We performed a comparison between Camunda and KiSSFLOW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."
"The product is stable."
"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."
"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."
"Camunda's process diagram creation and deployment is very easy."
"Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"The support team responds fast."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"The migration strategy needs to be improved."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."
"I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist."
"The product must provide more videos and training materials."
"The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."
"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform, OutSystems and Appian. See our Camunda vs. KiSSFLOW report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
