ISL Online vs TeamViewer comparison

ISL Online and TeamViewer are both solutions in the Remote Access category. ISL Online is ranked #32, while TeamViewer is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. ISL Online holds a 1.2% mindshare in VUS, compared to TeamViewer’s 8.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ISL Online users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of TeamViewer users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 19, 2026

TeamViewer Business and ISL Online are two competitive remote support solutions. TeamViewer Business seems to have the upper hand in terms of comprehensive functionality and ease of use, whereas ISL Online is preferred for its straightforward pricing and flexibility in deployment options.

Features: TeamViewer Business provides a rich feature set, including session recording, advanced security with two-factor authentication, and seamless integration capabilities. It's noted for its automatic reconnection feature, cross-platform compatibility, and efficient file transfer, enhancing workflow. ISL Online offers essential features such as unattended remote access, focusing on reliability and simplicity with easy-to-use operations that support cloud or on-premises deployment.

Room for Improvement: Feedback points to TeamViewer Business needing clearer licensing, better Linux support, and UI enhancements. ISL Online could improve on integration capabilities and provide more informative updates on features. TeamViewer users also cite cost and licensing complexities as areas needing attention, while ISL Online users look for better mobile platform support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions offer on-premises and cloud deployment options. TeamViewer also allows for hybrid cloud setups and is praised for responsive customer service. ISL Online is recognized for its stable performance and easy deployment, but there is less feedback on customer service, which suggests room for enhancement.

Pricing and ROI: TeamViewer Business is viewed as cost-effective considering its rich features, though concerns about high costs and complex licensing remain. ISL Online's pricing is simple and scalable, with pay-per-use options that appeal to SMEs prioritizing cost efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed ISL Online vs. TeamViewer Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ISL Online vs. TeamViewer

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 903,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Remote Access category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 5.9%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ISL Online is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer is 8.2%, up from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Access Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
TeamViewer	8.2%
Microsoft Intune	5.9%
ISL Online	1.2%
Other	84.7%

Remote Access

Featured Reviews

OluwashileAdeniyi

Senior Infrastructure Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized endpoint security has improved and supports hybrid work and BYOD policies

Regarding what I dislike about Microsoft Intune and its downsides, I would say that more Mac controls are needed because we have limited Mac and Linux control. When comparing controls and policies between Windows, Mac, and Linux, Windows has almost everything you can think of, while Mac and Linux have limited types of control. You cannot implement certain things on Mac and Linux that you can on Windows. The limited controls are a major issue. Additionally, if Microsoft could find a way to embed servers into Microsoft Intune, that would be beneficial. Microsoft Intune is not really designed for servers or Windows servers. It is more tailored towards Windows 11 and Windows 10 operating systems. Windows servers are not fully supported. Enterprise organizations usually have both servers and endpoints, which are users' workstations. For servers, most people look for other solutions such as SCCM, which is Configuration Manager. However, SCCM is what Microsoft Intune is trying to replace. Both SCCM and Microsoft Intune belong to Microsoft. Microsoft is trying to transition organizations into Microsoft Intune, the native cloud solution. However, because this update is still in process, servers are not fully compatible with Microsoft Intune and cannot be managed by it. The current policy that has emerged from issues with clients is what they call co-management, which is relatively new, and I do not know if adoption is significant. Many legacy or older customers who have been using these products for decades still have SCCM. When it is time for them to manage their Windows devices, they use what is called cloud attach. Cloud attach is a term whereby your SCCM is connected to your Microsoft Intune. Most people do not know about it, but I have deployed it for several organizations. Cloud attach and co-management work together so that your device is in SCCM, but some policies are pushed from Microsoft Intune. It is like two different solutions working hand in hand. That is what they call co-management. Microsoft Intune does not bring all of your endpoint and security management tools into one place, which is the goal and how it should be. However, as I mentioned, servers are not included. If we talk about end users, Microsoft Intune does bring all your devices together. In a typical enterprise environment, you have end users with workstations, laptops, company-issued phones, and bring your own devices. You can create policies for all of these. However, for the backend, your servers do not have much coverage. Servers are not really covered by Microsoft Intune in that way.

Read full review

ErikDas

Owner at Cherub

Easy to deploy, stable, scalable and safe

I previously used TeamViewer. ISL Online is definitely the better choice compared to TeamViewer, as it offers a more secure connection that does not involve peer-to-peer transport, and all data is encrypted. A single license for ISL Online costs about the same as TeamViewer but with multiple licenses, ISL Online is cheaper.

Read full review

Shubham-Agarwal

Manager - Projects at Cognizant

Remote access has cut critical issue resolution time and supports faster production troubleshooting

Perhaps on the UI side of TeamViewer because we are connecting to different remote desktop connections or remote server connections. Whenever we are working on one of the production issues and we open multiple connections, it is very hectic or confusing to jump from one server to another server. Perhaps on the UI side, if they can improve something related to the view sessions or which session is connected to which remote server, that would be helpful. Perhaps something related to the authentication because it should have a proper authentication mechanism. Every developer should not access TeamViewer or the remote desktop by using TeamViewer. We always have a proper authentication or multifactor authentication mechanism in place, so only those on on-call support or P1 support at that time can access the remote server, but not anyone else. I chose nine out of 10 because sometimes we face the session timeout issue. Suppose during the production support, we connect to one of the remote servers, and if it is idle for approximately 10 or 15 minutes, the session timeout happens. We have to follow the same authentication mechanism to connect to the remote server again. During the session timeout, it delays our process or the troubleshooting steps, which is the reason I have given nine out of 10 instead of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Stable solution at a good price."

"It is a cloud solution, and you can easily scale as your needs grow."

"The most valuable feature is the UEM capabilities."

"The initial setup is not complex."

"Microsoft Intune reduces the time of our engineers, cuts down costs for the deployment of our endpoints managed by Microsoft Intune, and helps to improve compliance and the security policies we wanted to apply on endpoints, which was not happening earlier."

"The security posture is very good. It's very customizable."

"Microsoft Intune is a very strong and modern endpoint management solution, especially for organizations moving towards cloud and hybrid environments."

"Comparing this to having an endpoint management solution, the efficiency gain may be up to 80%."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"The stability is great; reliability is what's very important to me, as well as security, and this solution may have only had one instance of downtime in 14 years."

"ISL is a fundamental partner for us since, throughout all these years, it has allowed us to grow and solve the problems of our customers and their users in a very fast and agile way without having to move, even providing service abroad."

"It's much easier to connect with other services, and it's working great. We haven't had any problems."

"Setting up the solution is easy and there's no maintenance involved."

"I personally really appreciate the file transfer feature as it is really easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is safety."

"The solution has a lot of features. It does what it is made to do and that's all we can ask for, really."

"ISL Online is easy to use. It provides a single platform on which we can do everything, and it's very low maintenance. After installation, you don't need an IT manager or staff to watch over it. It's secure. It's most important for us."

More ISL Online pros

"I use TeamViewer to connect to other workstations, Mac, or PC without a VPN connection."

"The solution has worked flawlessly; it’s stable and reliable, with no bugs or glitches."

"TeamViewer has a lot of options for deploying the Hosts, where you can mass deploy them very easily, and you can pre-configure them."

"The usability and graphic interface stand out for me because it is very easy to understand, with upper bars, all the features, and the file transfer functionality."

"TeamViewer has a good interface."

"In the years I have used TeamViewer, everything that I missed was already added."

"It's feature-rich and easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is very fast. The file transfer from remote machines to my machine or from my machine to the remote machine works well."

More TeamViewer pros

Cons

"If we could remote into a device, it would be great. Currently, we cannot directly connect to the user device. We have to use other tools such as VMware for connecting to devices."

"If you wish to block any App Store application, there is no way to do so."

"During the onboarding of Microsoft Intune, we faced the problem that the policies were not getting synced."

"Microsoft Intune is currently overpriced."

"The solution requires Mac support."

"Intune's privilege management feature, while beneficial, is less intuitive than other Intune features, making it challenging to use."

"The main differences between Intune and other products are, like I mentioned, in terms of the Mac. If the customers are majorly moving and adopting Mac laptops while they are using the Intune, they are leaving for other platforms, like Workspace ONE and vMOX."

"The reporting functionality of Microsoft Intune is limited compared to Microsoft System Center, which offers many more reporting options."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"What bothered me the most was that when I connected to the computer at the office, I was afraid that someone would turn on the monitor and watch what I was doing."

"Updating the program could be improved. When they're pushing updates, you don't really know that there's an update available."

"There have been times during updates when something wouldn't work quite right, however, they are quick with updates and quick with fixes."

"I would like to have a little bit more information when new features are released. They have added features that I didn't know about in the past. It would be easier for me to implement new features and consolidate them with other systems in our network if I knew beforehand."

"They should improve the integrations with other incident management software to be able to send the link directly from these platforms."

"If there is an update or new feature on ISL Online, I don't know about it. I would be happy to receive a newsletter or notification of new features or updates."

"There could be a section in the menu describing the new features and changes."

"We miss the possibility to communicate via head-set in ISL. At the moment, we combine ISL for visual communication with Skype for verbal communication."

More ISL Online cons

"TeamViewer is expensive, and you get a limited number of connections for your money."

"TeamViewer can improve connectivity. I had some problems connecting to my clients and now I use AnyDesk."

"Only the paid version allows for file transfer. Also, it is annoying that I have to upgrade every time they release a new version because I can't use an older version to access a new one even if my version is paid and their version is a trial."

"The product's expensive nature is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"By comparison, TeamViewer is a complete mess; the way they do it is a total nightmare, and it does not work well."

"I think the pricing could have been improved, as smaller organizations like us usually need a low-cost tool."

"Considering the earlier versions of the product, I think TeamViewer used to slow down the systems."

"It should have ability to display notes in the computer list."

More TeamViewer cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing needs improvement."

"The product is offered as part of a Microsoft standard bundle. The pricing can be competitive to Airwatch, and Maas360."

"Microsoft Intune is more expensive than other solutions, but it offers a wider range of features and control."

"I rate Intune an eight out of ten for affordability. It's bundled with the 365 licensing, which is competitive overall."

"No one can compete with Microsoft when it comes to price, and the features it is offering."

"The cost is somewhat on the higher side, particularly when considering certain price points, especially in markets like India."

"Microsoft Intune is a cost effective choice. It is less expensive than other products on the market."

"Microsoft Intune's costliness stems from licensing fees and the overhead associated with its management, user experience, and device remediation."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"We have a pay-per-use license available for 500 minutes within one year for 95 Euros. However, this option is not popular. Alternatively, we can purchase a one-year license for 339 Euros; if we need two licenses, the cost is double, and for three licenses, the cost is triple with a ten percent discount. For 99 Euros a year, we can open multiple sessions on the same computer with a multi-session subscription."

"TeamViewer was willing to give us a one-year package. Whereas, a lot of the other companies that we explored were paid by the month or quarter. It's just easier for our finance people at the college if we can make a one-time yearly payment."

"The solution has a pilot feature that is expensive. The overall price of the solution can be cheaper."

"We have an annual subscription that is just under $1,900 with no additional costs. We get these promotions about upgrades and stuff like that, but we haven't had a need to add more seats. Users can also use TeamViewer for home use with a non-commercial free license."

"We are using the standard free version of TeamViewer."

"We have a corporate license. The maximum amount number of users changes based on the amount you pay. E.g., with our license, there is a maximum amount of users who can use the solution at the same time (10 users)."

"The cost of the licenses depends on how you buy them. They just had a buy one get one free deal going, and they do that every once in a while. Where you buy one license, and they will give you the second one free, or you can try to get discounts. Most of our licenses that we have we tried to do something like that just to save some money."

"I am using the free version of TeamViewer. There is a subscription fee to use the premium features."

"The price was cheaper than what we were previously paying. At the time that we went with TeamViewer, we were using ShareConnect. The TeamViewer package was about half the cost and able to have a bigger number of users."

More TeamViewer pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Access solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

903,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Performing Arts

14%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	193
Midsize Enterprise	61
Large Enterprise	186

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	37
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Should I choose Teamviewer Tensor over the regular Teamviewer?

The number one advantage of TeamViewer for me is its ease of use, specifically as it relates to the client side. By f...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamViewer?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for TeamViewer Business are relatively very competitive and cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamViewer?

I believe latency can be optimized, and security control sometimes goes over the top and feels excessive. Virus scann...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 4% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

Splashtop Remote Support vs ISL Online

Compared 16% of the time

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs ISL Online

Compared 11% of the time

ScreenConnect vs ISL Online

Compared 9% of the time

LogMeIn Rescue vs ISL Online

Compared 8% of the time

Transmit Security vs ISL Online

Compared 6% of the time

More ISL Online Competitors

BeyondTrust Remote Support vs TeamViewer

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs TeamViewer

Compared 5% of the time

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs TeamViewer

Compared 4% of the time

LogMeIn Rescue vs TeamViewer

Compared 4% of the time

Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager vs TeamViewer

Compared 2% of the time

More TeamViewer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

June 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

ISL Online

June 2026

Download ISL Online product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamViewer

June 2026

Download TeamViewer product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

No data available

TeamViewer Tensor

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

ISL Online provides secure, cross-platform remote access and user-friendly features. Its unattended access and robust security options enhance IT operations without needing user interaction, making it ideal for versatile applications.

ISL Online stands out with its comprehensive remote access capabilities, facilitating controlled, secure connections across numerous platforms. Its ease of setup and stability make it a trusted option for diverse customers, enabling organized computer management and efficient customer support. Cloud and on-premise hosting flexibility underlines its adaptability in varied environments. The platform's strong unattended access mechanisms, seamless file transfer capabilities, and intuitive utilities such as drawing tools ensure efficient remote sessions. Strong encryption and generated security codes underscore its commitment to maintaining high security standards.

What are the key features of ISL Online?

Secure Remote Access: Allows control without user interaction.
Platform Versatility: Compatible with multiple systems.
Unattended Access: Enables efficient access when users are absent.
File Transfer: Provides seamless data exchange.
Intuitive Drawing Tools: Facilitates communication and collaboration.
Categorized Computer Management: Enhances IT efficiency.

What benefits can be expected when evaluating ISL Online?

High Security: Offers reliable encryption and code generation.
Stability: Users report robust performance during sessions.
Ease of Setup: Quick and straightforward configuration.
Cloud and On-Premise Flexibility: Supports different deployment models.
Efficient Customer Support: Improved response times and issue resolution.

ISL Online is widely used for remote technical support and customer assistance, enabling IT firms and managed service providers to remotely manage client devices and troubleshoot server issues. Government offices and broadcasting entities rely on it for secure access to unattended servers. ERP system providers benefit from its problem-solving and seamless file transfer capabilities, while cross-platform compatibility supports integration into unique IT environments, enhancing client interactions.

ISL Online

TeamViewer offers a license type mainly for small teams, focusing on remote connectivity solutions. It includes TeamViewer Remote and TeamViewer Tensor, catering to both small businesses and large enterprises with specialized needs.

TeamViewer Business isn't standalone but a primary license for small teams. Its remote connectivity suite includes TeamViewer Remote and TeamViewer Tensor, the latter offering enhanced features for enterprises. It enables secure, high-speed remote access, collaboration, and troubleshooting. Major users suggest aligning product descriptions and improvement in interfaces and user experiences.

What are the key features of TeamViewer?

High-speed and secure remote access: Fast connections with strong security measures.
Robust collaboration tools: Enhances team productivity remotely.
Screen sharing: Easy display sharing for presentations and meetings.
Session recording: Documentation and review of remote sessions.
Easy integration: Seamless compatibility with other platforms and tools.

What benefits do users highlight?

Improved workflow: Streamlines processes and reduces downtime.
Efficient troubleshooting: Quick resolutions to technical issues.
Compliance assurance: Meets necessary security standards and regulations.
Time and resource savings: Minimizes the need for physical presence and travel.

Organizations use TeamViewer for remote desktop connectivity to manage and solve IT issues. It allows technical support, collaboration, and training with real-time assistance and secure access. By enabling remote support for employees and customers, it ensures efficient issue resolution across industries, such as healthcare, finance, and education.

TeamViewer

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Mitsubishi Chemicals, Konica Minolta, Raifeissen bank, Terpel, Singtel, Teleroute, SOS Kinderdorf, Arsys, EMAAR, Dutco, Alterdata

Porsche Informatik, Philips, DHL, Intel, Motorola, Microsoft, IBM, Siemens, Fujitsu, American Red Cross

Buyer's Guide

ISL Online vs. TeamViewer

June 2026

Free Report: ISL Online vs. TeamViewer

Find out what your peers are saying about ISL Online vs. TeamViewer and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

903,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ISL Online vs. TeamViewer report.

See our list of best Remote Access vendors.

We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.