IBM DOORS vs Jira comparison

IBM and Atlassian are both solutions in the Application Requirements Management category. IBM is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.4, while Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4. IBM holds a 32.9% mindshare in ARM, compared to Atlassian’s 15.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

IBM DOORS

Read 55 IBM DOORS reviews

7,104 Views
2,421 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Jira

Read 274 Jira reviews

3,154 Views
1,686 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

IBM DOORS

Jira

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

IBM DOORS and Jira operate within the project management and requirements management categories. While IBM DOORS is known for optimizing large-scale requirements and traceability, Jira offers flexibility in project management, particularly for agile methodologies. IBM DOORS has an advantage in requirements engineering due to its emphasis on customization and traceability, whereas Jira stands out for agile project management with its modular functionalities and ease of use.

Features:IBM DOORS is distinguished by its robust traceability, customization through the Dynamic Extension Language (DXL), and comprehensive requirements analysis. It facilitates intricate requirements traceability and offers extensive audit capabilities. Meanwhile, Jira excels in agile project management, providing essential issue tracking, extensive integration options, and the ability to customize workflows to suit agile methodologies.

Room for Improvement:IBM DOORS can be difficult to use, with a steep learning curve, and its proprietary database sometimes limits integration. Efforts to enhance user-friendliness are ongoing with DOORS Next Generation. Jira's flexibility can lead to complex customization challenges and occasional performance issues. Moreover, its native reporting and requirement management integrations would benefit from further enhancement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:IBM DOORS typically involves on-premises or private cloud deployment, accommodating stable data control. Its customer service has been inconsistent but has seen improvements. Jira offers cloud, hybrid, and on-premises deployments, appealing to diverse organizational needs. While its support responds well, price negotiations can be challenging during transitions.

Pricing and ROI:IBM DOORS is often perceived as costly, especially for large-scale deployments, but shows significant ROI through enhanced requirements management. Jira presents a more affordable model for small and medium-sized teams but can grow expensive with additional plugins. Its ROI is enhanced by its adaptability, excelling in agile and fluid project management methodologies.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM DOORS vs. Jira Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM DOORS vs. Jira

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,874 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM DOORS

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jira

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

274

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Project Management Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Requirements Management category, the mindshare of IBM DOORS is 32.9%, down from 34.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jira is 15.5%, down from 15.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Requirements Management

Featured Reviews

SHRINIVAS ALAGERI

Architect at itcinfotech

Offers a well-refined ASPICE template and satisfying requirement management features

IBM DOORS effectively synchronizes with Polarion. But suppose when Polarion is running on Linux and you want to integrate with IBM DOORS on Windows, that is when compatibility issues arise. For the aforementioned issue we often receive advise in our company to migrate Polarion to Windows before integration. IBM DOORS is a heavy-duty application compared to competitors such as PTC Integrity. Exporting an IBM DOORS module is highly time-consuming for its bulkiness. PTC Integrity is a lighter solution that allows the development of a gateway template. It's crucial to consider the use cases and the other vendors that need to be integrated before using IBM DOORS. Our company is a PTC competence center, so most of our customers are from PTC. The customer integrations our company deals with include modeling tools such as Simulink, MATLAB, and Integrity Modeler to synchronize documents. The digital threat maintenance between IOD and Windchill is also a crucial part of our organization's operations. The solution should be more compatible with thin clients, there should be focus on web-based clients who can be more effective in IBM DOORS. At our company, we don't want every customer to use the thick client format with the solution. I would like to witness the seamless integration of IBM DOORS with Windchill in the future version. The integrations in IBM DOORS should be web-based, I don't prefer to use multiple plug-ins. For example, I want to integrate IBM DOORS with MATLAB, Simulink and Jenkins effortlessly which is possible in Codebeamer. I want every feature of Codebeamer to be present in IBM DOORS in the future releases.

Read full review

AmitUbale

Assistant General Manager at ICICI Bank

Efficient project management that's comprehensive and and helps with time efficiency

We use Jira primarily for project management within the organization. It helps us manage tasks, bug management, and tracking tickets effectively. We assign tickets to individual team members and track them easily For project management, Jira has helped facilitate efficient task segregation and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The shell scripting is the solution's most valuable aspect."

"When you install DOORS locally, you have the flexibility to do what you want with the solution. You can add functionality and do many things that you can't do with other tools or do well enough to satisfy your users' requirements."

"It is very customizable and easy to scale."

"The program is very stable."

"This product can help improve how your organization proceeds through solution development."

"It has the features of: traceability, configuration management, and user access."

"Rational DOORS' most valuable feature is that you can write any kind of requirement you want."

"It is a mature product that is stable."

More IBM DOORS pros

"The pricing of the product is very good. It's not too expensive"

"Integration is good."

"The solution is easy to use and user-friendly."

"The way it interfaces with Bitbucket and other things like that is valuable. Reporting and being able to link various issues or stories together are also valuable. We call them stories, and they're general reports."

"Kanban board: The board is easy to use and visually impressive to non-IT users, who found it easy to relate to."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is its ability to connect everything together."

"Jira can track projects, time management of assignments, and keep everything on schedule. The performance of the solution is good."

"The traceability mapping feature is something that became very useful, especially during releases and bug fixes."

More Jira pros

Cons

"The web application DOORS Web Access doesn't have the same functionality as the standard client, so it's not a real substitute. For example, web Access only provides writing requirements, but you can't do much more with it."

"The problem is that because the GUI is so bad, you either have to spend a lot of money customizing the interface yourself, or a lot of money on training."

"It could be more user-friendly. It's not a beautiful tool. The user interface is gray. It has only lists inside, and it's horrible when you want to add tables. It's tough to add tables and manage them. It also becomes difficult when you want to add images."

"It would be helpful if Microsoft provided a more user-friendly interface for updating and querying updates. Additionally, if there was a way for users to notify developers of any changes in requirements, it would allow for faster and more efficient updates to the solution's architecture. This could be in the form of a notification system that alerts developers of any changes that need to be made. Additionally, the solution is document-driven and it should be more digital."

"I think there is probably room to improve by offering free training."

"The interface is not very user-friendly and has not evolved in a long time."

"Not all Rational Team Concert operations are available from the web client. Certain operations, like creating streams or components, still require using the desktop application. They're not accessible through the web interface. And in my opinion, this limitation should be removed."

"The solution should be more compatible with thin clients"

More IBM DOORS cons

"There are some minor quirks, such as zero-point stories not appearing in the portfolio scope."

"Nowadays, many organizations are moving toward the Objectives and Key Results (OKR) framework, and this is something that Jira should be able to accommodate."

"In Jira Cloud, integration with Excel is missing. Previously, I could import our Excel files into Jira, and I could also download a big Jira report in the Excel format, but now, it needs to be manipulated after that, which is not good. It looks like they've done that on purpose, but I don't understand the reason for it."

"The reporting tool and the approval tool need work."

"My main concern is the administration of projects, especially user groups, and this requires root access rights but there is no concept of layered admin rights."

"When we use the plugin in Jira so, there are two different systems which we are working on, Jira and the X-ray plugin. The X-ray plugin should be incorporated into Jira because we have to fetch two reports. One report is faxed through Jira, and one can be faxed through X-ray. So there needs to be clarity about which the Jira team should reflect."

"The user interface and views on different devices should be improved."

"The GUI should have much better features like more graphical illustrations. There are some cases or benchmarks that we are trying to capture into a dashboard GUI's graphical summary, but unfortunately JIRA is not able to do that."

More Jira cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing costs for the product are quite high."

"I think it's expensive because you have to pay for the licenses to IBM and all that and maintain them."

"IBM is a bit too expensive in terms of pricing. Customers are paying a lot for the license, and the price is quite high for this kind of environment. It is quite high as compared to what we can get today with other solutions."

"IBM Rational DOORS is highly expensive."

"IBM DOORS is available at a reasonable price"

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very affordable and ten being quite expensive."

"Licensing fees are billed annually and there is no support included with what I pay."

"I don't personally know what the numbers are. I just know that one of the reasons we've limited it to three seats is a function of cost."

More IBM DOORS pricing and cost advice

"We feel that the product is a good value for the cost."

"It does not cost that much."

"It's not very cheap. It's also not very costly. I'd rate it a five out of ten in terms of pricing."

"Its price is good and similar to other products. It is about five or six dollars per user."

"It is an affordable tool."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten. It's paid yearly."

"The license is yearly. It is a large, long-running program."

"I think the starter pack of three users, up to five users, is free. So you can try it out."

More Jira pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,874 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

27%

Computer Software Company

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Government

Educational Organization

38%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Rational DOORS?

The traceability matrix in DOORS improved our project outcomes. It helps ensure coverage of requirements at different levels, from user requirements to software requirements to test requirements.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Rational DOORS?

Over the years, the first version cost something around 5800 euros.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Rational DOORS?

Compared to today, DOORS' competitors also excel in this discipline. Yet the price is too high. It's often not as generic as it used to be. IBM promised to find a way for a generic format that allo...

See all answers

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?

We operate under a nonlimited license with Jira, allowing a number of users to access it with a single enterprise license.

See all answers

Comparisons

Polarion Requirements vs IBM DOORS

Compared 24% of the time

Jama Connect vs IBM DOORS

Compared 24% of the time

IBM DOORS Next vs IBM DOORS

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Dimensions RM vs IBM DOORS

Compared 5% of the time

PTC Integrity Requirements Connector vs IBM DOORS

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM DOORS Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Jira

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText ALM Octane vs Jira

Compared 8% of the time

Polarion ALM vs Jira

Compared 6% of the time

Rally Software vs Jira

Compared 6% of the time

Codebeamer vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

More Jira Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM DOORS

June 2025

Download IBM DOORS product report

Buyer's Guide

Jira

June 2025

Download Jira product report

Also Known As

Rational DOORS

Jira Software

Overview

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS (DOORS) is a Requirements Management (RM) software designed to help organizations manage engineering project requirements throughout the development lifecycle. It provides a central location for capturing, defining, and organizing project requirements, facilitating communication and collaboration among stakeholders like engineers, system designers, and customers. Key features include requirements traceability, version control, and impact analysis, ensuring effective implementation and testing. DOORS improves efficiency, enhances communication, reduces risks, and supports better decision-making through clear visibility into requirements. Compared to its newer, web-based counterpart DOORS Next, the mature DOORS 9 offers a wider range of features with a traditional user interface but lacks web-based functionality and modern integration with IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) tools.

IBM

Jira is a powerful cloud- and subscription-based application lifecycle and issue management solution. It is designed to aid users both in project management and in resolving any issues that arise at any point in the software development process. It is especially concerned with easing the ability of developers to collaborate.

Jira Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Jira include:

DevOps lifecycle visibility and planning. Jira provides application developers with tools that enable them to track and visualize where they are in the development process. This means that a DevOps team can measure their progress at all times. Jira’s roadmapping feature also enables a DevOps team to work more efficiently by setting goals for their projects, keeping them on track. Additionally, they are able to track whether they are meeting the goals that they set for their projects.

Regular product updates. Atlassian is constantly updating Jira so that it is continuously evolving into an ever more powerful and user-friendly solution. Users can be sure that the product that they are using is always being tweaked so as to provide them with the best possible project management solution.

Flexibility. Jira enables users to customize their workflows and dashboard so that the solution is operating in a way that best matches their needs. Jira can also integrate with more than 3,000 other applications and integrations. Organizations can use it to expand their project management and DevOps capabilities in many different ways.

Jira Features

Security capabilities. Jira is equipped with a number of useful security features. It gives administrators the ability to restrict access to certain tools so that only users who are authorized to complete certain tasks have access to the tools related to the completion of that task. Users can also set default permissions so that only particular users can work on new projects or particular projects.

Real-time notification feature. Users can set Jira so that it offers them notifications that contain critical information in real time. It can send users email notifications when pressing issues have been updated. They can also set it to notify them about tasks that may be due, or other similar events.
Activity log. Jira has the ability to track any and all changes that are taking place within the software framework. Users can keep a close eye on everything that is going on. This promotes a high level of visibility and can be leveraged to aid developers in their collaboration efforts.

Reviews from Real Users

Jira is a powerful solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its workflow engine and its highly customizable dashboard.

Bharath R., the tool implementation and project management lead at a financial services firm, writes, “I feel the strongest feature of Jira is its workflow engine. It empowers us to automate our workflows within our organization. It's the one characteristic of Jira which I think can help any organization, be it in any domain.”

Uday J., a staff engineer at a computer company, says, “Another thing that I like a lot about Jira is that in the dashboard, you can plug the modules that you want. You can enable certain sections. For example, you can show trend history, open Jira tickets, etc. Some of the managers have created a dashboard for each engineer.”

Atlassian

Sample Customers

Infosys, Chevrolet Volt

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.

Buyer's Guide

IBM DOORS vs. Jira

June 2025

Free Report: IBM DOORS vs. Jira

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DOORS vs. Jira and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,874 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM DOORS vs. Jira report.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.