noted areas for improvement in consistency and communication. Entuity is recognized for excellent customer service with rapid and effective technical support but could improve on 24/7 availability.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager is seen as a more cost-effective option, offering various licensing models with available discounts for larger purchases, ensuring a quick return on investment through operational efficiency and cost savings. Entuity, although perceived as expensive, provides valuable features justified by the pricing. User feedback indicates differing ROI levels based on organizational needs and usage, but both options generally deliver satisfactory returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Entuity vs. ManageEngine OpManager Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Entuity vs. ManageEngine OpManager

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Entuity

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

68th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Entuity is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ManageEngine OpManager	1.4%
Entuity	0.6%
Other	98.0%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

A good solution for network monitoring and support management, but there is no centralized database

There is no centralized database. It is an issue if you use a local database and have multiple borders. However, if you have an external database, you can keep the same old data from an old border up to 100 borders. In addition, if we want to create an ABI or use an ABI to connect data, there is no competition when we ask for support. If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service. Other competitors like Micro Focus, a network management system, have a new supportability matrix in the market every quarter.

Read full review

Llahir Albar

Technical Solution Specialist at Crypto-gen

Has helped centrally manage users and assets while making operational tasks more efficient

The main drawback is there is less documentation available, both public documentation and partner-available documentation. The learning materials are very limited, and there is also a limitation of support SLA. It takes a huge amount of time to resolve certain issues when ManageEngine OpManager technical support gets involved. The expertise of support is limited. Reporting could be improved with more details. The content and richness can be improved on the reports. To make ManageEngine OpManager a better product, the first priority is improving the after-sales support and learning materials for local engineers and partners to enhance their capacities and expertise. The second priority is improving the product itself, including dashboards and reporting enrichment. Lastly, new feature adoption such as DLP or endpoint monitoring should be considered. Features that should be offered include DLP, Privileged User Access, data classification, and MDR. These are features that can be groomed around the MMS if properly configured.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We went for this solution because it comes with a lot of features; it's an all-in-one solution, which means we don't have to go for multiple solutions."

"The best thing about Entuity is that it's easy to use. It's user-friendly. It's intuitive and easy to customize as per your needs."

"I would encourage others to use Entuity, as it's powerful and user-friendly."

"This is a product that is easy to deploy and maintain with a positive end-user experience."

"We find the SurePath component of this solution to be very valuable, as it gives us the path to whatever we are configuring."

"The initial setup of Entuity is easy and the full process took approximately 30 minutes."

"I particularly like the theme and the dashboard that they have brought in this version. In the previous version, there was only a simple screen. There wasn't any dashboard. It was a simple view, but now, they have brought in a dashboard that gives the fields for the ops as well. They can get the data they want to see in a single place."

"We are able to receive a visualized monitoring of the network infrastructure which is very helpful."

More Entuity pros

"We use the solution to monitor links. It also helps us to track servers and monitor logs."

"The setup was easy."

"Alerting is the biggest asset as we can have real-time failure view and predict failures in some cases."

"The solution offers very good integration capabilities."

"Monitoring is the most valuable feature of this solution."

"We use ManageEngine OpManager to monitor our link status, latency, and errors."

"Device monitoring is a good tool of this solution."

"Concerning the ROI from ManageEngine OpManager, we're very happy and satisfied because we didn't have to pay for additional overheads, particularly because we now don't need that many admins, so we were able to save."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

Cons

"It should support IPAM or IP Address Management. When it comes to the network, IP Address Management is a feature for which we have to use a different solution. When we are managing networks, if IPAM also becomes a part of this, we do not have to look for a separate solution."

"The configuration of the logging could be improved because if someone deleted any note or inventory, or some change to the inventory, we are not able to identify which user or which administrator modifies these details. For example, there should be read-only locks on maps to prevent their deletion. This way people can only read and cannot delete that particular map."

"A typical user might want to see even more depth to the standard reporting and ease of integration."

"Entuity currently has APIs, but they are not straightforward. They are not flexible if an external system wants to communicate with Entuity or create an integration that is not available out of the box. Its APIs can be flexible so that they can be utilized for external integrations that are not available out of the box."

"Entuity can improve the fetching of device configuration. The solution uses scripts and I could not understand them or find any recourses on the internet to learn about the language that is used in the script. It could be more user-friendly and the device configuration management could be enhanced."

"We would like the backup element of this solution to be improved as, at present, it is very limited and does not have much scope for customization."

"Entuity currently has APIs, but they are not straightforward."

"In the most recent versions, Entuity has removed the Explorer navigation feature. This was very useful, and Entuity would be improved by restoring it."

More Entuity cons

"The only problem with it is that the setup isn't very intuitive."

"For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view; when I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface and get confused about which interface is connected to which endpoint."

"This solution is not suitable for enterprise-sized deployments, as it sometimes hangs and needs to be restarted."

"Needs an OVA, or more support for virtual deployments. Building a virtual instance of OpManager and OpManager Probe was a bit difficult because there was no OVA available."

"Stability regarding upgrades, sometimes impacting database issues."

"The storage level monitoring needs improvement. It needs storage level monitoring on the server itself. That feature is lacking right now."

"What I'd like ManageEngine OpManager to improve on is artificial intelligence. In particular, the machine learning feature should be integrated with the sensor flow. Doing this will give leverage, especially when you look at other products such as the Cisco DNA Center. When a switch goes down, I should be able to build on the correlation of other physical devices it's connected to so that I can integrate that with my CA CMDB. The ManageEngine OpManager team needs to draw a long-term roadmap where that feature becomes an integral part of the solution because right now, machine learning in ManageEngine OpManager is a long process. The solution doesn't have MLS search and I want to see ML being developed and applied for CA CMDB to greatly reduce the burden of tying everything. For example, if I have a data center switch that goes down now, I should know what server it's connected to, and when that switch goes down at twenty-four ports, I would get twenty-four alerts for different devices plugged in. I should be able to make a correlation that the major problem lies in the switch and not with the twenty-four elements connected to that switch. That is where machine learning should come into play and the ManageEngine OpManager AI should indicate "This is where the root of your problem is." It could be difficult, but this is a feature that should be improved or added to the solution."

"One challenge in ManageEngine OpManager is that improvements are needed because a customer using the solution has Check Point firewall and needs to monitor their VPN tunnels, but there is no option currently available for that."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have 400 licenses and we are only using 150 licenses."

"It can be comparatively expensive but that is because it is comprehensive."

"Entuity's licensing is very highly-priced."

"Entuity is not an expensive solution."

"It varies and depends on the quantity. It's worth the cost."

"The price of ManageEngine OpManager is reasonable. We have an annual license and the cost comes from how many devices are being monitored. There is not anything extra cost for maintenance and support."

"ManageEngine OpManager is cheaper than SolarWinds."

"We have a standard license for ManageEngine OpManager. We purchased the license for one year and now we are upgrading it soon."

"The product is not worth the money."

"The initial cost is low and the add-ons are reasonable."

"In terms of pricing, I would rate it a two out of five. It was expensive."

"The licensing costs depend on the number of devices and accounts that are being monitored by the solution."

"The solution's pricing is very low compared to other products."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

Based on my experience and use case, the setup cost and price of ManageEngine OpManager is good. However, if it were available in both on-premises and cloud versions, it would be more reliable for ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

ManageEngine OpManager could improve by adding network device control capabilities. The control feature would be more helpful for our operations. Currently, there is no feature for controlling inte...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine OpManager?

I am using ManageEngine OpManager for network and server reliability. We have multiple locations, so integrating all location devices in ManageEngine OpManager into one single console allows us to ...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs Entuity

Compared 19% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Entuity

Compared 13% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs Entuity

Compared 4% of the time

More Entuity Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 9% of the time

DX Spectrum vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

LibreNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

OpenNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

ScienceLogic vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 4% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Entuity

October 2026

Download Entuity product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

September 2026

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Also Known As

No data available

OpManager

Overview

Entuity offers a user-friendly interface with network mapping and integration capabilities. It provides real-time connectivity diagrams and detailed device monitoring. Automated network discovery ensures accurate topology mapping, and its updated dashboard enhances data visibility.

Entuity's focus is on network device monitoring, catering to switches, routers, access points, and firewalls. It tracks health, status, CPU, memory, and performance metrics, allowing users to set thresholds for alerts and incidents. Integration with monitoring systems enables insights and reports on connectivity and network metrics, reducing noise through event management capabilities while managing configurations and performance inventory.

What are the standout features of Entuity?

Ease of Deployment: Quickly set up with minimal effort, making it accessible for users with different technical backgrounds.
Real-Time Network Mapping: Provides live connectivity diagrams to enhance network understanding and troubleshooting.
SurePath Monitoring: Offers detailed insights into network device performance for improved oversight.
Automated Discovery: Delivers precise topology mapping for efficient network management.
Customizable Dashboard: Facilitates comprehensive data visibility tailored to specific needs.
Event Management: Streamlines alert processes to prioritize critical issues effectively.
Google API-Based Topology: Integrates with Google APIs for advanced topology visualization.

What benefits do users receive from Entuity?

Enhanced Integration: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing tools to improve functionality.
User-Friendly Interface: Enables ease of navigation and efficient management, reducing training requirements.
Stability and Updates: Continuous updates provide stable performance and feature enhancements.
Technical Support: Access to comprehensive support that aids in resolving issues promptly.

Entuity is implemented extensively in industries requiring robust network management, including telecommunications and enterprises with distributed networks. It ensures consistent monitoring and operational efficiency across locations, helping organizations maintain optimal network performance and reliability.

Park Place Technologies

ManageEngine OpManager offers real-time network performance monitoring and reporting. Known for its customizable dashboards and topology maps, it supports device monitoring and alerting, enhanced by features like Firewall Analyzer and NetFlow.

Designed for network infrastructure management, ManageEngine OpManager monitors servers, devices, applications, and security across on-premise and cloud environments. Adaptive thresholds and automation simplify proactive monitoring, while issues with dashboard design, business view enhancements, performance stability in large deployments, and licensing warrant attention. Its machine learning and AI could be more advanced. Despite these, organizations use its comprehensive dashboards for real-time insights into CPU, RAM, and disk utilization, receiving notifications for unauthorized requests or performance issues.

What are the key features of ManageEngine OpManager?

Network Reporting: Provides detailed reports for network performance.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers continuous monitoring of network parameters.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows for personalized dashboard setups for unique insights.
Topology Maps: Visualizes network layout for easier management.
Device Monitoring: Ensures all network devices are operating efficiently.
Automation: Streamlines network operations with automated tasks.
Firewall Analyzer: Enhances security measures and performance monitoring.
NetFlow: Analyzes bandwidth usage and traffic patterns.
Application Manager: Monitors server and application performance.

What benefits should users expect from ManageEngine OpManager?

Improved Network Performance: Real-time insights enhance network efficiency.
Proactive Alerts: Early warnings help address issues before they escalate.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies management with comprehensive integration features.
Scalability: Supports growth with multi-location deployment capabilities.

ManageEngine OpManager is widely implemented in industries requiring robust network infrastructure management. Companies in sectors with complex server and application needs benefit from its monitoring and alerting capabilities. Its ability to manage and provide insights across distributed locations makes it a valuable tool for enterprises operating in both on-premise and cloud environments.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Tait Communications, Vattenfall, Discovery, University of Minnesota, Pernod Ricard, Electric Car

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Buyer's Guide

Entuity vs. ManageEngine OpManager

September 2026

Free Report: Entuity vs. ManageEngine OpManager

Find out what your peers are saying about Entuity vs. ManageEngine OpManager and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Entuity vs. ManageEngine OpManager report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.