Meraki Dashboard vs Statseeker comparison

Cisco and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Cisco is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5, while Techniche is ranked #63 with an average rating of 7.0. Cisco holds a 1.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

Meraki Dashboard

Read 56 Meraki Dashboard reviews

2,457 Views
2,162 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

538 Views
479 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Meraki Dashboard

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and Meraki Dashboard are competing in the network monitoring and management space. Despite Statseeker’s data granularity, Meraki Dashboard holds an edge due to its advanced cloud-based features.

Features: Statseeker offers detailed network performance metrics, real-time anomaly detection, and lightweight data acquisition for efficient insights. Meraki Dashboard provides cloud management capabilities, seamless integration with the Meraki ecosystem, and automatic updates, offering an efficient approach to network control.

Room for Improvement: Statseeker could enhance its cloud-based offerings, integrate more modern IT infrastructure features, and expand its user interface capabilities. Meraki Dashboard could benefit from more competitive pricing, improved offline solutions, and additional flexibility in deployment options beyond its ecosystem.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Meraki Dashboard features a simple deployment model with its cloud infrastructure, easing configuration and setup, and customer service is known to be responsive. Statseeker’s deployment is resource-efficient for rapid setup in traditional environments, with strong customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Statseeker is more budget-friendly with lower setup costs, offering cost-effective network insights. Meraki Dashboard incurs higher costs due to its feature set but is justified by its efficient integration and management capabilities, often presenting a high value return for investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Meraki Dashboard vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Meraki Dashboard vs. Statseeker

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Meraki Dashboard

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

19th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

63rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Meraki Dashboard is 1.1%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Bilal-Ahmed

IT Manager at Fawaz

Seamless connectivity and comprehensive control over network devices

All of the features we are looking for are already in control. I think those features, which we are not currently utilizing, are already there. For example, the control for the cameras and everything else. The cameras are not connected through Meraki, but all other devices are on Meraki networks.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very easy to manage. It has good security, and it is working well with our firewall."

"Meraki Dashboard does not require a lot of maintenance. Cisco tells communicates through the Meraki Dashboard web client, it will automatically send updates to the equipment. They will send you an email on what day the updates will take place. If you want to proceed, you can click on accept, or you can decline them and schedule the updates at another time."

"I would say the ease of use is the most valuable feature. It's very easy to set up and get up and running."

"The ability to view the entire project stack, including the camera, features, and routers, which I believe are the most important or relevant components."

"We greatly utilize the network because we can plug it into the DNS, VPN, or equipment. It's very good. Meraki Dashboard enhances wireless network management. We appreciate its flexibility, as it allows for easy suite configuration. We can handle everything on there when there's a policy or any other requirement."

"There are some whitelist blacklist capabilities in the MX dashboard, which is very helpful."

"The most valuable feature is knowing the wireless and switch are healthy."

"The feature I find most valuable is the single pane of glass where you can configure a monitor view, all from one dashboard. For example, on the wireless side, you can configure it under the configuration panel, and then view statistics like location analytics, user analytics, etc."

More Meraki Dashboard pros

"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."

"The most important for us is how fast this solution is, as well as the granularity that you can get to, such as per-minute statistics."

"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."

"If somebody is complaining about slow networking then this solution allows us to see various ports to find out whether they are being overloaded."

"Grouping, Threshold/alerts, Netflow analyser, Private MIB object support are most valuable as they can provide more visibility into network performance, and for network troubleshooting."

"Being able to look back historically at the uptime and downtime is invaluable."

"We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all."

"I like the fact that I can aggregate multiple interfaces into a single graph. It allows me to quickly the summary of traffic for multiple devices which is helpful."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"There needs to be more improvement on the device-connected interface."

"For my purposes, I don't need to see any other features added to the Meraki Dashboard. I have no criticisms and I do like the tool. If I had a criticism for it, it would be about the pricing because it could be a little less, but again, for the service that you get, I won't complain about that too much."

"Third-party switches do not necessarily integrate easily with the system and this could be improved to allow for better adaptation."

"An area for improvement in Meraki Dashboard is licensing management because it's a little complex. Product licensing can be made a little bit easier through license concurrency and a more straightforward approach to applying the license to products and services."

"The coverage has been an issue for us."

"The solution can be expensive."

"It would be helpful to have the ability to create a floor plan based on an existing PDF or JPEG, which is automatically converted into a usable network map."

"It is not appropriate for large, enterprise businesses."

More Meraki Dashboard cons

"Maybe they could provide a little bit more flexibility on creating custom dashboards."

"I would like to see more comprehensive reporting and alerting."

"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."

"Configuration management: In configuration management it would be helpful if it would backup configuration files (running and start-up configuration) for devices. (Not sure if this is already available in the latest version)."

"It would be very nice to have the Cisco ACI option included in the regular license."

"If it had more detailed NetFlow information then it would be far better."

"There is a little bit of room to improve in the alerting section to give some more options there. It's all I can think of right now off the top of my head."

"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is said to be expensive."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"Meraki Dashboard's pricing is reasonable. It is sold yearly, typically for one, three, or five years. I rate its pricing a five out of ten."

"Licensing for Meraki Dashboard is paid every year, and it's on a per-device model that costs roughly $300 to $400 per device, but that comes with full support and troubleshooting, etc. Compared to similar products, Meraki Dashboard is quite high-end, but the costs you pay are all-in."

"The solution is currently the most expensive on the market."

"You don't have to pay for the dashboard."

"The pricing for a small setup is only a few hundred dollars a year. The fee is subscription-based."

"The Meraki Dashboard has more competitive pricing."

More Meraki Dashboard pricing and cost advice

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"It's probably $5K a year for the license."

"Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

"Statseeker is pretty cheap."

"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Meraki Dashboard?

We greatly utilize the network because we can plug it into the DNS, VPN, or equipment. It's very good. Meraki Dashboard enhances wireless network management. We appreciate its flexibility, as it al...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Meraki Dashboard?

The cost of the Meraki solution is high, which may not be affordable for smaller companies, especially in developing countries.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Meraki Dashboard?

The aspect I find challenging about this solution is that it is too extensive and complex. For example, when comparing Meraki Dashboard to Juniper Mist, the latter is quite simple. Mist is a very a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco DNA Center vs Meraki Dashboard

Compared 19% of the time

Zabbix vs Meraki Dashboard

Compared 14% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Meraki Dashboard

Compared 12% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Meraki Dashboard

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Meraki Dashboard

Compared 6% of the time

More Meraki Dashboard Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 48% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 28% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 24% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Meraki Dashboard

August 2025

Download Meraki Dashboard product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

July 2025

Download Statseeker product report

Overview

Meraki Dashboard is a comprehensive cloud-based platform that offers centralized management and control for all Meraki networking and security products. It provides a user-friendly interface, allowing administrators to easily monitor and configure their network infrastructure from anywhere. With real-time visibility, troubleshooting becomes effortless, ensuring optimal performance and minimizing downtime.

The intuitive dashboard offers a holistic view of the network, enabling quick identification of potential issues and proactive measures. It simplifies network deployment and scaling, with zero-touch provisioning and automatic firmware updates. The robust security features include advanced threat protection, content filtering, and VPN connectivity.

Meraki Dashboard also offers powerful analytics and reporting capabilities, providing valuable insights into network usage, application performance, and user behavior. With its seamless integration and scalability,

Meraki Dashboard is the ideal solution for organizations of all sizes, ensuring efficient network management and enhanced productivity.

Cisco

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Coop eG, Peet's Coffee & Tea, Priefert Manufacturing, Century Care Management, Clifton College, Zürs Ski Resort, Capital FM Arena, MAXI Autohöfe

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

Meraki Dashboard vs. Statseeker

July 2025

Free Report: Meraki Dashboard vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about Meraki Dashboard vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Meraki Dashboard vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.