Zabbix and Cisco Intersight compete in the IT monitoring and management category. While both have unique strengths, Zabbix offers a cost-effective solution with flexible customization, whereas Cisco Intersight provides comprehensive enterprise features.
Features: Zabbix provides robust monitoring features including email and SMS alerts, scalability, and customization options. It integrates well with other open-source solutions. Cisco Intersight offers cloud integration and management capabilities for data centers along with robust hybrid cloud environment integration.
Room for Improvement: Zabbix requires an improved interface and enhanced reporting, dashboards, and more built-in templates. Non-technical users find it challenging, and it has a complex setup. Cisco Intersight needs improvements in automation capabilities, integration with third-party tools, and hybrid cloud management.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zabbix can be deployed on-premises and supports hybrid and private clouds. It relies on community support, with a strong forum but lacks formalized support structures. Cisco Intersight integrates with public and hybrid clouds, offering structured enterprise-level support beneficial for comprehensive assistance.
Pricing and ROI: Zabbix is open-source with no licensing costs, leading to immediate ROI through reduced costs, with optional paid support available. Cisco Intersight employs a traditional pricing model with licensing fees, offering competitive pricing justified by its enterprise features that provide valuable support and functionality.
It simplifies the onboarding of new hardware, reducing time spent on manual installations and configurations.
For complex issues, it's challenging to get the right engineer quickly unless you have a specific contract like CX.
Cisco technical support is helpful.
Cisco provides better support than anyone else.
It is so straightforward that I have never had to use the support.
I rate its scalability a ten out of ten due to its capability to manage multiple domains and automate service requests.
Cisco Intersight is scalable enough for our needs, allowing management in a multi-environment setup and working remotely while deploying servers.
Zabbix has high scalability.
Zabbix is very scalable and lightweight.
I would rate its scalability ten out of ten.
It is always accessible online, secure, and allows access from any location, following strict authentication standards.
Some steps are not included in the official documentation, which can create challenges.
Zabbix is very scalable and lightweight.
Zabbix is quite stable, and we haven't had any problems with Zabbix itself.
I think the stability of Zabbix is around five to six on a scale of ten, where ten is the best and one is the worst.
There is a significant issue regarding migration from UCS Manager into Intersight without formatting the Fabric Interconnects (FI), which is problematic in a production environment.
It would be great to have a chat session mode AI so that when I am on standby and encountering issues, I could engage with it, much like ChatGPT.
When registering our devices and servers using tokens, auto-detection could make it easier by automatically identifying resources and adding them to the platform.
The only issue I can note is that it's Linux-based, and Linux documentation is not the best.
The potential and customization is a little difficult because you have to learn scripts.
Cisco Intersight's license cost is very high compared to AWS and Azure solutions, which have lower initiation costs.
The pricing is fair and reasonable, particularly for enterprises.
The pricing mechanism sounds fair.
Zabbix is providing everything free of cost.
It is literally free.
It also provides predictive analysis, predicting data leaks and making it easy to scale up servers remotely without requiring physical interference.
It provides visibility into other products and storage, and is beneficial for environments where Cisco and other vendors coexist, allowing full visibility of the entire infrastructure.
This solution has provided time savings and required fewer people to operate this tool, rather than direct cost savings.
If disk usage surpasses a threshold, say 70%, I receive alerts and can take proactive action.
The alerting systems are very good in Zabbix, and it has helped us to reduce time for reaction.
People want to save costs, which is why they install Zabbix, but the reporting functionality is not properly developed.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Zabbix | 9.8% |
| Cisco Intersight | 1.6% |
| Other | 88.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 56 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
Cisco Intersight is Cisco’s systems management platform that delivers intuitive computing through cloud-powered intelligence. This platform offers a more intelligent level of management that enables IT organizations to analyze, simplify, and automate their environments in ways that were not possible with prior generations of tools. This capability empowers organizations to achieve significant savings in Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and to deliver applications faster, so they can support new business initiates. The advantages of the model-based management of the Cisco UCS platform plus Cisco Intersight are extended to Cisco UCS servers and Cisco HyperFlex and Cisco HyperFlex Edge systems. Cisco HyperFlex Edge is optimized for remote sites, branch offices, and edge environments.
Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.
It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.
With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
