Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs CRITICALSTART comparison

Arctic Wolf Networks and Critical Start are both solutions in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category. Arctic Wolf Networks is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.3, while Critical Start is ranked #30. Arctic Wolf Networks holds a 5.7% mindshare in MDR, compared to Critical Start’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Arctic Wolf Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Critical Start users who would recommend it.

Arctic Wolf Managed Detecti...

Read 22 Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response reviews

5,868 Views
5,164 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CRITICALSTART

Read 10 CRITICALSTART reviews

946 Views
728 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Arctic Wolf Managed Detecti...

CRITICALSTART

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response and CRITICALSTART offer competing solutions in the managed security service market. Arctic Wolf holds an advantage in user-friendly experience and response time, while CRITICALSTART is noted for customizable security solutions.

Features: Arctic Wolf is known for seamless threat monitoring, intelligence-driven operations, and integration capabilities. CRITICALSTART offers robust threat analytics, personalized incident response, and adaptable security management.

Room for Improvement: Arctic Wolf could enhance customizability, extend analytics capabilities, and offer more personalization. CRITICALSTART could streamline deployment processes, improve the intuitiveness of the user interface, and enhance scalability for smaller organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Arctic Wolf provides a straightforward deployment process coupled with consistent customer support, enhancing operational efficiency. CRITICALSTART, despite a lengthier deployment phase due to customizability, provides deep customer interaction, adding value for invested users.

Pricing and ROI: Arctic Wolf is recognized for competitive pricing and strong ROI through proactive security and scalability. CRITICALSTART’s pricing strategy is higher but offset by a tailored security framework and adaptable features, offering valuable long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs. CRITICALSTART Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs. CRITICALSTART

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,455 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arctic Wolf Managed Detecti...

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

4th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SOC as a Service (1st)

CRITICALSTART

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

30th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (27th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is 5.7%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CRITICALSTART is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response	5.7%
CRITICALSTART	0.9%
Other	93.4%

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Featured Reviews

Dan Stepanukha

Network Administrator at a real estate/law firm with 201-500 employees

Stays ahead of threats with fast alerts and improves compliance documentation for investor readiness

The best features Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response offers are its time sensitivity. It alerts us right away if an anomaly occurs. The time sensitivity helps our team by making our response faster in case it's an actual attack, which luckily hasn't happened yet. Speed is definitely one of the best features of Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response. The documentation is really good with Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response, making filling out our NIST and incident response really easy. Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response has positively impacted my organization as it's an added layer of security, which has been really good. It also helped us stay up to date with our security posture so we can work better with investors who require certain paperwork or security postures. Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response has helped with investor requirements by assisting us with incident response paperwork, providing a score for NIST 2.0 framework rating, and allowing us to easily fill out documentation for bigger investors like Merrill Lynch so we can continue to work with them.

Read full review

Justin Hadley

Sr. Manager, Security Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

The transparency of data in the platform is perfect: You see everything as they are seeing it

Their Zero Trust Analytics Platform (ZTAP) engine, which is kind of their correlation engine, is by far and away one of the best in the business. We can filter and utilize different lists to build out different alerts, such as, what to alert on and when not to alert. This engine helps reduce our number of alerts and false positives. The service's Trusted Behavior Registry helps the provider solve every alert. The way that they have it built out is very intelligent. The way every alert comes in, it gets triaged one direction or another. If it is already a false positive, then it is still getting addressed and reviewed on a regular cadence. Also, true positive alerts get escalated to the appropriate personnel. Its mobile app is great. The ability just to be able to quick reference and see what's coming in when you're on the move or go. You don't always need to have your computer or laptop handy, because you can operate it just from the mobile app. It can communicate with analysts, which is great. The mobile app is great at affecting the efficiency of our security operations. Those guys are using it throughout the day, whether that be at the office, home, or off hours. Typically, they triage from the mobile app. Then, if an escalation needs to be done on a computer, they will pull out a computer. We were on the original UI for a few years, so the updated UI has been a refreshing change. It has significantly more ability to filter and translate data, then load that data. It is rather intuitive to click through for some of our junior analysts or interns, especially as we are starting to onboard and teach them different aspects of the security operations team.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I rate the overall solution nine out of ten."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the managed detection and response component."

"Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response helped secure our investor relationships, specifically with Merrill Lynch, which required us to document our security posture, and Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response made it really easy for that."

"Arctic Wolf is our eyes and ears 24/7 because we can't possibly watch all of our alerts. We may see all of these alerts, but our attention is distracted because we're working on other things."

"Security protection is the best feature of this product."

"They have a portal where you can evaluate and mitigate any vulnerabilities that you and your network might have."

"Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is a good product, and I would recommend it for any business."

More Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response pros

"The quick interaction between the agents is the most valuable feature. If we have questions, they're quick to answer. If we make a change to our system, they quickly make the changes that are necessary to filter the logs correctly."

"The main difference between the other options and this one is the quality of the personnel within the SOC. It's their knowledge and depth and the way they handle customers."

"My impression of the transparency of the data is that it has good detail. It allows you to see how many events have come in, how many of those events have made it down to their analysts to review, and then however many from their analysts to be able to close out, have been able to been escalated to us. It's a good metric that we can share with my management. They see the value of what the SOC is bringing on top of what my team is already doing."

"Their Zero Trust Analytics Platform (ZTAP) engine, which is kind of their correlation engine, is by far and away one of the best in the business. We can filter and utilize different lists to build out different alerts, such as, what to alert on and when not to alert. This engine helps reduce our number of alerts and false positives."

"There is a team of people who monitor our traffic and processes 24/7, so if anything raises a flag or alert, it will escalate back to me right away. That's the most incredible part: Humans working behind the scenes 24/7 to monitor our networks."

"From where we were prior to going into them, the service has increased our analysts’ efficiency to the point that they can focus on other areas of the business. It gives me the ability to allow analysts to do Level 3 and 4 work and stay out of the weeds of the alerts, where you tend to get alert fatigue. The service takes care of much of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 triage. It is more effective than what we had been used to, because it allows the filtering of Level 1 and Level 2 type alerts to be taken care of. This leaves less for us to handle, which is a good thing."

"The way that the user interface presents data enables our team to be able to make decisions significantly quicker, rather than have to dig into the details or go back to the original tools."

"Outside of using the platform to manage alerts, the feature of the service that we get the most value from is being able to reach out to them and say, "Hey, we might go buy a SIEM," for example. They give us their overview of what's out there, what they've dealt with, what they integrate with, and what that looks like. That's been pretty powerful over the years for us."

More CRITICALSTART pros

Cons

"If you are not in the security field, this can be difficult to figure out from time to time."

"I would actually be interested in having fewer features at a lower price."

"We get a lot of false alarms, but that's because they don't know our network in detail. I think that could be alleviated if we told them more about our network so they could create rules to skip some of those things."

"In the future, I would like to see a summary report."

"While they do inventory assets, including software inventory and CVE updates based on software subscriptions, would be a major improvement."

"More integrations with various security tools to improve data ingestion would be beneficial."

"It's nitpicky; however, if it could integrate with more of our products, like our CRM, that would be ideal. They may only integrate with Salesforce. We use a different mid-market CRM."

"They focus on detecting administrator-level control compromises. Because they're focusing more on administrator-level compromise, they are less able to see if an individual user has been compromised. It is, admittedly, very difficult because they don't know what normal human behavior is. If a hacker compromises a human account and then acts just like the human, how are you ever going to notice, unless you have some inside knowledge of how the company works? For example, they overlook account lockouts on user accounts, whereas in our own alerting system, we do not. We review every account lockout, and if it is bad, we contact the person, whereas they think of that as noise because they're more focused on the administrator-level compromise."

More Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response cons

"They could dig a little bit deeper into the Splunk alerts when they feel like they need to be escalated to us. For example, if a locked account shows up, they could do a little extra digging to verify that the locked account was due to a bad password on the local system. They could just do a little extra digging within the Splunk environment instead of pushing it onto us to go do that extra little digging."

"They just did a user interface overhaul to the website portal that you use for troubleshooting tickets. The old one was fine. The new one is not intuitive..."

"The UI has become slower but it's not something I would call them out on."

"There is room for improvement with the new UI, and that's about it. I would like to see a more intuitive design."

"The biggest room for improvement is not necessarily in their service or offering, but in the products that they support. I would like them to further their knowledge and ability to integrate with those tools. They have base integrations with everything, and we haven't come across anything. They should just continue to build on that API interface between their applications and other third-party consoles."

"The updated UI is actually pretty bad. Regarding the intuitiveness, it is fairly easy to use, but the responsiveness, on a scale of one to 10, is a one. It's really poor performance."

"The only thing I can think of that I would like to see, and I'm sure they could work this into a service pretty easily, is not only alerts on issues that are affecting my company, but some threat intelligence of a general nature on what's out there in the environment. That might be a nice add-in."

"During the six-month integration and rollout, there were some bumpy roads along the way. There were communication breakdowns between the project manager, CRITICALSTART leadership, and us (as the customer). I expressed my displeasure during the integration in their inability to effectively communicate when there were holdups or issues. They were going through some growing pains at that time, but they have been right there for us ever since."

More CRITICALSTART cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is more expensive than CrowdStrike, but it also has more features. I don't remember the amount, but I do remember that it was on the higher side. I believe we have five sensors, and the sensors have a yearly cost. We don't have any additional costs, but I know that if we have more features, they will add to the cost."

"I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."

"The pricing is pretty competitive."

"The pricing is fair."

"I find their pricing to be reasonable and competitive."

"I've told CRITICALSTART that I think the managed service they provide is cheaper than it should be. It's a really good deal."

"Overall, for what I'm paying for it, and the benefit I'm getting out of it, it is right where it needs to be, if not a little bit in my favor. For what it costs me to actually have this service, I could afford one internal person to do that job, but now I have a team of 10 or more who are doing that job, and they don't sleep because they work shifts."

"The pricing has always been competitive. They have always been good to us. They will make it a fight. They don't try to hide anything; it's always been fully transparent and well-worth what we pay for it."

"There are contractual penalties if their SLAs are not met. This commitment was very important in our decision to go with this service, because not having downtime is extremely important to us. The providers has not missed an SLA in the 18 months that I have worked with them."

"As far as the expense goes, it's very competitive pricing and the services you get are almost like you have a person on your team."

"The pricing of other services was so insane that they weren't even an option."

"It costs a lot for what we felt comfortable to spend."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Healthcare Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response?

The agents give pretty good visibility into what is happening at the endpoint.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was very good. It was a good experience because of the transparent pricing, which was very reasonable based on some of the other services that ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response?

Some of the alerts or reports were not very easy to understand, and it took time to go through those, which was sometimes a little frustrating. Some of the reports from Arctic Wolf Managed Detectio...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response

Compared 13% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender Experts for Hunting vs Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

Adlumin Security Operations vs Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response

Compared 4% of the time

Expel vs Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response

Compared 4% of the time

More Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response Competitors

Red Canary vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 15% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 12% of the time

ReliaQuest GreyMatter vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 12% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 11% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 9% of the time

More CRITICALSTART Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response

January 2026

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response report

Download Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response product report

Buyer's Guide

CRITICALSTART

January 2026

Download CRITICALSTART product report

Also Known As

Arctic Wolf AWN CyberSOC

Critical Start, CriticalStart

Overview

Built on the industry’s only cloud-native platform to deliver security operations as a concierge service, the Arctic Wolf® Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solution eliminates alert fatigue and false positives to promote a faster response with detection and response capabilities tailored to the specific needs of your organization. Your Arctic Wolf Concierge Security® Team (CST) works directly with you to perform threat hunting, incident response, and guided remediation, while also providing strategic recommendations uniquely customized for your environment.

Arctic Wolf Networks

The cybersecurity landscape is growing more complex by the day with the arrival of new threats and new tools supposedly designed for combating them. The problem is it’s all creating more noise and confusion for security professionals to sort through.

CRITICALSTART is the only MDR provider committed to eliminating acceptable risk and leaving nothing to chance. They believe that companies should never have to settle for “good enough.” Their award-winning portfolio includes end-to-end Professional Services and Managed Detection and Response (MDR). CRITICALSTART MDR puts a stop to alert fatigue by leveraging the Zero Trust Analytics Platform (ZTAP) plus the industry-leading Trusted Behavior Registry, which eliminates false positives at scale by resolving known-good behaviors. Driven by 24x7x365 human-led, end-to-end monitoring, investigation and remediation of alerts, their on-the-go threat detection and response capabilities are enabled via a fully interactive MOBILESOC app.

Critical Start

Sample Customers

Agero, Madison Memorial Hospital, DLZ, Howard LLP, City of Sparks

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs. CRITICALSTART

November 2025

Free Report: Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs. CRITICALSTART

Find out what your peers are saying about Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs. CRITICALSTART and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs. CRITICALSTART report.

See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.

We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.