AWS CodeCommit vs Atlassian SourceTree comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Atlassian Logo
2,911 views|1,977 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
2,177 views|2,020 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and AWS CodeCommit based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. Atlassian SourceTree Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences.""The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge.""The initial setup is straightforward.""The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."

More Atlassian SourceTree Pros →

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.""AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

More AWS CodeCommit Pros →

Cons
"The product's UI needs improvement.""Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer.""I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone.""For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."

More Atlassian SourceTree Cons →

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use.""The tool should improve its UI."

More AWS CodeCommit Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is a fee for using SourceTree."
  • "Atlassian SourceTree is a free solution."
  • More Atlassian SourceTree Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."
  • More AWS CodeCommit Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use Atlassian SourceTree to manage source code from different environments. It helps us merge all the codes by developers.
    Top Answer:AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.
    Top Answer:As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only… more »
    Top Answer:need some simple way to Cross-account access of Repository and CICD pipeline .
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    2,911
    Comparisons
    1,977
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    146
    Rating
    7.0
    5th
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    2,177
    Comparisons
    2,020
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CodeCommit
    Learn More
    Overview

    Atlassian SourceTree is a graphical user interface (GUI) desktop client that facilitates user interaction with Git repositories. SourceTree provides a visual interface that is easy to use and intuitive. It allows developers to save a lot of command lines when working with Git.

    The tool is free and works as a Git client for Windows and Mac OS. You can visualize and manage your repositories via the simple GUI. The client offers an efficient and consistent development process for Git and Mercurial.

    Atlassian SourceTree Key Features

    • Branch management: Typically, managing branches is a time-consuming and tedious process for project managers and developers. With SourceTree, you can switch working copies with a single click. You can also see where you are compared with the version in the repository, alerting you to push or pull.

    • Working copy: Developers who work using the command line often lack visibility. Access the “working copy” section to see the difference between your local copy and the version in the Git repository. This feature allows you to see exactly what has changed.

    • Branch history: the History section displays the full history of the branch, displaying each commit and file change. This feature enables smooth version control.

    • GitFlow: GitFlow organizes the workflow, streamlining parallel code changes and reducing merge conflicts.

    Atlassian SourceTree Benefits

    • Any level user can use SourceTree: beginners and experts benefit from the visibility and streamlined workflows of SourceTree. Beginners benefit from the simplified version control. Experts can review changesets and stash and pick between branches. Senior programmers can customize changeset and stashes, apply patches, rebase or shelve changesets. The tool offers detailed tutorials to help beginners and experts start quickly. Other benefits for beginners include easy access to commands with one click and simplified distributed version control.

    • Code visibility: the visualization of the Git process enables users to manage large projects with multiple branches and commits. SourceTree automatically tracks the activity of your code. It also features bookmarks where you can see a summarized view of all projects and repositories. Therefore, you can check a specific branch or commit with a single click. Finally, it features detailed branching diagrams that make it easy to follow the process.

    • Git and Hg support: the fully-featured GUI supports Git and Mercurial, offering a consistent development process from the start. You can also use SourceTree for a project on Github. Start by creating the project on Github, then connect it to the SourceTree software.

    • Free: the SourceTree tool is free to use, even for commercial uses, without buying a license.

    • Supports Git LFS: users can track large assets and submit code from a single dashboard.

    • Subordinated modules: you can use submodules for hand-picked dependencies and manage and group projects.

    Atlassian SourceTree Use Cases

    • Check-in and check-out code using the client-side application.
    • You can also use SourceTree to repair broken Git repositories because you can easily detect mistakes at a glance.
    • The simple and intuitive user interface allows users to search for and clone remote repositories.

    Reviews from Real Users

    A Program Manager/Engineer at a government says, "The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge… This product has helped because we have been able to fix problems when our code repository breaks."

    AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

    Sample Customers
    Facebook, NASA, Cisco, eBay, Redfin, Toyota, Kaiser Permanente, Gilt, CSIRO, Autodesk, The Daily Telegraph, CODE, Illumnia,
    Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS CodeCommit vs. Atlassian SourceTree
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit vs. Atlassian SourceTree and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 6th in Version Control with 5 reviews while AWS CodeCommit is ranked 5th in Version Control with 2 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while AWS CodeCommit is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS CodeCommit writes "Offers convenient and cost-effective version control but lacks some advanced features and integration options ". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with Git, GitHub, Bitbucket and Bitbucket Server, whereas AWS CodeCommit is most compared with Bitbucket, GitHub and Bitbucket Server. See our AWS CodeCommit vs. Atlassian SourceTree report.

    See our list of best Version Control vendors.

    We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.