DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs NetCrunch comparison

Broadcom and AdRem Software are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #75, while AdRem Software is ranked #82. Broadcom holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to AdRem Software’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AdRem Software users who would recommend it.

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Read 120 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews

747 Views
446 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

NetCrunch

Read 3 NetCrunch reviews

361 Views
290 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

NetCrunch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

DX Unified Infrastructure Management and NetCrunch compete in the infrastructure management category. DX Unified Infrastructure Management seems to have the upper hand in features and support, while NetCrunch excels in ease of use and monitoring.

Features: DX Unified Infrastructure Management is praised for scalability, detailed analytics, and strong automation capabilities. NetCrunch is known for intuitive dashboards, extensive data collection, and alert management.

Room for Improvement: DX Unified Infrastructure Management users suggest enhancements in user customization, a more straightforward learning curve, and better user experience. NetCrunch users recommend better integration capabilities, advanced reporting features, and more integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX Unified Infrastructure Management deployment is complex but has responsive customer service. NetCrunch is easier to deploy with less initial setup but has mixed reviews on customer support.

Pricing and ROI: DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a higher initial setup cost but provides a good return on investment due to its comprehensive feature set. NetCrunch offers competitive pricing with a faster realization of ROI because of easier deployment.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. NetCrunch Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. NetCrunch

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

75th

Ranking in Server Monitoring

24th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

55th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

120

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (41st), AIOps (21st)

NetCrunch

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

82nd

Ranking in Server Monitoring

26th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

62nd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (77th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetCrunch is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Arunpandiyan M

Senior Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Easy to set up, simple to use, and offers great technical support

There are quite a few manual processes. We've had issues with pulling reports. Sometimes we have trouble or get errors. The reporting process should be easier. If you have a hub, you should be able to have an unlimited number of servers. For example, if you have 500 servers, and the limit is ten, you have to pull 50 reports. We'd like to just pull one report for all servers. This also increases the time to pull reports. If we have to pull more reports, it takes that much longer than just pulling one. The product can be expensive. Right now, they are updating and consolidating the dashboard. I'm expecting an update that will resolve a few glitches in the server.

Read full review

Reginald Pierre

Senior Systems Administrator, Technical Lead at Connectivity Wireless

A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better

The initial setup is fairly easy. Most of it's wizard-based. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to set it up. But if you don't know certain things related to protocols and everything else, it might be difficult. If you know how SNMP works, it'll be fairly simple to set up.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can scale it pretty much however way you want to as long as you have the servers to throw at it."

"DX UIM is scalable."

"DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers visibility into network activities, integration capacity, and enhances monitoring at the core and application levels."

"Having all of our information within one tool set; our alerts, our monitors, and the things that our operations team needs to function."

"Another division handed us the opportunity to monitor their solutions as written, and UIM was very useful for that."

"Great customized dashboards and drill down reports with auto serve analytics."

"I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution."

"Probe packages and probe deployment."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros

"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."

Cons

"How we can get more native information from CA's solutions."

"There is also room for improvement in the reporting. It is not really good enough, according to our customers. So what we now usually do is use Power BI to get them the kinds of reports they want."

"We have experienced challenges with finding a mechanism to deploy the agents, but it's only on the first deployment so it's not a big issue."

"Customers have expressed that support is not as flexible, and it is difficult to obtain necessary information quickly."

"Better support and more accessible resources are crucial. Customers have expressed that support is not as flexible, and it is difficult to obtain necessary information quickly."

"Making a GUI with criteria such as selection by robot/hub/probe etc."

"I'm very happy with DX Unified Infrastructure Management, but what could be improved is its user interface because currently, it has many wide spaces. All the information you need is in DX Unified Infrastructure Management, and it's a reliable tool, and though that's more important than the gaps in the user interface being smaller or wider, those gaps still need some improvement. I know the team is working on it. My company had some backend problems with DX Unified Infrastructure Management in the past that have now been solved. The setup for the tool also needs improvement because it's complex. Another room for improvement in DX Unified Infrastructure Management is its technical support because it's sometimes not as knowledgeable or responsive. What I'm suggesting to be added to the tool is an open-standard ELK Elastic-based database where you can put in all data, so that you can use the data in other systems as well."

"I would like to see auditability. We've built our own audit functionality to ensure that every CI has the desired model configuration applied to it. And we run that on a daily basis. If that became part of the product, I think it might be a little bit less intensive in terms of resource, because we're doing it with scripts."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons

"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."

"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."

"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."

"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."

"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."

"CAD $400,000 annually."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?

We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?

I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?

The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Datadog vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 27% of the time

Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 22% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 19% of the time

Dynatrace vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 15% of the time

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors

Zabbix vs NetCrunch

Compared 52% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs NetCrunch

Compared 25% of the time

Nagios Core vs NetCrunch

Compared 23% of the time

More NetCrunch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management

May 2025

DX Unified Infrastructure Management report

Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download NetCrunch product report

Also Known As

DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager

No data available

Overview

DX Unified Infrastructure Management is the only solution that provides an open architecture, full-stack observability and zero-touch configuration for monitoring traditional data center, public cloud, and hybrid infrastructure environments.

Designed to ensure an optimal end-user experience, this solution provides a modern HTML5 operations console that makes it easy and fast for today’s IT teams to implement, use, and scale – leading to faster time to value.

Broadcom

NetCrunch is the complete network monitoring solution for monitoring traffic, topology, devices, systems, logs, and services. It's policy, and template-based configuration makes managing thousands of nodes a breeze. It automatically generates layer-2 maps and manages monitoring dependencies. NetCrunch supports major operating systems, virtualization platforms, and the Cloud. Complete SNMP support with 8,700+ MIBs included and a built-in MIB compiler.

AdRem Software

Sample Customers

CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex

AER Kooperation, AON Corpration, Advance Financial services, Airbus SAS, Bauer Net consult, Banco Soal, Bertelsmann, Burke County public, COF training services

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. NetCrunch

April 2025

Free Report: DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. NetCrunch

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. NetCrunch and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. NetCrunch report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors, best Server Monitoring vendors, and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.