AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub comparison

Read 94 GitHub reviews

1,637 Views
680 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

GitHub and AWS CodeCommit are competing in the version control platform category. GitHub seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive community support and seamless integration with various CI/CD services, making it preferable for collaborative projects.

Features: GitHub offers extensive integrations with CI/CD services, a strong community focus, and a vast repository of tools. AWS CodeCommit's features include seamless integration with AWS services, secure environments, and support for Git tools and workflows.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance security measures for private repositories, improve integration with non-Microsoft services, and offer more robust native project management tools. AWS CodeCommit might improve by expanding its community support, providing better UI navigation, and offering enhanced documentation for non-AWS integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub provides straightforward deployment with extensive documentation and community resources. Its customer service is responsive. AWS CodeCommit benefits from AWS's overall deployment efficiency and strong enterprise-oriented support, particularly beneficial for AWS-centric businesses.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers various pricing tiers suitable for individuals and enterprises, providing significant ROI through collaboration capabilities. AWS CodeCommit is cost-effective, especially for those leveraging existing AWS resources, with a competitive pay-as-you-go model.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub Report (Updated: June 2025).

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 5.9%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 6.5%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

Efficient integration of code changes with seamless private repository management

AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly. It doesn't require any complex authentication, which makes the process seamless. Deployments happen in a straightforward manner once the code is organized correctly in the repository. The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only. This ensures that unauthorized users cannot access sensitive files. AWS CodeCommit also integrates well when we use it with Check Point allowing us to implement information in the criteria we need.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem."

"The customer service is pretty good."

"The solution's most valuable feature is versioning."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"AWS CodeCommit's user interface is nice, and it's easy for people to pick up."

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

"The solution scalable."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"The ease of the planning board feature in GitHub is very valuable."

"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."

"Even if I'm not in the office, I can access and work on my code from anywhere with my account credentials."

"During our use of GitHub, we have not encountered any problems and GitHub adds new features frequently."

"GitHub is a fundamental tool in the software industry."

"You can write the code with AI. But when it comes to implementation, you must upgrade the bits of code that will support this and generate solutions based on that architecture. Then, you need comparable code bits. Therefore, AI can propose how much a specific function can be better optimized. So, AI can help stakeholders reach tasks quicker."

"Any complex banking can be handled very easily in GitHub. It allows us to integrate with tools like Grid, where we can merge and resolve conflicts without any hassle."

"Complication free with good ability for third-party integrations."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab."

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price."

"The tool should improve its UI."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile."

"Specifically, I want the solution to offer AI-based merging support, as it is the only area where the product has certain shortcomings."

"The ticketing system is not working."

"The initial setup and implementation could be easier, I had some difficulties with it at first but I don't have a development background."

"Regarding improvements, I preferred the tool's earlier pricing model, which limited storage and the number of repositories instead of the number of users, which was more convenient from a customer perspective. I've also experienced issues with GitHub servers being unable to support moving repositories, which caused problems. For basic plans, no support was available to help resolve these issues. I think GitHub should provide more support for smaller businesses to help with these problems."

"There is a bit of a learning curve."

"One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools."

"I think it would be valuable to have more security. Some of the data is very open to everyone."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"The solution is expensive."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price. Compared to Azure, AWS is more expensive, and that's the trend.

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics. A built-in dashboard with advanced analytics, like commit frequencies and pull request trends, could be added. These features would help gain dee...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 74% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodeCommit

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Download GitHub product report

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub