CA Asset Portfolio Management vs Flexera One comparison

Broadcom and Flexera are both solutions in the IT Asset Management category. Broadcom is ranked #24, while Flexera is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.7. Broadcom holds a 0.6% mindshare in IAM, compared to Flexera’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Flexera users who would recommend it.

CA Asset Portfolio Management

Read 14 CA Asset Portfolio Management reviews

222 Views
193 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Flexera One

Read 6 Flexera One reviews

937 Views
665 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CA Asset Portfolio Management

Flexera One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Flexera One and CA Asset Portfolio Management compete in the asset management domain. Flexera One has an edge in pricing and support, while CA Asset Portfolio Management offers a broad feature set for those focused on functionality.

Features: Flexera One offers robust cloud management, detailed software analytics, and comprehensive compliance tools with extensive automation capabilities. CA Asset Portfolio Management excels in asset tracking, lifecycle management, and integration with legacy systems.

Room for Improvement: Flexera One could enhance its asset tracking and legacy system integration. Additionally, it may consider broadening its lifecycle management capabilities. CA Asset Portfolio Management can improve its cloud functionalities, reduce complexity in deployment, and expand software analytics tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Flexera One offers a cloud-based deployment model, easing implementation and scaling, supported by responsive customer service. CA Asset Portfolio Management involves a more complex setup due to on-premise requirements but offers robust integration support and dedicated service teams.

Pricing and ROI: Flexera One typically requires a lower initial setup cost, offering a quicker ROI for cloud-centric enterprises. CA Asset Portfolio Management might have higher upfront costs, but it provides a substantial long-term ROI through detailed lifecycle management and asset optimization.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Asset Portfolio Management vs. Flexera One Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Asset Portfolio Management vs. Flexera One

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,155 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Asset Portfolio Management

Ranking in IT Asset Management

24th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

License Management (13th)

Flexera One

Ranking in IT Asset Management

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SaaS Management Platforms (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the IT Asset Management category, the mindshare of CA Asset Portfolio Management is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Flexera One is 4.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Asset Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1998918

Enterprise systems management team lead

Integrates well, highly stable, and scalable

CA Asset Portfolio Management can improve the uploading of batch information. I have to upload large amounts of information and it can take a long time to finish. There are some other solutions that are better, such as Micro Focus. We have approximately 10,000 PCs that we are busy processing and we have to upload information to them but when we use this solution it is complex. When we use Micro Focus it is better.

Read full review

Donna Boyd

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Reporting capabilities improve compliance and flexibility exceeds expectations

The mainframe need improvement. Flexera One does not have an agent for it, so it can't report on mainframe usage. Several people have suggested it as an improvement. One feature I would like to see in the tool is the ability to handle everything in one place. If not, it is what it is.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's easy to integrate with our system information."

"The most valuable feature of CA Asset Portfolio Management is the full integration with our Service Desk. It allows us to work both sides of life cycle management."

"You build the items one time and then you have your discovery that's coming in and the system will let you know whether or not you're out of compliance."

"Also, the software you have, you can monitor for end of life. If you have software that is end of life, then you can have it uninstalled and buy the new software, so you can make sure that you're not running into vulnerabilities with unsupported software in your environment."

"You could also look for software that is no longer being used and you can re-deploy the software, so then you save from a purchasing standpoint because you don't have to buy the software again."

"My organization now understands what type of products they have: warranties, how long the warranties last, depreciation. We never really knew what our depreciation values were, so it was really nice to have that on hand as well. It gives us a better view of our hardware, which is really beneficial."

"Reduces software cost. Reduces the risk of software audits."

"They're staying up to date as vendors make changes to how they want to manage the software. CA is usually really quick about getting those updates in the system."

More CA Asset Portfolio Management pros

"So the solution has a really great licensing module, and they're constantly keeping up with the newest trends."

"The best thing about FlexNet Manager for my clients is its strong grip on managing licenses and ensuring they stick to their contracts."

"It is a stable solution."

"I like the way it does its compliance. I like its discovery, and I like the fact that it keeps separate hardware and assets and provides easy accessibility to raw data."

"I like the way that Flexera connects our contracts to our purchases."

"I recommend it highly."

Cons

"There were a lot of things that we had to prepare for that we weren't thinking about with this installation. I think from a CA standpoint, the software was good. But us preparing for that, we had a lot more work to do."

"I'd like to see end-of-life information on software products."

"Needs a stronger reporting component, and more integration with CA Client Automation."

"I'd like to see more mobile. I'd like to have it actually manage mobile devices. It really doesn't, and I'd like to have a mobile application just for asset management."

"CA SAM is not a CA product. The vendor is Aspera and CA is the distributor, so support is difficult. It's more difficult to get a good response."

"CA Asset Portfolio Management can improve the uploading of batch information. I have to upload large amounts of information and it can take a long time to finish. There are some other solutions that are better, such as Micro Focus."

"Keeping the catalog updated and having more titles in the catalog is helpful, because the more items that are in the catalog, your process goes faster because you don't have to manually build all the entitlements."

"I would like to see more control over audit trail features, where you can turn on and off fields."

More CA Asset Portfolio Management cons

"Flexera One does not have an agent for it, so it can't report on mainframe usage."

"The mainframe need improvement."

"The hardware and connectors in the product have certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"They could improve their reporting. I'd particularly like them to allow you to schedule it."

"There is room for improvement in the purchasing module. There are things I would change in that. Also, the automation components, like having the contracts, scheduling, and notifications embedded into the application, which they've been promising to do since 2014."

"One area that could use improvement is the deployment of Flexera agents."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I can say that from a price perspective, you can go for FlexNet Manager if you have a very small environment."

"It was certainly on a par with the price we were paying for Snow License Manager. It wasn't overly expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FlexNet Manager?

The setup cost has changed a lot over the years, and I have not been involved with the pricing for six years. In the beginning, when I first became involved with it, I thought some of the pricing w...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FlexNet Manager?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FlexNet Manager?

I have used it at multiple companies. Primarily, we use the tool to ensure that we're compliant with all the vendors. The particular company I’m working for now is just for IBM. There are other tea...

See all answers

Comparisons

BMC Remedy vs CA Asset Portfolio Management

Compared 100% of the time

More CA Asset Portfolio Management Competitors

ServiceNow vs Flexera One

Compared 40% of the time

ServiceNow Discovery vs Flexera One

Compared 17% of the time

Lansweeper vs Flexera One

Compared 9% of the time

Device42 vs Flexera One

Compared 7% of the time

X-Formation LM-X License Manager vs Flexera One

Compared 7% of the time

More Flexera One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Asset Portfolio Management

July 2025

Download CA Asset Portfolio Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Flexera One

July 2025

Download Flexera One product report

Also Known As

CA IT Asset Manager, CA Asset Manager, ITAM, IT Asset Manager, CA SAM, CA Software Asset Manager, Asset Portfolio Management, Asset Portfolio Manager

FlexNet Manager Suite, FlexNet Manager Suite for Enterprises, Flexera SaaS Manager

Overview

CA Asset Manager gives you the confidence to deliver real business value throughout the asset lifecycle by enabling essential business functions such as
procurement, contract, vendor, license and financial management across your enterprise IT asset base. CA Asset Manager has recognized technology leadership in the areas of financial and contract management, and it is also an IT asset management market share leader.

Learn More: https://www.ca.com/us/products...

Broadcom

Flexera manages and optimizes enterprise software regardless of location, from the desktop to the datacenter to the cloud. We give mid-size enterprises a growth path and a roadmap for success.

Flexera

Sample Customers

First Horizon National Corporation, Logicalis, Racing and Wagering Western Australia

Foray Technologies, BMC

Buyer's Guide

CA Asset Portfolio Management vs. Flexera One

July 2025

Free Report: CA Asset Portfolio Management vs. Flexera One

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Asset Portfolio Management vs. Flexera One and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Asset Portfolio Management vs. Flexera One report.

See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.