Dameware Remote Support vs TeamViewer comparison

SolarWinds and TeamViewer are both solutions in the Remote Access category. SolarWinds is ranked #29, while TeamViewer is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. SolarWinds holds a 1.5% mindshare in VUS, compared to TeamViewer’s 8.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SolarWinds users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of TeamViewer users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 19, 2026

TeamViewer Business and Dameware Remote Support compete in the remote support industry. TeamViewer Business has the upper hand in reliability and usability, while Dameware Remote Support excels in comprehensive features and integration.

Features: TeamViewer Business offers robust cross-platform compatibility, secure remote connections, and ease of use. Dameware Remote Support provides network management tools, multi-platform support, and advanced tools for deeper network control.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TeamViewer Business is straightforward to deploy with minimal setup requirements and reliable customer service. Dameware Remote Support offers enhanced customization options for large-scale IT deployments with solid customer service.

Pricing and ROI: TeamViewer Business features a straightforward pricing structure, offering quick setup and competitive ROI. Dameware Remote Support has a higher upfront setup cost but delivers significant ROI through its extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Dameware Remote Support vs. TeamViewer Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Dameware Remote Support vs. TeamViewer

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 907,664 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Remote Access category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 5.9%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dameware Remote Support is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer is 8.2%, up from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Access Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
TeamViewer	8.2%
Microsoft Intune	5.9%
Dameware Remote Support	1.5%
Other	84.4%

Remote Access

Featured Reviews

OluwashileAdeniyi

Senior Infrastructure Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized endpoint security has improved and supports hybrid work and BYOD policies

Regarding what I dislike about Microsoft Intune and its downsides, I would say that more Mac controls are needed because we have limited Mac and Linux control. When comparing controls and policies between Windows, Mac, and Linux, Windows has almost everything you can think of, while Mac and Linux have limited types of control. You cannot implement certain things on Mac and Linux that you can on Windows. The limited controls are a major issue. Additionally, if Microsoft could find a way to embed servers into Microsoft Intune, that would be beneficial. Microsoft Intune is not really designed for servers or Windows servers. It is more tailored towards Windows 11 and Windows 10 operating systems. Windows servers are not fully supported. Enterprise organizations usually have both servers and endpoints, which are users' workstations. For servers, most people look for other solutions such as SCCM, which is Configuration Manager. However, SCCM is what Microsoft Intune is trying to replace. Both SCCM and Microsoft Intune belong to Microsoft. Microsoft is trying to transition organizations into Microsoft Intune, the native cloud solution. However, because this update is still in process, servers are not fully compatible with Microsoft Intune and cannot be managed by it. The current policy that has emerged from issues with clients is what they call co-management, which is relatively new, and I do not know if adoption is significant. Many legacy or older customers who have been using these products for decades still have SCCM. When it is time for them to manage their Windows devices, they use what is called cloud attach. Cloud attach is a term whereby your SCCM is connected to your Microsoft Intune. Most people do not know about it, but I have deployed it for several organizations. Cloud attach and co-management work together so that your device is in SCCM, but some policies are pushed from Microsoft Intune. It is like two different solutions working hand in hand. That is what they call co-management. Microsoft Intune does not bring all of your endpoint and security management tools into one place, which is the goal and how it should be. However, as I mentioned, servers are not included. If we talk about end users, Microsoft Intune does bring all your devices together. In a typical enterprise environment, you have end users with workstations, laptops, company-issued phones, and bring your own devices. You can create policies for all of these. However, for the backend, your servers do not have much coverage. Servers are not really covered by Microsoft Intune in that way.

Read full review

it_user323577

Tier1 - IT Support Technician at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees

We're able to see issues from the users' perspectives, but there are issues when connecting over VPN.

The ability to see issue from users perspective and installation of software. Worked well for awhile but issues with it connecting over VPN was a major drawback. We've been using it since 2009. We also utilize GoToAssist which has more features and runs smoother. It also allows us to send…

Read full review

Shubham-Agarwal

Manager - Projects at Cognizant

Remote access has cut critical issue resolution time and supports faster production troubleshooting

Perhaps on the UI side of TeamViewer because we are connecting to different remote desktop connections or remote server connections. Whenever we are working on one of the production issues and we open multiple connections, it is very hectic or confusing to jump from one server to another server. Perhaps on the UI side, if they can improve something related to the view sessions or which session is connected to which remote server, that would be helpful. Perhaps something related to the authentication because it should have a proper authentication mechanism. Every developer should not access TeamViewer or the remote desktop by using TeamViewer. We always have a proper authentication or multifactor authentication mechanism in place, so only those on on-call support or P1 support at that time can access the remote server, but not anyone else. I chose nine out of 10 because sometimes we face the session timeout issue. Suppose during the production support, we connect to one of the remote servers, and if it is idle for approximately 10 or 15 minutes, the session timeout happens. We have to follow the same authentication mechanism to connect to the remote server again. During the session timeout, it delays our process or the troubleshooting steps, which is the reason I have given nine out of 10 instead of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution’s most valuable feature is its ease of use."

"The performance of Microsoft Intune is good."

"The ability to block and erase remote devices is valuable to us, especially when those devices are lost."

"It helps us manage user certificates."

"The policies on the solution are very good, the process of enrolling devices is a useful aspect for us, the features that allow us to control the devices are helpful, the initial setup is not hard at all, technical support, in general, has been quite helpful, we've found the configuration capabilities to be quite good, and so far, the solution is fast and has an intuitive interface."

"This product offers an alternative solution to other UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) solutions."

"Microsoft Intune has saved me about 30% of my time through streamlined processes and efficient resource management."

"Internet-based access with security is what I have found to be most valuable. It is also a stable and scalable solution."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"Using DameWare has made the troubleshooting process faster."

"It was very easy to install."

"The ability to control admin rights through AD groups allows the techs to have all of the rights that they would normally without adjustments on the backend of the product."

"The usability and graphic interface stand out for me because it is very easy to understand, with upper bars, all the features, and the file transfer functionality."

"TeamViewer is useful for accessing data and systems remotely, and using this application, I can access other computers using an ID number that I provide to the users whose laptop I would like to access."

"It's worth every penny; I would recommend it any time."

"Getting started with TeamViewer was easy, with a very straightforward usage"

"The implementation process is simple."

"The solution is stable, reliable, has no bugs or glitches, does not crash or freeze, and the performance is good."

"Using TeamViewer for my personal clients has made things much better for me and my clients because my clients are happy to resolve a problem within seconds via TeamViewer."

"I don't know of any performance problems with TeamViewer - generally, it's a stable product."

More TeamViewer pros

Cons

"I switched away from Microsoft Intune because it cannot manage the MacBook very well."

"Customer support is decent overall, but not perfect. Most issues get resolved but sometimes response time can be a bit slow or require multiple follow-ups."

"I would like the ability to install the agent on devices from suppliers, which would enable us to implement a zero-trust strategy for guest devices."

"For migrations, sometimes we experience some issues with OS deployment and the user experience side."

"Management of Linux devices from Microsoft Intune would be great. Then we can manage any device and not only Windows and Apple."

"They should improve its compatibility with other operating systems such as iOS and Linux. It supports Linux but they still need to work on the iOS part."

"Intune could be improved by organizing different solutions, like Defender and Sentinel, into a single package. This would allow us to focus on security while Microsoft manages other areas. Having a unified solution would drive better management of various sectors. Although the Intune user experience is good, we should continue enhancing it."

"I find the solution quite old school with not many features."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"SolarWinds has a great KB but many of the articles are lacking updated information and the keyword search is lacking if you don't have previous experience with the product and encounter issues."

"Worked well for awhile but issues with it connecting over VPN was a major drawback."

"It would be useful if the solution could facilitate more than one remote user accessing my desktop at a time."

"By comparison, TeamViewer is a complete mess; the way they do it is a total nightmare, and it does not work well."

"TeamViewer could improve by having support for other operating systems, such as Linux."

"The product's expensive nature is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"We'd like to be able to work from mobile to desktop and vice versa. We'd like more mobility."

"There are some issues with the stability of TeamViewer."

"We access the solution through a VPN, which improves our security. However, earlier this year, around the beginning of March, a CVE in the TeamViewer client allowed remote connections to other network systems, which was concerning. You could have unintentionally gained admin rights if you didn't update TeamViewer promptly. It's crucial to always keep it updated to prevent such issues. The tool should consider implementing two-factor authentication to improve such security holes. It should also integrate good security updates, which should be implemented automatically."

"We would like to have an option to create subgroups, where only members of the subgroup have access to the other members."

More TeamViewer cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate Intune five out of 10 for pricing. It's expensive."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis."

"Consider the Microsoft Enterprise Mobility Suite rather than choosing specific sub-components, e.g. only Microsoft Intune."

"There is a cost benefit of using Microsoft Intune because of the packaging with other Microsoft products."

"It comes with the E5 plan. We bought the E5 plan from Microsoft."

"It is cheap, but as compared to Google, it is costly. Google is cheaper, but quality-wise, Microsoft Intune is better."

"Microsoft Intune is included in the E5 license at no additional cost."

"We have a limited budget for security investments, so Microsoft should consider reducing pricing in our region. This would make investment more viable, especially since larger businesses in other countries can afford it easily."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

Information not available

"It would be nice if it is cheaper."

"TeamViewer's price is cheaper than some other similar solutions. We have licenses for our users."

"The price was cheaper than what we were previously paying. At the time that we went with TeamViewer, we were using ShareConnect. The TeamViewer package was about half the cost and able to have a bigger number of users."

"I used the free version of TeamViewer."

"TeamViewer is $600 or $700 per port per year..."

"The version of the solution we are using is free."

"The pricing is a little bit on the higher side."

"TeamViewer pricing is reasonable... The simultaneous controller licensing model of TeamViewer - compared to LogMeIn’s controlled Host licensing model - seems to benefit us so far. We’re currently saving about 30 percent on licensing cost... The savings from licensing have been eaten up by the soft costs involved in dealing with and working around TeamViewer’s deficiencies in allowing granular control by multiple controllers, and the issues with the various settings that are missing on the macOS Host."

More TeamViewer pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Access solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

907,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	193
Midsize Enterprise	61
Large Enterprise	186

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	37
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Should I choose Teamviewer Tensor over the regular Teamviewer?

The number one advantage of TeamViewer for me is its ease of use, specifically as it relates to the client side. By f...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamViewer?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for TeamViewer Business are relatively very competitive and cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamViewer?

I believe latency can be optimized, and security control sometimes goes over the top and feels excessive. Virus scann...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 11% of the time

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs Dameware Remote Support

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds Dameware Remove Everywhere vs Dameware Remote Support

Compared 11% of the time

N-able Take Control vs Dameware Remote Support

Compared 7% of the time

ManageEngine ADAudit Plus vs Dameware Remote Support

Compared 7% of the time

Splashtop Remote Support vs Dameware Remote Support

Compared 4% of the time

More Dameware Remote Support Competitors

BeyondTrust Remote Support vs TeamViewer

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs TeamViewer

Compared 5% of the time

LogMeIn Rescue vs TeamViewer

Compared 3% of the time

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs TeamViewer

Compared 3% of the time

N-able Take Control vs TeamViewer

Compared 3% of the time

More TeamViewer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

July 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

Remote Access

July 2026

Download Dameware Remote Support product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamViewer

July 2026

Download TeamViewer product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

DameWare, SolarWinds DameWare, SolarWinds Dameware Remote Support

TeamViewer Tensor

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

Dameware Remote Support offers a robust IT management solution, designed to streamline remote troubleshooting and support for IT professionals. It ensures efficient administration with ease across networks.

Dameware Remote Support stands out as a comprehensive tool for IT departments, enabling seamless access and management of systems remotely. It integrates efficiently with existing infrastructures, offering features such as remote desktop control, system diagnostics, and user management. Designed for scalability, it adapts to varying network sizes, making it suitable for organizations looking to simplify their IT support processes.

What are the key features of Dameware Remote Support?

Remote Desktop Sharing: Allows IT pros to securely access desktops for quick issue resolution.
System Troubleshooting: Offers diagnostic tools to identify and address system problems efficiently.
Active Directory Management: Integrates with Active Directory to manage user roles and permissions.
Multi-platform Support: Compatible with Windows, Linux, and Mac systems, enhancing versatility.

What benefits should users look for in the reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Reduces time spent troubleshooting issues remotely, boosting productivity.
Cost-effectiveness: Offers a significant ROI by streamlining IT operations and reducing downtime.
User Satisfaction: Enhances tech support quality, leading to better user experiences.

Dameware Remote Support is implemented effectively across industries like healthcare, finance, and education, where remote access and control are critical. Its compatibility and comprehensive toolset cater to specific industry needs, providing reliable and secure remote management solutions.

SolarWinds

TeamViewer offers a license type mainly for small teams, focusing on remote connectivity solutions. It includes TeamViewer Remote and TeamViewer Tensor, catering to both small businesses and large enterprises with specialized needs.

TeamViewer Business isn't standalone but a primary license for small teams. Its remote connectivity suite includes TeamViewer Remote and TeamViewer Tensor, the latter offering enhanced features for enterprises. It enables secure, high-speed remote access, collaboration, and troubleshooting. Major users suggest aligning product descriptions and improvement in interfaces and user experiences.

What are the key features of TeamViewer?

High-speed and secure remote access: Fast connections with strong security measures.
Robust collaboration tools: Enhances team productivity remotely.
Screen sharing: Easy display sharing for presentations and meetings.
Session recording: Documentation and review of remote sessions.
Easy integration: Seamless compatibility with other platforms and tools.

What benefits do users highlight?

Improved workflow: Streamlines processes and reduces downtime.
Efficient troubleshooting: Quick resolutions to technical issues.
Compliance assurance: Meets necessary security standards and regulations.
Time and resource savings: Minimizes the need for physical presence and travel.

Organizations use TeamViewer for remote desktop connectivity to manage and solve IT issues. It allows technical support, collaboration, and training with real-time assistance and secure access. By enabling remote support for employees and customers, it ensures efficient issue resolution across industries, such as healthcare, finance, and education.

TeamViewer

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Illinois School District

Porsche Informatik, Philips, DHL, Intel, Motorola, Microsoft, IBM, Siemens, Fujitsu, American Red Cross

Buyer's Guide

Dameware Remote Support vs. TeamViewer

June 2026

Free Report: Dameware Remote Support vs. TeamViewer

Find out what your peers are saying about Dameware Remote Support vs. TeamViewer and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

907,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dameware Remote Support vs. TeamViewer report.

See our list of best Remote Access vendors.

We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.