IBM Power Systems vs Intel Server System comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
7,236 views|5,199 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Intel Logo
3,477 views|3,280 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 6, 2024

We compared Intel Server System and IBM Power Systems based on our user's reviews in several parameters.

IBM Power Systems offer exceptional performance, advanced virtualization capabilities, and robust security measures, while Intel Server System boasts powerful processing capabilities, stability, and advanced technology. Users appreciate IBM's flexibility and reliability, while Intel's customer service is highly praised. Both systems have received positive feedback on pricing and ROI. Intel users seek better hardware compatibility and faster processors, while IBM users desire enhanced performance, efficiency, and user experience.

Features: The Intel Server System is praised for its excellent performance, reliability, and advanced technology. Users appreciate its powerful processing capabilities, stability, and durability. The system also offers seamless connectivity, enhanced security, and efficient management. In contrast, IBM Power Systems are valued for their exceptional performance, advanced virtualization capabilities, reliable hardware, robust security measures, and flexibility to cater to diverse workloads.

Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Intel Server System product has received mixed feedback from customers, with some mentioning concerns about pricing and initial investment. In comparison, IBM Power Systems product has been praised for its fair pricing, minimal setup costs, and flexible licensing options., The Intel Server System has shown to be a valuable investment with improvements in performance, efficiency, and reliability. Users praise its advanced capabilities, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. It contributes to increased productivity and reduced downtime, enhancing overall business operations. On the other hand, IBM Power Systems have yielded highly satisfactory ROI and positive results according to user feedback.

Room for Improvement: Intel Server System users have expressed concerns about technical performance, hardware compatibility, processor speed, stability, user interface, power efficiency, and customer support. On the other hand, users of IBM Power Systems have suggested improvements in performance, efficiency, user experience, ease of use, software compatibility, and documentation and support.

Deployment and customer support: Based on user reviews, Intel Server System exhibits variability in the duration required for establishing a new tech solution, with some users taking three months for deployment and an additional week for setup. In comparison, IBM Power Systems reviews lack specific user quotes but emphasize the importance of considering the context in which the terms are used to accurately evaluate the time required., The customer service and support for Intel Server System is highly praised, with users commending their promptness, efficiency, and knowledgeable staff. On the other hand, IBM Power Systems receives positive feedback for their prompt assistance, reliability, and professionalism.

The summary above is based on 27 interviews we conducted recently with Intel Server System and IBM Power Systems users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

To learn more, read our detailed Rack Servers Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: Which product do you prefer: Intel Server System or IBM Power Systems?
Answer: Intel Server System and IBM Power Systems are both popular choices for Rack Servers. Below is a comparison of the two: Intel Server System Pros: Wide range of options to choose from Good performance and scalability They say it has competitive pricing Cons: Not as energy-efficient as some other options Can be more complex to manage IBM Power Systems Pros: Very energy-efficient Highly scalable Good performance for data analytics and other demanding workloads Cons: Could be costlier than some other options Not as wide range of options to choose from If you seek a Rack Server with a wide range of options and good performance, then Intel Server System may be a good choice. However, if you are looking for a Rack Server that is energy-efficient and highly scalable, it may be worth looking into IBM Power Systems.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Additionally, the processing power is far superior, especially with the RSA feature for reliability, serviceability, and availability.""The performance is the solution's most valuable asset. It has one of the highest levels of performance I have ever seen. It's quite remarkable, in that sense.""Power Systems' best features include its user-friendliness and self-checking/self-healing abilities.""On the security side, we get regular security patch updates and system hardening. There are free tools available to harden the system.""The backups work great, data recovery works great.""We value the stability and technology capability of this solution the most. It is very stable, and the processor technology of IBM is very good. When you have a CIO and you are dealing with C-level every day, you can, without any doubt, support the core banking or critical applications with this solution.""Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.""Some of the most valuable features are the processing power, stability, and security."

More IBM Power Systems Pros →

"It uses well known architecture and it's easy to develop for.""It is stable and easy to manage.""The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is more stable than AMD for VMware."

More Intel Server System Pros →

"In my country, there are power supply interruptions. IBM could find ways to make the product stable through these interruptions.""It would be ideal if the solution was more simple to work with.""IBM systems are old technologies. I couldn't renew and get to use IBM Power Systems, and it offers users very expensive support.""Its pricing could be better.""The pricing is high.""The price has room for improvement.""I would like to see IBM Power Systems integrate with all cloud types.""The solution is highly-priced."

More IBM Power Systems Cons →

"We have to scale it ourselves but it scales. It depends on the software because it's mostly the hardware platform that Intel is managing.""The shipment time can be improved. When we order Intel products, we have to wait for a long time. They can increase the local services and engineers in China. Local engineers will be able to know and understand customer problems much better.""When you have an Intel Server System, the prices may be much higher since it is a different processor, making the solution's pricing part one of its shortcomings where improvements are required."

More Intel Server System Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Why should I be charged for that use rather than a single CPU, a single socket?"
  • "The cost model is great. There is so much built in to the technology, that if you know how to use it you can save yourself a lot of money."
  • "It is designed for a large workload, as opposed to a small workload. For our circumstances, and even as an independent, I can't buy a Power system to experiment on. It can't happen. You cannot buy them."
  • "The pricing is reasonable."
  • "Its price is too high."
  • "Its price depends on the sizing."
  • "The pricing of the solution is very good because we can beat any other competitor with the pricing. Lately, they have offered good pricing for their customer."
  • "The price of the solution could be somewhat better and this is what lowers my rating of it to a seven or eight out of ten."
  • More IBM Power Systems Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price is competitive."
  • "It is not expensive."
  • "I rate the pricing a ten on a scale from one to ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is very expensive."
  • More Intel Server System Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:IBM Power Systems provides very good performance and stability compared to other brands or processors.
    Top Answer:IBM should provide a platform where users can learn about the storage and security of IBM Power Systems.
    Top Answer:In my company, we use the system for the data center and our IBM Cloud Pak System.
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is more stable than AMD for VMware.
    Top Answer:I rate the pricing a ten on a scale from one to ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is very expensive.
    Top Answer:When you have an Intel Server System, the prices may be much higher since it is a different processor, making the solution's pricing part one of its shortcomings where improvements are required.
    out of 22 in Rack Servers
    Average Words per Review
    out of 22 in Rack Servers
    Average Words per Review
    Also Known As
    Learn More
    Video Not Available
    IBM Power Systems are built to crush the most advanced data applications - from the mission-critical workloads you run today to the next generation of AI.

    Storage is simple with the Intel Storage System JBOD2000 family, a 2U form factor system with support for twelve 3.5" LFF or twenty-four 2.5" SFF drives with a single or multi-cable connectivity. The JBOD2000 family includes redundant, hot-swap fans and the option for redundant, hot-swap power supplies. The JBOD2000S2 products support 6Gb/s SAS/SATA connectivity via industry-standard SFF-8088 connectors with the latest JBOD2000S3 version supports up to 12 Gb/s SAS connectivity via industry standard SFF-8644 connectors. All these JBOD offerings are designed to provide highly available and easily expandable storage for Intel servers at an affordable price point.

    Sample Customers
    Emerson, Baosight, Pentamaster
    Top Industries
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Educational Organization11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Rack Servers
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Lenovo and others in Rack Servers. Updated: May 2024.
    772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Power Systems is ranked 4th in Rack Servers with 69 reviews while Intel Server System is ranked 9th in Rack Servers with 3 reviews. IBM Power Systems is rated 8.8, while Intel Server System is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of IBM Power Systems writes "A solution with minimal downtime and quick recovery time in the event of a sudden or unexpected crash". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Intel Server System writes "A stable product that constantly enhances its functionalities like multithreading and caching". IBM Power Systems is most compared with Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers, Oracle SPARC Servers, HPE ProLiant DL Servers, Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers and HPE Apollo, whereas Intel Server System is most compared with Oracle SPARC Servers, Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers and HPE ProLiant DL Servers.

    See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.