Open Liberty vs Spring Boot comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
2,535 views|2,328 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
VMware Logo
28,075 views|18,408 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 6, 2024

We compared Spring Boot and Open Liberty based on our user's reviews in several parameters.

In summary, Spring Boot is praised for its simplicity, flexible integration options, efficient customer service, cost-effectiveness, and positive ROI. On the other hand, Open Liberty is known for its strong performance, extensive documentation, exceptional customer service, affordability, and positive ROI. Spring Boot could improve in performance, documentation, and ease of use, while Open Liberty could enhance performance optimization and resource consumption.

Features: Spring Boot is favored for its simplicity, ease of use, flexibility, and rapid application development capabilities. In contrast, Open Liberty is highly valued for its strong performance, reliability, extensive documentation, and helpful community support.

Pricing and ROI: Spring Boot is known for its cost-effectiveness and reasonable pricing options, with a straightforward and hassle-free setup process. It offers flexibility in licensing options. On the other hand, Open Liberty is also affordable and easy to set up, with a favorable licensing structure., Spring Boot users have praised the product for its increased efficiency, reduced development time, improved performance, and enhanced productivity. Open Liberty users also experienced positive ROI by saving costs and receiving extensive support.

Room for Improvement: Spring Boot could benefit from improvements in performance, documentation, and ease of use. Error handling and compatibility with certain frameworks or features could also be improved. Users have mentioned the need for more efficient resource management and smoother integration with external components. Open Liberty requires enhancements in optimizing performance and resource consumption. Better memory footprint and streamlined memory management are suggested. Improving startup times and reducing deployment overhead are also important.

Deployment and customer support: The user reviews for Spring Boot and Open Liberty show that the duration required for establishing a new tech solution, including deployment, setup, and implementation phases, can vary. Some users of Spring Boot mentioned completing deployment and setup within the same week, while others took three months for deployment and an additional week for setup. Open Liberty users also had varied experiences, with some taking three months for deployment and a week for setup, while others needed only one week for both. It is important to consider the context in which these terms are used to accurately evaluate the duration needed for implementing these solutions., In terms of customer service, users have praised both Spring Boot and Open Liberty for their responsiveness and helpfulness. Customers appreciate the efficient and knowledgeable support from both teams. However, Open Liberty's customer service is often commended for going above and beyond to address concerns and provide prompt solutions.

The summary above is based on 31 interviews we conducted recently with Spring Boot and Open Liberty users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

To learn more, read our detailed Java Frameworks Report (Updated: April 2024).
772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: Which solution do you prefer: Spring Boot or Open Liberty?
Answer: Sometimes, Open Liberty is preferred over Spring Boot because Open Liberty is lightweight, scalable, and secure. It is also a good choice for microservices because it supports a wide range of deployment options. On the other hand, if you are looking for a framework that is easy to use and configure, it may be best to go for Spring Boot. Here are the pros and cons of each solution: Spring Boot Pros: Easy to use and configure Provides a lot of pre-built features and libraries Well-documented and supported Cons: Can be heavy and bloated for some use cases Not as flexible as some other frameworks Open Liberty Pros: Lightweight and efficient Highly scalable and secure Supports a wide range of deployment options Cons: Can be more challenging to learn and use than Spring Boot Not as many pre-built features and libraries
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is a stable solution compared to other vendors."

More Open Liberty Pros →

"I have found the starter solutions valuable, as well as integration with other products.""The API gateway and cloud configuration allows us to configure the properties outside of the service with respect to enrollment.""Spring Boot is much easier when it comes to the configuration, setup, installation, and deployment of your applications, compared to any kind of MVC framework. It has everything within a single framework.""The setup is straightforward.""The solution reduces our development time.""It's easy to set up the solution.""It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...The initial setup was not complex and was a simple process.""Spring Boot facilitates the use of Java which is open source. We use Github and other libraries that are available which assist in the building we need to do."

More Spring Boot Pros →

Cons
"Its support documentation could have detailed information on database integration."

More Open Liberty Cons →

"Perhaps an even lighter-weight, leaner version could be made available, to compete with alternative solutions, such as NodeJS.""The cross framework compatibility has some shortcomings. With JUnit Test Runner and Spring Boot, it's really tedious to make them both work to write the test cases.""They should include tutorial videos for learning new features.""Spring Boot's cost could be cheaper.""It needs to be simplified, more user-friendly.""The performance could be better.""We'd like to have fewer updates.""I would like to see more integration in this solution."

More Spring Boot Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is less costly than one of its competitors."
  • More Open Liberty Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Spring Boot is free; even the Spring Tools Suite for Eclipse is free."
  • "This is an open-source product."
  • "It's open-source software, so it's free. It's a community license."
  • "This solution is free unless you apply for support."
  • "As Spring Boot is an open-source tool, it's free."
  • "Spring Boot is an open source solution, it is free to use."
  • "If you want support there is paid enterprise version with support available."
  • "This is an open source solution."
  • More Spring Boot Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.
    772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Sometimes, Open Liberty is preferred over Spring Boot because Open Liberty is lightweight, scalable, and secure. It is also a good choice for microservices because it supports a wide range of… more »
    Top Answer:It is a stable solution compared to other vendors.
    Top Answer:The solution is expensive but worth the investment as it has integration capabilities to manage the overall components. However, it is less costly compared to Spring Boot.
    Top Answer:1. Open Source 2. Excellent Community Support -- Widely used across different projects -- so your search for answers would be easy and almost certain. 3. Extendable Stack with a wide array of… more »
    Top Answer:Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, which… more »
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offers… more »
    Ranking
    7th
    out of 12 in Java Frameworks
    Views
    2,535
    Comparisons
    2,328
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    168
    Rating
    10.0
    1st
    out of 12 in Java Frameworks
    Views
    28,075
    Comparisons
    18,408
    Reviews
    28
    Average Words per Review
    415
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Open Liberty is built on a foundation of Java EE and Eclipse Microprofile and lets you run only the features your app needs.
    In addition to support for the open source Open Liberty runtime, Open Liberty Support also includes support for Java EE, Eclipse Microprofile, and Eclipse OpenJ9 JVM when used with Open Liberty.
    Support for Open Liberty gives you 24x7x364 access to IBM’s world-class support and the development team that created Open Liberty.
    Open Liberty is the most flexible server runtime available to Java developers. Work at lightspeed in a lightweight environment and build cloud-native Java apps and microservices.

    Spring Boot is a tool that makes developing web applications and microservices with the Java Spring Framework faster and easier, with minimal configuration and setup. By using Spring Boot, you avoid all the manual writing of boilerplate code, annotations, and complex XML configurations. Spring Boot integrates easily with other Spring products and can connect with multiple databases.

    How Spring Boot improves Spring Framework

    Java Spring Framework is a popular, open-source framework for creating standalone applications that run on the Java Virtual Machine.

    Although the Spring Framework is powerful, it still takes significant time and knowledge to configure, set up, and deploy Spring applications. Spring Boot is designed to get developers up and running as quickly as possible, with minimal configuration of Spring Framework with three important capabilities.

    • Autoconfiguration: Spring Boot applications are initialized with pre-set dependencies and don't have to be configured manually. Spring Boot also automatically configures both the underlying Spring Framework and any third-party packages based on your settings and on best practices, preventing future errors. Spring Boot's autoconfiguration feature enables you to start developing Spring applications quickly and efficiently. With Spring Boot, you reduce development time and increase the overall efficiency of the development process.

    • Opinionated approach: Spring Boot uses its own judgment for adding and configuring starter packages for your application, depending on the requirements of your project. (These are defined by filling out a simple web-form during the initialization process.) Spring Boot chooses which dependencies to install and which default values to use according to the form’s values.

    • Standalone applications: Spring Boot allows developers to create applications that can run on their own without relying on an external web server, by embedding a web server inside the application. Spring Boot applications can be launched on any platform simply by hitting the Run command.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Spring Boot stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its autoconfiguration feature, which allows users to start developing applications in a minimal amount of time.

    A system analyst and team lead at a tech services company writes, “Spring Boot has a very lightweight framework, and you can develop projects within a short time. It's open-source and customizable. It's easy to control, has a very interesting deployment policy, and a very interesting testing policy. It's sophisticated. For data analysis and data mining, you can use a custom API and integrate your application. That's an advanced feature. For data managing and other things, you can get that custom from a third-party API. That is also a free license.”

    Randy M., A CEO at Modal Technologies Corporation, writes, “I have found the starter solutions valuable, as well as integration with other products. Spring Security facilitates the handling of standard security measures. The Spring Boot annotations make it easy to handle routing for microservices and to access request and response objects. Other annotations included with Spring Boot enable move away from XML configuration.”

    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm45%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Government8%
    Insurance Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm42%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Security Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise81%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Java Frameworks
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Apache, Eclipse Foundation and others in Java Frameworks. Updated: April 2024.
    772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Open Liberty is ranked 7th in Java Frameworks with 1 review while Spring Boot is ranked 1st in Java Frameworks with 38 reviews. Open Liberty is rated 10.0, while Spring Boot is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Open Liberty writes "Scalable solution with efficient monitoring features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spring Boot writes "It's highly scalable, secure, and provides all the enhanced tools I need. ". Open Liberty is most compared with Spring MVC, Amazon Corretto, Eclipse MicroProfile and Helidon, whereas Spring Boot is most compared with Jakarta EE, Apache Spark, Eclipse MicroProfile, Vert.x and Oracle Application Development Framework.

    See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.

    We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.