DX Performance Management vs ScienceLogic comparison

DX Performance Management

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

3,857 Views
1,813 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and DX Performance Management are competitive products in the IT management space. ScienceLogic seems to have the upper hand due to its high level of customization and flexibility, whereas DX Performance Management stands out for its straightforward user experience and specialized performance monitoring.

Features: ScienceLogic offers high customization with a multi-tenant environment, supports a wide range of integrations, and provides powerful monitoring templates. DX Performance Management is noted for specialized performance overviews, ease of setup, and network performance visibility.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic has room for improvement in its API expansion, reporting modules, and UI simplifications. Users also find challenges in deploying synthetic transaction monitoring and network configurations. DX Performance Management could enhance its high availability features, bolster reporting capabilities, and refine alerting for precision and consistency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products deploy well in on-premises environments, with ScienceLogic also offering cloud options. ScienceLogic's customer service is praised for its responsiveness and personalized support, though there is room for improvement. DX Performance Management provides competent technical support, with minor criticisms regarding consistency.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic's pricing is flexible with various licensing options but can become expensive with many devices. However, it offers a positive ROI by reducing incident response times. DX Performance Management's pricing is straightforward and competitive. Both reportedly streamline IT operations and reduce downtime, delivering positive ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Performance Management vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: September 2025).

DX Performance Management vs. ScienceLogic

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,785 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Performance Management

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

55th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure Capacity Planning (2nd), DX NetOps (2nd)

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

26th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (18th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (15th), AIOps (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Performance Management is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.2%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ScienceLogic	1.2%
DX Performance Management	0.3%
Other	98.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sandip Kheni

Lead Developer at STL - Sterlite Technologies Limited

The vertical database loads faster than any other product available

We experience disconnections between the solutions own components. In the last five years, there have been many intermittent connection issues with the four components and we still don't know the reasons. The solution has issues when loading groups that have been created in the application interfaces. It would be nice to have a mobile application. In the current industry and technical word, the mobile phone is the only thing that is always in your hands. Other Broadcom products have mobile applications but the solution doesn't offer one. It would be great to view device parameters and view or download graphs from a mobile device.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When we deployed it, right out of the box we were able to stand up Performance Management within two weeks, in our production environment, with full discovery and relevant information, actual information, that we could use in our command center, our 24/7 operations center."

"My sales representative, I would not trade him in for the world. He has done a really good job. I am really happy with him."

"When devices are having performance issues, it proactively build dashboards which allow us to go and do health checks, and resolve problems before they become an issue."

"Great dashboards and good integration with other solutions."

"The ability to very quickly and graphically navigate around, being able to zoom in to a timeframe, apply it to all the other panels... are all very intuitive."

"It can be easily integrated with other systems and is powerful enough to collect data from a large number of devices."

"Since the implementation of the tool, it has cut down on probably 60% of our outages and letting us know what is going on."

"The out-of-the-box dashboards are valuable, in terms of being able to visualize performance data in ways that we haven't in the past."

More DX Performance Management pros

"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."

"The power flow is great."

"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."

"ScienceLogic's custom enablement, which I can achieve as a Python developer, is unique."

"It is very easy to configure because we are using an agent-less version. You can very quickly implement a collector for monitoring device servers."

"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."

"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."

"I recommend ScienceLogic to other users."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"Policies could be improved."

"CA PM Business Hours Filtering: I understand that all monitoring systems have defects. The Business Hours Filtering does not always function properly. Sometimes, when applying business hours to CA PM reports that are 30 or more days in duration, the report generation times out and does not display results. We have other CA PM reports that, when we apply Business Hours Filtering, the report results displayed are the same as without the filter. We are not sure if this is a defect in CA PM or if it is a result of our complex configuration (folder structure) and application of business hours."

"It needs role-based administration."

"Since we are out of registered IP space, we are moving to ipv6 and we expect our vendors to move with us, and they have not delivered yet."

"This may be available by now but for server space, when it comes to the disk file system, I'd like to see that graphically represented, or the trend, rather than what I'm seeing now."

"Even though we can see when something is not available, it would also be it would be nice if some sort of alerting took place to that you could know immediately if something went down."

"The quantity of views which are tied to specific metric families is too high. Also, the problem is the view doesn't tell you which metric family it uses, so you don't know why you don't see data."

"I have mixed feeling about the scalability. I feel like there are things which are being put into UIM right now that are not being included in Performance Center that we need to see in Performance Center. We are kind of being driven to buy UIM, and I can't justify it."

More DX Performance Management cons

"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."

"They need a little more self-service."

"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."

"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."

"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."

"There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks."

"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."

"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."

"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."

"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."

"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. "

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Educational Organization

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	25

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DX Performance Management?

The tool helps us understand network performance.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Performance Management?

The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices.

What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?

Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management

Comparisons

Compared 24% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs DX Performance Management

Compared 24% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX Performance Management

Compared 22% of the time

SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs DX Performance Management

Compared 15% of the time

OmniPeek vs DX Performance Management

Compared 15% of the time

More DX Performance Management Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 12% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

DX Performance Management

October 2025

Download DX Performance Management product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

September 2025

Also Known As

CA Performance Management

No data available

Overview

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Broadcom

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

Sample Customers

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell