Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

Xcitium and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Xcitium is ranked #38 with an average rating of 9.0, while WithSecure is ranked #46 with an average rating of 7.5. Xcitium holds a 0.4% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Xcitium users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...

Read 17 Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection reviews

990 Views
911 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Read 8 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews

1,405 Views
1,405 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are prominent endpoint security solutions. WithSecure Elements stands out with its advanced feature set despite higher costs.

Features: Comodo's auto-containment, fileless malware protection, and zero-day protection are highlighted by users. WithSecure Elements is praised for its ransomware protection, behavioral analysis, and robust threat intelligence capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Comodo needs better malware detection accuracy, reduced system performance impact, and optimization in some areas. WithSecure Elements could benefit from enhanced behavioral analytics, fewer false positives, and refinements in certain areas.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Comodo is easy to deploy and has responsive customer service. WithSecure Elements offers seamless cloud-based deployment and efficient support.

Pricing and ROI: Comodo is cost-effective with quick ROI. WithSecure Elements costs more but provides advanced features and long-term security benefits, justifying the higher initial investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

38th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

46th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection	0.4%
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection	0.8%
Other	98.8%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

MehulSharma

CEO at SD GROUP

A cloud solution for endpoint security with DLP

We shared a datasheet with the customer. The customer mentioned that MDM or DLP is included in the product, but she cannot utilize these features in AP Protection, even though they are mentioned in the datasheet. This creates an issue recommending the product to the customer since she cannot use these features. Therefore, when updating your datasheet, clarifying which features apply to the customer's product use is crucial. This clarity is beneficial for both parties. I provide the solution on-premises, but we conduct the POC on the Azure platform. Additionally, we are partners with both Microsoft and AWS. This enables us to offer the AWS and Azure platforms, whichever the customer prefers. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Mark Feldman

IT-Manager at MKF-Schimanski-ERGIS GmbH

Central console streamlines patch monitoring and device management effortlessly

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up. I provide an installation file for every client through my domain controller and GPO, and it works properly. We have faced no incidents with viruses or network breaches, and it's easy to monitor patches. I can use remote desktop from the central console. The solution also saves my time because, being the only one handling it, I can monitor all devices easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool is an open-source EDR with antivirus features. It also has remote support and patch management."

"They offer the whole package. Remote monitoring and management (RMM) is included with it, which is pretty nice. They also have Windows patching and third-party patching. It was easy to use for protection. The containment engine was pretty nice for securing our environment."

"Overall, I would rate Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection a nine out of ten."

"The most valuable feature is the management of end-user machines."

"If you open up an application or a web browser, it puts a container in a sandbox area. So if there's some malicious code, it'll stick there. It also has way better protection for ransomware because it uses heuristics that are pretty effective. We've done a lot of tests with live malware, and it works really well."

"Containment is the best feature of the solution."

"The most valuable feature of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is its ability to provide ransomware protection."

"The big advantage is that it has a sandbox if something bad comes into it."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection pros

"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."

"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."

"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."

"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."

"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."

"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."

"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."

"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."

Cons

"The licensing fees are high. The company should work to try to lower them for the customer."

"They need to just modernize the infrastructure with something that is next-generation. We have recently moved to SentinelOne. It had been doing good for us for a while, but we needed something modern with new technology."

"The menu could be cleaned up."

"They need to enhance the performance of the agents. Currently, the performance is going low when the agent starts a full scan. The agent is consuming a lot of resources while scanning. When there are a lot of documents to check, it slows down the endpoint. This is the only thing that worries me about Comodo, but this issue is also there in other products. It is missing DLP, and I know that they are working on adding some data loss prevention capabilities. They have added some capabilities, but these capabilities are not yet mature. I hope they will enhance these capabilities because it is important to prevent the data from going out from inside. We are protected from the outside, but we also have to be protected from the inside out."

"The locking and backup capabilities of the solution can be improved."

"The solution's online documentation needs to be fine-tuned. It is not up to which solution currently has. There is some inconsistency in the knowledge present. I would like to see MDM in the solution's future releases."

"Would be good to have a better understanding of what it is that you've got in quarantine."

"The downside of the product stems from the fact that it is still an unknown product in the market. Comodo needs to invest more in advertisements and promotions."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection cons

"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."

"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."

"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."

"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."

"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."

"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."

"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."

"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate Comodo’s pricing a four out of ten."

"It's a cost-effective solution"

"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is inexpensive."

"It was about 35 or 40 bucks per year for the endpoint."

"Generally, the cost is between $16 and $19 per endpoint."

"The price of this product should be lower."

"The product is very reasonably priced."

"The product is pricey."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"The price is comparable."

"The product has average pricing."

"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."

"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

21%

Computer Software Company

17%

University

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

Auto Containment is a valuable feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

There are not many disadvantages, but they need to do some work on DLP integration. Support could be improved. Sometimes it is difficult to find exact solutions, and people occasionally get stuck, ...

See all answers

What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The notifications and patch management features are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Darktrace, which requires a special device purchase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client. It would help if it used less RAM in future versions.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 30% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 25% of the time

Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 13% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

October 2025

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection report

Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

September 2025

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

Comodo AEP

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business

Overview

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data.

Xcitium

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

WithSecure

Sample Customers

Christian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI Properties

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

September 2025

Free Report: Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.