Camunda and KiSSFLOW compete in the business process management software category. While Camunda is praised for its comprehensive feature set and customization capabilities, KiSSFLOW is favored for its simplicity and ease of use, particularly for non-technical users.
Features: Camunda offers a lightweight architecture with extensive BPMN, CMMN, and DMN coverage, providing open-source accessibility. It includes enterprise features such as heatmap analysis and decision table live editing. KiSSFLOW is known for its user-friendliness and flexibility, allowing non-technical users to automate processes quickly. It supports integration with tools like DocuSign and OpenText, enhancing its functional scope.
Room for Improvement: Camunda's areas for improvement include UI customization, a more intuitive forms engine, and enhanced community support. Its users also seek a standardized approach to support costs. KiSSFLOW could benefit from more granular UI customization control, richer integration capabilities, and improved stability in its input fields.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda supports deployment across on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud environments, offering robust tech support despite needing improvements in enterprise support. KiSSFLOW is cloud-based and praised for ease of implementation and excellent direct support, making it optimal for firms requiring rapid deployment.
Pricing and ROI: Camunda offers a cost-effective open-source model with enterprise licenses that can be expensive, justified by advanced features such as process dashboards. KiSSFLOW operates on a subscription basis, slightly pricier than competitors, yet delivering quick ROI through streamlined processes.
AWS provides the best support, followed by Microsoft, and then Google.
They provide better support for the enterprise edition.
Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically.
It allows for easy scaling, especially with ECS service configurations.
There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.
More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.
There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible.
AWS pricing is very competitive compared to Azure and cheap compared to Google.
There is a licensing cost for using the SaaS model and Enterprise edition of Camunda.
EC2 makes scaling horizontally incredibly easy, especially when working under the ECS service.
The biggest difference between Camunda and Bonita might be that Camunda is simpler and more flexible for setting.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Camunda | 16.5% |
| KiSSFLOW | 0.6% |
| Other | 82.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 41 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.
Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.
What are Camunda's key features?In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
