Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection compete in the endpoint security solutions market. Cybereason seems to have the upper hand in support and threat detection, while Comodo is preferred for its comprehensive feature set and proactive prevention capabilities.
Features: User reviews for Cybereason highlight its effective threat detection, rich analytics, and deep insights. Comodo reviews mention its auto containment, default-deny approach, and superior threat prevention.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest Cybereason could improve integration capabilities, reduce false positives, and enhance documentation. Comodo users desire better documentation, fewer update interruptions, and smoother update processes.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason users find deployment straightforward and commend its responsive customer service. Comparatively, Comodo’s deployment is similarly easy, but feedback on customer service indicates room for improvement.
Pricing and ROI: Cybereason users note its competitive pricing and good ROI. Comodo is perceived as more costly but justified by its extensive features and strong ROI.
Without this type of solution, work becomes hampered and files become inaccessible.
Customer support is generally satisfactory but could be improved, especially in terms of response time.
Nine is great actually since we have people available when we ask, and they know what they are talking about.
if you're a partner with them, they provide fairly good support through a concept called invest support.
When deploying on old PCs, servers, or laptops, optimal performance cannot be expected.
The stability of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated at ninety-five to ninety-seven percent.
We inform Cybereason about any issues, and they work on a new solution, either with an update or a custom fix in anticipation of the next update.
The main areas for improvement are support responsiveness and the additional enhancement with the DLP integration.
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows.
Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.
If anything happens or any suspicious activities are detected, an alert is generated, allowing for quick response.
It includes an auto containment feature, ensuring files and folders remain secure.
I can create groups of endpoints and define policies with multiple modules to activate or deactivate based on needs.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection | 0.6% |
| Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response | 0.9% |
| Other | 98.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 1 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data.
Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
