CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Entuity comparison

Broadcom and Park Place Technologies are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #87, while Park Place Technologies is ranked #67. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Park Place Technologies’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Park Place Technologies users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

1,090 Views
752 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Entuity

Read 11 Entuity reviews

1,747 Views
1,625 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

Entuity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and Entuity are competing in the network monitoring domain. Entuity often holds the upper hand due to its advanced feature set and efficiency in improving network uptime.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor is recognized for its extensive network traffic analysis, seamless integration with other CA tools, and competitive pricing support. Entuity's strengths lie in automated network discovery, real-time analytics, and detailed insights into network performance.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could simplify its deployment process, enhance its analytics capabilities, and improve integration flexibility with non-CA tools. Entuity could benefit from more flexible pricing options, an enhanced user interface, and stronger out-of-the-box configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor often involves a complex deployment process but provides strong customer service support. Entuity offers straightforward deployment with an effective support system to address client issues efficiently.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor is known for a cost-effective setup routine and favorable ROI for businesses integrated with CA Technologies. Entuity may have higher upfront costs but offers a strong ROI through powerful features and improvement in network uptime.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Entuity Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Entuity

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

87th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (65th)

Entuity

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

67th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Entuity is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Entuity	0.7%
CA Unified Communications Monitor	0.5%
Other	98.8%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer1605927

Sr.Solutions Engineer | Project Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Meets the needs of the customer but all of the features need improvement

I do not choose the solution. The client does. I am an implementer. We are systems integrators. It is worth mentioning that the solution should be easy to install and offer the user exhibition capabilities. Also, a data sheet should be used to gather information about the product, to facilitate easy and simple implementation. I rate CA Unified Communications Monitor as a five out of ten.

Read full review

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

A good solution for network monitoring and support management, but there is no centralized database

There is no centralized database. It is an issue if you use a local database and have multiple borders. However, if you have an external database, you can keep the same old data from an old border up to 100 borders. In addition, if we want to create an ABI or use an ABI to connect data, there is no competition when we ask for support. If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service. Other competitors like Micro Focus, a network management system, have a new supportability matrix in the market every quarter.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For us, it's very key to know the voice quality of the total solution, which is based on many components across many domains."

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"I particularly like the theme and the dashboard that they have brought in this version. In the previous version, there was only a simple screen. There wasn't any dashboard. It was a simple view, but now, they have brought in a dashboard that gives the fields for the ops as well. They can get the data they want to see in a single place."

"The most valuable feature of Entuity is network mapping and information. When clicking on a particular location it can automatically survey the connectivity diagram for us. We can arrange this icon in any kind of formats, such as ring or mesh. The networking mapping can show the components and interconnectivity with the help of IP addresses and NetFlow."

"We find the SurePath component of this solution to be very valuable, as it gives us the path to whatever we are configuring."

"This is a product that is easy to deploy and maintain with a positive end-user experience."

"This is a very user friendly solution, that is good for user access, allowing deep dives into devices, system performance and more."

"The setup was very simple and took about an hour."

"I would recommend Entuity to other users as it's user-friendly and easier to manage than other solutions."

"One of the most valuable features of Entuity is the user interface."

More Entuity pros

Cons

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved, specifically the user experience."

"Entuity can improve the fetching of device configuration. The solution uses scripts and I could not understand them or find any recourses on the internet to learn about the language that is used in the script. It could be more user-friendly and the device configuration management could be enhanced."

"Entuity currently has APIs, but they are not straightforward. They are not flexible if an external system wants to communicate with Entuity or create an integration that is not available out of the box. Its APIs can be flexible so that they can be utilized for external integrations that are not available out of the box."

"In the most recent versions, Entuity has removed the Explorer navigation feature. This was very useful, and Entuity would be improved by restoring it."

"It should support IPAM or IP Address Management. When it comes to the network, IP Address Management is a feature for which we have to use a different solution. When we are managing networks, if IPAM also becomes a part of this, we do not have to look for a separate solution."

"Entuity currently has APIs, but they are not straightforward."

"Entuity can expand its coverage on monitoring VoIP solutions a little bit more."

"We would like the backup element of this solution to be improved as, at present, it is very limited and does not have much scope for customization."

More Entuity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It can be comparatively expensive but that is because it is comprehensive."

"Entuity is not an expensive solution."

"We have 400 licenses and we are only using 150 licenses."

"Entuity's licensing is very highly-priced."

"It varies and depends on the quantity. It's worth the cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

22%

University

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Comparisons

StackState vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

LogicMonitor vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Entuity

Compared 27% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Entuity

Compared 20% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs Entuity

Compared 5% of the time

More Entuity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

March 2026

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Entuity

March 2026

Download Entuity product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

No data available

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

Entuity network management software continually monitors network bandwidth, network error rate and network congestion, which are all factors that impact overall network throughput. Events can be raised in response to abnormal traffic to allow remedial action before users are impacted. The Entuity network monitor continually evaluates network latency and network jitter to calculate MOS and ICPIF scores. Events can be raised when these scores are unacceptable for business application, voice and video performance. Key Features include: Root Cause Analysis, Event Management, Flow Monitoring & Analysis, Application Path Monitoring and Network Performance Monitoring.

Park Place Technologies

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

Tait Communications, Vattenfall, Discovery, University of Minnesota, Pernod Ricard, Electric Car

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Entuity

March 2026

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Entuity

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Entuity and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Entuity report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.