IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

ArcSight Analytics vs Splunk User Behavior Analytics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features are that you get lots of connectors, which make it easy to log in to my ASM, and lots of prebuilt roles from the company.""The correlation engine is good."

More ArcSight Analytics Pros →

"The product is at the forefront of auto-remediation networking. It's great.""This is a good security product.""The solution appears to be stable, although we haven't used it heavily."

More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Pros →

Cons
"Currently, there are no compatible connectors for this solution, which means we have to depend on FlexConnectors.""It needs more user analytics and aggregation user queries. And it's slow. When you query over ArcSight, it is very slow."

More ArcSight Analytics Cons →

"The price of Splunk UBA is too high.""I'm not aware of any lacking features.""Currently, a lot of network operations need improvement. We still need people to handle incidents. Our vision is to leverage status and convert it directly from the network devices. It would be ideal if we could take action using APIs and API code and remove manual processes."

More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Behavior Analytics - UEBA solutions are best for your needs.
621,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:For tools I’d recommend:  -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also,… more »
Top Answer:The most valuable features are that you get lots of connectors, which make it easy to log in to my ASM, and lots of prebuilt roles from the company.
Top Answer:The solution isn't overly expensive. It's quite affordable. It's not the priciest option on the market. I'm not sure of the exact cost as its not an aspect of the solution I directly deal with.
Ranking
Views
335
Comparisons
187
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
272
Rating
6.5
Views
7,775
Comparisons
5,631
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
389
Rating
8.7
Comparisons
Also Known As
ArcSight User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight UBA
Caspida, Splunk UBA
Learn More
Overview

ArcSight User Behavior Analytics offers enterprises the ability to monitor and detect from internal and external security threats and fraud.

Splunk User Behavior Analytics is a behavior-based threat detection is based on machine learning methodologies that require no signatures or human analysis, enabling multi-entity behavior profiling and peer group analytics – for users, devices, service accounts and applications. It detects insider threats and external attacks using out-of-the-box purpose-built that helps organizations find known, unknown and hidden threats, but extensible unsupervised machine learning (ML) algorithms, provides context around the threat via ML driven anomaly correlation and visual mapping of stitched anomalies over various phases of the attack lifecycle (Kill-Chain View). It uses a data science driven approach that produces actionable results with risk ratings and supporting evidence that increases SOC efficiency and supports bi-directional integration with Splunk Enterprise for data ingestion and correlation and with Splunk Enterprise Security for incident scoping, workflow management and automated response. The result is automated, accurate threat and anomaly detection.
Offer
Learn more about ArcSight Analytics
Learn more about Splunk User Behavior Analytics
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
8 Securities, AAA Western, AdvancedMD, Amaya, Cerner Corporation, CJ O Shopping, CloudShare, Crossroads Foundation, 7-Eleven Indonesia
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
University25%
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm50%
Insurance Company13%
Government13%
Security Firm13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company22%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise42%
Large Enterprise50%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise37%
Large Enterprise52%
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise38%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise69%
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Analytics vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics
July 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Analytics vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics and other solutions. Updated: July 2022.
621,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ArcSight Analytics is ranked 16th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 2 reviews while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is ranked 5th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 3 reviews. ArcSight Analytics is rated 6.6, while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "Good correlation engine but query functions are sluggish". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk User Behavior Analytics writes "Stable, with good automation capabilities, however, we want to be able to automate even more". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA, whereas Splunk User Behavior Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Elastic Enterprise Search, Cisco Stealthwatch, Microsoft Defender for Identity and IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics. See our ArcSight Analytics vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics report.

See our list of best User Behavior Analytics - UEBA vendors.

We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.