AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub comparison

Read 94 GitHub reviews

3,809 Views
1,524 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

GitHub and AWS CodeCommit are competing in the version control platform category. GitHub seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive community support and seamless integration with various CI/CD services, making it preferable for collaborative projects.

Features: GitHub offers extensive integrations with CI/CD services, a strong community focus, and a vast repository of tools. AWS CodeCommit's features include seamless integration with AWS services, secure environments, and support for Git tools and workflows.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance security measures for private repositories, improve integration with non-Microsoft services, and offer more robust native project management tools. AWS CodeCommit might improve by expanding its community support, providing better UI navigation, and offering enhanced documentation for non-AWS integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub provides straightforward deployment with extensive documentation and community resources. Its customer service is responsive. AWS CodeCommit benefits from AWS's overall deployment efficiency and strong enterprise-oriented support, particularly beneficial for AWS-centric businesses.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers various pricing tiers suitable for individuals and enterprises, providing significant ROI through collaboration capabilities. AWS CodeCommit is cost-effective, especially for those leveraging existing AWS resources, with a competitive pay-as-you-go model.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub Report (Updated: July 2025).

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub

Download the complete report

Helped 861,481 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 5.6%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 6.9%, up from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

Efficient integration of code changes with seamless private repository management

AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly. It doesn't require any complex authentication, which makes the process seamless. Deployments happen in a straightforward manner once the code is organized correctly in the repository. The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only. This ensures that unauthorized users cannot access sensitive files. AWS CodeCommit also integrates well when we use it with Check Point allowing us to implement information in the criteria we need.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution scalable."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

"It helps us to install our code idea projects."

"The customer service is pretty good."

"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."

"The solution is quite scalable."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"GitHub is a fundamental tool in the software industry."

"I recommend using GitHub because it is reliable and helpful for developers."

"With GitHub, we can manage our development progress, CID, and continuous integration. It helps streamline our development processes effectively."

"I appreciate saving from Visual Studio Code that implements changes directly on GitHub."

"The support team is good."

"GitHub provides enough storage for uploading the source code."

"GitHub is easy, secure, and widely documented."

"GitHub provides good time reduction and this is what I value the most."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"When I compare code, AWS has a cap on the file size, and that size is pretty small compared to what GitHub and GitLab provide."

"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

"Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price."

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics."

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity."

"The query function in GitHub is a bit stiff."

"The GitHub repository needs an upgraded user interface and overall UI improvements."

"I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature."

"It is currently only from the development perspective. It doesn't have features related to project management and testing. It is not like Azure. So, there is a lot of room for improvement. It is a version control product, and it would be good if they can come up with a complete DevOps product."

"GitHub's issue management could be improved a little from an organization standpoint. It would be helpful to have the ability to organize a work board or a backlog more comprehensively. For organizations migrating to GitHub from arbitrary systems, it's a little bit of a headache to move on to that system."

"The security for this solution could be tightened up and improved."

"Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"The solution is expensive."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"I use the free version of GitHub."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"The private repositories are free, which is very good."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,481 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is actually one of the cost-effective AWS services. It follows a straightforward pricing model where you pay for users and storage. With around 40 to 50 developers, it ranges from $1...

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab. Simple things...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 72% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Mend.io vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodeCommit

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Download GitHub product report

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub