Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Statseeker comparison

Broadcom and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #75, while Techniche is ranked #60 with an average rating of 7.0. Broadcom holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.
DX Unified Infrastructure M...
Read 120 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews
  • 743 Views
  • 454 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
Statseeker
Read 38 Statseeker reviews
  • 416 Views
  • 252 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

DX Unified Infrastructure Management and Statseeker are competing in the network monitoring and management domain. Statseeker stands out due to its robust features, offering more value and justification for its cost.

Features: DX Unified Infrastructure Management provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities, strong integration with third-party systems, and scalability. Statseeker offers real-time monitoring, extensive historical data analysis, and simplicity in accessing extensive data, giving it an edge.

Room for Improvement: DX Unified Infrastructure Management could improve its real-time insights, ease of data access, and deployment speed. Statseeker could enhance third-party integration capabilities, reduce cost, and expand its feature set for broader device support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX Unified Infrastructure Management features a flexible deployment process with robust support. Statseeker is known for its swift, straightforward deployment and efficient customer service, providing users with a seamless initial setup experience.

Pricing and ROI: DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers an attractive setup cost with a quick ROI due to a moderate price point. Statseeker, although initially costlier, delivers substantial ROI with its premium value through exceptional analytical capabilities and real-time insights.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 851,042 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DX Unified Infrastructure M...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
75th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
120
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (24th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (55th), Cloud Monitoring Software (41st), AIOps (21st)
Statseeker
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
60th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Arunpandiyan M - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to set up, simple to use, and offers great technical support
There are quite a few manual processes. We've had issues with pulling reports. Sometimes we have trouble or get errors. The reporting process should be easier. If you have a hub, you should be able to have an unlimited number of servers. For example, if you have 500 servers, and the limit is ten, you have to pull 50 reports. We'd like to just pull one report for all servers. This also increases the time to pull reports. If we have to pull more reports, it takes that much longer than just pulling one. The product can be expensive. Right now, they are updating and consolidating the dashboard. I'm expecting an update that will resolve a few glitches in the server.
Read full review
JH
Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise
The product has improved our organization by simplifying monitoring and giving real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise. If we notice five devices with latency or errors, I wouldn't know that if I didn't command line into 800 devices and check every day. I can see the status on the dashboard and it just makes it easy to know where the problems are. If we didn't have that capability by using Statseeker, then it would be very complex to monitor. We'd need to have another tool or manually log into every device to try to check things. And this product just does it all for us. That streamlines and improves our workload so that we only need to have two people in our office for the network team. It improves availability. If a circuit goes down texts and email alerts get sent out. So, even if it's in the evening or we're not on premises, we'll know if something's down. We use it all the time because it really helps.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Great customized dashboards and drill down reports with auto serve analytics."
"It delivers our customers many metrics, so they may make decisions"
"You can scale it pretty much however way you want to as long as you have the servers to throw at it."
"The ability to monitor any platform. We have Windows, Linux, AIX, and mainframe all being monitored with the same UIM infrastructure."
"The benefit is easy installation. Thus, the model approach of the product and out-of-the-box probes, which deliver direct value."
"The feature that we've found to be very helpful is the way the solution categorizes the devices to identify groups, groups of devices and clusters. This allows us to be aware of their position within the topology."
"Latest version of tool comes integrated with Jaspersoft reporting solution, giving excellent reports."
"It is easy to implement but requires good planning."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros
"The graphics and trends are the most valuable for us."
"Grouping, Threshold/alerts, Netflow analyser, Private MIB object support are most valuable as they can provide more visibility into network performance, and for network troubleshooting."
"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."
"Statseeker helps to quickly see if you have a spike or something going on. In the future, we need to get NetFlow in the tool so we can see what the IP is."
"The product simplifies monitoring by providing real-time alerts through a GUI dashboard, email and texts."
"Summary Reports provide a quick way to identify where potential issues are. Drill-downs provide more granular details very quickly."
"Device grouping is very easy, and you can discover thousands of devices in a few minutes."
"The most important feature is just the fact that it doesn't aggregate the information up, and I can look at detailed information going back quite a long time."
More Statseeker pros
 

Cons

"I'm very happy with DX Unified Infrastructure Management, but what could be improved is its user interface because currently, it has many wide spaces. All the information you need is in DX Unified Infrastructure Management, and it's a reliable tool, and though that's more important than the gaps in the user interface being smaller or wider, those gaps still need some improvement. I know the team is working on it. My company had some backend problems with DX Unified Infrastructure Management in the past that have now been solved. The setup for the tool also needs improvement because it's complex. Another room for improvement in DX Unified Infrastructure Management is its technical support because it's sometimes not as knowledgeable or responsive. What I'm suggesting to be added to the tool is an open-standard ELK Elastic-based database where you can put in all data, so that you can use the data in other systems as well."
"Within this product there are individual probes, and each of these probes doesn't always necessarily output the same kind of information into our database. So when we try to collect what's called QoS data, from one probe we might get a ton of information, lots of good stuff that we can use in our database, but then from another probe, we might not get so much or we might not be able to pull the things that we want to."
"It is a little complex to use versus other softwares."
"DX UIM's reporting and customization need to be improved."
"We had to do some work to make what was more of a business class solution work at an enterprise level."
"A useful feature to have would be automatic configuration per standard by new robots that check in for any particular customer."
"Stability."
"Currently lacks a mobile application which would be helpful."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons
"The interface could be more user-friendly and it would be nice if there were enhanced options for reporting."
"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."
"Maybe they could provide a little bit more flexibility on creating custom dashboards."
"I would like to see a friendlier user interface in the administration tool."
"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."
"We haven't seen an ROI."
"The main issue I've seen, in the last six months to a year, is when I upgrade I seem to be hitting bugs. The upgrade won't go smoothly and I have to engage support. These things happen when you upgrade, it's not the end of the world, but from a stability point of view, the only time I've so far, is during upgrades."
"It would be very nice to have the Cisco ACI option included in the regular license."
More Statseeker cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CAD $400,000 annually."
"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."
"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."
"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."
"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."
"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."
"We pay a yearly maintenance fee of approximately $40,000 USD."
"We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."
"Statseeker is pretty cheap."
"The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think."
"When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost."
"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."
"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."
"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."
More Statseeker pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
851,042 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Real Estate/Law Firm
6%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Retailer
8%
University
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?
We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?
I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?
The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?
We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Statseeker?
There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Statseeker?
Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Datadog vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Datadog vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 24% of the time
Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 20% of the time
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 16% of the time
Dynatrace vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Dynatrace vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 14% of the time
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 13% of the time
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker
Compared 54% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker
Compared 46% of the time
More Statseeker Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management
May 2025
DX Unified Infrastructure Management reportDownload DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Statseeker
April 2025
Statseeker reportDownload Statseeker product report
 

Also Known As

DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager
No data available
 

Overview

DX Unified Infrastructure Management is the only solution that provides an open architecture, full-stack observability and zero-touch configuration for monitoring traditional data center, public cloud, and hybrid infrastructure environments.

Designed to ensure an optimal end-user experience, this solution provides a modern HTML5 operations console that makes it easy and fast for today’s IT teams to implement, use, and scale – leading to faster time to value.

Broadcom
Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.
Techniche
 

Sample Customers

CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex
With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.
Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker
April 2025
Free Report: DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker
Find out what your peers are saying about DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
851,042 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.