CRITICALSTART vs Elastic Security comparison

Critical Start and Elastic are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. Critical Start is ranked #25, while Elastic is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.8. Critical Start holds a 1.3% mindshare in SOAR, compared to Elastic’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Critical Start users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Elastic users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Elastic Security and CRITICALSTART compete in the cybersecurity market, with Elastic Security offering the edge in pricing and support, while CRITICALSTART's advanced features make it attractive to tech buyers.

Features: Elastic Security provides robust threat detection and response capabilities, leveraging Elastic Stack for extensive search, analytics, and machine learning functionalities. CRITICALSTART stands out with its Managed Detection and Response services, comprehensive threat intelligence, and advanced threat hunting capabilities that outshine Elastic Security’s approach.

Room for Improvement: Elastic Security could enhance its threat hunting capabilities and offer more personalized customer support. Integration with third-party tools and a more streamlined user interface would be beneficial. CRITICALSTART might improve its pricing model and initial setup costs. Increasing transparency regarding data handling and providing self-service options for routine tasks can enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Security integrates smoothly with existing Elastic Stack installations, though its support is generally broad. CRITICALSTART ensures a streamlined deployment process with dedicated, personalized support and in-depth incident management, making it exceptional in hands-on service.

Pricing and ROI: Elastic Security offers a cost-effective solution, especially for Elastic Stack users, ensuring good ROI for budget-conscious organizations. CRITICALSTART, despite higher initial costs, provides robust threat management solutions that deliver long-term ROI for those prioritizing extensive security features and proactive monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed CRITICALSTART vs. Elastic Security Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CRITICALSTART vs. Elastic Security

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Torq

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Torq is 3.6%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CRITICALSTART is 1.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Security is 5.1%, up from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Torq	3.6%
Elastic Security	5.1%
CRITICALSTART	1.3%
Other	90.0%

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

AdityaDesai

Solutions Architect at ProArch

Automation has streamlined multi-tenant SOC workflows and improves alert handling efficiency

Although the reporting within Torq is not that great, we did ask for many features regarding reporting in Torq, but due to some platform constraints, they could not make the whole dataset available for us to be used in reporting. Except for that, we used some basic reporting. When I used Torq, it was indeed in the early stages of AI capabilities. Only a few customers were allowed to use it, and we were among them. It functioned well as long as we summarized the data properly. If you input garbage, you would get garbage out. Thus, we had to do significant fine-tuning regarding what data context we provided to the AI orchestrator to get meaningful results. In terms of Torq's unified platform approach to AI SOC automation and case management compared to managing multiple point solutions across my security stack, I find it case-centric. The unified view in case management is good since it provides clarity, although there are limitations regarding how many items in case management can be modified at once. Bulk operations are very limited, potentially due to their back-end database or data retrieval processes that can be improved. Regarding improvements for Torq, when we were onboarded, there were aspects we were uncertain about, such as the number of cases that could be generated, what data we could bring in, how many clients we could onboard, and similar concerns. Initially, we also lacked clarity about the number of playbooks or workflows we could build. Different triggers like system triggers, case-based triggers, and others can be employed without restrictions, but when it comes to on-demand and scheduled jobs, there is a limitation based on the subscription and pricing tier that notably caps the number of workflows we can create. No bulk editing across cases was one issue, along with limited filtering related to single grouping constraints. Additionally, the out-of-the-box case templates provided require substantial modifications before they become usable. There is also a feature in the cases for notes that cannot be searched. They are only visible through the UI, which is another area for improvement. The workflow and execution-based charges seem misleading as this was not discussed initially. I am not sure if new customers are made aware of this. It seems that workflows revolving around cases hinder functionality outside of case management, as we have many use cases needing on-demand triggers and schedules for functions like reporting or polling devices. Creating additional workflows to achieve basic functionalities raises costs significantly, which disadvantages customers. While they facilitate optimization and scaling, the support received tends to be very basic. Improvements can be made in that area as well.

Read full review

Justin Hadley

Sr. Manager, Security Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

The transparency of data in the platform is perfect: You see everything as they are seeing it

Their Zero Trust Analytics Platform (ZTAP) engine, which is kind of their correlation engine, is by far and away one of the best in the business. We can filter and utilize different lists to build out different alerts, such as, what to alert on and when not to alert. This engine helps reduce our number of alerts and false positives. The service's Trusted Behavior Registry helps the provider solve every alert. The way that they have it built out is very intelligent. The way every alert comes in, it gets triaged one direction or another. If it is already a false positive, then it is still getting addressed and reviewed on a regular cadence. Also, true positive alerts get escalated to the appropriate personnel. Its mobile app is great. The ability just to be able to quick reference and see what's coming in when you're on the move or go. You don't always need to have your computer or laptop handy, because you can operate it just from the mobile app. It can communicate with analysts, which is great. The mobile app is great at affecting the efficiency of our security operations. Those guys are using it throughout the day, whether that be at the office, home, or off hours. Typically, they triage from the mobile app. Then, if an escalation needs to be done on a computer, they will pull out a computer. We were on the original UI for a few years, so the updated UI has been a refreshing change. It has significantly more ability to filter and translate data, then load that data. It is rather intuitive to click through for some of our junior analysts or interns, especially as we are starting to onboard and teach them different aspects of the security operations team.

Read full review

Laurentiu Popescu

Chief Product Officer at ClusterPower

Has improved threat detection with deep log analysis and streamlined investigation workflows

The most useful features I find in Elastic Security are the forensic ones that allow us to carry deeper analysis into the logs for in-depth investigations, and the dashboards, with the reporting dashboard being quite user-friendly. Elastic Security is quite good at identifying threats, as it is part of the deep investigation tool that I mentioned before. Unless we need to look further into a certain log, we can carry out a deeper analysis and forensics on those particular logs. I can assess the impact of Elastic Security's real-time data analysis on our threat response efficiency as working pretty good. We are looking for real-time analysis because we have a continuous inflow of logs from different sources: from our cloud, from Active Directory, from our network. So it works pretty well.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Almost four or five hours of work is now completed in four or five minutes."

"We have seen fewer failures of automations from the time Torq came into the picture, we've had a more streamlined process of handling incidents, and at the same time, we've learned to embed the AI into our incident types, and that is how it has helped us in the automation."

"Using that one piece of AI, we auto-closed 511 cases in quarter four alone."

"Torq's unified platform approach to AI, SOAR, automation, and case management is superior compared to my experience managing multiple point solutions."

"If I review about 100 vendors that I might work with, Torq is definitely in the top five that gave me personally investment back, just because every bit of effort I put into Torq eventually became a workflow that gave it back to me."

"Torq offers the best feature through integration with AI."

"Torq has exceeded expectations by delivering workflows in a timely and lower effort manner than XSOAR, and it meets all my needs while saving a ton of time and targeting $600,000 saved this year, which is a substantial amount of money."

"Torq has impacted my organization positively by allowing us to earn time and invest resources in other projects that are more meaningful and more interesting, pushing deeper into what a SOC is, and building our processes."

More Torq pros

"This has been a positive experience and money well spent."

"From where we were prior to going into them, the service has increased our analysts’ efficiency to the point that they can focus on other areas of the business."

"The quick interaction between the agents is the most valuable feature. If we have questions, they're quick to answer. If we make a change to our system, they quickly make the changes that are necessary to filter the logs correctly."

"The way that the user interface presents data enables our team to be able to make decisions significantly quicker, rather than have to dig into the details or go back to the original tools."

"The biggest lesson is transitioning from alert overload to being at a point where we do have eyes on alerts, where every alert is truly possible."

"CRITICALSTART makes us much more comfortable with knowing someone else is watching our data and our systems and knowing that professional security people are taking a look at any issues that do arise."

"There is a team of people who monitor our traffic and processes 24/7, so if anything raises a flag or alert, it will escalate back to me right away. That's the most incredible part: Humans working behind the scenes 24/7 to monitor our networks."

"I also use their mobile app. It's very easy to use and very convenient to be able to respond to alerts wherever you are. I love the app. You can respond and communicate, per ticket, with their SOC in near real-time. The response is very quick."

More CRITICALSTART pros

"The most valuable feature is the speed, as it responds in a very short time."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is that it is more flexible than AlienVault."

"You just deploy and start using, and it's quite stable and hasn't broken down on us at all."

"In my previous organization, I used this for central log management, increasing developer productivity."

"Its flexibility is most valuable; we can have a number of scenarios, and we can get logs from anything, and if we know how to use Logstash, we can tweak it in many ways, which makes the logging search on Elastic very easy."

"We like Elastic Security because it's a REST API-based solution. That's the primary reason we use it."

"Based on my experience, it's quite easy and manageable with small scale implementations, and the time to market is quite fast."

"My advice to anybody who is considering this product is that it is a very competitive tool that is very new in the market and the vendor is doing their best to improve services."

More Elastic Security pros

Cons

"It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet."

"Regarding stability, I have noticed some lagging, crashing, and downtime, which is one of my largest gripes."

"We have MCP that we are working with our cloud security platform, and we wanted to connect this MCP to the case management."

"Torq does extensive marketing saying that SOAR is dead and markets itself as an all-in-one solution, but this is not actually true."

"There are some issues and bugs that I think need to be fixed, but they are currently not focused on it."

"Even now, we have workflows that are in production that use AI steps and I get different results, making it unusable to some degree."

"Torq can probably use more ML and look at what can be closed and what cannot be closed in terms of data classification."

"If Torq could enhance its AI features, it would benefit customers significantly by making the platform even more user-friendly."

More Torq cons

"The biggest room for improvement is not necessarily in their service or offering, but in the products that they support."

"The updated UI is actually pretty bad. Regarding the intuitiveness, it is fairly easy to use, but the responsiveness, on a scale of one to 10, is a one. It's really poor performance."

"They could dig a little bit deeper into the Splunk alerts when they feel like they need to be escalated to us."

"The biggest room for improvement is not necessarily in their service or offering, but in the products that they support. I would like them to further their knowledge and ability to integrate with those tools. They have base integrations with everything, and we haven't come across anything. They should just continue to build on that API interface between their applications and other third-party consoles."

"During the six-month integration and rollout, there were some bumpy roads along the way. There were communication breakdowns between the project manager, CRITICALSTART leadership, and us (as the customer). I expressed my displeasure during the integration in their inability to effectively communicate when there were holdups or issues. They were going through some growing pains at that time, but they have been right there for us ever since."

"They just did a user interface overhaul to the website portal that you use for troubleshooting tickets. The old one was fine. The new one is not intuitive and I hate it."

"It has frustrated us that they don't have a native Slack integration, because most things do now. That's something we've asked for, for years, and it just doesn't really seem like it's a priority."

"In terms of responsiveness, when I open up an alert, sometimes it takes a bit of time to load. However, it only happened once or twice."

More CRITICALSTART cons

"The solution could offer better reporting features."

"There are connectors to gather logs for Windows PCs and Linux PCs, but if we have to get the logs from Syslog then we have to do it manually, and this should be automated."

"We had issues with scalability. Logstash was not scaling and aggregation was getting delayed. We moved to Fluentd making our stack from ELK to EFK."

"Improvements in Elastic Security could include refining and normalizing queries to make them more user-friendly, enhancing the user experience with better documentation, and addressing any latency issues."

"It could use maybe a little more on the Linux side."

"Its documentation should be a bit better. I have to spend at least a couple of hours to find the solution for a simple thing. When we buy Elastic, training is not included for free with Elastic. We have to pay extra for the training. They should include training in the price."

"Elastic Security has a steep learning curve, so it takes some time to tune it and set it up for your environment. There are some costs associated with logging things that don't have value. So you need to be cautious to only log things that make sense and keep them around for as long as you need. You shouldn't hold onto things just because you think you might need them."

"We'd like better premium support."

More Elastic Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing of other services was so insane that they weren't even an option."

"The pricing has always been competitive. They have always been good to us. They will make it a fight. They don't try to hide anything; it's always been fully transparent and well-worth what we pay for it."

"There are contractual penalties if their SLAs are not met. This commitment was very important in our decision to go with this service, because not having downtime is extremely important to us. The providers has not missed an SLA in the 18 months that I have worked with them."

"As far as the expense goes, it's very competitive pricing and the services you get are almost like you have a person on your team."

"I've told CRITICALSTART that I think the managed service they provide is cheaper than it should be. It's a really good deal."

"Overall, for what I'm paying for it, and the benefit I'm getting out of it, it is right where it needs to be, if not a little bit in my favor. For what it costs me to actually have this service, I could afford one internal person to do that job, but now I have a team of 10 or more who are doing that job, and they don't sleep because they work shifts."

"It costs a lot for what we felt comfortable to spend."

"Elastic Stack is an open-source tool. You don't have to pay anything for the components."

"It's a monthly cost with Elastic SIEM, but I am not sure of the exact cost."

"The base product is open-source but if you need advanced security features then you need to pay for the subscription. Elastic Security's price is reasonable in some cases and in other cases it's not."

"The licensing cost of Elastic Security is based on the daily ingestion rate. I can't recall the exact figure, but for 10GB of log action daily, it would cost around $20,000."

"Elastic Security is free to use."

"Compared to other products such as Dynatrace, this is one of the cheaper options."

"We use the open-source version, so there is no charge for this solution."

"It is easy to deploy, easy to use, and you get everything you need to become operational with it, and have nothing further to pay unless you want the OLED plugin."

More Elastic Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	40
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Torq?

Torq can be improved by adding some more features, such as adding more automation and providing a no-code option so I...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Torq?

My main use case for Torq is reviewing the incidents and responding to them. After that, I investigate them and take ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Torq?

I would definitely recommend others to use Torq as it is an all-rounder tool which even integrates AI. As we all know...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several time...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?

I am satisfied with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing cost. It is a pure 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Security?

I do not have any specific recommendations for improvements in Elastic Security, but I feel that the AI module should...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tines vs Torq

Compared 25% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Torq

Compared 15% of the time

Blink Ops vs Torq

Compared 13% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Torq

Compared 10% of the time

Dropzone AI vs Torq

Compared 7% of the time

More Torq Competitors

ServiceNow Security Operations vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 12% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 10% of the time

Binary Defense MDR vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 9% of the time

Expel vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 6% of the time

More CRITICALSTART Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security

Compared 5% of the time

Wazuh vs Elastic Security

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Elastic Security

Compared 2% of the time

More Elastic Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Torq

July 2026

Download Torq product report

Buyer's Guide

CRITICALSTART

August 2026

Download CRITICALSTART product report

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security

August 2026

Download Elastic Security product report

Also Known As

No data available

Critical Start, CriticalStart

Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash

Overview

Torq is the enterprise AI SOC solution that effectively combines adaptive insights and automation to handle critical threats efficiently. It manages threat lifecycles, swiftly moving from triage to response, ensuring effective risk management.

Torq is designed to streamline security operations by aggregating telemetry across your security stack. It investigates significant risks and manages threats from triage to containment and remediation. This AI-driven tool enhances the capabilities of your SecOps team, allowing them to achieve more impactful results without introducing complicated processes.

What are the key features of Torq?

Adaptive Agentic Insights: Provides real-time threat intelligence tailored to specific security challenges.
Automation: Automates responses to security incidents, minimizing manual intervention requirements.
Threat Lifecycle Management: Comprehensive handling of threats from detection to remediation.
Telemetry Aggregation: Integrates data across platforms for a unified security overview.

Why consider Torq based on reviews?

Efficiency: Users notice significant reductions in time spent managing threats.
Risk Reduction: Enhanced ability to identify and address critical threats promptly.
Resource Optimization: Allows teams to allocate effort to other critical tasks by reducing manual security operations.
Scalability: Adaptable to meet the demands of growing or changing infrastructures.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Torq shows effectiveness by adapting to specific risk scenarios often encountered in these fields. Its integration with existing infrastructures makes it a valuable asset for maintaining stringent security standards, essential for protecting critical data and operations in diverse high-stakes environments.

Torq

CRITICALSTART enhances cybersecurity through advanced alert management, expert guidance, and a user-friendly interface. It promotes efficient monitoring and response to alerts, utilizing a Zero Trust model for heightened security.

CRITICALSTART is designed for organizations seeking to manage security alerts and streamline monitoring processes. Known for its quick response times and efficient alert filtering, it integrates tools like Cylance and Carbon Black to offer managed detection and response services. Users experience enhanced security by focusing on critical threats while the platform's easy navigation aids in efficiently responding to alerts. Improvement areas include better alert prioritization, enhanced compliance disclosure, and smoother integration with third-party communication tools.

What are the key features of CRITICALSTART?

Alert Management: Efficient handling and filtering of alerts to minimize noise.
Expert Guidance: Insights for integrating SIEM and optimizing response strategies.
Mobile Access: Easy access through a mobile app to manage alerts on the go.
Zero Trust Model: Enhances security by minimizing unnecessary access and noise.
User-Friendly Interface: Seamless navigation enhances user interaction and response times.

What advantages and ROI should users consider?

Improved Security Confidence: Advanced alert handling promotes a secure environment.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlined monitoring allows focus on critical threats.
Expert Insight: Professional guidance enhances security strategies and operations.
Quick Response Times: Rapid handling of threats reduces potential impacts.

In industry applications, organizations use CRITICALSTART to bolster cybersecurity measures across finance, healthcare, and technology sectors. Managed detection services and third-party integration make it suitable for enterprises looking to optimize security operations and minimize alert fatigue while ensuring 24/7 monitoring and protection.

Critical Start

Elastic Security stands out for its speed, scalability, and intuitive interface. It integrates seamlessly with Elasticsearch and Kibana, providing efficient data indexing, centralized log management, and intelligent threat identification, all while being open-source.

Elastic Security offers robust capabilities in security monitoring, threat identification, and SIEM functionalities. Its open-source nature enhances scalability, facilitating log aggregation and infrastructure monitoring. Users appreciate the intuitive dashboards and machine learning integration, which aid in proactive security measures and anomaly detection. Despite its strengths, improvements are needed in documentation, scalability, and configuration complexity. High data volume pricing and limited machine learning support are concerns, while dashboard enhancement and seamless integration with existing systems are desirable. The platform is widely used for alerting suspicious activities, analyzing logs from firewalls and Active Directory, and providing endpoint protection. It serves as a key tool for security awareness and auditing, integrating effectively with technologies like Kibana and OpenShift.

What are the most notable features of Elastic Security?

Speed and Scalability: Quickly processes large volumes of data with ease.
Intuitive Interface: Provides a user-friendly experience for efficient navigation and management.
Centralized Log Management: Consolidates logs for easier monitoring and analysis.
Threat Identification: Intelligent features help detect and alert potential threats.
Machine Learning Integration: Applies advanced analytics to identify anomalies.

What benefits or ROI should be considered in reviews?

Affordability: Offers cost-effective security solutions.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse IT environments and security needs.
Forensic Capabilities: Enables detailed security analysis and incident response.
Community Support: Leverages a broad community for shared insights and assistance.

Organizations deploy Elastic Security across industries for log aggregation and security monitoring, detecting unauthorized access, and analyzing system logs. It is essential for infrastructure monitoring and integrates effectively with systems such as Fluentd and OpenShift, supporting comprehensive security views across enterprise environments.

Elastic

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care

Buyer's Guide

CRITICALSTART vs. Elastic Security

August 2026

Free Report: CRITICALSTART vs. Elastic Security

Find out what your peers are saying about CRITICALSTART vs. Elastic Security and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CRITICALSTART vs. Elastic Security report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.