Atlassian SourceTree and AWS CodeCommit are both Git repository hosting services designed to streamline version control for development teams. Atlassian SourceTree is favored for its user-friendly experience, while AWS CodeCommit stands out for its tight integration within the AWS ecosystem and advanced cloud-native capabilities.
Features: Atlassian SourceTree provides a comprehensive visual interface facilitating branch management and repository browsing. It is user-friendly and accessible for those less familiar with command-line interfaces. AWS CodeCommit seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, offers robust security, and is highly scalable, making it suitable for teams using AWS.
Room for Improvement: Atlassian SourceTree needs to improve performance and stability, as user feedback indicates slowdowns with large repositories. Additionally, enhanced support for large-scale projects and reducing memory consumption would be advantageous. AWS CodeCommit requires better documentation, more granular permission settings, and improved ease of use for teams not deeply embedded in the AWS ecosystem. Enhanced user interface customization would also be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Atlassian SourceTree is easier to deploy due to its straightforward installation process and comprehensive setup guides. Its customer service is rated as responsive and helpful. AWS CodeCommit, while more complex to integrate due to its dependency on the AWS ecosystem, benefits from AWS’s extensive support network, offering thorough assistance and resources.
Pricing and ROI: Atlassian SourceTree is generally cost-effective, especially for small to medium-sized teams, due to its free availability for individual use. AWS CodeCommit, though potentially more costly depending on usage, offers better ROI for larger enterprises already leveraging AWS services. Users acknowledge the higher initial setup costs but commend its long-term value due to seamless AWS integration and robust performance.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS CodeCommit | 5.1% |
| Atlassian SourceTree | 6.4% |
| Other | 88.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
Atlassian SourceTree is a graphical user interface (GUI) desktop client that facilitates user interaction with Git repositories. SourceTree provides a visual interface that is easy to use and intuitive. It allows developers to save a lot of command lines when working with Git.
The tool is free and works as a Git client for Windows and Mac OS. You can visualize and manage your repositories via the simple GUI. The client offers an efficient and consistent development process for Git and Mercurial.
Atlassian SourceTree Key Features
Atlassian SourceTree Benefits
Atlassian SourceTree Use Cases
Reviews from Real Users
A Program Manager/Engineer at a government says, "The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge… This product has helped because we have been able to fix problems when our code repository breaks."
AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
