Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs Jira comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Software AG and Atlassian are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Additionally, 66% of Software AG users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

Alfabet IT Planning & Portf...

Read 4 Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management reviews

2,298 Views
1,126 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Jira

Read 284 Jira reviews

29,602 Views
13,617 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Alfabet IT Planning & Portf...

Jira

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management and Jira based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Planisware, monday.com and others in Project Portfolio Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Project Portfolio Management Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alfabet IT Planning & Portf...

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (14th)

Jira

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

284

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Application Requirements Management (1st), Project Management Software (1st)

Featured Reviews

Mohammad Shalan

Head of Business Agility and Development at Aqarat Real Estate Development Company

Helps us to implement and understand the status of our projects

The initial setup is straightforward. The solution's deployment takes around two months time. We have to set up the solution. We have to put in the data to ensure that the solution is working. We need to fill out our process, our tools, and our data. Two developers were involved in the deployment process. It is a self-maintained solution that requires updates from time to time. I rate the setup an eight out of ten.

Read full review

RituRaj

SDE 2 at Virtusa

Centralized sprint boards have transformed our planning and now improve cross‑team visibility

While Jira is very powerful, there are definitely areas it could be improved, especially for usability and simplicity. One common challenge is that Jira can feel overwhelming for new users. The number of features, configurations, workflows, and settings is huge. Onboarding non-technical teams or new employees sometimes takes longer than expected. A simple default experience for a beginner would help a lot. Another issue is performance. In large organizations with heavy customizations, large backlogs, or complex dashboards, Jira can occasionally feel slow, especially when loading filters, reports, or larger boards. Pricing can also become expensive as an organization scales and multiple Atlassian products and plugins are added. Some smaller teams sometimes feel the ecosystem becomes costly over time. The mobile experience would be smoother for project managers or leadership users who mainly want quick update approvals or dashboard views on the go. Overall, Jira's biggest strength is flexibility, but that flexibility can also create complexity if not managed carefully. Improving simplicity, performance, and ease of adoption would make the platform even stronger. An additional improvement I would mention for Jira is around balancing flexibility with simplicity. Jira gives organizations a huge amount of customization power, which is great. But over time, many teams end up creating overly complicated processes. After a few years, some Jira environments become difficult to maintain because there are many workflows, custom fields, permissions, and automations layered on top of each other. It would help if Jira would provide a strong built-in recommendation or health check for keeping a project clean or efficient. For example, identifying unused custom fields, suggesting workflow simplicity improvements, flagging redundant automations, or recommending dashboard optimization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The dashboard is the most valuable feature."

"My personal experience with the product was good, primarily because of the support team's responsiveness."

"I would recommend trying planningIT"

"ERP approach to IT (edit architecture elements as data using forms, easier for many people compared to drawing / modeling) Hundreds of predefined reports (not only for analysis but also for displaying profiles for single elements like an application including dynamically generated diagrams based on edited data) Very sophisticated meta model (dozens of man years of experience condensed in it) Enterprise collaboration features Web client for the enterprise, either on-site installation or running in a private cloud."

"The solution is valuable because it's pretty flexible; it allows you to do a lot of stuff, the functionality is pretty rich, and it integrates well with other products, like GitLab, that we are currently intensely using at the company."

"Jira has a good reporting system. It also has an API, so we can do all sorts of reporting."

"The integration is nice. We can integrate with TeamViewer and many more solutions. We need to go into Jira to complete the secure software delivery."

"JIRA is very good."

"JIRA is powerful, but what truly makes it a powerful tool is integration with other Atlassian packages and third-party software."

"I like it for team collaboration and task management. I also like its analytics and dashboards."

"The solution is very powerful, has many good features, in particular a good reporting capability."

"The most valuable features are the customized Dashboard, Sprint Planning, and Automatic Notifications."

More Jira pros

Cons

"Only few predefined integrations with other tools exist, most integrations are implemented via an integration module based on XML typically needing vendor expertise."

"The user-experience, enhanced performance, and in-hand governance can be improved."

"The tool is clearly not very intuitive."

"I'm mostly focusing on the requirements traceability with my thesis, the integration could improve for other tools. The companies are not only using Jira. For example, for the test cases or for the documents templates, we are using Polarion and we have been having some integration issues."

"There is a perception with Jira that they try to nickel and dime you quite a bit."

"The scalability has to be improved more because Jira currently is similar to a standalone solution with very limited integration."

"The performance for different dashboards, whenever they are loaded, it takes more time than you're comfortable with."

"Jira could improve the workflow, screen, and field configurability. They are lagging behind other solutions, such as Allegra in work system configurability."

"It should have Behavior Driven Development (BDD). There should be an option to add macros to help with that. A lot of people are using it now, and it would be nice if there was a way in there to be able to generate the BDD of commands whenever you're creating a story."

"So at one point in time, they did a huge UI upgrade. At that time, I felt like they had changed something, so it was hard to figure out. Now that we are habituated, it's not an issue now."

"From a very software-centric or a lead developer standpoint, there should be the ability to work at multiple levels. You have epic stories and use cases or epic stories and tasks. It would be nice to be able to have multiple levels of stories and multiple levels of epics work with it. It's lacking a little bit there, and this is the big thing for me because it makes it difficult to do a real sprint when you're limited to one story per epic. It's really hard to isolate tasks at multiple levels to match the type of use cases you normally do. That's the biggest difficulty. Other than that, they've been improving year to year, and every version seems to have a level of improvement."

More Jira cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive. There is a yearly licensing cost. There are no additional costs, only the standard license, and the cloud license."

"It is an affordable tool."

"JIRA's pricing is very economical. I would say that JIRA is a great deal more economical than Microsoft."

"To try this solution, use their cloud offering to get familiar. After that, it's in my view worth the money."

"The cost is about $10 per user, per month."

"There is an annual subscription to use Jira."

"There is a monthly license required for this solution and it is expensive."

"The license is yearly. It is a large, long-running program."

"We currently have ten users, and it is free for ten users."

More Jira pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	109
Midsize Enterprise	60
Large Enterprise	154

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?

Jira operates on a subscription model, typically priced per user. It is quite affordable, and the setup cost is low. Licensing is simple and easy to get started with.

See all answers

Comparisons

Wrike vs Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management

Compared 9% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management

Compared 8% of the time

monday.com vs Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management

Compared 4% of the time

Planview Daptiv vs Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management

Compared 4% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management Competitors

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Jira

Compared 12% of the time

Asana vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

monday.com vs Jira

Compared 3% of the time

IBM DOORS vs Jira

Compared 3% of the time

More Jira Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

August 2026

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management report

Download Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Jira

September 2026

Download Jira product report

Also Known As

planningIT, alfabet planningIT, Alfabet IT Planning and Portfolio Management

Jira Software

Overview

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management provides an integrated solution designed to enhance IT portfolio management, enabling informed decision-making for strategic business outcomes.

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management assists organizations in aligning their IT investments with business goals. It offers comprehensive tools for planning, managing, and optimizing IT portfolios, reducing costs and increasing agility. The solution supports stakeholders by delivering insights into the IT landscape, helping to streamline processes and enhance performance management. It aims to optimize IT resource allocation, facilitating strategic planning and execution.

What essential features does Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management offer?

IT Portfolio Management: Offers insights into IT assets to optimize investments and reduce redundancy.
Strategic Roadmapping: Enables users to visualize and align IT initiatives with business strategies.
Risk Management: Provides tools to identify and mitigate potential IT risks.
Financial Management: Assists in managing IT budgets and tracking financial performance over time.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Helps organizations manage resources effectively, reducing unnecessary expenditures.
Agility: Enhances the ability to adapt to changing business priorities.
Informed Decision-Making: Offers data-driven insights for improved strategic plans.
Improved Risk Management: Reduces the impact of potential disruptions on IT operations.

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management is widely implemented across industries such as finance and healthcare, where precise planning and risk management are crucial. It supports these industries by facilitating the alignment of IT strategies with rapidly evolving company objectives, enabling them to maintain competitive advantages while managing costs and resources efficiently.

Software AG

Jira is a comprehensive tool favored by teams for its ability to streamline project management and enhance Agile workflows. Its versatile features, such as customization options and integration capabilities, enable efficient task management and collaboration.

Jira supports Agile methodologies through its adaptability and robust functionalities. Teams benefit from its customizable workflows, enabling seamless integration with third-party applications. Despite its complexity in customization and interface challenges, Jira is invaluable for sprint planning, backlog management, and issue tracking. It provides strong reporting tools, though some users highlight areas for improvement in documentation and stability. It's especially useful for IT, development, and marketing teams to maintain productivity and effective collaboration.

What are the key features of Jira?

Customization: Allows crafting specific workflows and processes tailored to team needs.
Agile Compatibility: Supports Scrum and Kanban boards for efficient Agile practices.
API Integration: Offers robust integration options with numerous plugins and tools.
Reporting Tools: Provides detailed analytics for informed sprint planning and tracking.

What benefits should users expect from Jira?

Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates communication and teamwork across departments.
Improved Task Management: Streamlines tracking of tasks and issues for projects.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse team requirements through customizable features.
Efficiency: Boosts productivity with support for Agile methodologies.

Jira's implementation in software development and project management sectors underscores its suitability for managing complex projects. Its use extends to QA and marketing for organizing workflows and ensuring effective task distribution. Despite some areas needing refinement, Jira remains integral for teams aiming to boost collaboration and maintain streamlined project processes.

Atlassian

Sample Customers

FUJITSU, Coca Cola, ING, CreditSuisse, CosmosDirekt, GTA, Echo Entertainment Group, Electrolux, Cern

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Planisware, monday.com and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.