Atera vs Cortex comparison

Atera and Cortex are both solutions in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category. Atera is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0, while Cortex is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0. Atera holds a 2.3% mindshare in ISM, compared to Cortex’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Atera users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Cortex users who would recommend it.

Atera

Read 15 Atera reviews

943 Views
69 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Cortex

Read 3 Cortex reviews

90 Views
18 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Atera

Cortex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Atera and Cortex are competing solutions in IT management and cybersecurity respectively. Cortex appears to have an advantage due to its superior features, despite its higher cost.

Features: Atera provides remote monitoring, patch management, and ticketing systems, offering a comprehensive suite for IT management. Cortex is known for its advanced threat intelligence, automated security responses, and cybersecurity enhancements, making it suitable for security-centric needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Atera has a straightforward cloud-based deployment with accessible support, facilitating seamless onboarding. Cortex has a more complex deployment due to extensive security layering, but its specialized support ensures structured implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Atera is cost-effective with predictable pricing and offers significant ROI through its integrated solutions. Cortex requires a higher initial setup cost reflecting its security capabilities, delivering excellent ROI for organizations focused on top-tier security.

To learn more, read our detailed Atera vs. Cortex Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. Cortex

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 858,038 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atera

Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)

14th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (4th), Patch Management (11th)

Cortex

Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category, the mindshare of Atera is 2.3%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cortex is 0.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Service Management (ITSM)

Featured Reviews

James Clowes

IT Manager at Dynamic Bradview Roofing

Having fewer hardware replacements saves us in annual costs

There is a new version of the interface coming out. I have been asking for a new version for a while. While the interface is nice, I guess the developer thinks one way and the user thinks another. So, I think the interface is getting a big overhaul. This is what they have mentioned in their webinars and stuff. It is in beta, but I'm not on the beta program, so I haven't seen it. I can't really complain about the old interface, but now that I have heard there is a new one coming, all I want is the new one. The one thing that could do with improvement is the reporting. This is from someone who worked in an MSP, where I would want to run a report and be able to just present that to a client. Reports are fine for internal use, where they never leave your company. However, if I was an MSP, I would probably want a little bit more information or the ability to customize some of it without having to edit PDFs.

Read full review

NikhilSharma1

Senior Technical Lead at Happiest Minds Technologies

Provides comprehensive network visibility and helps us identify threats efficiently

The product could be improved in several areas. The complexity and confusion regarding product variants, such as XDR, Forexiant, and Forexon, must be addressed. There is also a need for clearer differentiation between features and capabilities within Cortex's suite, as the overlap between XDR and XIM can be confusing. Improvements in the user interface and more intuitive KQL query handling could also enhance usability. Additionally, better support for various deployment scenarios and cost management options would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have better access when I go to look for something regarding either a specific user or software. It is easier to locate. When I am troubleshooting with my clients on the phone, I am not fiddling around looking through a bunch of ticket notes trying to locate something. It makes me a lot more efficient."

"Atera has saved our organization money. We look at Atera as an extra employee that we only pay about $300 a month. This is incredible savings over having to hire somebody to do all the tasks that Atera performs for us."

"I really like the Shared Script Library and automation tasks which they have implemented... because all the Atera users in the community can share their scripts and their automation tasks knowledge. The same goes for the Shared SNMP Template Library."

"There are a lot fewer hardware replacements. Once people migrated from old style hard disks over to SSDs, you have things like hard disks filling up faster. So, I run a script to clear out all the waste, e.g., all the temporary files and downloads. A lot of our business runs through a custom web application that we built. This involves people downloading a lot of PDFs and Excel files, and not just having them sitting in folders. With Atera, I can just go through and clean the temporary files out."

"All of the features of Atera are valuable because they allow the customers to achieve their goals. It is easy to use, has good collaboration, and has zero maintenance."

"Measuring the integration is very helpful when using Atera Assist Test. It takes the solution to the next level by automating activities. It doesn't just provide the solution but also allows running scripts to fix issues before a technician has to work on them."

"The most valuable features of this solution are automatic batch matching and unattended support access."

"Pricing is definitely my favorite part of it. It is also extremely easy to use."

More Atera pros

"The solution's stability is generally good."

"The solution's most valuable feature is writing playbooks."

"It was easy to integrate Cortex with existing infrastructure and other tech tools."

Cons

"The one thing that could do with improvement is the reporting. This is from someone who worked in an MSP, where I would want to run a report and be able to just present that to a client."

"I would like to see more mobile device management. iPad is a big one. I know they've been working on some of that. For me, it would be amazing if I could do tablet devices and even expand it to POS systems or the like. I know that a lot goes into that but I've seen it is an area they're looking at."

"Customization could be improved."

"There is definitely room for improvement with its automation capabilities."

"They are working on an update, and I would like to see more stuff outside of just computers and servers. Increasingly, we need to be able to monitor and manage network devices. Atera is improving on that already, which is one place that it is currently lacking."

"There should be enhancements in network monitoring capabilities beyond just physical devices like computers and servers. It would be beneficial to include better tools for monitoring networking infrastructure such as routers. Additionally, while Atera excels in ticket management, I believe there's room for improvement in user authentication and security features, especially when accessing and managing remote equipment. These updates would contribute to a more robust and secure user experience overall. Atera should include a monitoring tool integrated with Azure or similar cloud platforms. It would be beneficial to have capabilities for monitoring network growth and automatically generating statistics based on system stability and performance metrics. This feature would help us better manage and optimize our equipment and network resources, especially for strategic customer planning and resource allocation."

"I also use Apple Zoho, which does not require you to download anything. You can get help from Zoho. Atera, on the other hand, requires you to download an applet."

"It should improve its processes."

More Atera cons

"It would be more beneficial to integrate threat intelligence in Cortex."

"The complexity and confusion regarding product variants, such as XDR, Forexiant, and Forexon, must be addressed."

"It's quite lagging and not very fast."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is my favorite part of it. It was per user, not per client."

"Atera happened to have the best pricing model."

"We pay per user. I am the only user. It is $150 per user. If I need to add one, it is not as costly as expanding with other providers."

"The value of the product is perfect, neither cheap nor expensive. I think it is the right rate. It would be awesome if it continued to be the same price because it is a great solution that I like. I like it because I'm not paying per device. I have some customers on monthly contracts and some of them are on break'n fix. If I have a client who is on break'n fix, and they need to pay per agent, then I am losing money. If they were ever to change structures, going to pay-per-device model, then I would need to think about changing to something else."

"One of the biggest issues I face is the need to pay per technician. I've dealt with other platforms that you need to have 250-500 devices. Even though the cost declines as the number of devices a person has increases, they still require you to pay for 250 or 500, respectively. With Atera, the number doesn't matter as you always pay the same amount. I approximate that Atera saves me $100 per week."

"Our company is a startup. The initial reason I looked into Atera was the fact that you pay by the technician, not per-device. That means you are able to jump right in with a service without having a large overhead."

"As an internal IT, it's gold right there. It is money in the bank."

"The solution cost approximately $200 Canadian per month."

More Atera pricing and cost advice

"It's cheaper compared to its competitors."

"Cortex is an expensive solution."

"Cortex XDR is a costly solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

858,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atera?

Pricing is low. It costs around 149 bucks per month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atera?

It should improve its processes.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Atera?

Atera is integral to our daily operations. We use it for RMM, PSA, our ticket system, and contact with people. We also integrate it with different products.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cortex?

Cortex is an expensive solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cortex?

It would be more beneficial to integrate threat intelligence in Cortex.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cortex?

With Cortex, we can automate the analysis of all the alerts. We use it to automate any kind of activity.

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Atera

Compared 23% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs Atera

Compared 15% of the time

N-able N-central vs Atera

Compared 10% of the time

ConnectWise Automate vs Atera

Compared 7% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs Atera

Compared 7% of the time

More Atera Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atera

June 2025

Download Atera product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Service Management (ITSM)

May 2025

Download Cortex product report

Overview

Atera offers a comprehensive solution for MSPs and IT Professionals. The platform provides in one integrated solution: full remote monitoring and management (RMM), PSA, remote access, patch management, billing, reports, and so much more! Atera’s disruptive pricing model also helps managed IT service providers scale their business while providing continued best-in-class service. All plans include unlimited devices, meaning you only pay per technician.Everything you need, in one easy-to-use platform

Thousands of paying users in over 75 countries
Free 30-day trial, no credit card or commitment required
No hidden fees or restrictions, all plans include unlimited devices
Seamless integration with your favorite IT tools including: Splashtop, AnyDesk, TeamViewer, and ScreenConnect

What can Atera do for you?

Improve Efficiency. Atera delivers customers the tool suite for IT management. Everything you need in an all-in-one, easy-to-use platform.
Automation. Set alerts and proactively prevent issues for your clients. Minimize time spent on manual tasks and spend more time on what matters most, serving your customers.
Disruptive Pricing, Unlimited Devices. Per technician-based pricing with unlimited servers and workstations means you can cover it all, at one fixed price.

Atera

Cortex is a robust data analysis and automation platform designed for streamlining complex workflows and enhancing decision-making for professionals across industries. Its functionalities aim to provide efficiency and accuracy, catering to the demands of a tech-savvy audience.

Cortex offers a comprehensive suite of tools tailored for data-driven environments, focusing on seamless integration and workflow automation. It assists users in processing large datasets with precision, ensuring valuable insights are delivered effectively. The platform's adaptability allows for customization to specific industry requirements, making it a versatile choice for businesses seeking to optimize performance. While Cortex is equipped with powerful features, users may find room for improvement in areas like scalability and user experience enhancement, ensuring it evolves to meet future technological advancements.

What are Cortex's most valuable features?

Data Processing: Efficient handling of large volumes of data ensures precision in analysis.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines repetitive tasks for improved productivity.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless connection with existing systems for unified operations.
Customization Options: Flexible settings tailored to industry-specific needs.
Real-time Insights: Delivers immediate data-driven insights for informed decision-making.

What benefits should users look for?

Time Efficiency: Significant reduction in time spent on manual data handling.
Cost Reduction: Automation leads to decreased operational costs over time.
Improved Accuracy: Enhanced precision in data analysis and reporting.
Scalability: Ability to grow and adapt as requirements change.
Informed Decisions: Access to real-time data improves strategic decision-making.

Cortex finds application in industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, where data accuracy and efficiency are crucial. In finance, it aids in risk assessment and fraud detection. Healthcare benefits from its data handling to streamline patient management and improve treatment protocols. In manufacturing, Cortex optimizes supply chain processes and resource allocations. Its adaptability to specific industry requirements emphasizes its utility as a versatile tool in data-driven settings.

Cortex

Sample Customers

MSPs, IT consultants, and IT departments worldwide trust and use Atera.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. Cortex

June 2025

Free Report: Atera vs. Cortex

Find out what your peers are saying about Atera vs. Cortex and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

858,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atera vs. Cortex report.

See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.

We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.