AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub comparison

Read 95 GitHub reviews

3,567 Views
1,355 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

GitHub and AWS CodeCommit compete in the version control and collaboration category. GitHub seems to have the upper hand due to its strong open-source community support and superior features like project boards and GitHub Actions.

Features: GitHub brings a stronger open-source community, project boards, and GitHub Actions that support DevOps integration and automation. AWS CodeCommit offers tight integration with AWS services, IAM-based access control, and seamless integration with AWS tools, making it ideal for AWS-centric workflows.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could improve its security features, refine its support for large files, and offer a friendlier interface for newcomers. AWS CodeCommit would benefit from expanding its feature set, improving documentation, and enabling better integration with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub provides robust community support and is mostly used in public cloud environments. AWS CodeCommit is also public cloud-based but requires significant interaction with AWS support. Both offer satisfactory customer service with varying reliance on community and official support teams.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers a free tier with unlimited public repositories, appealing to open-source projects, but its enterprise pricing is viewed as costly. AWS CodeCommit presents a cost-effective model with free initial users and charges based on storage, presenting strong ROI for AWS-focused businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub Report (Updated: September 2025).

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 5.1%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 8.0%, up from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	8.0%
AWS CodeCommit	5.1%
Other	86.9%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

Efficient integration of code changes with seamless private repository management

AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly. It doesn't require any complex authentication, which makes the process seamless. Deployments happen in a straightforward manner once the code is organized correctly in the repository. The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only. This ensures that unauthorized users cannot access sensitive files. AWS CodeCommit also integrates well when we use it with Check Point allowing us to implement information in the criteria we need.

Read full review

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Improved deployment pipeline visibility with generally good support

My primary use case involves working with GitHub for code management. I have extensive experience using it for various tasks, such as creating repositories, managing pull requests, and utilizing GitHub Actions for automating workflows GitHub contributes to efficient project management by…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit is that it acts as a code repository with code versioning and approval features similar to those found on GitHub."

"What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem."

"The solution is quite scalable."

"The customer service is pretty good."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"AWS CodeCommit's user interface is nice, and it's easy for people to pick up."

"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."

"The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"I recommend using GitHub because it is reliable and helpful for developers."

"The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code."

"I'm able to access any repository that I like, whether it's public or private."

"GitHub is pure or open-source; you can access it anywhere. You can have a lot of collateral information. You can make the changes and do the reviews from one place."

"The Projects Tab, which shows you the todo list and the progress for projects, is very helpful."

"GitHub is convenient and easy to use."

"The most valuable features are GitHub Actions for triggering workflows, GitHub Secrets for saving credentials without needing a third-party service, and the UI for identifying errors in the code when we commit."

"The ease of the planning board feature in GitHub is very valuable."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

"There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics."

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"The initial setup and implementation could be easier, I had some difficulties with it at first but I don't have a development background."

"The documentation needs to be more concise and easier for developers to understand."

"The sign in process is a bit difficult. Signing up was challenging at that time."

"GitHub uses basic configuration, but messaging is not clear."

"They're improving the work items to track the progress of the team, but in my experience, Azure DevOps is better in this functionality. GitHub needs to improve the form to track the progress of the work done by a team."

"When I was new, I faced challenges with Git commands, such as reversing or deleting mistakes."

"One thing GitHub could do is probably the same thing as what Sourcetree does. When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict."

"If we have complex branch strategies, it becomes very complicated to manage all those branches."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"The solution is expensive."

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"The private repositories are free, which is very good."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	48

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is actually one of the cost-effective AWS services. It follows a straightforward pricing model where you pay for users and storage. With around 40 to 50 developers, it ranges from $1...

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

Understanding AWS CodeCommit was a hectic job for developers at first, while it was easier for the DevOps team. Even with access, they faced questions and difficulties navigating the service, indic...

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeCommit?

The positive impact of AWS CodeCommit on my organization was significant, especially transitioning from Subversion (SVN), which was an outdated technology for repositories. It was a very hectic pro...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 59% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 12% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Mend.io vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodeCommit

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Download GitHub product report

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub