Top 10 Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Alternatives

Vendor: Check Point Software Technologies

4.4 out of 5

60 reviews
97% willing to recommend

157 followers

Top Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) surpasses its competitors by integrating advanced security features with seamless network access, providing a unified cloud-native solution that enhances visibility, control, and protection across distributed environments.

Check Point Software Technologies Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Check Point Software Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Fortinet FortiGate

4.2 out of 5

Fortinet FortiGate

4.2 out of 5

Fortinet FortiGate offers a broad feature set with strong on-premises capabilities, emphasizing VPN, UTM, and SD-WAN integration. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE focuses on cloud-native scalability and advanced threat prevention, highlighting seamless SASE integration and Zero Trust Network Access.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Fortinet FortiGate Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiGate offers a straightforward setup process with transparent cost structures, while Check Point Harmony SASE presents a more complex setup with potentially higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiGate offers a straightforward setup process with transparent cost structures, while Check Point Harmony SASE presents a more complex setup with potentially higher initial expenses.

Netgate pfSense

4.3 out of 5

Netgate pfSense

4.3 out of 5

Netgate pfSense offers cost-effective network management with flexible deployment, ideal for small to medium businesses. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides robust security and cloud integration, suiting organizations prioritizing advanced threat protection.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Netgate pfSense Report

Pricing

Netgate pfSense offers a straightforward one-time setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE involves variable setup fees potentially higher due to its advanced configuration options.

View comparison

Pricing

Netgate pfSense offers a straightforward one-time setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE involves variable setup fees potentially higher due to its advanced configuration options.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE excels with flexible access control and simplified VPNs, attracting those valuing deployment ease. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers robust threat protection, appealing to those emphasizing seamless integration and bundled pricing for a comprehensive security ecosystem.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE offers a cost-effective setup with user-friendly deployment, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has higher initial costs but provides comprehensive security features.

View comparison

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE offers a cost-effective setup with user-friendly deployment, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has higher initial costs but provides comprehensive security features.

Cisco Secure Firewall

4.1 out of 5

Cisco Secure Firewall

4.1 out of 5

Cisco Secure Firewall offers advanced threat defense and seamless integration with Cisco products, enhancing enterprise security. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE excels in Zero Trust Network Access and cloud management, ideal for remote setups. Both face licensing challenges impacting potential buyers.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Secure Firewall Report

Pricing

Cisco Secure Firewall typically requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers a more budget-friendly installation option.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Secure Firewall typically requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers a more budget-friendly installation option.

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Umbrella attracts tech buyers with its DNS-layer security and detailed threat intelligence. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE impresses with its zero-trust access and protocol support, appealing to those valuing robust security features and comprehensive access controls in cloud environments.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Umbrella Report

Pricing

Cisco Umbrella typically incurs higher initial setup costs compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, making cost efficiency a notable distinction between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Umbrella typically incurs higher initial setup costs compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, making cost efficiency a notable distinction between the two solutions.

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Prisma Access offers comprehensive monitoring and seamless integration with other Palo Alto platforms. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE emphasizes ease of deployment. Prisma Access suits enterprises with complex needs, while Check Point Harmony SASE appeals to those prioritizing quick, user-friendly setup.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report

Pricing

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks involves a significant setup cost with advanced features, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting affordability over feature complexity.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiClient

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiClient

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiClient offers strong threat protection and cost-effective solutions for businesses, focusing on ease of deployment and VPN integration. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE excels with secure remote access and a user-centric design, appealing to enterprises prioritizing advanced security features.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiClient typically involves lower setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers more comprehensive initial deployment services, potentially increasing initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiClient typically involves lower setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers more comprehensive initial deployment services, potentially increasing initial expenses.

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

4.2 out of 5

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

4.2 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE offers user-centric security features like split tunneling and Citrix SD-WAN integration. In comparison, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform provides robust data protection and seamless VPN integration, appealing to buyers prioritizing content filtering and data loss prevention.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE offers a straightforward setup process, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform has a more complex initial configuration. Harmony SASE emphasizes ease of deployment and Zscaler focuses on advanced customization options.

View comparison

Pricing

Lookout

3.6 out of 5

Lookout

3.6 out of 5

Lookout excels in mobile security with advanced threat intelligence, appealing to budget-conscious buyers for its cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers a robust cloud security framework with seamless integration, suitable for those seeking comprehensive features and strong long-term ROI.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Lookout Report

Pricing

Lookout has higher setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Lookout has higher setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.

Cloudflare One

4.4 out of 5

Cloudflare One

4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE excels in seamless security management with advanced features, including Zero Trust Network Access. In comparison, Cloudflare One offers simplicity with consolidated features like strong DDoS protection, appealing to businesses seeking straightforward yet robust security options.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cloudflare One Report

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE offers a competitive initial setup cost, while Cloudflare One requires a higher upfront investment, highlighting a notable difference in cost structure for organizations evaluating their SASE solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 34 more products

Related categories

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Firewalls