Entuity vs ManageEngine OpManager comparison

Park Place Technologies and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Park Place Technologies is ranked #67, while ManageEngine is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3. Park Place Technologies holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Park Place Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Entuity

Read 11 Entuity reviews

1,747 Views
1,625 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 56 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

4,660 Views
4,427 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

Entuity

ManageEngine OpManager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine OpManager and Entuity are key players in the network monitoring software market, with ManageEngine OpManager having an upper hand due to its affordability and ease of deployment, especially for smaller environments.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager is known for effective device and network monitoring, automation, alerting, and reporting capabilities, allowing proactive system management with customizable threshold settings. Entuity shines with advanced network mapping, application-level monitoring, and superb integration capabilities, complemented by clear visualization of network components and traffic patterns.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager needs better stability during upgrades, enhanced artificial intelligence features, and a simpler user interface. Its backup solutions also need simplification. Entuity should work on integration with other tools, improve device configuration retrieval, and support more recent technologies and devices. Enhancing the SLA dashboard and network mapping logging features is also recommended for Entuity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both ManageEngine OpManager and Entuity primarily offer on-premises deployment. Users report ManageEngine OpManager is easier to deploy in smaller environments, while Entuity's setup process is intuitive. For customer service, ManageEngine OpManager receives praise for responsive support, with noted areas for improvement in consistency and communication. Entuity is recognized for excellent customer service with rapid and effective technical support but could improve on 24/7 availability.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager is seen as a more cost-effective option, offering various licensing models with available discounts for larger purchases, ensuring a quick return on investment through operational efficiency and cost savings. Entuity, although perceived as expensive, provides valuable features justified by the pricing. User feedback indicates differing ROI levels based on organizational needs and usage, but both options generally deliver satisfactory returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Entuity vs. ManageEngine OpManager Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Entuity vs. ManageEngine OpManager

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Entuity

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

67th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Entuity is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.9%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ManageEngine OpManager	1.9%
Entuity	0.7%
Other	97.4%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

A good solution for network monitoring and support management, but there is no centralized database

There is no centralized database. It is an issue if you use a local database and have multiple borders. However, if you have an external database, you can keep the same old data from an old border up to 100 borders. In addition, if we want to create an ABI or use an ABI to connect data, there is no competition when we ask for support. If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service. Other competitors like Micro Focus, a network management system, have a new supportability matrix in the market every quarter.

Read full review

Charles A

Deputy Director at Access Healthcare Services Pvt Ltd

Reporting features improve operational efficiency while weekend support needs enhancement

Support is moderate and needs improvement, especially during weekends when technicians perform upgrades. During weekends, they need to provide more support to ensure a smooth transition. There is a call for ManageEngine OpManager to scale better in automation and AI functionality. Although the product stability is good, support enhancement is necessary to enable better planning for upgrades and maintenance activities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I particularly like the theme and the dashboard that they have brought in this version. In the previous version, there was only a simple screen. There wasn't any dashboard. It was a simple view, but now, they have brought in a dashboard that gives the fields for the ops as well. They can get the data they want to see in a single place."

"The setup was very simple and took about an hour."

"We find the SurePath component of this solution to be very valuable, as it gives us the path to whatever we are configuring."

"This is a very user friendly solution, that is good for user access, allowing deep dives into devices, system performance and more."

"Event management and the geographical Google API-based network topology are the most valuable features of Entuity."

"The initial setup of Entuity is easy and the full process took approximately 30 minutes."

"My clients have received a good return on investment."

"We went for this solution because it comes with a lot of features; it's an all-in-one solution, which means we don't have to go for multiple solutions."

More Entuity pros

"The solution's network device monitoring is the most valuable feature."

"The setup was easy."

"Defining thresholds and other alerting criteria is fairly simple and would not require a lot of training. This is very useful if you are managing a large environment."

"Managing platforms and network device virtualization on one platform is beneficial."

"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager makes it easy to monitor all the network alerts on the application."

"The most valuable feature is the monitoring alerts, as the administrators are immediately notified and can do the required action immediately, and this is the feature we value and use the most."

"The most valuable feature is the network-related reporting."

"The solution is easy to deploy. It's also easy to manage and monitor the environment. Instead of being reactive, it's proactive."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

Cons

"The configuration of the logging could be improved because if someone deleted any note or inventory, or some change to the inventory, we are not able to identify which user or which administrator modifies these details."

"In the most recent versions, Entuity has removed the Explorer navigation feature. This was very useful, and Entuity would be improved by restoring it."

"Entuity can improve the fetching of device configuration. The solution uses scripts and I could not understand them or find any recourses on the internet to learn about the language that is used in the script."

"Entuity currently has APIs, but they are not straightforward."

"It should support IPAM or IP Address Management. When it comes to the network, IP Address Management is a feature for which we have to use a different solution. When we are managing networks, if IPAM also becomes a part of this, we do not have to look for a separate solution."

"What might be improved for the user may be the depth of insight into the events that do happen and the ease of integration."

"Entuity currently has APIs, but they are not straightforward. They are not flexible if an external system wants to communicate with Entuity or create an integration that is not available out of the box. Its APIs can be flexible so that they can be utilized for external integrations that are not available out of the box."

"Entuity could improve by having more integration because now network management is not a standalone solution. You have to integrate it with your network, applications, and everything else. We have to collect that information from those solutions or relevant managers. Additionally, the SLA dashboard should be improved."

More Entuity cons

"The only problem with it is that the setup isn't very intuitive. I know that they just upgraded the product to make it a little bit easier to use, but compared to some of the other platforms, it is not easy to configure it, set it up, and get it running. However, once you have set it up and got it running, it runs great."

"The solution is a bit difficult to configure."

"ManageEngine OpManager could improve by having a better cloud presence."

"The dashboard has some limitations and should be more user-friendly."

"It is sometimes difficult to manage the user interface. It can get very complicated."

"The dashboard could include additional features."

"There are certain things that are not possible to do with Op Manager. It's a solution that still needs time to develop."

"The dashboard could include more features."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It varies and depends on the quantity. It's worth the cost."

"We have 400 licenses and we are only using 150 licenses."

"Entuity's licensing is very highly-priced."

"It can be comparatively expensive but that is because it is comprehensive."

"Entuity is not an expensive solution."

"The product is not worth the money."

"The solution's licensing costs are yearly and based on the number of applications."

"The pricing is moderate."

"The price of ManageEngine OpManager is reasonable. We have an annual license and the cost comes from how many devices are being monitored. There is not anything extra cost for maintenance and support."

"ManageEngine OpManager has a three-tier licensing model."

"We had perpetual licenses. The cost was around 36,000 for OPManager, and then you'd have the yearly maintenance fee of 2,000 or 3,000."

"It is reasonably priced."

"We have a standard license for ManageEngine OpManager. We purchased the license for one year and now we are upgrading it soon."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

University

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

Based on my experience and use case, the setup cost and price of ManageEngine OpManager is good. However, if it were available in both on-premises and cloud versions, it would be more reliable for ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

ManageEngine OpManager could improve by adding network device control capabilities. The control feature would be more helpful for our operations. Currently, there is no feature for controlling inte...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine OpManager?

I am using ManageEngine OpManager for network and server reliability. We have multiple locations, so integrating all location devices in ManageEngine OpManager into one single console allows us to ...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs Entuity

Compared 27% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Entuity

Compared 20% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs Entuity

Compared 5% of the time

More Entuity Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 11% of the time

OpenNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

LibreNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

DX Spectrum vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Entuity

March 2026

Download Entuity product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

March 2026

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Also Known As

No data available

OpManager

Overview

Entuity network management software continually monitors network bandwidth, network error rate and network congestion, which are all factors that impact overall network throughput. Events can be raised in response to abnormal traffic to allow remedial action before users are impacted. The Entuity network monitor continually evaluates network latency and network jitter to calculate MOS and ICPIF scores. Events can be raised when these scores are unacceptable for business application, voice and video performance. Key Features include: Root Cause Analysis, Event Management, Flow Monitoring & Analysis, Application Path Monitoring and Network Performance Monitoring.

Park Place Technologies

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Tait Communications, Vattenfall, Discovery, University of Minnesota, Pernod Ricard, Electric Car

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Buyer's Guide

Entuity vs. ManageEngine OpManager

March 2026

Free Report: Entuity vs. ManageEngine OpManager

Find out what your peers are saying about Entuity vs. ManageEngine OpManager and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Entuity vs. ManageEngine OpManager report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.