Avada Software Infrared360 vs Dynatrace comparison

Avada Software and Dynatrace are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Avada Software is ranked #70, while Dynatrace is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7. Avada Software holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to Dynatrace’s 5.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Avada Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Dynatrace users who would recommend it.

Avada Software Infrared360

Read 13 Avada Software Infrared360 reviews

2,396 Views
1,222 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Dynatrace

Read 360 Dynatrace reviews

31,414 Views
21,362 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Avada Software Infrared360

Dynatrace

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Dynatrace and Avada Software Infrared360 are key players in the software monitoring and management industry. User reviews indicate that Dynatrace has an edge in broader feature offerings, while Avada Software Infrared360 excels in IBM middleware management and ease of deployment.

What features are offered by Dynatrace in comparison to Avada Software Infrared360?

Dynatrace is noted for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, automated problem detection, and root cause analysis. It includes application performance management, AI-driven insights, and full-stack observability. Avada Software Infrared360 shines with its powerful IBM middleware management, simplified integration, and centralized control of middleware environments.

What areas of improvement can be found in Dynatrace in comparison to Avada Software Infrared360?

Dynatrace users suggest improvements in its complexity, lengthy setup time, and steep learning curve. In contrast, Avada Software Infrared360 could enhance its documentation, user training resources, and the breadth of its integration capabilities.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Dynatrace in comparison to Avada Software Infrared360?

Dynatrace deployment is complex, with some users needing significant support. Avada Software Infrared360 offers a more straightforward deployment process but has reported issues with customer service responsiveness. Both products can benefit from improved support services.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Dynatrace in comparison to Avada Software Infrared360?

Dynatrace has a higher initial setup cost but provides a strong ROI over time. Avada Software Infrared360 is cost-efficient with a quicker return on investment, making it more budget-friendly while Dynatrace justifies its higher cost with long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Avada Software Infrared360 vs. Dynatrace Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Avada Software Infrared360 vs. Dynatrace

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,646 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Avada Software Infrared360

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

70th

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Activity Monitoring (6th), Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (12th), Server Monitoring (35th)

Dynatrace

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

360

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (5th), Mobile APM (2nd), Container Monitoring (2nd), AIOps (2nd), AI Observability (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Avada Software Infrared360 is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dynatrace is 5.5%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Dynatrace	5.5%
Avada Software Infrared360	0.5%
Other	94.0%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Walter Kuhn

ICT Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems

* We now have the possibility of getting a central perspective on all tenants. * We have defined access roles for developers. Therefore, they can 'read in' their queues on the development and testing stages. With special roles, they may also write. This improves our development and testing cycle. * For operative systems, we have restricted the access. Still, selected people can react if something is happening in the various BOQs.

Read full review

Manish Indupuri

senior DevOps engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

AI-driven insights have reduced downtime and improved cross-team collaboration

We encountered some challenges while using Dynatrace. Although the initial setup was smooth, fine-tuning alert thresholds and custom metrics took some time. Another challenge was that Dynatrace charges based on host units, so we had to carefully plan our agent deployments. The licensing model is expensive. Additionally, the complexity of setup is an issue. While OneAgent and auto-discover services are powerful, the setup is more complex compared to other tools such as Prometheus and Grafana. These integrations are simple and basic, but Dynatrace setup requires more complexity based on the environment. For new users wanting to use Dynatrace, it is difficult. However, the AI-related solutions and metrics took us to the next level for identifying and fixing things. Dynatrace requires an agent for operation. OneAgent is powerful, but it is also resource-heavy. On lightweight nodes or older systems, the agent can slightly impact performance. If Dynatrace could implement a lightweight agent behavior, we could make things faster. Additionally, if Dynatrace could add a long-term retention policy so that we could store more data and find fine-grained details, that would help us. While Dynatrace managed edition supports on-premises deployment, the SaaS version depends on cloud connectivity. For highly regulated or air-gapped environments, setup and updates can be challenging. Although the initial setup is smooth, if someone wants to fine-tune it and fully understand the tool end-to-end, it could be tricky.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It allows non-technical users to inspect their individual components within the total infrastructure without disturbing other components and without bothering the technical teams."

"IR360 does not require a large team to manage our entire middleware estate and allows the leveraging of a logical model of reuse."

"The product has a small footprint on our system, they're very knowledgeable of MQ, which we use, and the features that they provide for monitoring our MQ system are just really, really good."

"One way it's helped the business is how you're able to empower MQ users, without your administrators, to be able to do different types of processes in the environment."

"We have easily created use case testing harnesses for specific flows that incorporate various message types."

"I highly recommend Infrared360 for an all-in-one IBM MQ tool."

"Monitoring that ties into our incident management system"

"The administration piece makes it very easy to do MQ administration. It gives us a lot more flexibility and capabilities."

More Avada Software Infrared360 pros

"As compared to New Relic and other providers, it is more expensive, which is its biggest disadvantage, but its biggest advantage is its capability because it is more feature-rich."

"Once you have it running, Dynatrace will show you a picture of your environment that nobody else would have, except perhaps for the architect."

"Dynatrace really did an awesome job to provide us a better solution."

"We are now able to identify the root cause in 15 minutes. It has helped the entire operations of our company."

"Alerts monitors reporting and troubleshooting proactive monitoring system health and business process monitoring."

"I like the auto email alerting feature the most, as it is set up based on the application error or condition."

"Dynatrace covers the important tiers and allows us to quickly find trends and root causes in all our critical application lifecycle steps"

"The web dashboard is very simple to use."

More Dynatrace pros

Cons

"The user interface could be sexier and more ergonomic. The competing products have similar problems."

"One area where they could improve is with their documentation. Some sections are not up to date with new release information and providing additional samples in some areas would be very helpful."

"Some of the graphics in the interface could be improved. It's pretty basic."

"We definitely need a better overview in terms of a dashboard giving us insights."

"Some of the graphics in the interface could be improved. It's pretty basic. Some interfaces are not up to what you're used to seeing on other, more Windows-like tools."

"We are still working with the FTE/MFT subscription monitoring and reporting functionality. That is an area in which we would like to see further development taking place."

"The user interface could be sexier and more ergonomic."

More Avada Software Infrared360 cons

"Some of the analytics that you get in, e.g., a waterfall analysis of a web page could be clearer. A lot of that is not directly attributable to Dynatrace. Sometimes a vendor will implement a tag or JavaScript plugin that's named something entirely different than what it does. This makes it difficult to track that from the waterfall list, figure out where exactly that component is, and dig more into what it's doing. Dynatrace could probably improve a bit on that waterfall layout to make it clearer as to what exactly is there. It does a wonderful job of telling you what loads and when, but it could be improved in terms of telling me what exactly it is loading."

"Include network monitoring in more detail for deep dive analytics of network components."

"There is still a certain amount of technical skills needed to be able to understand what you are seeing on it, and you also need a large amount of technical or infrastructure skills to understand how and where to install it."

"You have got cloning at one level, but it would be nice to have cloning at deeper levels. Or, as you are doing the cloning, it would be nice if you could select different options. Then, you are not having to sit there and build dashboards, and spending a lot of time in the cloning area."

"We have some issues with react user sessions."

"Some of the analytics that you get in, e.g., a waterfall analysis of a web page could be clearer."

"Its infra monitoring is not that good. Strong end-to-end infrastructure monitoring is missing."

"This tool had a feature of doing load test in production or lower environment, which was shut down earlier this year. We are missing that feature badly and we definitely want to see that feature back."

More Dynatrace cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Because the licensing is at the QMGR level, you need to have at least a small cushion of licenses for occasional enterprise needs."

"Start small, then increase licensing later as per your demand."

"Our internal budget calculation model incorporates the pricing per endpoint for any new projects. However, as our footprint for distributed queue managers shrinks as part of our shared middleware hub deployment, the initial licensing and support costs have been reduced over the last five years."

"Avada Software's licensing metric is very good because the license fees are based on the number of connections (which have not increased for us very much over the years) rather than the CPU processing power (which increases significantly whenever our hardware is upgraded) or the number of users (which has increased for us a lot since our original purchase)."

"Dynatrace has a place for everybody. How you use it and what your budgetary limitations are will dictate what you do with it. But it's within everybody's reach. If you're a small organization and you have a large infrastructure, you may not be able to monitor the whole thing. You may have to pick and choose what you want to monitor, and you have the ability to do so. Your available funds are going to dictate that."

"Everything is great, but the licensing could always be cheaper. With the every growing tool set of Ops teams, we find it harder to budget for tooling while ensuring we still have the proper insight into our applications."

"The solution has saved us money through the consolidation of tools. With a hybrid landscape, we had multiple tools. When we consolidated, we removed four or five other monitoring tools with one. For the last ROI calculation that I did, Dynatrace was saving us up to $500,000 per year."

"A Dynatrace partner will always be willing to give you a trial. Go through the trial to see if there is a benefit for your company."

"The limitations I see are more to do - and maybe it's because of the nature of the job I have - but they have to do with pricing. It's a little bit pricey. It's a very good tool. It's worth the price, to a certain degree. But it's hard to justify when it's that costly."

"We license it for two environments, typically all of production and all of one lower environment, usually our staging environment. If there is a downside to Dynatrace, the only thing I can think of would be the cost. If it were cheaper, I'd have it in all my environments. I don't think they're charging more than it's worth, by any means. It's just that good software costs money."

"We found an issue within the first week of ownership that has been costing us more than the entire license cost."

"Dynatrace is still kind of an expensive solution compared to others. But I recognize that they are ahead of the competition when we do a feature by feature comparison."

More Dynatrace pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Construction Company

12%

Printing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	78
Midsize Enterprise	50
Large Enterprise	300

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any advice about APM solutions?

The key is to have a holistic view over the complete infrastructure, the ones you have listed are great for APM if you need to monitor applications end to end. I have tested them all and have not f...

See all answers

What cloud monitoring software did you choose and why?

While the environment does matter in the selection of an APM tool, I prefer to use Dynatrace to manage the entire stack. Both production and Dev/Test. I find it to be quite superior to anything els...

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 12% of the time

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 11% of the time

Aurea CX Messenger vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 6% of the time

IBM MQ vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 5% of the time

More Avada Software Infrared360 Competitors

Datadog vs Dynatrace

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Dynatrace

Compared 5% of the time

New Relic vs Dynatrace

Compared 5% of the time

Avantra vs Dynatrace

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Dynatrace

Compared 3% of the time

More Dynatrace Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Avada Software Infrared360

May 2026

Download Avada Software Infrared360 product report

Buyer's Guide

Dynatrace

May 2026

Download Dynatrace product report

Also Known As

Infrared360

No data available

Overview

Avada Software Infrared360 is a comprehensive monitoring solution designed for businesses to effectively manage their enterprise middleware environments, providing robust support for operational processes.

Avada Software Infrared360 acts as a powerful middleware management tool, offering real-time monitoring and detailed insights into system operations. Designed for seamless integration, it ensures users can troubleshoot and optimize their infrastructure efficiently. With its flexible architecture, users gain centralized control over their middleware systems, making it an invaluable asset for maintaining operational continuity.

What features make Avada Software Infrared360 valuable?

Real-Time Monitoring: Enables live tracking of middleware environments to quickly identify issues.
Centralized Management: Offers a unified platform to oversee all deployments, reducing complexity.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows personalization for enhanced visibility tailored to user needs.
Historical Analytics: Provides data analysis over time to improve system performance and planning.

Which benefits or ROI can users expect from Avada Software Infrared360?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines operations through centralized and real-time management.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes system functionality and reduces downtime with immediate issue resolution.
Cost Reduction: Decreases expenses related to managing middleware systems by improving resource allocation.
Scalability: Supports growth by accommodating expanding middleware requirements without significant re-investment.

Avada Software Infrared360 is particularly effective in industries where large-scale middleware management is crucial, such as finance and telecommunications. These sectors benefit from its robust monitoring capabilities and real-time insights, enabling them to maintain high levels of service and operational efficiency.

Avada Software

Dynatrace offers AI-driven root cause analysis, full-stack observability, and more. Its seamless integration and automated alerts enhance operational efficiency for application performance monitoring across diverse environments.

Dynatrace provides users with comprehensive tools for proactive monitoring, leveraging AI-powered insights to detect bottlenecks and monitor user behavior. It enhances system dependency visualization via Smartscape and offers deep transaction insights through PurePath. Session Replay captures real user experiences, while custom dashboards emphasize essential metrics. Integration capabilities and seamless deployment are key, though users face challenges with navigation, integration, and licensing. Enhancing third-party training tools and optimizing real-time AI diagnostics is desired, with demands for better database monitoring reports and simpler UI.

What are Dynatrace's key features?

AI-Driven Root Cause Analysis: Identifies issues with precision.
Full-Stack Observability: Monitors across all platforms.
Smartscape: Visualizes system dependencies.
PurePath: Provides transaction flow insights.
Session Replay: Captures user interactions.
Custom Dashboards: Focuses on essential metrics.
Automated Alerts: Minimizes downtime.

What benefits should users consider?

Operational Efficiency: Enhances performance management.
Seamless Deployment: Reduces manual intervention.
Integration Capabilities: Ensures smooth system coexistence.
User Experience Insights: Tracks behavior and reliability.

Dynatrace is implemented in industries like finance for monitoring infrastructure and user experience. In manufacturing, it helps ensure system reliability. Its AI-driven approach is crucial for cloud deployments, supporting performance optimization and proactive monitoring.

Dynatrace

Sample Customers

USBank, Southwest Airlines, Visiting Nurse Services of New York, Aon Hewitt, Parker Hannifin, Cantonal Bank of Zurich (ZKB), Hagemeyer NA, and many others

Audi, Best Buy, LinkedIn, CISCO, Intuit, KRONOS, Scottrade, Wells Fargo, ULTA Beauty, Lenovo, Swarovsk, Nike, Whirlpool, American Express

Buyer's Guide

Avada Software Infrared360 vs. Dynatrace

April 2026

Free Report: Avada Software Infrared360 vs. Dynatrace

Find out what your peers are saying about Avada Software Infrared360 vs. Dynatrace and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Avada Software Infrared360 vs. Dynatrace report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.