Avada Software Infrared360 and Sentry are two competing products in the tech industry. Users are generally happier with the features of Sentry but find the pricing and support of Avada Software Infrared360 more favorable. Despite this, Sentry seems to be preferred due to its superior features, which users find worth the higher cost.
Features: Avada Software Infrared360 offers comprehensive monitoring tools, automation capabilities, and an intuitive interface. Sentry provides advanced error tracking, performance monitoring, and user-friendly features that users find superior.
Room for Improvement: Avada Software Infrared360 needs a more intuitive design, enhanced integration options, and better reporting capabilities. Sentry could improve its reporting capabilities, reduce complexity in configuration, and enhance user documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Avada Software Infrared360's deployment model is straightforward, and its customer service is highly rated. Sentry also offers an easy deployment process but has mixed reviews regarding customer service responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: Avada Software Infrared360 is cost-effective with a favorable ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Sentry has a higher setup cost, but users acknowledge a solid ROI due to its robust feature set.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Sentry | 5.8% |
Avada Software Infrared360 | 0.3% |
Other | 93.9% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 4 |
Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
Large Enterprise | 5 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 7 |
Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
Large Enterprise | 3 |
Avada Software specializes in Enterprise Middleware solutions. Founded by some pioneers in SOA, MQ and J2EE technology, Avada’s Flagship product, Infrared360, is a holistic & innovative private cloud enabled portal providing self-service administration, monitoring, load testing, auditing & statistical reporting for Enterprise Middleware including IBM’s middleware stack of MQ, IIB (message broker), WAS, and Datapower, as well as other applications servers such as JBoss, TC Server, Weblogic, and other messaging technologies such as Tibco EMS and Kafka*.
Accessed via any web browser on any device, Infrared360 is a single web application, yet scales to 2500+ endpoints without deploying anything (no agents, no scripts) to those endpoints.
Using trusted ‘spaces’ and delegated visibility and control, the portal uniquely provides different business units or even different application users virtual ‘spaces’ in which to work. Within those spaces are only the objects and resources the user has been granted visibility. Role policy dictates permissions on those resources.
It is the ONLY Enterprise Messaging Solution with a built in SOA engine that lets you leverage internal and external services for managing and correcting problems within your middleware messaging environment.
*Kafka coming soon
Sentry is a robust error management system known for real-time error tracking and integration with tools like Slack, GitLab, and Jira, benefiting those seeking comprehensive application performance insights.
Sentry offers a seamless platform to monitor errors in both front-end and back-end applications, providing real-time alerts and comprehensive event log context. With its integration capabilities, teams effectively track application metrics and access performance data without direct production access, ensuring enhanced reliability. Sentry's features such as event grouping and code trace logs linked to Git repositories highlight its utility in maintaining application efficiency. Enhanced security and regular updates make it a preferred choice over competitors. Despite some requests for improvements in automation and UI enhancements, Sentry remains invaluable for error management and application performance monitoring.
What are the key features of Sentry?In industries like technology, Sentry is crucial for monitoring errors in web applications, offering real-time alerts and performance tracking. It is frequently used in ETL processes to detect failures without direct developer access, benefiting teams who manage large-scale applications and databases efficiently.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.