We compared Spring Boot and Open Liberty based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
In summary, Spring Boot is praised for its simplicity, flexible integration options, efficient customer service, cost-effectiveness, and positive ROI. On the other hand, Open Liberty is known for its strong performance, extensive documentation, exceptional customer service, affordability, and positive ROI. Spring Boot could improve in performance, documentation, and ease of use, while Open Liberty could enhance performance optimization and resource consumption.
Features: Spring Boot is favored for its simplicity, ease of use, flexibility, and rapid application development capabilities. In contrast, Open Liberty is highly valued for its strong performance, reliability, extensive documentation, and helpful community support.
Pricing and ROI: Spring Boot is known for its cost-effectiveness and reasonable pricing options, with a straightforward and hassle-free setup process. It offers flexibility in licensing options. On the other hand, Open Liberty is also affordable and easy to set up, with a favorable licensing structure., Spring Boot users have praised the product for its increased efficiency, reduced development time, improved performance, and enhanced productivity. Open Liberty users also experienced positive ROI by saving costs and receiving extensive support.
Room for Improvement: Spring Boot could benefit from improvements in performance, documentation, and ease of use. Error handling and compatibility with certain frameworks or features could also be improved. Users have mentioned the need for more efficient resource management and smoother integration with external components. Open Liberty requires enhancements in optimizing performance and resource consumption. Better memory footprint and streamlined memory management are suggested. Improving startup times and reducing deployment overhead are also important.
Deployment and customer support: The user reviews for Spring Boot and Open Liberty show that the duration required for establishing a new tech solution, including deployment, setup, and implementation phases, can vary. Some users of Spring Boot mentioned completing deployment and setup within the same week, while others took three months for deployment and an additional week for setup. Open Liberty users also had varied experiences, with some taking three months for deployment and a week for setup, while others needed only one week for both. It is important to consider the context in which these terms are used to accurately evaluate the duration needed for implementing these solutions., In terms of customer service, users have praised both Spring Boot and Open Liberty for their responsiveness and helpfulness. Customers appreciate the efficient and knowledgeable support from both teams. However, Open Liberty's customer service is often commended for going above and beyond to address concerns and provide prompt solutions.
The summary above is based on 31 interviews we conducted recently with Spring Boot and Open Liberty users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"It is a stable solution compared to other vendors."
"We like that it is an open-source tool."
"This is a pretty light solution. It's not too heavy."
"I have found the starter solutions valuable, as well as integration with other products."
"This is a stable solution that is being used in the HR space."
"Features that help with monitoring and tracking network calls between several micro services."
"Spring Boot could improve its integration with the major cloud providers. Connectivity with cloud solutions isn't easy compared to other frameworks like Django and Python."
"The most valuable feature of Spring Boot is all the interactions to various applications happen using Spring Boot."
"It's great because it simplifies development. Together with MyBatis they make a beautiful pair for Java development."
"Its support documentation could have detailed information on database integration."
"Nothing really comes to mind in terms of areas of improvement."
"They should integrate the solution with more AI and machine learning platforms."
"I would like to see more integration in this solution."
"Spring Boot can improve the dependency tree that we use for libraries. It would be helpful if it was less complex."
"When we change versions, we run into issues."
"The performance could be better."
"The cross framework compatibility has some shortcomings. With JUnit Test Runner and Spring Boot, it's really tedious to make them both work to write the test cases."
"If you want to have multiple integrations, the setup phase will become complex."
Open Liberty is ranked 7th in Java Frameworks with 1 review while Spring Boot is ranked 1st in Java Frameworks with 38 reviews. Open Liberty is rated 10.0, while Spring Boot is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Open Liberty writes "Scalable solution with efficient monitoring features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spring Boot writes "It's highly scalable, secure, and provides all the enhanced tools I need. ". Open Liberty is most compared with Spring MVC, Amazon Corretto, Eclipse MicroProfile and Helidon, whereas Spring Boot is most compared with Jakarta EE, Apache Spark, Eclipse MicroProfile, Vert.x and Oracle Application Development Framework.
See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.
We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
