Nov 29, 2021
SentinelOne
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum and Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection compete in the cybersecurity space. Kaspersky stands out in pricing and customer support while Comodo is favored for its comprehensive features.
Features: Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum offers centralized management, EDR services, and modular capabilities in network protection. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection includes Zero Day protection, API virtualization, and a sandbox environment for handling ransomware.
Room for Improvement: Kaspersky needs to enhance malware detection without signature reliance and improve performance stability. Comodo requires better DLP capabilities, consistent scanning performance, and more responsive support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaspersky offers diverse deployment options across cloud environments but has mixed reviews on technical support. Comodo, with faster deployment in private and public clouds, faces issues with support responsiveness but resolves immediate problems effectively.
Pricing and ROI: Kaspersky's pricing is economical for large deployments with competitive yearly licenses. Comodo, slightly more costly, provides valuable enterprise-level features, offering a reasonable ROI with substantial security returns.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
Without this type of solution, work becomes hampered and files become inaccessible.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
Customer support is generally satisfactory but could be improved, especially in terms of response time.
The technical support from Kaspersky was very responsive.
I would rate technical support from Kaspersky a nine out of ten.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Activating the newly purchased licenses is instantaneous, allowing installations without adjustments since it's cloud-based.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
Any endpoint added to Active Directory can be detected by Kaspersky Security Center, which can then push the agent onto it.
Both scalability and stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are solid.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
When deploying on old PCs, servers, or laptops, optimal performance cannot be expected.
The stability of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated at ninety-five to ninety-seven percent.
There have been performance issues during scanning, causing the PC to respond slowly.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows.
The main areas for improvement are support responsiveness and the additional enhancement with the DLP integration.
Kaspersky needs to improve its security techniques as it has not been in Gartner records for the last two years.
I previously mentioned that Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business doesn't have built-in DLP, which was a concern.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business does not have encryption tools.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.
The pricing and licensing cost of Kaspersky Endpoint Security is cheaper compared to Trend Micro.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
It includes an auto containment feature, ensuring files and folders remain secure.
If anything happens or any suspicious activities are detected, an alert is generated, allowing for quick response.
It stands out as an antivirus and malware protection solution due to its extensive feeds and resources for antivirus signatures.
The best features in Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are the file threat protection, web threat protection, mail threat protection, network threat protection, firewall, behavior detection, and exploit prevention.
The unified endpoint management and the capabilities that are added to the antivirus and anti-malware are what differentiate this solution from others.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.6% |
| Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum | 2.3% |
| Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection | 0.8% |
| Other | 93.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 45 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 48 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 1 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 63 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 33 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data.
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum offers robust protection and user-friendly detection tools beyond endpoints for small to mid-sized businesses, enhancing cybersecurity strategies with essential EDR and seamless XDR integration.
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum unites endpoint protection with automatic response capabilities, allowing businesses to identify, analyze, and neutralize threats efficiently. With features like antivirus, firewall, encryption, centralized management, and robust reporting, it supports multiple platforms and enhances secure environments for computers, servers, and networks. While user satisfaction is high due to its straightforward management and modular capabilities, some desire improvements in performance, AI integration, and cloud compatibility. Enhanced support, training, and simpler updates are also sought, though organizations value its effectiveness against malware and spyware. Despite high pricing and resource demands, Kaspersky's user-friendly approach and integration capabilities remain appreciated.
What are the features of Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum?
What benefits or ROI can users expect?
Organizations rely on Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum for endpoint protection against cyber threats, including malware and ransomware. Deployed across computers, servers, and mobile environments, it allows for centralized manageability, device control, and web access control. This approach ensures comprehensive security updates, file encryption, and efficient network activity monitoring, making it suitable for diverse business implementations.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
