DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Ixia Hawkeye comparison

Broadcom and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #73, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #37 with an average rating of 10.0. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Read 120 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews

1,862 Views
987 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Ixia Hawkeye

Read 4 Ixia Hawkeye reviews

706 Views
466 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Ixia Hawkeye

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

DX Unified Infrastructure Management and Ixia Hawkeye are solutions competing in network performance monitoring. Ixia Hawkeye holds an edge with its superior features, though DX Unified Infrastructure Management is preferred in pricing and support.

Features: DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers centralized monitoring, automated troubleshooting, and easy integration for streamlined operations. Ixia Hawkeye delivers extensive network visibility, proactive issue detection, and comprehensive insights into network behavior, providing in-depth performance optimization.

Room for Improvement: DX Unified Infrastructure Management could enhance scalability, improve advanced analytical tools, and expand its integration capabilities. Ixia Hawkeye may benefit from simplifying its deployment process, offering more competitive pricing, and enhancing user interface design for better accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX Unified Infrastructure Management is praised for straightforward integration and a robust support system. Ixia Hawkeye, while slightly more complex in deployment, compensates with strong technical support, ensuring that users have access to necessary resources and guidance.

Pricing and ROI: DX Unified Infrastructure Management is known for competitive pricing, making it accessible for budget-conscious businesses seeking good ROI for smaller investments. Ixia Hawkeye, though initially higher in cost, provides substantial ROI with its advanced analytics and performance enhancements in larger environments, appealing to enterprises requiring detailed analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,655 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

73rd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

50th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

120

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (22nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (38th), AIOps (25th)

Ixia Hawkeye

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

37th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

36th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Ixia Hawkeye	0.3%
DX Unified Infrastructure Management	0.5%
Other	99.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Mark Tukh

Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies

Great scalability, versatility, infrastructure coverage and ease of implementation

I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. The number of people needed for deployment depends on the customer, but we usually need at least one person and two to three at other times. The initial implementation takes about two months. The full implementation can be infinite because you may want to implement more. The product does not require a lot of maintenance. To increase the implementation, we push additional services in the first and second years to make it more robust and fully implemented. We usually sell to big enterprises. It can also be affordable for smaller enterprises, but we don't work with them a lot. We have from 2,000 to 10,000 workers. So the product itself can have five, ten or even 20 users.

Read full review

José Enrique Cano Rodriguez

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting

Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Another division handed us the opportunity to monitor their solutions as written, and UIM was very useful for that."

"We are able to go in and actually leverage the thick client for a nice easy drag and drop solution."

"The real value is our being able to pull all the historic data that we need in order to gather every little metric and nuanced piece of information from a given device, a given piece of infrastructure, in order for us to generate alerts."

"You can integrate clouds, hybrid infrastructure, and on-premise infrastructure into one product."

"The ability to monitor any platform. We have Windows, Linux, AIX, and mainframe all being monitored with the same UIM infrastructure."

"It delivers our customers many metrics, so they may make decisions"

"Great out-of-the-box capability."

"DX UIM is scalable."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros

"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."

"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."

"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."

"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."

Cons

"A useful feature to have would be automatic configuration per standard by new robots that check in for any particular customer."

"I'd also like to see more probes. More probes in the sense that we were coming across devices that we're expected to monitor and manage for which, out of the box, there isn't a nice, clean solution. There are probes that are dedicated for certain devices and certain device types, which is great. But then there are times we come across nuanced products that we have to develop our own solution for. There are probes that exist in there that allow us to make a customized solution, but it takes a lot more time."

"Customers have expressed that support is not as flexible, and it is difficult to obtain necessary information quickly."

"It needs a little bit more functionality in the Admin Console."

"Making a GUI with criteria such as selection by robot/hub/probe etc."

"How we can get more native information from CA's solutions."

"Within this product there are individual probes, and each of these probes doesn't always necessarily output the same kind of information into our database. So when we try to collect what's called QoS data, from one probe we might get a ton of information, lots of good stuff that we can use in our database, but then from another probe, we might not get so much or we might not be able to pull the things that we want to."

"The other element is that there are no real templates, out of the box. Let's go with an example where we do have the probe, which is great, and we do have a really nuanced customer with a small set of devices that maybe not a lot of other customers use. There might not be a template in place, so effectively we have the tool in front of us but we still need to develop a solution. So it would be really nice to see a little bit more of something like a central repository of templates that we could use. That would help us expedite our onboarding process."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons

"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."

"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."

"Improvements in network performance are essential."

"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."

"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."

"CAD $400,000 annually."

"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."

"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."

"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."

"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."

"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	80

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?

We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?

I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?

The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...

See all answers

What do you like most about Ixia Hawkeye?

It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ixia Hawkeye?

Improvements in network performance are essential.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ixia Hawkeye?

Our objective is to evaluate the performance of GPON and DOCSIS networks which involves considering factors such as pricing, sales, and the technical aspects of conducting tests. To achieve this, v...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortra's Network Server Suite vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 14% of the time

NetCrunch vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 7% of the time

Loom Systems vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 6% of the time

SelectStar vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 5% of the time

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 21% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 16% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 16% of the time

Aurea CX Monitor vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 13% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 12% of the time

More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management

October 2025

DX Unified Infrastructure Management report

Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

October 2025

Download Ixia Hawkeye product report

Also Known As

DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager

No data available

Overview

DX Unified Infrastructure Management is the only solution that provides an open architecture, full-stack observability and zero-touch configuration for monitoring traditional data center, public cloud, and hybrid infrastructure environments.

Designed to ensure an optimal end-user experience, this solution provides a modern HTML5 operations console that makes it easy and fast for today’s IT teams to implement, use, and scale – leading to faster time to value.

Broadcom

Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex

EMA

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye

September 2025

Free Report: DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.