AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub comparison

Read 97 GitHub reviews

4,134 Views
1,323 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

GitHub and AWS CodeCommit are key players in version control, each offering distinct benefits. GitHub leads with its robust community backing and extensive integrations, making it ideal for collaborative and open-source projects. AWS CodeCommit excels in AWS service integration, benefiting teams entrenched in the AWS ecosystem.

Features: GitHub stands out with a user-friendly interface, third-party tool integrations, and strong security features including SSH keys. AWS CodeCommit is favored for its IAM-based access control, seamless AWS service integration, and efficient code versioning and approval processes.

Room for Improvement: GitHub needs to address scaling issues, enhance security, and improve DevOps functionalities. AWS CodeCommit could improve user interface design, simplify migration processes, and enhance third-party tool integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is known for its deployment in public and hybrid cloud setups, supported by a large user community. AWS CodeCommit offers reliable AWS technical support but may benefit from improved documentation and a more intuitive user interface.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides a beneficial free tier for public repositories but can entail high costs for larger teams due to licensing complexities. AWS CodeCommit offers competitive pricing within AWS, based on users and storage, proving cost-efficient for teams operating primarily in the AWS cloud environment.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub Report (Updated: February 2026).

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub

Download the complete report

Helped 882,410 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (4th), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 5.0%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 10.1%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	10.1%
AWS CodeCommit	5.0%
Other	84.9%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Uma Tulasi

DevOps Engineer at Huntington Bank

Seamless integration enhances team collaboration and process efficiency

The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab. Simple things such as viewing directory structures or browsing through commit history and pull request flow could use serious upgrades. We had to create workarounds for features that come standard elsewhere, such as automatically assigning reviewers based on code ownership and setting up required review templates. The search functionality is another pain point, as trying to find specific code across repositories is limited. At Walgreens, we had a large mono repo for our pharmacy services code, and developers constantly complained about how difficult it was to search through it effectively in AWS CodeCommit. I also wish it had better CI/CD visualization built in.

Read full review

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit is that it acts as a code repository with code versioning and approval features similar to those found on GitHub."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"It helps us to install our code idea projects."

"What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem."

"The customer service is pretty good."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"AWS CodeCommit's user interface is nice, and it's easy for people to pick up."

"It is a really good product where you can easily create your repository and integrate it with other tools such as IAM to handle the user and management aspects of the repository."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"GitHub is a very good tool, and people should use it more than any other, even Bitbucket."

"I find GitHub's pull request strategies and GitHub Actions to be very valuable."

"GitHub Actions, specifically in the DevOps field, have been extremely valuable."

"Complication free with good ability for third-party integrations."

"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."

"The ease of use is valuable."

"The learning curve is small."

"The versioning of the code and the tracking of changes are definitely some of my top features."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price."

"The number of users for AWS CodeCommit is generally less compared to other version control systems."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"When I compare code, AWS has a cap on the file size, and that size is pretty small compared to what GitHub and GitLab provide."

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"There is room for improvement in terms of interface."

"There can be conflict issues when two developers work on the same file or line of code, and it would be great to see that improved, possibly with an AI solution."

"We are not able to access GitHub from our VPN."

"GitHub needs to improve its UI."

"I decided not to use GitHub but developed my tool because I found it more efficient. I'm familiar with my tools, making them easier to use. I like being able to customize them to fit my workflow and the way I think.. Software development is like a personal workshop, and I tailor my version control to match my approach."

"There is nothing that I find that needs improvement in GitHub."

"This solution could be improved if migration was fully automated to make it easy, for example, to migrate repositories into GitHub."

"The stability can be improved."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"The solution is expensive."

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,410 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is actually one of the cost-effective AWS services. It follows a straightforward pricing model where you pay for users and storage. With around 40 to 50 developers, it ranges from $1...

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is a good product to use when you also have to use CodePipeline because it is all integrated in the same system, which is beneficial. However, the integration with other code pipelin...

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is a version control system integrated directly in the cloud environment, similar to GitHub, GitLab, and other platforms. It offers every single benefit of using any other version co...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 40% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 18% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 14% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

Aikido Security vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodeCommit

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Download GitHub product report

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub