DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Statseeker comparison

Broadcom and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #65, while Techniche is ranked #66 with an average rating of 7.0. Broadcom holds a 0.8% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Read 120 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews

4,418 Views
2,253 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

1,232 Views
1,170 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

DX Unified Infrastructure Management and Statseeker are competing in the network monitoring and management domain. Statseeker stands out due to its robust features, offering more value and justification for its cost.

Features: DX Unified Infrastructure Management provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities, strong integration with third-party systems, and scalability. Statseeker offers real-time monitoring, extensive historical data analysis, and simplicity in accessing extensive data, giving it an edge.

Room for Improvement: DX Unified Infrastructure Management could improve its real-time insights, ease of data access, and deployment speed. Statseeker could enhance third-party integration capabilities, reduce cost, and expand its feature set for broader device support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX Unified Infrastructure Management features a flexible deployment process with robust support. Statseeker is known for its swift, straightforward deployment and efficient customer service, providing users with a seamless initial setup experience.

Pricing and ROI: DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers an attractive setup cost with a quick ROI due to a moderate price point. Statseeker, although initially costlier, delivers substantial ROI with its premium value through exceptional analytical capabilities and real-time insights.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

65th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

120

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (23rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (47th), Cloud Monitoring Software (37th), AIOps (26th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

66th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
DX Unified Infrastructure Management	0.8%
Statseeker	0.4%
Other	98.8%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Kc Njokuoma

Solution Architect at SA Consulting

Helps us provide visibility into network performance, capacity planning, and cost analysis

Better support and more accessible resources are crucial. Customers have expressed that support is not as flexible, and it is difficult to obtain necessary information quickly. Customers would benefit from improved training material for integration with other products. The solution's pricing is high and needs to be reconsidered, and the technical support should improve to provide more accessible and open information.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Not only are our internal processes simplified and enhanced by UIM but it also adds value to the services we provide to our customers."

"The main feature for us is its flexibility with their message bus and their API to make it do what you need it to do, since everyone's different."

"We have found that the ROI with this solution is that the features available allow us to spot potential issues before they occur and cause problems for our customers."

"It provides us with great detailed information that can be easily reported and delivered to customers."

"It has provided greater security for our most important asset which is the handling of information."

"If you have a highly disparate estate across old and new technologies, Nimsoft is the only realistic in-house answer, prior to considering the customisation of open source alternatives."

"The CA tools allow me to get into detailed transactions for custom ranking, and be able to make predictions."

"We are able to configure alert by client requirements and can see those alert with a lot of detail."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros

"The Statseeker polling engine is very efficient and it does not miss any outage."

"I believe Statseeker has reduced the complexity of our network monitoring, providing real-time alerts and on-demand graphs that improve our network availability."

"The stability of this solution is great compared to other solutions, such as SolarWinds, and Statseeker is one step further."

"We have used this product since the organization was established and it has been an integral part of our business as usual functions and I would suggest that if we stopped using it then this would have a negative impact on our operations."

"Whether it is a down network switch or a down router, we can get back online faster for the customers."

"Customer service is excellent, with a brilliant support team that is always responsive and always positive."

"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."

"The most important feature for us is the interface statistics, because our customer normally asks us for bandwidth utilization reports. Statseeker has very descriptive transmit and receive information."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"Parts of the Unified Management Portal are not written in HTML5. I would like all components (Portlets) to be HTML5."

"There should be wider coverage of storage infrastructure."

"The first level has not been the most helpful, but maybe a lot of our issues just require higher engineers."

"UIM does have a large initial learning curve for new users, and you must learn the basic architecture."

"Maybe a little bit more on the reporting side. It does integrate with a product called iReport, but that's very cumbersome to use."

"More HTML5, more flexibility, and reducing the number of screens, fewer mouse clicks, fewer mouse movements."

"The major problem we have when we sell CA UIM is that we need to sell additional products because it doesn't cover all the features."

"It is a little complex to use versus other softwares."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons

"It could use more features on Netflow analyser, such as time series graphs and a single network export UDP port and UDP forwarding."

"Statseeker tech support was bad around 2-3 years ago."

"More private MIB object support, such as WAN optimisation performance and wireless, would be helpful."

"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed."

"I would like to see a friendlier user interface in the administration tool."

"I would like to see fully automatic updates so that our version is always current."

"The main issue I've seen, in the last six months to a year, is when I upgrade I seem to be hitting bugs. The upgrade won't go smoothly and I have to engage support. These things happen when you upgrade, it's not the end of the world, but from a stability point of view, the only time I've so far, is during upgrades."

"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."

"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."

"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."

"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."

"CAD $400,000 annually."

"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."

"Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."

"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

"We pay a yearly maintenance fee of approximately $40,000 USD."

"We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."

"We now feel the pricing is a good value. Previously we had a just a normal license but now we've got an Enterprise license. Since the Enterprise, it's been a lot better value. We did think it was pretty expensive before, but with the Enterprise license it's almost less than half that price. If you have a number of accounts within the organization that use Statseeker, I would suggest get the Enterprise license."

"Statseeker is pretty cheap."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Marketing Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	80

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?

We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?

I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?

The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ConnectWise RMM vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 4% of the time

Fortra's Network Server Suite vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 3% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 3% of the time

Nagios XI vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 3% of the time

NetCrunch vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 3% of the time

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 24% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Statseeker

Compared 15% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 12% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker

Compared 9% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management

March 2026

DX Unified Infrastructure Management report

Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

March 2026

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager

No data available

Overview

DX Unified Infrastructure Management is the only solution that provides an open architecture, full-stack observability and zero-touch configuration for monitoring traditional data center, public cloud, and hybrid infrastructure environments.

Designed to ensure an optimal end-user experience, this solution provides a modern HTML5 operations console that makes it easy and fast for today’s IT teams to implement, use, and scale – leading to faster time to value.

Broadcom

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker

March 2026

Free Report: DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.