AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
2,177 views|2,020 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Atlassian Logo
9,719 views|7,164 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 6, 2024

We compared Bitbucket and AWS CodeCommit based on our user's reviews in several parameters.

Bitbucket stands out for its seamless integration with various tools, robust version control system, and efficient collaboration features. Users appreciate competitive pricing options, user-friendly licensing, and excellent customer support. On the other hand, AWS CodeCommit is praised for its efficient version control, integration with AWS services, reliable performance, security measures, and user-friendly interface. Areas for improvement in CodeCommit include lack of information on customer service, pricing, setup, and ROI. Additionally, suggestions for improvement include enhancing the user interface, navigation, and integration with other tools.

Features: Bitbucket's valuable features include seamless integration with other tools, a reliable version control system, and efficient collaboration capabilities. On the other hand, AWS CodeCommit offers an efficient version control system, seamless integration with other AWS services, reliable performance, comprehensive security measures, and a user-friendly interface.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket offers competitive pricing options and a straightforward setup process. The licensing options are flexible and user-friendly. On the other hand, no information is available regarding the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of AWS CodeCommit., The users reported positive ROI with Bitbucket, highlighting benefits like streamlined development, improved collaboration, and increased productivity. On the other hand, the ROI for AWS CodeCommit was not specified in the reviews.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket could improve its user interface, navigation, and search functionality. Users also recommend better integration with development tools and platforms, and simplifying the process of setting up repositories and configuring permissions. In contrast, AWS CodeCommit has areas for improvement.

Deployment and customer support: Based on user feedback, Bitbucket users reported spending around three months on deployment and an extra week on setup, while AWS CodeCommit user feedback regarding duration is currently unavailable., Bitbucket users have expressed satisfaction with the prompt, efficient, and knowledgeable customer service provided. In contrast, no information is available about the customer service and support of AWS CodeCommit.

The summary above is based on 33 interviews we conducted recently with Bitbucket and AWS CodeCommit users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.""AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

More AWS CodeCommit Pros →

"You can use Bitbucket to whitelist IP addresses during deployment.""Bitbucket lets me create new projects in a few clicks and check out files in a seamless and integrated manner.""The code reviews and the ability to support DevSecOps are very important.""BitBucket is a reliable and user-friendly product.""The tool's automation helped because we onboarded a lot of projects and teams into Bitbucket. The product's automation helped us complete activities in two days which previously used to take around two weeks to complete. We have completely automated processes that were earlier manual. It has good integration with Jira and Jenkins.""What I liked the most about this program is that it integrates seamlessly with JIRA.""Bitbucket is definitely a tool to consider if somebody is still on CVS. It is a great tool and well integrated with Bamboo.""This is a very dependable product that is easy to use and it has an excellent GUI interface."

More Bitbucket Pros →

Cons
"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use.""The tool should improve its UI."

More AWS CodeCommit Cons →

"The UI could be a little better compared to competing solutions.""The module component needs improvement.""Technical support is not very fast.""I would like to see the tool's desktop version.""Bitbucket doesn't currently offer AI functionalities.""I think the developers are constantly working on improving the pull requests support.""The installation of Bitbucket on our server was not as easy as other Atlassian products, so it is something that can be improved.""Bitbucket can improve by integrating a tool to manage conflict code. This would save time."

More Bitbucket Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."
  • More AWS CodeCommit Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "You have to buy additional licenses when you exceed 50 users."
  • "With our small number of users, our licensing fees are approximately $10 USD per month."
  • "Licensing is on a monthly basis, it's available on our website. They have a free version, the pro version and then they have an enterprise version, and we're using a kind of the middle of the pro version for about $7 per user per month."
  • "We have approximately 40 licenses for Bitbucket."
  • "I understand Bitbucket's cost is on the higher side."
  • "I rate the price from Bitbucket a four out of five."
  • "Sometimes there are issues in obtaining licenses and the pricing could be improved."
  • "When it comes to licensing we have the standard plan."
  • More Bitbucket Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.
    Top Answer:As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only… more »
    Top Answer:need some simple way to Cross-account access of Repository and CICD pipeline .
    Top Answer:Its key strength lies in securing and centralizing code repositories.
    Top Answer:It would be beneficial to have a straightforward mechanism for integrating the initial tasks defined in Bitbucket with Jira when the need arises.
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    2,177
    Comparisons
    2,020
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    7.5
    1st
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    9,719
    Comparisons
    7,164
    Reviews
    32
    Average Words per Review
    329
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CodeCommit
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

    Bitbucket is a team-oriented Git-based code hosting and collaboration solution. The best-in-class Jira and Trello integrations in Bitbucket are meant to bring the entire software team together to complete a project. Bitbucket gives your team a single location to collaborate on code from concept to cloud deployment, to generate quality code through automated testing, and to deploy code with confidence.

    There are three deployment options for Bitbucket:

    1. Bitbucket Cloud is a web-based version of Bitbucket that is hosted on Atlassian's servers and accessible via a URL. Pipelines, an exclusive built-in CI/CD tool in Bitbucket Cloud, allows you to create, test, and deploy directly from Bitbucket.

    2. Bitbucket Server is installed on your computer and runs in your environment. Bamboo, our robust CI/CD platform, has strong connections with Bitbucket Server, allowing you to totally automate your workflow. The license is unlimited.

    3. Bitbucket Data Center appears to users as a single instance of Bitbucket Server, but it is actually hosted on a cluster of servers in your environment.
    4. This has some advantages over Bitbucket Server:

    • Availability: If one cluster node fails, the remaining cluster node(s) can continue to service requests, resulting in little or no downtime for customers.
    • Performance at scale: A cluster of numerous Bitbucket Server-running machines can manage more traffic than a single system.
    • Mirroring: For distributed teams working with large repositories, smart mirroring can increase Git clone performance.

    Bitbucket Features

    Bitbucket has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Workflow control: This helps you to enforce a project or team workflow.
    • Cooperation: Pull requests with inline commentary for code review cooperation.
    • Customization: If you don't find what you're looking for in our Marketplace, you can use our full Rest API to create unique features for your workflow.
    • Jira and Trello integration: Bring order to the chaos and keep the entire software company informed. Access to Jira issues and Trello cards' branches, build status, commits, and status.
    • Code collaboration: From concept to cloud, code collaboration is a must. Create a merging checklist with designated approvers and check for passing builds before transitioning Jira issues based on pull request status.
    • Consistent delivery: With built-in continuous delivery, you can build and test automatically. Build, test, and deploy with Bitbucket Pipelines, our integrated CI/CD solution. Benefit from code-based configuration and quick feedback loops.
    • Simple deployment: Keep track of your deployments, preview them, and confidently promote them.
    • Code security: You can rest easy knowing your code is safe on the cloud, and you can use checks to prevent errors from occurring.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Bitbucket stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its robust traceability and user-friendly interface. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

    One PeerSpot reviewer, a Developer III at an Information Technology at a energy/utilities company, writes, “Bitbucket has improved our organization because it has simplified and streamlined our developer communication code and review process. It is also much more visual.” He adds, “Bitbucket's traceability is great. Being able to see pool requests is just a great thing for collaboration.”

    Kajal P., Quality Assurance Manager at a tech services company, notes, “The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it has been a good experience from my side using this solution."

    Sample Customers
    Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob
    Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Government9%
    Media Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization43%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise49%
    Large Enterprise41%
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS CodeCommit is ranked 5th in Version Control with 2 reviews while Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews. AWS CodeCommit is rated 7.6, while Bitbucket is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS CodeCommit writes "Offers convenient and cost-effective version control but lacks some advanced features and integration options ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". AWS CodeCommit is most compared with GitHub, Atlassian SourceTree and Bitbucket Server, whereas Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, GitHub, Atlassian SourceTree, Liquibase and IBM Rational ClearCase. See our AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket report.

    See our list of best Version Control vendors.

    We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.