No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
AWS CodeCommit Logo

AWS CodeCommit Reviews

Vendor: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

What is AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed source control service that facilitates seamless integration with AWS services, offering scalable and secure private Git repositories. It enhances team collaboration with features like pull requests and IAM access control.

Get the AWS CodeCommit Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, Bitbucket and more!
AWS CodeCommit is the #5 ranked solution in top Version Control solutions. PeerSpot users give AWS CodeCommit an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. AWS CodeCommit is most commonly compared to GitHub: AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub. AWS CodeCommit is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 47% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 14% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
AWS CodeCommit
May 2026
Get the report
Helped 892,943 peers since 2012

Featured AWS CodeCommit reviews

Read more reviews

AWS CodeCommit mindshare

As of May 2026, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit in the Version Control category stands at 4.6%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AWS CodeCommit4.6%
Bitbucket13.7%
Git12.6%
Other69.1%
Version Control

PeerResearch reports based on AWS CodeCommit reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryVersion ControlMay 7, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMay 7, 2026Download
ComparisonAWS CodeCommit vs BitbucketMay 7, 2026Download
ComparisonAWS CodeCommit vs GitHubMay 7, 2026Download
ComparisonAWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket ServerMay 7, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
GitHub4.410.6%100%99 interviewsAdd to research
Bitbucket4.213.7%98%53 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

AWS CodeCommit's valuable features include easy integration with AWS services, user-friendly interface, robust security measures with IAM access control, native support for version control, private repositories, branch management, and seamless scalability. It offers effective code approval processes, testing environments, and works well with pipelines like CodePipeline, CodeBuild, and CodeDeploy. The platform supports integration with tools such as CloudWatch, CloudTrail, and Git tools, enhancing collaboration and security through permissions and encryption.
  • "The most valuable features of AWS CodeCommit include the least privilege access from IAM, where permissions are granted only for the specific repository the developer is working on, which allows for hundreds of repositories with controlled access per project."
  • "It is a really good product where you can easily create your repository and integrate it with other tools such as IAM to handle the user and management aspects of the repository."
  • "What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem."

Room for Improvement

AWS CodeCommit lacks certain features found in Bitbucket, such as code reviewers and debugging options. The interface could be more intuitive compared to GitHub or GitLab. Users face challenges with migration processes and integrating third-party tools. There's a need for better documentation and training resources for beginners. Improvements are needed in search functionality and mass change handling. Users desire enhancements in insight analytics and CI/CD visualization to streamline operations and project management.
  • "The number of users for AWS CodeCommit is generally less compared to other version control systems."
  • "The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab."
  • "Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

ROI

Users mentioned that AWS CodeCommit significantly improved their project collaboration and management by providing a reliable and scalable repository hosting service. Many users experienced a noticeable reduction in downtime and latency, resulting in enhanced productivity. The ability to integrate seamlessly with other AWS services optimized their workflow while lowering costs associated with self-hosted solutions. Some noted that the secure environment provided by AWS CodeCommit boosted their confidence in code integrity and data safety.

Pricing

AWS CodeCommit is considered a cost-effective solution, offering competitive pricing that is cheaper for initial usage with the first five active users free and $1 per additional user monthly. While some users find AWS CodeCommit expensive compared to Azure, others appreciate the substantial cost savings due to AWS handling management tasks. The pricing model is primarily based on the number of users and storage used, with detailed cost information available on AWS's official site.
  • "AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily use AWS CodeCommit as a central code repository for version control, continuous integration, and deployment processes. It is utilized for storing application and infrastructure code. Its integration with CI/CD pipelines helps automate deployment to environments like S3 and EC2. Teams appreciate its seamless cloud integration and IAM rules usefulness, allowing them to manage code across microservices. AWS CodeCommit's native cloud features simplify code management compared to previous solutions like Subversion.

Service and Support

AWS CodeCommit customer service and support receive high marks for efficiency and responsiveness. Many users report quick response times and effective assistance across various technical levels. AWS support is separate and contingent on the level signed with AWS, with ratings often close to perfect. Some users express challenges due to limited direct contacts, and support tickets follow strict protocols requiring regular follow-ups. Nonetheless, most experiences meet or exceed expectations.

Deployment

AWS CodeCommit's initial setup is frequently described as easy and quicker compared to Bitbucket and Azure. Duration varies, from a few minutes to a couple of hours, influenced by users' AWS experience. Some note the importance of learning repository integration and file management. Assistance from YouTube videos is beneficial. Users find setup straightforward and maintenance simple, though some encountered issues with VS Code. Often delivered pre-installed within existing infrastructure, easing the adoption.

Scalability

AWS CodeCommit is highly scalable, backed by S3, accommodating multiple developers without bottlenecks. Users appreciate its competitive pricing compared to other platforms. Deployment is smooth with no scalability issues, allowing easy adjustment of storage needs. It efficiently manages repository demands, ensuring technical stability. Some users haven't tested extensive scaling but believe it offers reliable scalability based on current performance. Unlimited access for deployment prioritization is a significant feature that many find useful.

Stability

Most feedback indicates AWS CodeCommit is stable and reliable. Users report few stability issues, praising its performance and security. Some users mention minor concerns, such as limitations with large file comparisons. Occasionally, there are references to stability hiccups during major releases, including latency and brief access interruptions. AWS CodeCommit generally receives high marks for stability, though some groups experienced bottlenecks and unanticipated access disruptions during peak times, which were swiftly managed.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our AWS CodeCommit Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business35
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise42
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
8%
Government
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
Educational Organization
5%
Construction Company
4%
Religious Institution
4%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
Logistics Company
3%
Computer Software Company
3%
Transportation Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Marketing Services Firm
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
Retailer
1%

Compare AWS CodeCommit with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit effectively manages multiple repositories, supports versioning, and collaborates through pull requests and branch management. Its integration with AWS services like EC2, S3, and CodePipeline enhances development workflows. The platform also provides secure encryption, IAM-based access control, and customizable policies, ensuring smooth permission setup. Despite its integration benefits, areas like online repository forks, code reviewing, and file size limitations compared to GitHub necessitate enhancements. Organizations leverage CodeCommit for continuous integration and development, particularly when transitioning from older systems like Subversion.

What are the key features of AWS CodeCommit?
  • Seamless AWS Integration: Efficiently integrates with AWS services like CodePipeline and CodeBuild.
  • IAM-based Access Control: Provides secure access management with IAM rules.
  • Branch Management: Features for managing branches effectively.
  • Notification Rules: Enhances team collaboration with efficient notification setups.
  • Private Repositories: Offers secure, privately managed repositories.
What are the benefits of using AWS CodeCommit?
  • Easy Scalability: Adapts to growing development needs without complex configurations.
  • Enhanced Security: Encrypts data and allows for customizable security policies.
  • Improved Collaboration: Supports effective team collaboration with pull requests and notifications.
  • Seamless Integration: Integrates with AWS services to streamline deployment workflows.
  • Cost-Effective: Provides a cost-efficient solution for code management in the cloud.

In industries focused on cloud-based infrastructure, AWS CodeCommit supports private code storage and leverages AWS's secure environment. Teams manage and deploy applications efficiently, benefitting from seamless integration with AWS services. It is particularly beneficial for transitioning from traditional systems, aiding in modernizing and streamlining development processes.

AWS CodeCommit was previously known as CodeCommit.

AWS CodeCommit customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Related questions

  • 55
When evaluating Version Control, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 50
Why is Version Control important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Version Control

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
GitHub vs AWS CodeCommit Logo
GitHub vs AWS CodeCommit
Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit Logo
Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit
Bitbucket Server vs AWS CodeCommit Logo
Bitbucket Server vs AWS CodeCommit
IBM Rational ClearCase vs AWS CodeCommit Logo
IBM Rational ClearCase vs AWS CodeCommit
Atlassian SourceTree vs AWS CodeCommit Logo
Atlassian SourceTree vs AWS CodeCommit
Liquibase vs AWS CodeCommit Logo
Liquibase vs AWS CodeCommit
Cloudogu SCM- Manager vs AWS CodeCommit Logo
Cloudogu SCM- Manager vs AWS CodeCommit
See all alternatives
 
AWS CodeCommit Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
DevOps Engineer at Huntington Bank4.0I've used AWS CodeCommit at both Huntington and Walgreens for managing Git repositories in cloud infrastructures. Despite valuable integrations and security features, its Git interfaces and search functionality need improvement compared to alternatives like GitHub and GitLab.
DevOps Engineer at GFT Group3.5I've used AWS CodeCommit for about a year and found it effective for version control within AWS, especially with IAM integration, though it lacks widespread adoption and has uncertain scalability compared to more popular tools like GitHub.
DevOps Engineer at Paydoh4.5I transitioned from SVN and GitHub to AWS CodeCommit, which improved access control and integration with AWS tools, though initial setup and migration were challenging; better documentation and third-party integration support would enhance its usability.
Cloud Architect at Altimetrik (Deployed at FORD)4.0I use AWS CodeCommit to manage code repositories, leveraging its scalability and seamless integration with other AWS services. However, it could benefit from improved analytics and better third-party tool integration. Its quality rivals that of Azure.
AWS Engineer at 6thgen4.0We use AWS CodeCommit mainly for its seamless integration with AWS services, providing user-friendly features without complex authentication. Private repositories secure files, but handling mass changes could improve. We switched from GitHub for better deployment integration.
Senior Big Data Engineer - Machine Learning and Sentiment Analysis at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees3.0I use AWS CodeCommit for various tasks, including Glue and pipelines, mainly because my customer requires it. However, I find GitHub and GitLab more effective, especially since CodeCommit has limitations like a small file size cap for code comparison.
AWS Cloud Engineer at Datamellon4.0We utilize AWS CodeCommit for clients already integrated with it, appreciating its user-friendly interface, security, and scalability. However, for new clients, we prefer alternatives like GitHub and GitLab due to the interface limitations of CodeCommit.
Chief Innovation Officer at Fluid.Live4.5We use AWS CodeCommit as our version control system, keeping most application codes there. Its integration with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews has been highly valuable. We find it worth the investment, fulfilling our version control needs effectively.