Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Absolute Secure Access vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Absolute Secure Access
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
34th
Ranking in ZTNA
37th
Ranking in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)
38th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (144th), Network Diagnostics (14th)
Check Point Harmony SASE (f...
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
7th
Ranking in ZTNA
2nd
Ranking in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)
6th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (7th), Firewalls (15th), Anti-Malware Tools (6th), ZTNA as a Service (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) category, the mindshare of Absolute Secure Access is 0.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is 3.4%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Absolute Secure Access?
Share your opinion
Nasseer Qureshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Delivers seamless and secure remote access while enhancing security posture
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers strong features, but there are areas that could be improved. One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers. It works with standard SAML and SSO, but we would prefer deeper integrations with solutions such as Ping for more advanced identity-based policies. Additionally, a mobile-specific client or lightweight agent would be helpful for securing access from smartphones, especially in BYOD environments. We would appreciate more granular reporting and analytics, including better drill-down capabilities to investigate specific users or app activity. The logs are comprehensive, but filtering them can sometimes feel messy. The user interface on the management portal could be more intuitive, especially when managing multiple sites or remote offices. Some of the policy configuration steps are nested and could be streamlined.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) solutions are best for your needs.
864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
34%
Healthcare Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Educational Organization
5%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Perimeter 81?
Even after restarting, it tries to quickly reestablish connection which is very helpful.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perimeter 81?
It's essential to consider the organization's specific requirements and budget. Here are some general recommendations: * Evaluate your needs * Understand pricing models * Request a quote * Compare ...
What needs improvement with Perimeter 81?
In terms of improvement, Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity. Additionally, expanding integration options wit...
 

Also Known As

NetMotion , NetMotion Diagnostics, NetMotion Mobile IQ
Check Point Quantum SASE
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

4-County Electric Power Association
Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith
Find out what your peers are saying about Zscaler, Cisco, Palo Alto Networks and others in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE). Updated: July 2025.
864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.