Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Statseeker comparison

Broadcom and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #73, while Techniche is ranked #61 with an average rating of 7.0. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.
DX Unified Infrastructure M...
Read 120 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews
  • 1,862 Views
  • 987 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
Statseeker
Read 38 Statseeker reviews
  • 613 Views
  • 546 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

DX Unified Infrastructure Management and Statseeker are competing in the network monitoring and management domain. Statseeker stands out due to its robust features, offering more value and justification for its cost.

Features: DX Unified Infrastructure Management provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities, strong integration with third-party systems, and scalability. Statseeker offers real-time monitoring, extensive historical data analysis, and simplicity in accessing extensive data, giving it an edge.

Room for Improvement: DX Unified Infrastructure Management could improve its real-time insights, ease of data access, and deployment speed. Statseeker could enhance third-party integration capabilities, reduce cost, and expand its feature set for broader device support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX Unified Infrastructure Management features a flexible deployment process with robust support. Statseeker is known for its swift, straightforward deployment and efficient customer service, providing users with a seamless initial setup experience.

Pricing and ROI: DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers an attractive setup cost with a quick ROI due to a moderate price point. Statseeker, although initially costlier, delivers substantial ROI with its premium value through exceptional analytical capabilities and real-time insights.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,771 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DX Unified Infrastructure M...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
73rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
120
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (22nd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (50th), Cloud Monitoring Software (38th), AIOps (25th)
Statseeker
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
61st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Statseeker0.3%
DX Unified Infrastructure Management0.5%
Other99.2%
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Mark Tukh - PeerSpot reviewer
Great scalability, versatility, infrastructure coverage and ease of implementation
I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. The number of people needed for deployment depends on the customer, but we usually need at least one person and two to three at other times. The initial implementation takes about two months. The full implementation can be infinite because you may want to implement more. The product does not require a lot of maintenance. To increase the implementation, we push additional services in the first and second years to make it more robust and fully implemented. We usually sell to big enterprises. It can also be affordable for smaller enterprises, but we don't work with them a lot. We have from 2,000 to 10,000 workers. So the product itself can have five, ten or even 20 users.
Read full review
JE
We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices
One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Probe packages and probe deployment."
"Great customized dashboards and drill down reports with auto serve analytics."
"It is easy to implement but requires good planning."
"I can use the Drag and Drop feature to build dashboards within minutes."
"Technical support is great."
"It is the foundation for our monitoring solution."
"The ability to monitor any platform. We have Windows, Linux, AIX, and mainframe all being monitored with the same UIM infrastructure."
"The number of probes available. Out of the box, I believe about 200 probes are available. And, if there's a probe that is not available, you can write one. You can also go to the communities and suggest, and based on demand, CA will write one for you."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros
"We are now able to easily track where problems are with bandwidth and port errors, rather than having to do a lot of diagnostics."
"The monitoring provided by this solution helps us to track down and solve issues."
"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."
"The most important feature for us is the interface statistics, because our customer normally asks us for bandwidth utilization reports. Statseeker has very descriptive transmit and receive information."
"We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all."
"I like the fact that I can aggregate multiple interfaces into a single graph. It allows me to quickly the summary of traffic for multiple devices which is helpful."
"The graphics and trends are the most valuable for us."
"This solution helps in terms of troubleshooting, and you can do capacity planning with it."
More Statseeker pros
 

Cons

"Stability."
"It is a little complex to use versus other softwares."
"We would like to see automatic network topology."
"Making a GUI with criteria such as selection by robot/hub/probe etc."
"We had to do some work to make what was more of a business class solution work at an enterprise level."
"I think it can be improved by a greater provision of specialized technical support, as there are very few trained personnel there."
"DX UIM's reporting and customization need to be improved."
"I'd also like to see more probes. More probes in the sense that we were coming across devices that we're expected to monitor and manage for which, out of the box, there isn't a nice, clean solution. There are probes that are dedicated for certain devices and certain device types, which is great. But then there are times we come across nuanced products that we have to develop our own solution for. There are probes that exist in there that allow us to make a customized solution, but it takes a lot more time."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons
"The interface could be more user-friendly and it would be nice if there were enhanced options for reporting."
"Maybe they could provide a little bit more flexibility on creating custom dashboards."
"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."
"I would like to see fully automatic updates so that our version is always current."
"It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open."
"The inclusion of configuration management features and SIP links would improve this solution."
"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."
"I'd say the interface could improve a little bit. I find with new users, I tend to have to spend a bit of time walking them through how to use the interface. It could be a little more user friendly."
More Statseeker cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."
"CAD $400,000 annually."
"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."
"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."
"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."
"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."
"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."
"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."
"We pay somewhere between $5,000 and $8,000 yearly in licensing fees."
"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."
"We now feel the pricing is a good value. Previously we had a just a normal license but now we've got an Enterprise license. Since the Enterprise, it's been a lot better value. We did think it was pretty expensive before, but with the Enterprise license it's almost less than half that price. If you have a number of accounts within the organization that use Statseeker, I would suggest get the Enterprise license."
"Statseeker is pretty cheap."
"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."
"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."
More Statseeker pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Performing Arts
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Educational Organization
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business29
Midsize Enterprise20
Large Enterprise80
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise34
 

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?
We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?
I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?
The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?
We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Statseeker?
There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Statseeker?
Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Fortra's Network Server Suite vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Fortra's Network Server Suite vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 18% of the time
NetCrunch vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
NetCrunch vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 8% of the time
Loom Systems vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Loom Systems vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 7% of the time
Ixia Hawkeye vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Ixia Hawkeye vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 6% of the time
SelectStar vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
SelectStar vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 6% of the time
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors
SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker
Compared 39% of the time
Zabbix vs Statseeker Logo
Zabbix vs Statseeker
Compared 26% of the time
WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker Logo
WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker
Compared 18% of the time
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker
Compared 17% of the time
More Statseeker Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management
October 2025
DX Unified Infrastructure Management reportDownload DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Statseeker
September 2025
Statseeker reportDownload Statseeker product report
 

Also Known As

DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager
No data available
 

Overview

DX Unified Infrastructure Management is the only solution that provides an open architecture, full-stack observability and zero-touch configuration for monitoring traditional data center, public cloud, and hybrid infrastructure environments.

Designed to ensure an optimal end-user experience, this solution provides a modern HTML5 operations console that makes it easy and fast for today’s IT teams to implement, use, and scale – leading to faster time to value.

Broadcom
Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.
Techniche
 

Sample Customers

CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex
With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.
Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker
September 2025
Free Report: DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker
Find out what your peers are saying about DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Statseeker report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.