Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Azure Monitor comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.3, while Microsoft is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.0% mindshare in APM, compared to Microsoft’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Amazon OpenSearch Service

Read 13 Amazon OpenSearch Service reviews

7,710 Views
3,701 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Azure Monitor

Read 56 Azure Monitor reviews

11,526 Views
10,028 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Amazon OpenSearch Service

Azure Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

Azure Monitor and Amazon OpenSearch Service are key players in cloud monitoring and data analytics. While Azure Monitor has the edge for its seamless integration with Microsoft platforms and scalability, Amazon OpenSearch Service stands out for its versatile search capabilities.

Features: Azure Monitor boasts dynamic alerting, extensive Azure service integration, and strong telemetry capabilities. It integrates smoothly with Microsoft tools and offers stable performance. Amazon OpenSearch Service is celebrated for its robust search performance, flexibility in dashboard customization, and reliability in data handling, making it excellent for real-time analytics.

Room for Improvement: Azure Monitor could benefit from more advanced visualization tools, improved multi-cloud capabilities, and enhanced user-friendliness for alert configuration. Amazon OpenSearch Service could improve its cost management, data visualization, and real-time analytics alerts, while also simplifying its configuration and auto-scaling capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Monitor is designed for public and hybrid cloud environments, though technical support can be inconsistent. Self-help resources are adequate for troubleshooting. Amazon OpenSearch Service benefits from AWS's robust support infrastructure but Azure's tight integration within Microsoft ecosystems provides ease of use for those within the Azure platform.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Monitor's competitive pricing, particularly its pay-as-you-go model, appeals to existing Azure users. Despite data ingestion cost variability, it offers a solid return on investment. Conversely, Amazon OpenSearch Service's managed nature increases costs, especially with extensive data usage, although it offsets management overhead, impacting its cost-effectiveness compared to Azure Monitor.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Azure Monitor Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Azure Monitor

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon OpenSearch Service

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

24th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (19th), Search as a Service (4th)

Azure Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Amazon OpenSearch Service is 1.0%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Monitor is 2.1%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Monitor	2.1%
Amazon OpenSearch Service	1.0%
Other	96.9%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Md. Shahariar Hossen

Senior Software Engineer at Cefalo

Event tracking has become smoother and data analytics provide clear insights for user actions

Amazon OpenSearch Service is not providing the processing feature directly. From Amazon OpenSearch Service, we are actually maintaining the AWS SQS, the queue service, which is responsible for providing information about what data has to be modified. So using that SQS, we're actually providing it, but we're not directly using Amazon OpenSearch Service for keeping data to other data pipeline thing. So far we didn't use it for any machine learning purposes, but in future, we have plans to extend or implement this feature. Since AWS itself is secure and Amazon OpenSearch Service is a part of this entire ecosystem, it becomes much easier for security purposes. From the validation point of view, Amazon OpenSearch Service itself provides easy to communicate APIs and up-to-date documents, which is much beneficial. For example, if I'm missing anything, I can directly go and check the documentation. That is actually much easier. I would rate it as really good so far. It's much faster. For our local machine, we can also use a kind of replica of Amazon OpenSearch Service just for development purposes. That is another good feature. I would say for the encryption thing and also the user access control management, it's much faster. For some of these hashing algorithms, it also worked really well so far. To be honest, I didn't find any places where it can be improved. However, I think they could provide more abstraction. For example, still for searching, we have to write down the queries in a specific manner, such as for a specific JSON structure or in a specific way. Otherwise, they don't provide us the actual results. For at least this purpose, I think abstraction could be a bit easier or a bit improved. Other than that, right now there is the age of AI, so some kind of prompting could also work, but I'm not sure how it could be integrated. As a user, lower prices or reasonable pricing is always better. Those can be improved as well. However, it is good that most of the services including Amazon OpenSearch Service actually provide pay as you go pricing. So if there were a bit lower version or a bit less payment methodology, it might be much better.

Read full review

Andy Rabern

Consultant at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

Telemetry insights have improved how I track user behavior and application performance daily

I feel Azure Monitor does a fair job. I do feel it is not a streaming service in my opinion. There are advantages to having stream messaging and logging on that level. But for what it is, I feel it does well. My perspective is more based on an Application Insights agent running on a service or an app service and sending the telemetry via the agent, and also doing the filtering of telemetry at the agent level so you are not having a ton of telemetry. I believe Azure Monitor does pretty much the same thing. I have also used tools such as New Relic, and New Relic is a much more robust tool, but that is a different product and you are going to pay for that. It is a different offering altogether. The subscription that we had at the time allowed for a couple gigabytes of telemetry during the month, and I believe that telemetry only lives for about two months. You have to experiment with it to see how much you want to pay. I was not really involved in the pricing. It was more along the lines of we were running up against our limits in terms of the amount of free telemetry or telemetry that we get with our subscription, and so we either needed to scale back or turn specific telemetry types off or do some more sampling. It is nice that those capabilities are there so that you can reduce the amount of telemetry. I cannot really speak to pricing but I do believe that it is somewhat reasonable for Azure Monitor. New Relic is pretty expensive, I believe.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Regarding valuable features of the solution, we found with the process, which we have used in both cases where we used the solution that while you're seeing the streaming of data, you can analyze in the initial phase what sort of data you are streaming and whether it is valuable."

"This service already sorts data like vectors. They have classified the storage pre-defined."

"The customer service is excellent, rated nine out of ten."

"It's actually easier to collaborate since it is already deployed in the AWS cloud itself."

"They have the good documentation in the help text and that is the reason the Amazon Elasticsearch is the perfect solution for the current market."

"We retrieve historical data with just a click of a button to move it from cold to hot or warm because it's already stored in the backend storage"

"It enables us to efficiently search and retrieve our event data, offering us a versatile approach to locate specific information within these logs."

"It's a good log management platform. In terms of infrastructure management, it's good."

More Amazon OpenSearch Service pros

"We like the monitoring, we can look for the downtimes and look at the log to see whenever there is a crash and all the information around it."

"The detailed logging is great."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The feature that I found most valuable in Azure Monitor is its monitoring abilities. With Azure Monitor, you are able to monitor all of your cloud resources across multiple subscriptions in one dashboard and create solution-specific alerts that can trigger an email to the team responsible for that specific solution."

"Azure Monitor gives us the observability to check everything that we have in the cloud."

"Some good integration capabilities are present in the tool."

"The solution is quite stable."

"The solution's most valuable features are its ability to focus on delivery and maximizing the performance of applications and services."

More Azure Monitor pros

Cons

"In terms of data handling capabilities with Amazon OpenSearch Service, they can be complex and managing data in comparison to other SIM solutions is a major drawback, as it is very hard to handle the data."

"I would say that, basically, the configuration part is an area with a shortcoming...Some upgradation is required on the configuration side so that we can get to use it."

"They can enhance data visualization."

"One improvement I would like to see is support for auto-scaling."

"Amazon Elasticsearch can improve the bullion in the near search and the ease of integration with Kibana. Additionally, there could be more flexibility in the configuration and documentation."

"It would be beneficial to have some level of customization available in the managed service, tailored to the specific use cases of the end users."

"The pricing aspect is a concern. The service is way too costly. For the past month, I used only 30 to 40 MB of data, and the cost was $500. AWS could improve pricing."

"As a user, lower prices or reasonable pricing is always better."

More Amazon OpenSearch Service cons

"I'd like the solution to do more around vulnerability assessment. It's lacking in the product right now."

"Azure Monitor could improve network performance monitoring and make it more advanced."

"Automation related to gathering metrics from more applications could be improved."

"There are a lot of things that take more time to do, such as charting, alerting, and correlation of data, and things like that. Azure Monitor doesn't tell you why something happened. It just tells you that it happened. It should also have some type of AI. Environments and applications are becoming more and more complex every day with hundreds or thousands of microservices. Therefore, having to do a lot of the stuff manually takes a lot of time, and on top of that, troubleshooting issues takes a lot of time. The traditional method of troubleshooting doesn't really work for or apply to this environment we're in. So, having an AI-based system and the ability to automate deployments of your monitoring and configurations makes it much easier."

"We encounter some difficulties in monitoring the operating system on its own."

"I would like more transparency when we use the solution with another environment, like on-premises, or on another cloud environment, like AWS or GCP."

"What I feel is when I open a screen of Azure, some places are very complex to navigate to. It is not very user-friendly when it comes to accessing certain sections."

"When something goes down, we want the option to have automation in place to get it back up again as quickly as possible."

More Azure Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to other cloud platforms, it is manageable and not very expensive."

"You only pay for what you use."

"There is a community edition available and the price of the commercial offering is reasonable."

"The solution is not expensive, but priced averagely, I will say."

"Azure Monitor is one of the more cost effective solutions on the market."

"Its cost depends on the ingestion of the logs. It could go anywhere. For an out-of-the-box platform such as FrameFlow, you pay pretty much a fixed price and you get what you get, whereas, with something like Azure Monitor, you pay by the ingestion charge, so you can have one client who pays hardly anything for the same alerts, and another client pays loads and loads."

"It's a costly solution"

"Regarding pricing, Azure Monitor is free with Azure license, so there are no additional costs for using it."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"Azure Monitor's price is minimal to the point of being almost negligible."

"Customers of Azure Monitor must pay an amount that depends largely on how many services they need to integrate and the storage space required in terms of logs, etc. If they only have a few small services to monitor, the price won't be too high, but on the opposite side of the spectrum, it can certainly get pricey."

"Besides standard licensing fees the customer needs to additionally pay based on the ingested data size"

More Azure Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	29

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon OpenSearch Service?

I would consider the pricing as a six based on how much data we are handling; if we handle minimal data, it's cheap, but for large data, it becomes costly. Our clients usually pay between $1,000 to...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon OpenSearch Service?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon OpenSearch Service?

Amazon OpenSearch Service is a user-friendly version of Elasticsearch, as per my understanding. I have been using it for our volunteer management system where around 5,000 to 6,000 users are using ...

See all answers

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?

Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Monitor?

I am a developer who uses Azure Monitor for telemetry of the applications that I work on. Application Insights is one of those tools, and I have also used other non-Azure products before. Currently...

See all answers

Comparisons

Grafana Loki vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 7% of the time

Xapien vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 6% of the time

Azure AI Search vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 5% of the time

Grafana vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 5% of the time

Datadog vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon OpenSearch Service Competitors

Datadog vs Azure Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

Grafana vs Azure Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Sentry vs Azure Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

New Relic vs Azure Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

More Azure Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon OpenSearch Service

June 2026

Download Amazon OpenSearch Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor

June 2026

Download Azure Monitor product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

No data available

Overview

Amazon OpenSearch Service provides scalable and reliable search capabilities with efficient data processing, supporting easy domain configuration and integration with numerous systems for enhanced performance.

Amazon OpenSearch Service offers advanced features for handling JSON, diverse search grammars, quick historical data retrieval, and ultra-warm storage. It also includes customizable dashboards and seamless tool integration for large enterprises. With its managed infrastructure, OpenSearch Service supports efficient system analysis and business analytics, improving overall performance and flexibility. Despite these features, areas like configuration complexity, lack of auto-scaling, and integration with Kibana require attention. Users seek enhanced documentation, better pricing options, and more flexible data handling. Desired improvements include default filters, mapping configuration, and alerting capabilities. Enhanced data visualization and Compute Optimizer Service integration are also recommended for future updates.

What features define Amazon OpenSearch Service?

Scalable Search: Offers reliable search capabilities across vast datasets.
JSON Handling: Supports efficient management of JSON data.
Ultra-warm Storage: Enables cost-effective historical data retrieval.
Dashboard Customization: Supports tool integration and tailored visuals.
System Upgrades: Allows for seamless infrastructure upgrades.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Performance Enhancement: Significant improvement in search and data retrieval.
Cost-Effectiveness: Provides a cloud-native solution optimized for AWS environments.
Comprehensive Analytics: Delivers detailed insights for business applications.

Amazon OpenSearch Service is utilized in various industries for log management, data storage, and search capabilities. It supports infrastructure and embedded management, analyzing logs from AWS Lambda, Kubernetes, and other services. Companies use it for application debugging, monitoring security and performance, and customer behavior analysis, integrating it with tools like DynamoDB and Snowflake for a cost-effective solution.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Azure Monitor delivers comprehensive monitoring across applications and cloud resources, integrating seamlessly with Azure services to enhance performance tracking and telemetry analysis.

Azure Monitor extends monitoring capabilities for applications, infrastructure, and security, featuring easy integration with Azure and third-party tools. It supports dynamic alerting and telemetry, offering log analytics and metrics gathering. Users benefit from its alert system and intuitive dashboards, making it a preferred choice for multi-cloud and infrastructure monitoring across diverse IT environments. While users seek improved query building and interface navigation, they appreciate its scalability and cost-effectiveness.

What key features does Azure Monitor offer?

Integration with Visual Studio: Enhances debugging and monitoring for developers.
Dynamic Alerting: Provides real-time notifications for critical conditions.
Telemetry Capabilities: Advanced data collection to analyze and optimize application performance.
Logging and Metrics Gathering: Offers detailed insights for better resource management.
Custom Queries and Log Analytics: Facilitates in-depth data exploration and analysis.

What benefits do users experience with Azure Monitor?

Ease of Integration: Streamlines operations across Azure and third-party services.
Scalability: Adapts to growing monitoring needs efficiently.
Cost-Effectiveness: Balances cost with enhanced performance visibility.
Reporting Features: Provides comprehensive reports to improve operational efficiency.
Multi-Cloud Support: Extends monitoring capabilities across different cloud environments.

Azure Monitor sees widespread use for infrastructure and application monitoring across industries. Companies rely on it for performance tracking and incident management, often integrating it with Application Insights for enriched data analysis. Organizations use it to monitor servers and cloud services, utilizing its capabilities in DevOps practices and during cloud transformation processes for analyzing database metrics and ensuring efficient application functioning.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

VIDCOIN, Wyng, Yellow New Zealand, zipMoney, Cimri, Siemens, Unbabel

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group

Buyer's Guide

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Azure Monitor

June 2026

Free Report: Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Azure Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Azure Monitor and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Azure Monitor report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.