AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub comparison

Read 95 GitHub reviews

3,385 Views
1,286 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

GitHub and AWS CodeCommit compete in the version control category for development teams. Based on feature set and user preferences, GitHub holds an advantage due to its strong community and open-source nature, whereas AWS CodeCommit is preferred for AWS-native integration with enhanced security.

Features: GitHub offers comprehensive features such as branching capabilities, seamless integration with tools like Jenkins, and a vibrant community for collaborative projects. In contrast, AWS CodeCommit is noted for its tight integration with AWS tools, detailed access control via IAM, and environment management, making it efficient for organizations relying heavily on AWS.

Room for Improvement: GitHub users often request better integration with DevOps tools, improved security features like built-in scans, and refined branching. AWS CodeCommit could benefit from a more user-friendly interface, enhanced third-party tool integration, and improved Insight Analytics for competitive advantage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub's wide adoption is supported by extensive community resources, reducing the need for direct support, and it is typically deployed in public cloud environments. AWS CodeCommit, integrated within the AWS ecosystem, offers smoother deployment for AWS users and strong technical support for scaling.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub attracts personal and small projects with its free tier, offering private repositories and enterprise pricing for higher ROI due to community-driven efficiencies. AWS CodeCommit has competitive user and storage-based pricing, delivering cost savings to AWS users because of its integrated management, suited to diverse budgets and organizational needs.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub Report (Updated: November 2025).

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,846 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 4.9%, down from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 8.1%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	8.1%
AWS CodeCommit	4.9%
Other	87.0%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Andrea-Carella

DevOps Engineer at GFT Group

Has improved repository management through policy customization but needs better integration with external tools

AWS CodeCommit is a good product to use when you also have to use CodePipeline because it is all integrated in the same system, which is beneficial. However, the integration with other code pipeline tools outside the AWS world is uncertain, as there has been no experience with that integration. The number of users for AWS CodeCommit is generally less compared to other version control systems. To improve the adoption of AWS CodeCommit with respect to others that are more used in the market, something would need to be done to increase market share, as people are often more educated to use GitLab or GitHub. AWS CodeCommit is quite easy to learn in general, but competitors have a bigger market share in this particular area for many reasons.

Read full review

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Improved deployment pipeline visibility with generally good support

My primary use case involves working with GitHub for code management. I have extensive experience using it for various tasks, such as creating repositories, managing pull requests, and utilizing GitHub Actions for automating workflows GitHub contributes to efficient project management by…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit is that it acts as a code repository with code versioning and approval features similar to those found on GitHub."

"The customer service is pretty good."

"The solution is quite scalable."

"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."

"It is a really good product where you can easily create your repository and integrate it with other tools such as IAM to handle the user and management aspects of the repository."

"The solution scalable."

"The solution's most valuable feature is versioning."

"It helps us to install our code idea projects."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"The support team is good."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the version control field."

"I find GitHub very user friendly."

"The Projects Tab, which shows you the todo list and the progress for projects, is very helpful."

"GitHub is very straightforward. I really appreciate the versioning capabilities, ease of use, and the ability to host code."

"During our use of GitHub, we have not encountered any problems and GitHub adds new features frequently."

"GitHub have a built-in software application development environment and this has been most useful."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy but it is always good to connect with GitHub's team that manages APIs."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"The number of users for AWS CodeCommit is generally less compared to other version control systems."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab."

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price."

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"There is a bit of a learning curve."

"Could be more user friendly."

"The GUI design is poor, so I exclusively use the CLI, which is much easier to use and understand. It would be great to see the GUI updated to be more user-friendly."

"We want to incorporate management comments within GitHub, making it more like a product management tool. We haven't done that yet. Another change we're considering is migrating from GitHub to Azure DevOps, especially now that Microsoft has introduced it."

"The descriptions within Github could be more user-friendly to show the trees of Gitflow."

"There is nothing that I find that needs improvement in GitHub."

"GitHub could automate the setup process more, such as creating YAML files for GitHub Actions."

"The sign in process is a bit difficult."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"The solution is expensive."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	48

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is actually one of the cost-effective AWS services. It follows a straightforward pricing model where you pay for users and storage. With around 40 to 50 developers, it ranges from $1...

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

Understanding AWS CodeCommit was a hectic job for developers at first, while it was easier for the DevOps team. Even with access, they faced questions and difficulties navigating the service, indic...

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeCommit?

The positive impact of AWS CodeCommit on my organization was significant, especially transitioning from Subversion (SVN), which was an outdated technology for repositories. It was a very hectic pro...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

GitHub is very stable for me with no performance issues.

What needs improvement with GitHub?

When working with the CI/CD pipeline and somebody is writing the workflow file, it would be best to include the AI feature so if they write incorrect code, it will notify me about it in the same da...

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 57% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 16% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

AWS CodeCommit

November 2025

Download GitHub product report

October 2025

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent