Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs Jira comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Software AG and Atlassian are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Additionally, 66% of Software AG users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

Alfabet IT Planning & Portf...

Read 4 Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management reviews

2,602 Views
1,275 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Jira

Read 284 Jira reviews

32,184 Views
14,483 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Alfabet IT Planning & Portf...

Jira

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management and Jira based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Planisware, monday.com and others in Project Portfolio Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Project Portfolio Management Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 916,956 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alfabet IT Planning & Portf...

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (14th)

Jira

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

284

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Application Requirements Management (1st), Project Management Software (1st)

Featured Reviews

Mohammad Shalan

Head of Business Agility and Development at Aqarat Real Estate Development Company

Helps us to implement and understand the status of our projects

The initial setup is straightforward. The solution's deployment takes around two months time. We have to set up the solution. We have to put in the data to ensure that the solution is working. We need to fill out our process, our tools, and our data. Two developers were involved in the deployment process. It is a self-maintained solution that requires updates from time to time. I rate the setup an eight out of ten.

Read full review

RituRaj

SDE 2 at Virtusa

Centralized sprint boards have transformed our planning and now improve cross‑team visibility

While Jira is very powerful, there are definitely areas it could be improved, especially for usability and simplicity. One common challenge is that Jira can feel overwhelming for new users. The number of features, configurations, workflows, and settings is huge. Onboarding non-technical teams or new employees sometimes takes longer than expected. A simple default experience for a beginner would help a lot. Another issue is performance. In large organizations with heavy customizations, large backlogs, or complex dashboards, Jira can occasionally feel slow, especially when loading filters, reports, or larger boards. Pricing can also become expensive as an organization scales and multiple Atlassian products and plugins are added. Some smaller teams sometimes feel the ecosystem becomes costly over time. The mobile experience would be smoother for project managers or leadership users who mainly want quick update approvals or dashboard views on the go. Overall, Jira's biggest strength is flexibility, but that flexibility can also create complexity if not managed carefully. Improving simplicity, performance, and ease of adoption would make the platform even stronger. An additional improvement I would mention for Jira is around balancing flexibility with simplicity. Jira gives organizations a huge amount of customization power, which is great. But over time, many teams end up creating overly complicated processes. After a few years, some Jira environments become difficult to maintain because there are many workflows, custom fields, permissions, and automations layered on top of each other. It would help if Jira would provide a strong built-in recommendation or health check for keeping a project clean or efficient. For example, identifying unused custom fields, suggesting workflow simplicity improvements, flagging redundant automations, or recommending dashboard optimization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ERP approach to IT (edit architecture elements as data using forms, easier for many people compared to drawing / modeling) Hundreds of predefined reports (not only for analysis but also for displaying profiles for single elements like an application including dynamically generated diagrams based on edited data) Very sophisticated meta model (dozens of man years of experience condensed in it) Enterprise collaboration features Web client for the enterprise, either on-site installation or running in a private cloud."

"The dashboard is the most valuable feature."

"I would recommend trying planningIT"

"My personal experience with the product was good, primarily because of the support team's responsiveness."

"Jira is flexible and accessible for the end-user, lets users track their requests, has a look and feel that is good for our purposes, and because we are connected to Power BI, we have better visibility and a range of metrics that give good insight."

"The adaptability of the Scrum and Kanban boards for other uses, with careful use of the customization features."

"It benefits us because we have globally located teams, and our team members work in different geographies, so the product is a better way to manage progress and see the status of different tasks."

"Powerful features including a good reporting capability."

"Each project participant began to think before writing, employees started to plan their time and try to work faster and better, and customers can create tickets and requests via JIRA so most requests are processed faster."

"The solution helps a lot with scrums, is great for development, and the documentation is quite good."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"The most valuable features of Jira are all the integrations with other systems. It's not the best in any specific area but it has lots of plug-ins and integrations."

More Jira pros

Cons

"The user-experience, enhanced performance, and in-hand governance can be improved."

"The tool is clearly not very intuitive."

"Only few predefined integrations with other tools exist, most integrations are implemented via an integration module based on XML typically needing vendor expertise."

"Some small issues with stability."

"Lacks field-level permission in the cloud version."

"The integration and management features need to be improved."

"There needs to be easier integration with third-parties — personally, this is the biggest issue for me."

"it would be helpful to have a better tutorial for learning and to have a better understanding of what the features are and what they do."

"In the way it is deployed, I think Jira is too dependent on the third-party applications that are available in its marketplace. If we could get some of the basic functionalities which are offered by these third-party applications, that would be ideal because each time we need a new functionality, we have to purchase a new plugin as an add-on."

"Reporting is something Jira could work on. The reporting capabilities should have the same flexibility we see in Excel, including the ability to manipulate data and create graphs. They need to have that, so we don't need to export to a spreadsheet."

"From a very software-centric or a lead developer standpoint, there should be the ability to work at multiple levels."

More Jira cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive. There is a yearly licensing cost. There are no additional costs, only the standard license, and the cloud license."

"The standard package of Jira is for 100 users. They should offer more packages for other increments, such as 500 or 2,000. In my previous company, there was a free package that provided a minimal number of users."

"For very small companies, if you have less than 10 individuals, it is $10 a year for each of the products. When we were a part of the enterprise and had more than 10 people using it, or before they came up with this solution for small companies, it was $2,500 a year for the license for Jira and Confluence, and I believe something like $600 a year to perpetuate the license. I can't remember if it was $600 or $2,500 annually. It was for up to 25 people at the time, and this was in the early 2000s and mid 2000s."

"We are using the enterprise license which is nice because it ensures that we always have the latest versions of Jira software."

"The price is quite competitive."

"It is subscription-based, and we probably pay yearly. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of price."

"The price seems reasonable to me. It's very similar to Splunk."

"The price of Jira is reasonable."

"We feel that the product is a good value for the cost."

More Jira pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	108
Midsize Enterprise	60
Large Enterprise	155

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?

Jira is a good tool and it is not that expensive. The setup cost is pretty straightforward and the onboarding is smooth.

See all answers

Comparisons

Wrike vs Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management

Compared 9% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management

Compared 9% of the time

monday.com vs Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management

Compared 4% of the time

Planview Daptiv vs Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management Competitors

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Jira

Compared 12% of the time

Asana vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

monday.com vs Jira

Compared 3% of the time

IBM DOORS vs Jira

Compared 3% of the time

More Jira Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

October 2026

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management report

Download Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Jira

October 2026

Download Jira product report

Also Known As

planningIT, alfabet planningIT, Alfabet IT Planning and Portfolio Management

Jira Software

Overview

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management provides an integrated solution designed to enhance IT portfolio management, enabling informed decision-making for strategic business outcomes.

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management assists organizations in aligning their IT investments with business goals. It offers comprehensive tools for planning, managing, and optimizing IT portfolios, reducing costs and increasing agility. The solution supports stakeholders by delivering insights into the IT landscape, helping to streamline processes and enhance performance management. It aims to optimize IT resource allocation, facilitating strategic planning and execution.

What essential features does Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management offer?

IT Portfolio Management: Offers insights into IT assets to optimize investments and reduce redundancy.
Strategic Roadmapping: Enables users to visualize and align IT initiatives with business strategies.
Risk Management: Provides tools to identify and mitigate potential IT risks.
Financial Management: Assists in managing IT budgets and tracking financial performance over time.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Helps organizations manage resources effectively, reducing unnecessary expenditures.
Agility: Enhances the ability to adapt to changing business priorities.
Informed Decision-Making: Offers data-driven insights for improved strategic plans.
Improved Risk Management: Reduces the impact of potential disruptions on IT operations.

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management is widely implemented across industries such as finance and healthcare, where precise planning and risk management are crucial. It supports these industries by facilitating the alignment of IT strategies with rapidly evolving company objectives, enabling them to maintain competitive advantages while managing costs and resources efficiently.

Software AG

Jira is a comprehensive tool favored by teams for its ability to streamline project management and enhance Agile workflows. Its versatile features, such as customization options and integration capabilities, enable efficient task management and collaboration.

Jira supports Agile methodologies through its adaptability and robust functionalities. Teams benefit from its customizable workflows, enabling seamless integration with third-party applications. Despite its complexity in customization and interface challenges, Jira is invaluable for sprint planning, backlog management, and issue tracking. It provides strong reporting tools, though some users highlight areas for improvement in documentation and stability. It's especially useful for IT, development, and marketing teams to maintain productivity and effective collaboration.

What are the key features of Jira?

Customization: Allows crafting specific workflows and processes tailored to team needs.
Agile Compatibility: Supports Scrum and Kanban boards for efficient Agile practices.
API Integration: Offers robust integration options with numerous plugins and tools.
Reporting Tools: Provides detailed analytics for informed sprint planning and tracking.

What benefits should users expect from Jira?

Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates communication and teamwork across departments.
Improved Task Management: Streamlines tracking of tasks and issues for projects.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse team requirements through customizable features.
Efficiency: Boosts productivity with support for Agile methodologies.

Jira's implementation in software development and project management sectors underscores its suitability for managing complex projects. Its use extends to QA and marketing for organizing workflows and ensuring effective task distribution. Despite some areas needing refinement, Jira remains integral for teams aiming to boost collaboration and maintain streamlined project processes.

Atlassian

Sample Customers

FUJITSU, Coca Cola, ING, CreditSuisse, CosmosDirekt, GTA, Echo Entertainment Group, Electrolux, Cern

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Planisware, monday.com and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.