Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Azure Monitor comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.2, while Microsoft is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.6% mindshare in APM, compared to Microsoft’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Amazon OpenSearch Service

Read 13 Amazon OpenSearch Service reviews

4,952 Views
2,377 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Azure Monitor

Read 56 Azure Monitor reviews

10,028 Views
8,925 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Amazon OpenSearch Service

Azure Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Azure Monitor and Amazon OpenSearch Service compete in the monitoring and analytics category. Azure Monitor seems to have an edge in environments heavily utilizing Microsoft services due to its seamless integration and telemetry features, while OpenSearch Service is advantageous for handling large datasets with its strong search and managed support.

Features: Azure Monitor provides dynamic alerting, effortless integration with Microsoft platforms, and robust security features. It supports comprehensive cloud monitoring with stable performance and rich analytics. Amazon OpenSearch Service excels with scalable, managed search capabilities, a customizable dashboard, and efficient search grammar for large datasets.

Room for Improvement: Azure Monitor could enhance its AI and automation for dynamic alerts and expand its integration scope beyond Azure. Simplified interfaces, more transparent billing, and enhanced support are needed. Amazon OpenSearch Service could improve integration flexibility and provide more user-friendly configurations. Enhanced real-time analytics and automated scaling are also suggested areas for enhancement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Monitor supports broad deployment from hybrid to public cloud settings but receives mixed feedback on technical support regarding response time and expertise. Amazon OpenSearch Service focuses on public cloud deployment, with a need for better documentation and improved customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Monitor offers a pay-as-you-go model that is cost-effective within the Microsoft ecosystem, despite some concerns about hidden storage costs, providing good ROI by lowering IT overhead. OpenSearch Service's costs are higher due to its managed service nature, with users appreciating its value for large datasets, though there's concern over potential unexpected charges.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Azure Monitor Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Azure Monitor

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon OpenSearch Service

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

26th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (22nd), Search as a Service (3rd)

Azure Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

7th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Amazon OpenSearch Service is 1.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Monitor is 3.3%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Azure Monitor	3.3%
Amazon OpenSearch Service	1.6%
Other	95.1%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Md. Shahariar Hossen

Senior Software Engineer at Cefalo

Event tracking has become smoother and data analytics provide clear insights for user actions

Amazon OpenSearch Service is not providing the processing feature directly. From Amazon OpenSearch Service, we are actually maintaining the AWS SQS, the queue service, which is responsible for providing information about what data has to be modified. So using that SQS, we're actually providing it, but we're not directly using Amazon OpenSearch Service for keeping data to other data pipeline thing. So far we didn't use it for any machine learning purposes, but in future, we have plans to extend or implement this feature. Since AWS itself is secure and Amazon OpenSearch Service is a part of this entire ecosystem, it becomes much easier for security purposes. From the validation point of view, Amazon OpenSearch Service itself provides easy to communicate APIs and up-to-date documents, which is much beneficial. For example, if I'm missing anything, I can directly go and check the documentation. That is actually much easier. I would rate it as really good so far. It's much faster. For our local machine, we can also use a kind of replica of Amazon OpenSearch Service just for development purposes. That is another good feature. I would say for the encryption thing and also the user access control management, it's much faster. For some of these hashing algorithms, it also worked really well so far. To be honest, I didn't find any places where it can be improved. However, I think they could provide more abstraction. For example, still for searching, we have to write down the queries in a specific manner, such as for a specific JSON structure or in a specific way. Otherwise, they don't provide us the actual results. For at least this purpose, I think abstraction could be a bit easier or a bit improved. Other than that, right now there is the age of AI, so some kind of prompting could also work, but I'm not sure how it could be integrated. As a user, lower prices or reasonable pricing is always better. Those can be improved as well. However, it is good that most of the services including Amazon OpenSearch Service actually provide pay as you go pricing. So if there were a bit lower version or a bit less payment methodology, it might be much better.

Read full review

Andy Rabern

Consultant at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

Telemetry insights have improved how I track user behavior and application performance daily

I feel Azure Monitor does a fair job. I do feel it is not a streaming service in my opinion. There are advantages to having stream messaging and logging on that level. But for what it is, I feel it does well. My perspective is more based on an Application Insights agent running on a service or an app service and sending the telemetry via the agent, and also doing the filtering of telemetry at the agent level so you are not having a ton of telemetry. I believe Azure Monitor does pretty much the same thing. I have also used tools such as New Relic, and New Relic is a much more robust tool, but that is a different product and you are going to pay for that. It is a different offering altogether. The subscription that we had at the time allowed for a couple gigabytes of telemetry during the month, and I believe that telemetry only lives for about two months. You have to experiment with it to see how much you want to pay. I was not really involved in the pricing. It was more along the lines of we were running up against our limits in terms of the amount of free telemetry or telemetry that we get with our subscription, and so we either needed to scale back or turn specific telemetry types off or do some more sampling. It is nice that those capabilities are there so that you can reduce the amount of telemetry. I cannot really speak to pricing but I do believe that it is somewhat reasonable for Azure Monitor. New Relic is pretty expensive, I believe.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's actually easier to collaborate since it is already deployed in the AWS cloud itself."

"It's a good log management platform. In terms of infrastructure management, it's good."

"The stability of the product is good."

"The business analytics capabilities are the most important feature it provides."

"We retrieve historical data with just a click of a button to move it from cold to hot or warm because it's already stored in the backend storage"

"I would definitely recommend Amazon OpenSearch Service to other professionals due to its fast and reliable search capabilities."

"It enables us to efficiently search and retrieve our event data, offering us a versatile approach to locate specific information within these logs."

"They have the good documentation in the help text and that is the reason the Amazon is the perfect solution in the current market."

More Amazon OpenSearch Service pros

"The most valuable feature is that it ensures our servers are up."

"Log analytics and log queries are the most valuable features of Azure Monitor."

"I can conclude reports for the monthly, weekly, and peak time of the resources."

"The solution works well overall. It's easy to implement and simple to use."

"The feature that I found most valuable in Azure Monitor is its monitoring abilities. With Azure Monitor, you are able to monitor all of your cloud resources across multiple subscriptions in one dashboard and create solution-specific alerts that can trigger an email to the team responsible for that specific solution."

"From a business standpoint, I think the ability to see where your users are is valuable."

"The solution's most valuable features are its ability to focus on delivery and maximizing the performance of applications and services."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

More Azure Monitor pros

Cons

"In terms of data handling capabilities with Amazon OpenSearch Service, they can be complex and managing data in comparison to other SIM solutions is a major drawback, as it is very hard to handle the data."

"One improvement I would like to see is support for auto-scaling."

"As a user, lower prices or reasonable pricing is always better."

"It would be beneficial to have some level of customization available in the managed service, tailored to the specific use cases of the end users."

"I would say that, basically, the configuration part is an area with a shortcoming...Some upgradation is required on the configuration side so that we can get to use it."

"They can enhance data visualization."

"The configuration should be more straightforward because we had to select a lot of things."

"One glaring issue was with our mapping configuration as the system accepted the data we posted, but after a few months, when we attempted complex queries, we realized the date formatting had become problematic."

More Amazon OpenSearch Service cons

"The solution needs better monitoring. It requires better log controls."

"The process of implementation needs to be easier."

"This solution has fewer features than some of its competitors, so adding more features to it would make it better."

"In terms of pricing, Azure Monitor's billing based on data size can sometimes lead to increased costs, especially when developers need to purge data frequently. While there are mechanisms in place to track and manage this, there is room for improvement in terms of optimizing data pausing and related processes. Enhancements in this area could help mitigate potential billing concerns and provide a more seamless experience for users."

"As a younger product it still has room for feature improvement and enhancement."

"have used multiple products like Webex and PRTG. Some features could be added. Azure Monitor should add SMS and APIs. We have very limited access to Azure Monitor. I usually get alerts on my phone when they are integrated with Slack. I am not always available, but my team is. Sometimes, I am traveling and don't have access to my email, but I have Slack and other third-party projects that send me instant messages if a sensor goes down."

"They need to work on a more hybrid deployment that will allow us to monitor local on-premise deployments and connect to different systems. I would like to see more integration."

"The troubleshooting logs need improvement. There should be some improvement there. I have a hard time finding the right logs at the right times whenever there is an issue occurring."

More Azure Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You only pay for what you use."

"There is a community edition available and the price of the commercial offering is reasonable."

"The solution is not expensive, but priced averagely, I will say."

"Compared to other cloud platforms, it is manageable and not very expensive."

"Azure Monitor is one of the more cost effective solutions on the market."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"The licensing is a monthly fee."

"Its cost depends on the ingestion of the logs. It could go anywhere. For an out-of-the-box platform such as FrameFlow, you pay pretty much a fixed price and you get what you get, whereas, with something like Azure Monitor, you pay by the ingestion charge, so you can have one client who pays hardly anything for the same alerts, and another client pays loads and loads."

"The tool is expensive."

"Besides standard licensing fees the customer needs to additionally pay based on the ingested data size"

"Customers of Azure Monitor must pay an amount that depends largely on how many services they need to integrate and the storage space required in terms of logs, etc. If they only have a few small services to monitor, the price won't be too high, but on the opposite side of the spectrum, it can certainly get pricey."

"The product offers a pay-as-you-go model to users. The charges are to be paid according to the usage of the product."

More Azure Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	29

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon OpenSearch Service?

We retrieve historical data with just a click of a button to move it from cold to hot or warm because it's already stored in the backend storage

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon OpenSearch Service?

I would consider the pricing as a six based on how much data we are handling; if we handle minimal data, it's cheap, but for large data, it becomes costly. Our clients usually pay between $1,000 to...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon OpenSearch Service?

In terms of data handling capabilities with Amazon OpenSearch Service, they can be complex and managing data in comparison to other SIM solutions is a major drawback, as it is very hard to handle t...

See all answers

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?

Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Monitor?

Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?

See all answers

Comparisons

Grafana Loki vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 20% of the time

Datadog vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 6% of the time

Xapien vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon Athena vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon OpenSearch Service Competitors

Datadog vs Azure Monitor

Compared 15% of the time

Sentry vs Azure Monitor

Compared 11% of the time

Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

Grafana vs Azure Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Azure Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More Azure Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon OpenSearch Service

January 2026

Download Amazon OpenSearch Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor

January 2026

Download Azure Monitor product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

No data available

Overview

Amazon OpenSearch Service provides scalable and reliable search capabilities with efficient data processing, supporting easy domain configuration and integration with numerous systems for enhanced performance.

Amazon OpenSearch Service offers advanced features for handling JSON, diverse search grammars, quick historical data retrieval, and ultra-warm storage. It also includes customizable dashboards and seamless tool integration for large enterprises. With its managed infrastructure, OpenSearch Service supports efficient system analysis and business analytics, improving overall performance and flexibility. Despite these features, areas like configuration complexity, lack of auto-scaling, and integration with Kibana require attention. Users seek enhanced documentation, better pricing options, and more flexible data handling. Desired improvements include default filters, mapping configuration, and alerting capabilities. Enhanced data visualization and Compute Optimizer Service integration are also recommended for future updates.

What features define Amazon OpenSearch Service?

Scalable Search: Offers reliable search capabilities across vast datasets.
JSON Handling: Supports efficient management of JSON data.
Ultra-warm Storage: Enables cost-effective historical data retrieval.
Dashboard Customization: Supports tool integration and tailored visuals.
System Upgrades: Allows for seamless infrastructure upgrades.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Performance Enhancement: Significant improvement in search and data retrieval.
Cost-Effectiveness: Provides a cloud-native solution optimized for AWS environments.
Comprehensive Analytics: Delivers detailed insights for business applications.

Amazon OpenSearch Service is utilized in various industries for log management, data storage, and search capabilities. It supports infrastructure and embedded management, analyzing logs from AWS Lambda, Kubernetes, and other services. Companies use it for application debugging, monitoring security and performance, and customer behavior analysis, integrating it with tools like DynamoDB and Snowflake for a cost-effective solution.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure.

With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts.

Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.

Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility.

Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

VIDCOIN, Wyng, Yellow New Zealand, zipMoney, Cimri, Siemens, Unbabel

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group

Buyer's Guide

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Azure Monitor

December 2025

Free Report: Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Azure Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Azure Monitor and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Azure Monitor report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.