Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ArcSight Analytics vs CyberArk Identity comparison

OpenText and CyberArk are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. OpenText is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0, while CyberArk is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.7. OpenText holds a 1.2% mindshare in UBA, compared to CyberArk’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of CyberArk users who would recommend it.
ArcSight Analytics
Read 15 ArcSight Analytics reviews
  • 272 Views
  • 106 Comparison Views
66% willing to recommend
CyberArk Identity
Read 23 CyberArk Identity reviews
  • 26 Views
  • 17 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

CyberArk Identity and ArcSight Analytics compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. CyberArk Identity seems to have the upper hand in user-focused security and identity management, while ArcSight is superior in threat visibility.

Features: CyberArk Identity offers strong password rotation, robust integration capabilities, and adaptive authentication for privileged users. It also provides extensive identity management and seamless UI integration. ArcSight Analytics excels in threat analysis with powerful log correlation, behavioral analytics, and a rich set of connectors for comprehensive network insights.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk Identity could improve in Mobile Device Management, integration, and user-friendly design, with challenges in third-party integration and a steep learning curve. ArcSight Analytics needs enhancements in user interface, third-party application integration, and user-friendliness, with complexity and slow query performance being major issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk Identity supports flexible deployment across cloud environments, with mixed technical support reviews. ArcSight Analytics favors on-premises or hybrid deployment, with generally good technical support, though longer response times are noted.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk Identity is expensive but provides substantial ROI due to comprehensive security features. ArcSight Analytics is also costly, with significant investment in training and hardware, yet both justify their costs with essential security benefits for large organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ArcSight Analytics vs. CyberArk Identity Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Analytics vs. CyberArk Identity
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Analytics
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
13th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
CyberArk Identity
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Authentication Systems (8th), Identity Management (IM) (11th), Authorization Software (3rd), Enterprise Password Managers (8th), Access Management (6th), Active Directory Management (9th), Cloud Resource Access Management (2nd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of ArcSight Analytics is 1.2%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CyberArk Identity is 0.6%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
 

Featured Reviews

Syed Ubaid Ali Jafri - PeerSpot reviewer
It has improved our system and network policy monitoring
They should improve on the following: * Timely resolution of issues and proper support once a ticket has been generated. * Systems appearing on the network which are not part of the domain controller. These should be monitored. * Inactive connections from servers, which are upgraded or downgraded within a VM, should be automatically revoked. * Logger monitoring should be separated from ESM monitoring. * Ability to integrate with cloud-based applications and monitor cloud-based events. * Ability to log and notify tailored rules via SMS/email. * Provide more ArcSight training and workshops.
Read full review
Julio Montero - PeerSpot reviewer
Access management system provides strong security and effortless user authentication
The solution can be deployed on cloud or on-premises. CyberArk is more on the cloud than on local hardware. The deployment is initially quite difficult. That said, when you are doing the implementation of CyberArk, there are so many tutorials that make the learning process very easy. The only complaint could be the language barrier. It's difficult if you don't have a very good level of English. Otherwise, it is very easy. You can have it set up within three months without much difficulty. It's hard to get started, however, once you get going, it gets easier. A full deployment takes half a year or less. There is some maintenance necessary. A company is constantly hiring and letting go of employees. The access is always changing, so access must always be adjusted. Or, if we need another law of filter, we would need to add those, or even take them away. That's another aspect of maintenance.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network."
"ArcSight Analytics has improved our system and network policy monitoring."
"The correlation engine is good."
"This solution allows us to identify connections for all users."
"The most valuable feature is the log monitoring."
"One of the most valuable features is the alerts."
"The data collection and the integration with different products are valuable features."
"The ability to correlate different logs is the solution's most valuable feature."
More ArcSight Analytics pros
"Being able to integrate CyberArk Identity with Microsoft Defender is valuable."
"The tool is a very strong and valuable enterprise solution, particularly in ensuring the continuity of service."
"I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users."
"The solution helps with auditing, and monitoring, and integrates with Splunk for log analysis. User activity logs are captured in CyberArk Identity and sent to external tools like Splunk for analysis and monitoring."
"The feature that we find most valuable is the ability to integrate multiple IDs for on-premises Active Directory."
"The tool helps with authentication. It acts as an MFA for any kind of privileged access that occurs in our organization."
"CyberArk Identity is a mature product."
"The setup, via cloud, is simple."
More CyberArk Identity pros
 

Cons

"Their support team could be better."
"[There is] complexity in maintaining it and managing it. It's not easy to use. It requires a lot of training."
"There is a GUI, but it is not complete and lacks functionality that needs to be performed using the console."
"Network integration is very crucial, and you need to have the knowledge to get it done."
"The customer service could be improved, and additional integrations with other APIs could be added."
"The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with."
"I would like to see integration with automation products, such as Phantom Automation."
"Inactive connections from servers, which are upgraded or downgraded within a VM, should be automatically revoked."
More ArcSight Analytics cons
"In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for improvement."
"To enhance the product, they can consider improving the user interface of the software and possibly the customer support team."
"Something they could improve is the management of multifactor authentication. When you translate the page from one language to another, it can be a difficult process."
"CyberArk Identity's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."
"More integrations would be better."
"When you translate the page from one language to another, it can be a difficult process. The translation isn't always good, and it may have a completely different name. I've noticed this in the English to Spanish translation."
"The solution could be easier to use and I found it to be very complex involving many steps."
More CyberArk Identity cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is expensive."
"ArcSight Analytics is a bit expensive compared with other tools in terms of licensing costs, training, hardware implementation, and support."
"The monthly licensing fee is around $20,000. There aren't any costs in addition to the standard licensing fee."
"In addition to the costs of standard licensing fees, there is the cost of labor for maintenance."
"It can range between $30,000 and $40,000 USD, and can go up to $500,000 and $600,000 USD."
"My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics."
"I would rate the tool’s pricing a seven out of ten. The product’s pricing is expensive and is on a yearly basis. You will need to pay around 10,000 GBP for 500 users."
"We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."
"There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."
"The pricing of CyberArk Identity is competitive."
"There could be some additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution when you want to develop connectors in CyberArk Identity."
"The pricing point is very good. I compared it with other products, and it does not require a heavy investment."
"It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive."
"Their pricing is obviously a lot higher than many vendors in the marketplace but their service is also unmatched."
More CyberArk Identity pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What SOC product do you recommend?
For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
See all answers
What do you like most about ArcSight Analytics?
ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Analytics?
My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics.
See all answers
What do you like most about CyberArk Identity?
The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?
The pricing point is very good. I compared it with other products, and it does not require a heavy investment.
See all answers
What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?
It does not have global market penetration, and sometimes, there are support issues. CyberArk Identity can definitely improve on the IAM rules when I create them. The stability can also be better.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Identity Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Identity
Compared 21% of the time
Microsoft Intune vs CyberArk Identity Logo
Microsoft Intune vs CyberArk Identity
Compared 14% of the time
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Identity Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Identity
Compared 11% of the time
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk Identity Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk Identity
Compared 9% of the time
Microsoft Active Directory vs CyberArk Identity Logo
Microsoft Active Directory vs CyberArk Identity
Compared 7% of the time
More CyberArk Identity Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Analytics
April 2025
ArcSight Analytics reportDownload ArcSight Analytics product report
Buyer's Guide
CyberArk Identity
April 2025
CyberArk Identity reportDownload CyberArk Identity product report
 

Also Known As

ArcSight User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight UBA
Idaptive
 

Overview

ArcSight User Behavior Analytics offers enterprises the ability to monitor and detect from internal and external security threats and fraud.

OpenText

CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

  • Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
  • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
  • Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
  • Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

CyberArk
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Analytics vs. CyberArk Identity
April 2025
Free Report: ArcSight Analytics vs. CyberArk Identity
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Analytics vs. CyberArk Identity and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ArcSight Analytics vs. CyberArk Identity report.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.