No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit
Ranking in Version Control
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Bitbucket
Ranking in Version Control
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 4.5%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket is 11.8%, down from 23.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Bitbucket11.8%
AWS CodeCommit4.5%
Other83.7%
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Andrea-Carella - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps Engineer at Sorint
Has improved repository management through policy customization but needs better integration with external tools
AWS CodeCommit is a good product to use when you also have to use CodePipeline because it is all integrated in the same system, which is beneficial. However, the integration with other code pipeline tools outside the AWS world is uncertain, as there has been no experience with that integration. The number of users for AWS CodeCommit is generally less compared to other version control systems. To improve the adoption of AWS CodeCommit with respect to others that are more used in the market, something would need to be done to increase market share, as people are often more educated to use GitLab or GitHub. AWS CodeCommit is quite easy to learn in general, but competitors have a bigger market share in this particular area for many reasons.
AmitRathod - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited
Collaborating on code has become smoother while pricing and hosting options still need work
Bitbucket needs improvement as it has very limited cloud hosting options. With Atlassian phasing out its self-hosted server version, organizations are forced to choose between Bitbucket Cloud, which may not meet strict local compliance requirements, or a highly expensive data option. Additionally, Bitbucket is not competitive on pricing for scaling teams, as the free tier is great for up to five team members, but the jump in price for growing teams beyond five users can become steep compared to other repositories. Some enterprise users report that Bitbucket's stability can affect its speed when handling very large repositories, and though it has good support, the technical support team should be more active, as I have not seen them as active compared to GitLab and GitHub. The limited cloud hosting options and pricing for scaling teams are two important areas for improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution's most valuable feature is versioning."
"What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem."
"It is a really good product where you can easily create your repository and integrate it with other tools such as IAM to handle the user and management aspects of the repository."
"The most valuable features of AWS CodeCommit include the least privilege access from IAM, where permissions are granted only for the specific repository the developer is working on, which allows for hundreds of repositories with controlled access per project."
"It helps us to install our code idea projects."
"The solution is quite scalable."
"The customer service is pretty good."
"The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent."
"The dynamic solution is definitely scalable and customizable to any need."
"The version control feature for our code and the security aspect is valuable to us."
"This solution is perfectly stable, we never had a problem with it, and after five years it is still running as we expect, I love this program for that."
"Overall, it's quite good."
"BitBucket is a reliable and user-friendly product."
"The most valuable features are the scripts used for migration purposes and to create new repository releases."
"The code reviews and the ability to support DevSecOps are very important."
"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is its capabilities."
 

Cons

"There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics."
"The number of users for AWS CodeCommit is generally less compared to other version control systems."
"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."
"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."
"The tool should improve its UI."
"Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price."
"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."
"Understanding AWS CodeCommit was a hectic job for developers at first, while it was easier for the DevOps team."
"I would like to see the tool's desktop version."
"Atlassian is a very poor support model; I have been impacted a couple of times and it is very difficult and frustrating."
"The mandatory move to the cloud model is the biggest complaint."
"I would like to see the security logs option on the tool directly. The current way to work with security logs is through an email protocol."
"Fine tuning for procedures and features related to analytics and code validation is needed."
"While it is a good and useful product for my application, there are several disadvantages to the system."
"Sometimes the performance of Bitbucket is lagging; the UI loading part has some glitches at times, creating frustration for the developers."
"Bitbucket's usability and integration with other tools could be improved somewhat."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."
"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."
"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."
"I rate the price from Bitbucket a four out of five."
"I understand Bitbucket's cost is on the higher side."
"Bitbucket is a cost-effective solution. It is the cheapest in the market. It is lower than GitLab and GitHub."
"When it comes to licensing we have the standard plan."
"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten because it is cheaper than solutions like GitLab."
"I rate the product price as two on a scale of one to ten, where ten means that it is a very expensive tool."
"We have approximately 40 licenses for Bitbucket."
"A full licensing cost is paid for Bitbucket."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
8%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Construction Company
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise23
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?
AWS CodeCommit is actually one of the cost-effective AWS services. It follows a straightforward pricing model where you pay for users and storage. With around 40 to 50 developers, it ranges from $1...
What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?
AWS CodeCommit is a good product to use when you also have to use CodePipeline because it is all integrated in the same system, which is beneficial. However, the integration with other code pipelin...
What is your primary use case for AWS CodeCommit?
AWS CodeCommit is a version control system integrated directly in the cloud environment, similar to GitHub, GitLab, and other platforms. It offers every single benefit of using any other version co...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?
Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket?
Bitbucket needs improvement as it has very limited cloud hosting options. With Atlassian phasing out its self-hosted server version, organizations are forced to choose between Bitbucket Cloud, whic...
What is your primary use case for Bitbucket?
My main use case for Bitbucket is to collaborate on code, manage versions, then automate the software development life cycle, and design for professional teams to manage all repositories as well as...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

CodeCommit
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob
Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.