

Appian and KiSSFLOW compete in the category of process automation and form building. Based on the data comparisons, Appian seems to have the upper hand due to its rapid app deployment and comprehensive integration capabilities.
Features: Appian offers rapid development facilitated by its low-code platform, agile process modeling, and robust integration capabilities. It allows quick app deployment and fast ROI. In contrast, KiSSFLOW provides user-friendliness, ease of use, and seamless integrations with platforms like Google Drive, making it accessible for both IT and non-IT users.
Room for Improvement: Appian could enhance flexibility in customizing interfaces, improve support for complex models, and strengthen integration with DevOps tools. KiSSFLOW could advance its UI customization capabilities, improve stability, and enhance process flow integration. Both platforms require enhancements for diverse business needs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Appian and KiSSFLOW offer deployment options including Public, Private, and Hybrid Clouds. Appian provides strong customer service with versatile deployment options and emphasizes support for high-severity issues. KiSSFLOW offers similar deployment versatility but could improve scalability support and direct customer interaction.
Pricing and ROI: Appian's pricing is flexible and competitive, though high, and offers compelling ROI due to rapid deployment and process efficiency. KiSSFLOW is less expensive, focusing on ease of use and quick setup, providing robust value. Appian's comprehensive feature set justifies its cost, while KiSSFLOW attracts with a lower price point and intuitive interface.
Using Appian is saving us five full-time employees, which is significant since we currently have only four team members.
They see return on investment in terms of cost savings, time savings, more efficient processes, and more efficient employees.
The Return on Investment is significant.
I would give Appian's customer support 10 out of 10 due to their next-level support.
The technical support for Appian rates as 10 out of 10 because they have a great support team.
Their customer service is responsive, and the team is very prompt for support.
Our volume has increased by 20% in the two years since using Appian, and it can handle the increased volume effectively.
On a scale of one to 10, Appian rates as a nine for scalability.
Initially, without much coding, I can easily handle five thousand records.
We have tested Appian during peak usage and off-peak times, and we have not experienced any issues such as lagging or system disruptions.
It depends on how it has been designed and how it has been configured.
The stability of Appian would rate as nine, as it's a stable environment.
It has room to improve for use cases where the users are public facing, where anonymous users could come to a site and run a business workflow or interact with some data.
If Appian can suggest the country based on that address, it would significantly decrease error rates in processing remittance.
It also suggests the best automation process that can be configured within Appian.
Appian provides value for money, is easy to use, has a straightforward setup procedure, and offers great support from the Appian team.
The price of Appian, on a competitive landscape, is a little bit on the higher side for companies, rating maybe a 6.5.
On the pricier side, both Appian and Pega are enterprise-level solutions, placing them on the slightly higher side.
Previously we could process only five to ten transactions within an hour, but now, after switching to Appian, we can process about 100 transactions in an hour, making it 10 times faster.
Appian is aiding in leveraging AI technologies in multiple ways: one way is for developers, as they make development efficient and quick by enabling developer co-pilots across various phases of the application, which helps design Appian quickly and provides suggestions along the way.
The zero-code integration feature is remarkable, allowing for ease of data transfer and workflow enhancement.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Appian | 3.7% |
| KiSSFLOW | 0.8% |
| Other | 95.5% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 44 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
Appian is a unified low-code platform and solution used by businesses to build enterprise applications and workflows. This product adapts to the needs of clients and the technologies they are already using to combine their data in a single workflow and maximize resources. The platform has four main components through which it transforms the work process for companies of various sizes. They are:
Appian is utilized across a diverse set of industries, including automotive and manufacturing, energy and utilities, education, financial services, telecom and media, transportation, retail, insurance, healthcare, and life sciences. The most frequent use cases of Appian are customer journey, governance, risk and compliance, operational efficiency, supply chain, distributed order management, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) management.
Appian Features
Appian has various features that allow users to create solutions for their businesses. These features can be separated into a few groups according to function, including automation, low-code application development, and integrations and data. Some of the most frequently used features of Appian include:
Appian Benefits
The benefits of using Appian include:
Reviews from Real Users
A practice leader - digital process automation at a computer software company values Appian highly because the product is easy to develop, low-code, and has a good user interface.
Alan G., an advisory board member at Codecon VR, Appian offers a clear application life cycle, easy to learn documentation, and comes with a fundamentals course.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.