ManageEngine OpManager vs Zabbix comparison

Read 106 Zabbix reviews

17,122 Views
13,019 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine OpManager and Zabbix compete in network and device monitoring. OpManager seems to have the upper hand with its real-time views, automation, and customization options, while Zabbix stands out for its open-source advantages and flexibility without licensing costs.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager provides automation, alerting, and reporting with real-time views and proactive measures. It integrates well with diverse environments, offering ample customization. Zabbix, being open-source, allows flexibility with automated network and item discovery, advanced alerting, and monitoring through templates. Its scalability and adaptability cater to various environments.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager could enhance its machine learning capabilities, optimize the backup process, and improve dashboard customization. Support and deployment are also areas of concern. Zabbix could offer a more user-friendly UI and reporting system, as well as improve automated discovery and advanced analytics. Its steep learning curve and the need for better prebuilt templates are often mentioned by users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine OpManager is primarily on-premises, with some users facing challenges in accessing top-tier support. Zabbix offers flexible deployment, including hybrid and public cloud, suitable for adaptable environments. Both receive positive feedback for customer service, though ManageEngine's support heavily depends on regions.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager offers a tiered licensing model, which can be costly but provides ROI through reduced admin overhead and efficiencies. It is cheaper than some competitors like SolarWinds. Zabbix, being open-source, eliminates licensing costs, making it cost-effective for those with the technical expertise, and users highlight affordability as a significant advantage.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine OpManager vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: April 2025).

ManageEngine OpManager vs. Zabbix

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zabbix

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

106

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (8th), Server Monitoring (1st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.6%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zabbix is 13.0%, up from 11.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

MUBDIUL ISLAM

Junior System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

NetFlow monitoring has improved operations but needs better configurations

For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface. When I add the interface, I am confused about which interface is connected to which endpoint. If identifying the interface was easier, it would take less time to configure. Another issue is with threshold values; sometimes, it shows kilobytes (kB) while our threshold is set to gigabytes. This can be confusing. Improving this aspect would be beneficial. In URL monitoring, there is room for enhancement.

Read full review

ASM Naushad Alam

Network Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes

We have not yet purchased the commercial version so have a lack of technical ability. We do not yet fully know the key points or key features of the solution. We just use what we use along with WhatsUp Gold. Based on our use only, stability is rated a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The uptime and monitoring are valuable to us because we need to monitor the uptime of our services, the memory, and the CPUs."

"Monitoring is the most valuable feature of this solution."

"Device backups are smooth and managed centrally, with a nice dashboard, so you can quickly see the status."

"Overall, I give the product a rating of ten."

"The solution is easy to deploy. It's also easy to manage and monitor the environment. Instead of being reactive, it's proactive."

"We don't have to keep an eye on it; it has a good automation option, which keeps us informed. It gives very less false positives. Overall, a really great product."

"It is easy to use and deploy."

"The solution gives pretty good network visibility. I am also impressed with it's monitoring."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

"The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration."

"The solution is stable."

"SNMP monitoring, source discovery, and alert triggering are most valuable."

"The integration with third-party tools and the alerts are most valuable."

"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of virtual machines."

"Our customers also like that they don't have to use multiple modules. Micro Focus and major vendors typically require you to buy several modules and plugins. Our customers do not like that. We offer them a single product for all their monitoring needs."

"The best thing about Zabbix is the integration and the APIs that are included are very fast"

"We detect problems before the customer does and before it actually happens using the predictive functions in Zabbix."

More Zabbix pros

Cons

"The integration with various OEM products could be simplified."

"WMI and SNMP integration with the domain controller should be seamless"

"Some of our customers have been asking that OpManager have a feature to monitor the operating system, however, I tell them that Endpoint Central is doing that. You can buy endpoints and then OpManager, and they integrate between them, and everything is okay."

"We have been facing an issue since last year when a lot of our users started to work from home through their mobiles or computers. We are having trouble reaching these devices. We are now planning to publish our instance to the cloud so that we can reach these devices. Its performance should be improved in terms of the discovery of the devices. I would like to feel confident with the discovery that this solution does. For example, on my dashboard, I would like to be able to view a list of all devices seen on a specific server. At present, it is difficult to find such information. This would be an excellent feature to have."

"The dashboard could include more features."

"It would be great if there were some sort of artificial intelligence feature which would help us make improvements in the network once we find an issue, and do it automatically."

"For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view."

"This product is little bit slow sometimes. It may be that we need to change the configuration to improve performance."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

"The reporting features need improvement, especially detailed inventory reporting. Since it's freeware, reporting may not be a major focus."

"Zabbix is powerful, but it is difficult to understand initially. There are many things that can be improved, but we might not be using Zabbix to its fullest extent. The software has more features than we need."

"I have experienced stability issues approximately five or ten times."

"Even though it’s such a powerful monitoring system, it would be more helpful if it had a flexible UI."

"Its UI should be improved. They did some improvements in version 5, but it could benefit from some more work. Its integrations should also be improved. They've been active for one year, and they seem to have noticed that. It has new integrations, but it could benefit from more integrations. As far as I know, there is no model to push statistics, metrics, or events towards Zabbix. This type of API isn't yet there, whereas some other tools provide an API for this."

"The only issue I can note is that it's Linux-based, and Linux documentation is not the best."

"Its UI needs to be improved a little bit more so that an end-user is also able to handle it. I can handle it, but others should also be able to handle it in a better way. It becomes complex when we are growing and need to add proxies. We need more scalability features and documentation for different use cases. A lot of articles are available, but they need to be in proper documentation. For example, when you have thousands of servers that have to be monitored in different regions of the world, there should be some kind of documentation to describe how you can create proxies and add them. Sometimes, when you are using the database, it can get overloaded. When the network is growing, the number of transactions becomes very high, and the database gets overloaded. There should be information about how to reduce the load on the MySQL database, which is what Zabbix is using. The market is growing a lot, and it should be enhanced for a lot more things. We are currently bringing enhancements at our end for different use cases. For example, when dockerization is going on, how can we check the logs inside the Dockers. We should also be able to monitor and check the number of logins and add features such as SSO login and two-factor authentication as a protocol. These are the security features and concerns that we have to deal with. Currently, we are developing modules to add features to Zabbix, but they should also work on these features."

"For us, the initial setup was complex"

More Zabbix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, I would rate it a two out of five. It was expensive."

"The initial cost is low and the add-ons are reasonable."

"The product is not worth the money."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"ManageEngine OpManager is cheaper than SolarWinds."

"We have a standard license for ManageEngine OpManager. We purchased the license for one year and now we are upgrading it soon."

"As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance."

"ManageEngine OpManager has a three-tier licensing model."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

"Its licensing is fair. It seems to be much cheaper than others."

"The solution is free. However, many open-sourced tools start out free but eventually start charging."

"We purchased Zabbix for a good price, including support"

"Zabbix and Grafana are both open source products, we only needed to go to their website and download the application and we began to use them. The solutions are free."

"There is no license but we need to pay for support."

"We are using the free, open-source version."

"Zabbix is open-source so if one wishes to implement it in-house, they must have qualified professionals to set up and optimize databases, Linux/Unix OS, PHP, Apache, and depending on what is monitored, a full-stack network and systems administrator may be needed."

"This is an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

More Zabbix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

31%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

33%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?

The product provides intensive reports.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

The pricing was okay. However, it has been increasing a lot lately. The product is not worth the money.

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

What do you like most about Zabbix?

The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?

The cost is minimal. It is literally free.

What needs improvement with Zabbix?

For me, Zabbix is very straightforward. I cannot think of any improvements needed. It's a very mature product. The only issue I can note is that it's Linux-based, and Linux documentation is not the...

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Comparisons

Compared 25% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 14% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

SCOM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

Checkmk vs Zabbix

Compared 10% of the time

LibreNMS vs Zabbix

Compared 9% of the time

Icinga vs Zabbix

Compared 8% of the time

NetXMS vs Zabbix

Compared 4% of the time

Centreon vs Zabbix

Compared 4% of the time

More Zabbix Competitors

Product Reports

ManageEngine OpManager

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Download Zabbix product report

Also Known As

OpManager

No data available

Overview

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

Sample Customers

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba

ManageEngine OpManager vs. Zabbix