CrowdStrike Observability vs Elastic Observability comparison

CrowdStrike and Elastic are both solutions in the Log Management category. CrowdStrike is ranked #41 with an average rating of 7.7, while Elastic is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.1. CrowdStrike holds a 0.5% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Elastic’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Elastic users who would recommend it.

CrowdStrike Observability

Read 4 CrowdStrike Observability reviews

793 Views
777 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

Read 27 Elastic Observability reviews

9,965 Views
2,491 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

CrowdStrike Observability

Elastic Observability

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CrowdStrike Observability and Elastic Observability based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Observability vs. Elastic Observability Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Observability vs. Elastic Observability

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Observability

Ranking in Log Management

41st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Elastic Observability

Ranking in Log Management

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (11th), Container Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Observability is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Observability is 1.3%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

ManelAlvarez

Technical engineer at Devoteam Management Consulting

Protection improves through superior global visibility and robust cloud integration

CrowdStrike Observability is especially useful when using a multi-cloud environment. Although it is expensive, the protection level it provides justifies the price. For users on Google Cloud, I prefer using Google's GTI technology. Overall, I would rate CrowdStrike Observability as nine out of ten. I rate the overall solution as nine.

Read full review

Adelina Craciun

Product Owner at Swisscom

Customization enables tailored monitoring and alerting across departments

The possibility to customize it has been quite useful. Whatever the other departments want to dream up, we implement. Whatever they want to monitor, the granularity of it, the changes in the threshold, and the anomalies that they want reported all require some development. So far, every single request has been fulfilled.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The log aggregation and correlation of data are notable features that enhance our operations."

"The price is worth it."

"I find the most effective feature of CrowdStrike Observability to be its cloud vision and attack surface vision, which enhance network traffic analysis."

"The intelligence database provided by CrowdStrike is very impressive."

"It is a powerful tool that allows users to collect and transform logs as needed, enabling flexible visualization and analysis."

"We can view and connect different sources to the dashboard using it."

"The ability to ensure that the data is searchable and maintainable is highly valuable for our purposes."

"The most valued feature of Elastic is its log analytics capabilities."

"It is very stable, and I would rate it ten out of ten based on my interaction with it."

"Good design and easy to use once implemented."

"Elastic APM has plenty of features, such as the Elastic server for Kibana and many additional plugins. It's a comprehensive tool when used as a logging platform."

"The solution is open-source and helps with back-end logging. It is also easy to handle."

More Elastic Observability pros

Cons

"For reporting or log management, having a longer duration for backup without needing to purchase a paid subscription would be beneficial. Currently, there is a default ninety-day backup period."

"The customer service is not satisfactory for me. The support is only available in English, and my users in LATAM regions such as Peru and Colombia require local language support, which is not currently provided."

"Integration with Huawei should be more straightforward."

"For reporting or log management, having a longer duration for backup without needing to purchase a paid subscription would be beneficial."

"Integration with Huawei should be more straightforward."

"The tool's scalability involves a more complex implementation process. It requires careful calculations to determine the number of nodes needed, the specifications of each node, and the configuration of hot, warm, and cold zones for data storage. Additionally, managing log retention policies adds further complexity. The solution's pricing also needs to be cheaper."

"If we had some pre-defined templates for observability that we could start using right away after deploying it – instead of having to build or to change some of the dashboards – that would be helpful."

"Elastic Observability could improve asset discovery as the current requirement to push the agent is not ideal."

"There's a steep learning curve if you've never used this solution before."

"The price is the only issue in the solution. It can be made better and cheaper."

"The solution needs to use more AI. Once the product onboards AI, users would more effectively be able to track endpoints for specific messages."

"The only challenging aspect for new users is often writing the query language."

"I am familiar with Azure Monitor, which I find more user-friendly compared to Elastic, which is a very technical tool."

More Elastic Observability cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

"The product is not that cheap."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"We have been using the open-source version."

"Elastic Observability's pricing could be better for small-scale users."

"So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."

"One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."

"The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CrowdStrike Observability?

The areas of CrowdStrike Observability that have room for improvement include the approach towards customer issues, where resolution takes time. When raising a ticket for a customer, it takes time ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CrowdStrike Observability?

The typical use case for CrowdStrike Observability is for customers who are looking for the best protection for their endpoints, data, and overall EDR and XDR solution. CrowdStrike Observability wo...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CrowdStrike Observability?

The complete portfolio of CrowdStrike Observability includes multiple solutions for various customers. I am currently on medical leave due to an accident that required surgery. My previous position...

See all answers

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

The license for Elastic Observability is the same as for other uses; you pay for Elastic, and you can use it for various cases. Observability is actually cheaper compared to logs because you're not...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

I think they are working on the AI-based features, which are currently in technical preview. The only challenging aspect for new users is often writing the query language. Basic searching is very e...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wazuh vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 24% of the time

Datadog vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 23% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 9% of the time

Lumen Security Log Monitoring vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 9% of the time

More CrowdStrike Observability Competitors

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 13% of the time

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 12% of the time

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 11% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs Elastic Observability

Compared 7% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

July 2025

Download CrowdStrike Observability product report

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

August 2025

Download Elastic Observability product report

Overview

Unify security, log management, and observability with the new CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale module, the next evolution of Humio, including the all-new managed Falcon Complete LogScale service.

CrowdStrike

Elastic Observability is primarily used for monitoring login events, application performance, and infrastructure, supporting significant data volumes through features like log aggregation, centralized logging, and system metric analysis.

Elastic Observability employs Elastic APM for performance and latency analysis, significantly aiding business KPIs and technical stability. It is popular among users for system and server monitoring, capacity planning, cyber security, and managing data pipelines. With the integration of Kibana, it offers robust visualization, reporting, and incident response capabilities through rapid log searches while supporting machine learning and hybrid cloud environments.

What are Elastic Observability's key features?

Economic licensing: Offers cost-effective plans.
Extensive metrics tracking: Helps in comprehensive system monitoring.
Comprehensive logging: Centralizes log data efficiently.
Performance Monitoring: Provides robust APM capabilities.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with other solutions.
Kibana visualization: Facilitates data visualization and reporting.
Machine learning support: Enables advanced data analysis.
Flexible deployment: Supports various deployment environments.
Rapid log searches: Enhances quick incident response.
Accessibility: Offers extensive online documentation and connector support.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Elastic Observability reviews?

Stability: Look for consistent performance and reliability.
Compliance: Effective monitoring aids in regulation adherence.
System Security: Enhanced system monitoring and alert management.
Cost-Effectiveness: Evaluate the economic pricing models.
Scalability: Adequate scalability options for growing needs.

Companies in technology, finance, healthcare, and other industries implement Elastic Observability for tailored monitoring solutions. They find its integration with existing systems useful for maintaining operation efficiency and security, particularly valuing the visualization capabilities through Kibana to monitor KPIs and improve incident response times.

Elastic

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Observability vs. Elastic Observability

July 2025

Free Report: CrowdStrike Observability vs. Elastic Observability

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike Observability vs. Elastic Observability and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrowdStrike Observability vs. Elastic Observability report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.