AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub comparison

Read 97 GitHub reviews

3,549 Views
1,207 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

GitHub and AWS CodeCommit compete in the version control category for development teams. Based on feature set and user preferences, GitHub holds an advantage due to its strong community and open-source nature, whereas AWS CodeCommit is preferred for AWS-native integration with enhanced security.

Features: GitHub offers comprehensive features such as branching capabilities, seamless integration with tools like Jenkins, and a vibrant community for collaborative projects. In contrast, AWS CodeCommit is noted for its tight integration with AWS tools, detailed access control via IAM, and environment management, making it efficient for organizations relying heavily on AWS.

Room for Improvement: GitHub users often request better integration with DevOps tools, improved security features like built-in scans, and refined branching. AWS CodeCommit could benefit from a more user-friendly interface, enhanced third-party tool integration, and improved Insight Analytics for competitive advantage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub's wide adoption is supported by extensive community resources, reducing the need for direct support, and it is typically deployed in public cloud environments. AWS CodeCommit, integrated within the AWS ecosystem, offers smoother deployment for AWS users and strong technical support for scaling.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub attracts personal and small projects with its free tier, offering private repositories and enterprise pricing for higher ROI due to community-driven efficiencies. AWS CodeCommit has competitive user and storage-based pricing, delivering cost savings to AWS users because of its integrated management, suited to diverse budgets and organizational needs.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub Report (Updated: December 2025).

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,927 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (4th), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 5.0%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 9.3%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	9.3%
AWS CodeCommit	5.0%
Other	85.7%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Uma Tulasi

DevOps Engineer at Huntington Bank

Seamless integration enhances team collaboration and process efficiency

The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab. Simple things such as viewing directory structures or browsing through commit history and pull request flow could use serious upgrades. We had to create workarounds for features that come standard elsewhere, such as automatically assigning reviewers based on code ownership and setting up required review templates. The search functionality is another pain point, as trying to find specific code across repositories is limited. At Walgreens, we had a large mono repo for our pharmacy services code, and developers constantly complained about how difficult it was to search through it effectively in AWS CodeCommit. I also wish it had better CI/CD visualization built in.

Read full review

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS CodeCommit's user interface is nice, and it's easy for people to pick up."

"The customer service is pretty good."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit is that it acts as a code repository with code versioning and approval features similar to those found on GitHub."

"The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent."

"The solution scalable."

"What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"The product helps our team collaborate across different locations."

"The code versioning is excellent, and having a detailed log, including every change made to the code by every developer, is invaluable. It makes it so that if there is a bug or problem in the product channel, we can find exactly where it happened and how to fix it."

"The product has a good UI. It's simple and easy to access, and technical help is easily available. The two-factor authentication security is another valuable feature."

"It is very helpful, time saving, and user-friendly."

"The ease of use is valuable."

"GitHub is easy, secure, and widely documented."

"The most valuable features are GitHub are the standard features, they are very useful."

"GitHub provides enough storage for uploading the source code."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics."

"The number of users for AWS CodeCommit is generally less compared to other version control systems."

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab."

"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"We are not able to access GitHub from our VPN."

"The solution should have less integration with the AI part, but it needs to add features with other automation tools so that it can be easily integrated."

"GitHub's issue management could be improved a little from an organization standpoint. It would be helpful to have the ability to organize a work board or a backlog more comprehensively. For organizations migrating to GitHub from arbitrary systems, it's a little bit of a headache to move on to that system."

"The integration with Visual Studio Code could be more streamlined."

"There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished."

"The initial setup and implementation could be easier, I had some difficulties with it at first but I don't have a development background."

"GitHub could add some more security features."

"I would like a more graphical, user-friendly UI, to avoid writing so much code on cmd."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"The solution is expensive."

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"I use the free version of the tool."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,927 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

University

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is actually one of the cost-effective AWS services. It follows a straightforward pricing model where you pay for users and storage. With around 40 to 50 developers, it ranges from $1...

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is a good product to use when you also have to use CodePipeline because it is all integrated in the same system, which is beneficial. However, the integration with other code pipelin...

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is a version control system integrated directly in the cloud environment, similar to GitHub, GitLab, and other platforms. It offers every single benefit of using any other version co...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 44% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 14% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 14% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 4% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

AWS CodeCommit

January 2026

Download GitHub product report

January 2026

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent